0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views

Republic of The Philippines Department of Education Region XI Division of The City of Mati Fausta Salazar Como Memorial School Tua-Tua, City of Mati

The document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for teacher Hazel T. Llanto from the Fausta Salazar Como Memorial School in the Philippines. It evaluates her performance for SY 2018-2019 against objectives related to content knowledge, pedagogy, and learner achievement. For her first objective on applied content knowledge, she received ratings of 4 for quality, efficiency, and timeliness. For her second objective on using teaching strategies to enhance learner achievement, she received ratings of 4 for quality and 3 for efficiency. Overall, her performance was found to be satisfactory.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views

Republic of The Philippines Department of Education Region XI Division of The City of Mati Fausta Salazar Como Memorial School Tua-Tua, City of Mati

The document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for teacher Hazel T. Llanto from the Fausta Salazar Como Memorial School in the Philippines. It evaluates her performance for SY 2018-2019 against objectives related to content knowledge, pedagogy, and learner achievement. For her first objective on applied content knowledge, she received ratings of 4 for quality, efficiency, and timeliness. For her second objective on using teaching strategies to enhance learner achievement, she received ratings of 4 for quality and 3 for efficiency. Overall, her performance was found to be satisfactory.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 40

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region XI
Division of the City of Mati
FAUSTA SALAZAR COMO MEMORIAL SCHOOL
Tua-tua, City of Mati

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Hazel T. Llanto Name of Rater: Nemesia S. Leopoldo, Ed.D.


Position: TEACHER I Position: School Head
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Fausta Salazar Como Memorial School Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING


EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per
Very Results
KRA Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Q E T Ave
(5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
7.50% Quality
Basic 1.
Education Content
1. Applied
knowledge of
June
2018 to
Showed Showed Showed
knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
Showed
knowledge of
No
acceptable
4 4 4
Services Knowledge content within March content and content and content and content and evidence was
and and across 2019 its its its its shown
Pedagogy curriculum integration integration integration integration
teaching areas. within and within and within and within and
across across across across
subject areas subject areas subject areas subject
as shown as shown as shown in areas as
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha MOV 1 with shown in
rating of 7 rating of 6 a rating of 5 MOV 1 with
a
rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted No
least 4 lessons using lessons using any 1 acceptable
lessons using MOV 1 and MOV 1 and of the given evidence
MOV 1 and supported by supported by MOV was shown
supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the
any 1 of the other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
7.50% Quality
Basic
Education
2. Used a range
of teaching
June
2018 to
Showed Showed Showed
knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
Showed
knowledge of
No
acceptable
4 3 3.5
Services strategies that March content and content and content and content and evidence was
enhance learner 2019 its its its its shown
achievement in integration integration integration integration
literacy and within and within and within and within and
numeracy across across across across
skills. subject areas subject areas subject areas subject
as shown as shown as shown in areas as
inMOV1witha inMOV1witha MOV 1 with shown in
rating of 7 rating of 6 a rating of 5 MOV 1 with
a
rating of 4
Efficiency Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated No
using using using using acceptable
different different different different evidence was
teaching teaching teaching teaching shown
strategies strategies strategies strategies
that promote that promote that promote that promote
reading, reading, reading, reading,
writing writing writing writing
and/or and/or and/or and/or
numeracy numeracy numeracy numeracy
skills as skills as skills as skills as
shown in shown in shown in shown in
MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
7.50% Quality
Basic
Education
3. Applied a
range of
June
2018 to
Used
different
Used
different
Used
different
Used
different
No
acceptable
4 4 4
Services teaching March teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence was
strategies to 2019 strategies strategies strategies strategies shown
develop critical that develop that develop that develop that develop
and creative critical and critical and critical and critical and
thinking, as creative creative creative creative
well as other thinking thinking thinking thinking
higher- order and/or other and/or other and/or other and/or
thinking skills. HOTS as HOTS as HOTS as other HOTS
shown in shown in shown in as
MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with shown in
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 MOV
1 with a
rating
of 4

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No


least 4 lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable
lessons as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1of the shown
MOV 1 and supported by supported by given MOV
supported by any1 of the any 1of the
any1ofthe other given other given
other given MOV MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 2. 4. Managed June 7.50% Quality Used Used Used Used No 4 4 4
Educatio Learning classroom 2018 to classroom classroom classroom classroom acceptable
n Environme structure to March managemen managemen managemen managemen evidence
Services nt and engage 2019 t strategies t strategies t strategies t strategies was shown
Diversity learners, that engage that engage that engage that engage
of individually or learners in learners in learners in learners in
Learners in groups, in activities/ta activities/ta activities/ta activities/ta
meaningful sks as sks as sks as sks
exploration, shown in shown in shown in as shown in
discovery and MOV 1 with MOV1witha MOV 1 with MOV 1with
hands-on a rating of 7 rating of 6 a rating of 5 a
activities rating of 4
within a range
of physical
learning
environments.
learning
environments.

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No


at least 4 3 lessons 2 lessons as 1 acceptable
lessons supported evidenced lesson evidence
supported by MOV 1 by MOV 1 supported was shown
by MOV 1 and any 1 and by any of
and any 1 of the other supported the
of the other acceptable by any 1of acceptable
acceptable MOV the other MOV
MOV given MOV

Timelines
s

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 5. Managed June 7.50% Quality Applied Used Applied Applied No 4 4 4
Educatio learner 2018 to teacher classroom teacher teacher acceptable
n behavior March managemen managemen managemen managemen evidence
Services constructively 2019 t strategies t strategies t strategies t strategies was shown
by applying of learner that engage of learner of learner
positive and behavior learners in behavior behavior
non-violent that activities/ta that that
discipline to promote sks as promote promote
ensure positive and shown in positive and positive and
learning- non-violent MOV1witha non-violent non-violent
focused discipline rating of 6 discipline discipline
environments. as shown in as shown in as
MOV MOV shown in
submitted submitted MOV
with a with a submitted
rating of 7 rating of 5 with a
rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No


at least 4 of at least 4 of at least 4 of any 1 acceptable
the given the given the given of the given evidence
strategies strategies strategies strategies was shown
as observed as observed as observed as observed
in at least 4 in 3 lessons in 2 lessons in only 1
lessons lesson

Timelines
s
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 6. Used June 7.50% Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied No 3 3 3
Educatio differentiated, 2018 to differentiate differentiate differentiate differentiate acceptable
n developmental March d teaching d teaching d teaching d teaching evidence
Services ly appropriate 2019 strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown
learning address address address address
experiences to learner learner learner learner
address diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as
learners’ shown in shown in shown in shown in
gender, needs, MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV
strengths, a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 1 with a
interests and rating
experiences. of 4
experiences.

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No


at least 4 3 2 any 1 at acceptable
differentiate differentiate differentiate least 4 evidence
d teaching d teaching d teaching lessons as was shown
strategies in strategies in strategies in observed in
at least 2 at least 2 2 lessons as 3 lessons as
lessons as lessons as evidenced observed in
evidenced evidenced by MOV 1 2 lessons
by MOV 1 by MOV 1 and observed in
and and supported only 1
supported supported by lesson
by any 1 of by any1ofthe differentiate
the other any1ofthe other d teaching
acceptable other acceptable strategy in
MOV acceptable MOV only 1
MOV lesson as
evidently
shown in
any 1 of the
acceptable
MOV

Timelines
s

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per
Results
KRA
Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 3. 7. Planned, June 7.50% Quality Planned Planned Planned Planned No 4 4 4
Educatio Curriculu managed and 2018 to and and and and acceptable
n m and implemented March implemente implemente implemente implemente evidence
Services Planning developmental 2019 d d d d was shown
ly sequenced developmen developmen developmen developmen
teaching and tally tally tally tally
learning sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
processes to teaching teaching teaching teaching
meet and and and and
curriculum learning learning learning learning
requirements process as process as process as process as
and varied shown in shown in shown in shown in
teaching MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
contexts. a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No


at least 4 3 2 1 acceptable
developmen developmen developmen developmen evidence
tally tally tally tally was shown
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching teaching teaching teaching
and and and and
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
evidently evidently evidently evidently
shown in shown in shown in shown
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and in any 1 of
supported supported supported the
by any 1 of by any 1 of by any 1 of given MOV
the other the other the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timelines
s

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 8. Participated June 7.50% Quality Consistentl Frequently Occasionall Rarely No 3 3 3
Educatio in collegial 2018 to y participated y participated acceptable
n discussions March participated in participated in evidence
Services that use 2019 in LACs/FGDs in LAC/FGD/ was shown
teacher and LACs/FGDs / meetings LACs/FGDs meeting to
learner / meetings to discuss / meetings discuss
feedback to to discuss teacher/lea to discuss teacher/lea
enrich teacher/lea rner teacher/lea rner
teaching rner feedback to rner feedback to
practice. feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
enrich instruction enrich instruction
instruction as shown in instruction as
as shown in the MOV as shown in shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV the
submitted submitted MOV
submitted
Efficiency Participated Participated Participated Participated No
in at least 4 in 3 in 2 in 1 acceptable
LACs/FGDs LACs/FGDs LACs/FGDs LAC/FGD/ evidence
/ meetings / meetings / meetings in any 1 of was shown
as evidently as evidently as evidently the given
shown in shown in shown in MOV
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timelines
s

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 9. Selected, June 7.50% Quality Developed Developed Developed Developed No 4 4 4
Educatio developed, 2018 to and used and used and used and acceptable
n organized and March varied varied varied used varied evidence
Services used 2019 teaching teaching teaching teaching was shown
appropriate and and and and
teaching and learning learning learning learning
learning resources, resources, resources, resources,
resources, including including including including
including ICT, ICT, to ICT, to ICT, to ICT, to
to address address address address address
learning goals. learning learning learning learning
goals as goals as goals as goals
shown in shown in shown in as shown in
MOV1witha MOV1witha MOV 1 with MOV 1 with
rating of 7 rating of 6 a rating of 5 a
rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No
at least 4 3 varied 2 varied any acceptable
varied teaching teaching teaching evidence
teaching and and and was shown
and learning learning learning
learning resources, resources, resource,
resources, including including including
including ICT, as ICT, as ICT,
ICT, as evidently evidently as evidently
evidently shown in shown in shown in
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of
MOV 1 and supported supported the
supported by any 1 of by any 1 of acceptable
by any 1 of the the MOV
the acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timelines
s

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, June 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No 3 3 3
Educatio Assessme selected, 2018 to selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable
n nt and organized and March organized organized organized organized evidence
Services Reporting used 2019 and used and used and used and used was shown
diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
formative and formative formative formative formative
summative and and and and
assessment summative summative summative summative
strategies assessment assessment assessment assessment
consistent strategies strategies strategies strategies
with consistent consistent consistent consistent
curriculum with with with with
requirements. curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
requirement requirement requirement requirement
s as shown s as shown s as shown s as shown
in MOV 1 in MOV 1 in MOV 1 in MOV 1
with a with a with a with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No


at least 4 3 varied 2 varied 1 acceptable
varied assessment assessment assessment evidence
assessment tools as tools as tool as was shown
tools as evidently evidently evidently
evidently shown shown in shown in
shown inany1ofthe any1ofthe any of the
inany1ofthe acceptable acceptable acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timelines
s

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 11. Monitored June 7.50% Quality Consistentl Frequently Occasionall Rarely No 4 4 4
Educatio and evaluated 2018 to y monitored monitored y monitored monitored acceptable
n learner March and and and and evidence
Services progress and 2019 evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated was shown
achievement learner learner learner learner
using learner progress progress progress progress
attainment and and and and
data. achievemen achievemen achievemen achievemen
t using t using t using t
learner learner learner using
attainment attainment attainment learner
data as data as data as attainment
shown in shown in shown in data
the MOV the MOV the MOV as shown in
submitted submitted submitted the
MOV
submitted
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted No
combinatio combinatio combinatio 1 acceptable
n of at least n of 3 of the n of 2 of the acceptable evidence
4 of the acceptable acceptable MOV was shown
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timelines
s

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 12. June 7.50% Quality Consistentl Frequently Occasionall Rarely No 3 3 3
Educatio Communicate 2018 to y showed showed y showed showed acceptable
n d promptly March prompt and prompt and prompt and prompt and evidence
Services and clearly 2019 clear clear clear clear was shown
the learners’ communica communica communica communica
needs, tion of the tion of the tion of the tion of the
progress and learners’ learners’ learners’ learners’
achievement needs, needs, needs, needs,
to key progress progress progress progress
stakeholders, and and and and
including achievemen achievemen achievemen achievemen
parents/guard t to key t to key t to key t to
ians. stakeholder stakeholder stakeholder key
s, including s, including s, including stakeholder
parents/ parents/ parents/ s,
guardians guardians guardians including
as shown in as shown in as shown in parents/
the MOV the MOV the MOV guardians
submitted submitted submitted as
shown in
the
MOV
submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted No


combinatio combinatio combinatio any 1 acceptable
n of at least n of 3 of the n of 2 of the of the given evidence
4 of the acceptable acceptable MOV was shown
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timelines
s

Performance Indicators Rating


Weight
Very Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfacto Poor
QET Satisfactory Results Q E T Ave
KRA (5) (3) ry (2) (1)
(4)
Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed June ### Quality Consistentl Frequently Occasionall Rarely No 3 3 3
Educatio Factor various 2018 to y performed performed y performed performed acceptable
n related March various various various various evidence
Services works/activiti 2019 related related related related was shown
es that work/activit work/activit work/activit work/activit
contribute to ies that ies that ies that ies that
the teaching- contribute contribute contribute contribute
learning to the to the to the to the
process. teaching teaching teaching teaching
learning learning learning learning
process as process as process as process as
shown in shown in shown in shown in
the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted No


at least 4 3 different 2 different any 1 of the acceptable
different kinds of kinds of acceptable evidence
kinds of acceptable acceptable MOV was shown
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV

Timelines
s
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 -5.000 Outstanding
3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

NEMESIA S. LEOPOLDO, Ed.D. HAZEL T. LLANTO


Rater Ratee Approving Authority
oldo, Ed.D.

T DURING
ON

Score

0.3
Score

0.263
Score
0.3
Score

0.3
Score
0.3
Score

0.225
Score
Score

0.3
Score

0.225
Score
0.3
Score
0.225
Score

0.3
Score
0.225
Score

0.3

3.5625
ATISFACTORY

You might also like