0% found this document useful (0 votes)
115 views6 pages

Fmea Rating

The document describes severity, occurrence, and detection rankings used in a Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA). Severity is ranked from 1-10 based on the seriousness of the failure effect, from no effect to hazardous without warning. Occurrence is ranked from 1-10 based on the probability of failure, from very remote to very high likelihood. Detection is ranked from 1-10 based on the ability to detect the failure mode, from almost certain to almost impossible. The rankings are used to evaluate design failures and identify areas for improvement.

Uploaded by

janaprathap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
115 views6 pages

Fmea Rating

The document describes severity, occurrence, and detection rankings used in a Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA). Severity is ranked from 1-10 based on the seriousness of the failure effect, from no effect to hazardous without warning. Occurrence is ranked from 1-10 based on the probability of failure, from very remote to very high likelihood. Detection is ranked from 1-10 based on the ability to detect the failure mode, from almost certain to almost impossible. The rankings are used to evaluate design failures and identify areas for improvement.

Uploaded by

janaprathap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Design FMEA

Severity

Severity is the rank associated with the most serious effect for a given failure mode.
A reduction in the severity ranking index can be effected only through a design change.
Severity should be estimated using the following table;

Effect Criteria: Severity of Effect Ranking


Hazardous Affects safe vehicles operation, involves non-complience 10
witj out with government regulation without warming
warming
Hazardous effects safe vehicle operation, involves non- complience 9
with warming with government regulation with warming
very high Vehicle / item inoperable (loss of primary function) 8
High Vehicle / item inoperable but with reduced performance. 7
Customer very dissatisfied
Moderate Vehicle / item operable but comfort item inoperable. 6
Customer very dissatisfied
Low Vehicle /item inoperable and comfort item operable. 5
Customer dissatisfied
Very low Fit & Finish does not conform.Defects noticed 4
by most customers>75%
Minor Fit & Finish does not conform.Defects noticed 3
by most customers>50%
Very Minor Fit & Finish does not conform.Defects noticed 2
by most customers>25%
None No effect 1

Occurrence:

Probability of Failure Possible Failure Rates Ranking

very high >/=10% 10


High
5% 9

High 2% 8
1% 7

Moderate 0.5% 6
0.2% 5
0.1% 4
Low 0.05% 3
0.01% 2
Remote </=0.001% 1
Detection

Detection Criteria:Likehood of detection by design control Ranking


Absolete Design control will not / cannot detect a cause/ 10
uncertainity Mechanism and subsequent failure mode : or
there is no design control.

Very remote Very remote chance the design control will detect a 9
potential cause/ mechanism and subsequent
failure mode
Remote Remote chance the design control will detect a 8
potential cause/ mechanism and subsequent
failure mode
Very Low Very low chance the design control will detect a
potential cause mechanism and subsequent failure mode. 7

Low Low chance the design control will detect a potential


cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. 6

Moderate Moderate chance the desgin control will detect a 5


potential cause / mechanism and subsequent failure
mode.
Moderatly High Moderately high chance the design control will detect 4
a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure
mode.
High High chance the design control will detect a potential 3
cause / mechanism and subseuent failure mode.
Very High Very high chance the design control will detect a 2
potential cause / mechanism and subsequent failure
Almost certain Design control will almost certainly detect a potential 1
cause / mechanism and subseuent failure mode.
PROCESS FMEA

Severity

Severity is the rank associated with the most serious effect for a given failure mode.
A reduction in the severity ranking index can be effected only through a design change
to system, sub system or component redesign of the process.

Effect Customer Effect Mfg./Assembly Effect Ranking


Hazardous Affects safe vehicles operation,or involves non-complience May endager operator, 10
with out with government regulation without warning operator, Machine or assembly
warning without warning.

Hazardous effects safe vehicle operation, involves non- complience May endager operator, 9
operator, Machine or assembly
with warning with government regulation with warning without warning.
very high Vehicle / item inoperable (loss of primary function) 100% scrap, repair time>one 8
hour
High Vehicle / item inoperable but with reduced performance. 100% Segregation & portion 7
scrap, repair time half an hour
Customer very dissatisfied to one hour
Moderate Vehicle / item operable but comfort item inoperable. Portion scraped without sorting 6
or repair time less than half an
Customer very dissatisfied hour
Low Vehicle /item inoperable and comfort item operable. 100% reworked or repaired off-line 5
not go to repair department
Customer dissatisfied
Very low Fit & Finish does not conform.Defects noticed Sorted no scrap and a portion 4
by most customers>75% reworked
Minor Fit & Finish does not conform.Defects noticed No scrap, Portion rework on line 3
but out of station
by most customers>50%
Very Minor Fit & Finish does not conform.Defects noticed No scrap, Portion rework online 2
but in station.
by most customers>25%
None No effect No effect 1

Occurrence:

Probability of Failure Possible Failure Rates Ranking

very high >/=10% 10


High
5% 9

High 2% 8
1% 7

Moderate 0.5% 6
0.2% 5
0.1% 4
Low 0.05% 3
0.01% 2
Remote </=0.001% 1
Detection

Detection Criteria:Likehood of detection by design control Ranking


Almost impossible Certain non-conformance 10

Very remote Very remote chance the design control will detect a 9
potential cause/ mechanism and subsequent
failure mode
Remote Remote chance the design control will detect a 8
potential cause/ mechanism and subsequent
failure mode
Very Low Very low chance the design control will detect a
potential cause mechanism and subsequent failure mode. 7

Low Low chance the design control will detect a potential


cause/mechanism and subsequent failure mode. 6

Moderate Moderate chance the desgin control will detect a 5


potential cause / mechanism and subsequent failure
mode.
Moderatly High Moderately high chance the design control will detect 4
a potential cause/mechanism and subsequent failure
mode.
High High chance the design control will detect a potential 3
cause / mechanism and subseuent failure mode.
Very High Very high chance the design control will detect a 2
potential cause / mechanism and subsequent failure
Almost certain Design control will almost certainly detect a potential 1
cause / mechanism and subseuent failure mode.
Detection

Detection Criteria:Likehood of detection by design control Type Detection Method


A B C
Almost impossible Certain non-conformance x Cannot detect or is not
checked
Very remote Controls will probably not detect x Indirect or random
checks only

Remote Controls have poor chance of detection x Visual inspection only

Very Low Controls have poor chance of detection x Double visual inspection
only

Low Control may detect x x SPC charting methods

Moderate Control may detect x Variable gauging or


100% Go/No Go after
parts left station
Moderatly High Controls have a good chance to detect x x Set-up and first-piece
check and subsquent
controls
High Controls have a good chance to detect x x cannot accept discrepant
part
Very High Controls almost certain to detect x x Cannot pass discrepant
part
Almost certain Controls certain to detect x cannot make discrepant
cause / mechanism and subseuent failure mode. part

Inspection types:

A : Error proofed/Mistake proofed/Poka-yoke

B : Gauging

C : Manual Inspection
Ranking

10

You might also like