Scribd
Upload
109 views

Tiger Tools

1. Tiger Tools was preparing to launch a new product but initial testing of the oven used in production showed the process was incapable of meeting specifications. 2. Jim Peterson took 18 samples of 20 pieces each and found the process width ranged from .84 to .91 cm, exceeding the 1.44 cm specification. 3. On the suggestion of her professor, Michelle had Jim take a second set of 27 samples of 5 pieces each. This showed a reduced range of .37 to .44 cm, indicating the smaller samples revealed variability not seen in the larger samples.

Uploaded by

Shynne Abadiano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
109 views

Tiger Tools

1. Tiger Tools was preparing to launch a new product but initial testing of the oven used in production showed the process was incapable of meeting specifications. 2. Jim Peterson took 18 samples of 20 pieces each and found the process width ranged from .84 to .91 cm, exceeding the 1.44 cm specification. 3. On the suggestion of her professor, Michelle had Jim take a second set of 27 samples of 5 pieces each. This showed a reduced range of .37 to .44 cm, indicating the smaller samples revealed variability not seen in the larger samples.

Uploaded by

Shynne Abadiano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

TIGER TOOLS

Tiger Tools, a division of Drillmore Industries, was about to launch a new product. Production
Manager Michelle York asked her assistant, Jim Peterson, to check the capability of the oven
used in the process. Jim obtained 18 random samples of 20 pieces each. The results of those
samples are shown in the following table. After he analyzed the data, he concluded that the
process was not capable based on a specification width of 1.44 cm. Michelle was quite
disappointed when she heard this. She had hoped that with the introduction of the new product
her operation could run close to full capacity and regain some of its lost luster. The company had
a freeze on capital expenditures of more than $10,000, and a replacement oven would cost many
times that amount. Jim Peterson worked with the oven crew to see if perhaps different settings
could produce the desired results, but they were unable to achieve any meaningful improvements.
Tiger Tools
Sample Mean Range
1 45.01 .85
2 44.99 .89
3 45.02 .86
4 45.00 .91
5 45.04 .87
6 44.98 .90
7 44.91 .86
8 45.04 .89
9 45.00 .85
Sample Mean Range
10 44.97 .91
11 45.11 .84
12 44.96 .87
13 45.00 .86
14 44.92 .89
15 45.06 .87
16 44.94 .86
17 45.00 .85
18 45.03 .88
Still not ready to concede, Michelle contacted one of her former professors and
explained the problem. The professor suggested obtaining another set of samples,
this time using a smaller sample size and taking more samples. Michelle then
conferred with Jim and they agreed that he would take 27 samples of five
observations each. The results are shown in the following table.

Sample Mean Range


1 44.96 .42
2 44.98 .39
3 44.96 .41
4 44.97 .37
5 45.02 .39
6 45.03 .40
7 45.04 .39
8 45.02 .42
9 45.08 .38
10 45.12 .40
11 45.07 .41
12 45.02 .38
13 45.01 .41
14 44.98 .40
Sample Mean Range
15 45.00 .39
16 44.95 .41
17 44.94 .43
18 44.94 .40
19 44.87 .38
20 44.95 .41
21 44.93 .39
22 44.96 .41
23 44.99 .40
24 45.00 .44
25 45.03 .42
26 45.04 .38
27 45.03 .40

Questions
Consider the following questions, and then write a brief report to Michelle
summarizing your findings.
1. How did Jim conclude that the process was not capable based on his first set of
samples? (Hint: Estimate the process standard deviation, using A Rn 2 _ 3 _ . )
2. Does the second set of samples show anything that the first set didn’t? Explain
what and why.
3. Assuming the problem can be found and corrected, what impact do you think this
would have on the capability of the process? Compute the potential process
capability using the second data set.
4. If small samples can reveal something that large samples might not, why not
just take small samples in every situation?

You might also like