Efficient Aldolase Catalytic Antibodies The Enamine Mechanism of Natural
Efficient Aldolase Catalytic Antibodies The Enamine Mechanism of Natural
12. S. Sen, P. Brahma, S. K. Roy, D. K. Mukherjee, S. B. 18. P. Y. Yan and I.-C. Khoo, IEEEJ. Quantum Electron. the 34 mW/cm2 as the correct value of /1 for the
Roy, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 100, 327 (1983). 25, 520 (1989). beam coupling calculations. Subsequently, with both
13. G. P. Wiederrecht, W. A. Svec, M. P. Niemczyk, M. 19. The value for /1 in this experiment is given by the beams incident on the sample, beam 1 was found to
R. Wasielewski, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 8918 (1995). relation increase in intensity to 64 mW/cm2.
14. M. R. Wasielewski, R. L. Smith, A. G. Kostka, J. Am. /1 = /00 - IT') (2) 20. A. G. Chen and D. J. Brady, Opt. Lett. 17, 441
Chem. Soc. 102, 6923 (1980). where /l is the intensity in beam 1 after the sample in (1992).
15. J. C. Scott, L. Th. Pautmeier, W. E. Moerner, J. Opt. the absence of diffraction and IT is the total diffrac- 21. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Office
Soc. Am. B 9, 2059 (1992). tion efficiency of the grating. For the case of an ap- of Computational and Technological Research, Divi-
16. H. J. Eichler, D. Gunter, D. W. Pohl, Laser-Induced plied electric field of 0.4 kV/cm, the value for /1 was sion of Advanced Energy Projects, U.S. Department
Dynamic Gratings (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986). 68% (34 mW/cm2) of the value of /l without the of Energy, under contract W-31-109-ENG-38.
17. Q. Wang, R. M. Brubaker, D. D. Nolte, M. R. Melloch, electric field. In other words, 32% of the total power
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9,1626 (1992). lies in the diffracted spots. It is reasonable to consider 18 July 1995; accepted 18 October 1995
Efficient Aldolase Catalytic AntibodiesUseThat activation energy (E) for proton abstrac-
tion from the Cot atom and subsequent
the Enamine Mechanism of Natural Enzymes enamine formation. The enamine acts as
the carbon nucleophile, or aldol donor,
JOrgen Wagner, Richard A. Lerner,* Carlos F. Barbas 111* which reacts with an aldehyde electrophile,
the aldol acceptor, to form a new C-C
Antibodies that catalyze the aldol reaction, a basic carbon-carbon bond-forming reaction, bond. The Schiff base is then hydrolyzed
have been generated. The mechanism for antibody catalysis of this reaction mimics that and the product is released (in this case, a
H H 0Q
° CH R R H
H, Lys-Ab H .Lys-Ab
13,~~~~~~~ ~0 0
N02
O' N: __2 0 ~N: NO
R R X= NH-A
Fig. 1. (A) General mechanism of a class aldo- o o
lase-catalyzed aldol-addition reaction (5, 7) (Enz, Fig. 2. The 1,3-diketone hapten structure con-J O
enzyme; B, base). (B) Mechanism of trapping the tains the elements of a chemical and entropic trap.nn
essential e-amino group of a Lys residue in the The binding pocket induced with the hapten 1 0 0
antibody (Ab) binding pocket by using the 1,3- does not preclude attainment of a reasonable Fig. 3. Synthesis of hapten 1. (a) LDA 12 equiva-
diketone hapten 1. The formation of the stable Heathcock angle for attack of the aldol donor on lents (eq)], THF, 4000, 1 hour. (b) 4-nitrobenzyl-
covalent vinylogous amide 2 can be detected at A the acceptor. A proper attack geometry is at- bromide, hexamethylphosphoramide, -78° to
= 316 nm (£ = 15,000). R = p(HOOC(0H9)3- tamned by simple rotation of both enamine and -40°C, 48% yield. (c) (i) Pd/C, H2, ethanol; (ii)
CONH)C6H4-. aldehyde faces. glutaric anhydride, 0H2012, 74% yield.
1798 SCIENCE * VOL. 270 * 15 DECEMBER 1995
showing that trapping of the enamine in- zymes in synthesis is their rather poor catalysts that direct the aldol addition in
termediate with the 1,3-diketones precludes acceptance of a range of substrates (6). either direction (Table 1, entry 1 or 7).
catalysis involving the Lys £--amino group. Although natural enzymes display broad Antibodies 38C2 and 33F12 are restricted to
To establish that enamine formation with specificity with respect to the aldol accep- direct the aldol addition with acetone or
the hapten in the trapping assay and ace- tor, the aldol donor is usually limited to aliphatic ketones as donors and 3-phenylpro-
tone in the catalytic assay are dependent on the natural substrate. For example, among
the same Lys residue, antibodies incubated the ketones studied for antibody catalysis Table 1. Substrate specificity of antibody 3802; R
with acetone were treated with NaBH4. (Table 1), only acetone is a substrate for a = 0H3C0NHC6H4CH2-. The kinetic parameters
Reduction with NaBH4 of the imine inter- natural enzyme. In contrast, antibody al- ka and Km of each reaction were calculated with
mediate formed in the reaction of acetone dolases can use various aldol donors and respect to the aldehyde. The aldol donors (ace-
with the Lys E--amino group in the antibod- acceptors. The antibodies accept acetone, tone, 2-butanone, 3-pentanone, 2-pentanone,
ies would result in irreversible isopropyla- fluoroacetone, chloroacetone, 2-butanone, and acetaldehyde) were fixed at a constant con-
nion of the essential amine (5). After treat- 3-pentanone, 2-pentanone, and dihydroxy- centration of 5% v/v in each experiment (1 7, 19).
ment, the antibodies could not form the acetone as aldol donor substrates. In reac- Products 7/8 and 9/1 0 were formed at ratios 94 to
vinylogous amide with the diketones. These tions with 2-butanone and 2-pentanone, the 4 and 73 to 27, respectively.
experiments provide evidence that the re- antibodies exhibit some control of the regi- (1O-t Km
action mechanism and residues induced oselectivity of the aldol addition by prefer- Reaction kca3mi-1 (jiM)
with the 1 ,3-diketone hapten are the same ential formation of the most substituted 0 OH
as those recruited in the catalytic reactions. enamine. The relative efficiency of catalysis R~JL. RJA.)
F1 6.7 17
is 64-fold greater than that obtained with- dence of the utility of antibody catalysts to
33F1 2 had the same kcat =4.53 x 10-3i
which correlates well with the HPLC measurements.
m- 1,
catalysis by the enzyme 2-deoxyribose-5- perform disfavored chemical transforma- 19. The aldehydes 3 and 5 were prepared by using the
tions (16, 24). Heck reaction [T. Jeffrey, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Corn-
popaealdolasephosphate
(22). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~mun.
1984, 1287 (1984)]. The products of the aldol
We studied the product distribution of additions of entries 1 to 5 have been prepared by
the antibody-catalyzed reaction of 5 with REFERENCES AND NOTES independent synthesis. Typically, 50 to 1 00 mg aIde-
acetone after 30% conversion with a nor- 1R.ALenrS.JBnkvcP.GShut,cice
A Lerer,S. Bekovc, P G.Schltz,Scince hyde, 1 ml ketone, 4 ml H20, and 1 0 p.1 of saturated
1 NaOH solution were shaken for 1 houriThe products
mal-phase HPLC chiral support column 252, 659 (1991). were separated and purified by preparative reversed-
(Scheme 1) (22). Both antibodies catalyze 2. C. F. Barbas Ill, A. S. Kang, R. A. Lemer, S. J. Ben- phase HPLC. All new compounds were characterized
kovic, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 7978 (1991); by 'H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 13C-NMR,
K. D. Janda et al., ibid. 91, 2532 (1994); P. Wirsching and infrared and mass spectrometry.
Racemic mixture ~ b 0 et al., Science, in press. 20. The reaction was monitored by HPLC as in (1 7) but
0 0 Ab 3. ~~~~~~~~~C.
H.Heathcock, Aldrichim. Acta 23, 99 (1990); C. at 77/23 ratio instead of 75/25. The retention times
for the aldehyde 5 and the 3-hydroxy ketone 6 are
RyLKH +
cH3
R..,,.J["
,
~~~~~~pH7.5
H. Heathcock, Science 214,395 (1981); D. A. Evans,
ibid. 240, 420 (1988); S. Masamune, W. Choy, J. 1. n 19 m epciey
CH3 CH3
~~~~~~~~~~~Peterson,
L. R. Sita, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 24, 219.2
a.L emnd and9Yin Chen,petrahedrnyef..6
>95% de OH 0W OH U 83%de 1 (1985); 0. A. Evans, J. V. Nelson, T. R. Taber, Top. 2575(195);JL-
ReymondanY.Ce, petrshdonalcomuiction.
(38C2) Rl(38C2) I I Stereoc(3802) 3, 1(1982); C. H.Heathcock eta. n 22. The four diastereoisomers have been separated on a
I I ~~~~~~~~~~Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, B. M. Trost, Ed. DIE hrla Jclm iha ortcpo
>9%de CH H3 ..u65% de (Pergamon, Oxford, 1991), vol. 2, pp. 133-319; grAmCE7/Chexane/ethancol,ummin 254h
a , nmiorai The-
(33F12) (48,54S,S) (33F712) Paterson, Pure Appi. Chem. 64, 1821 (1992). gretention tiesaforethenofour mVisoer were 19.74h
OH 0 OH 0 4. S. Kobayashi, H. Uchiro, I. Shiina, T. Mukaiyama, 23.3 t4R5Se 25.15i4omers ande 297.9
4retetintme
R R.
Tetrahedron 49, 1761 (1993); K. Furuta, T. Ma- 4P5)232 R5S,5154SR,an279
CH, ruyama, H. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 min (4S,5S). The relative configuration had been de-
CH (4, S H(R 5Ruy1041 (19)H. Bachot,Angew. Chem. St.oE. Engi termined previously [see (20)]. The absolute config-
(4R, 5S (4R, R) 1041(1991) T. Bac, Ange. Chem.Int. E. EngL uration was deduced from an experiment wherein
33, 417 (1994), and references therein; E. M. Car- tectls a -exrbs--hsht loa
Scheme 1. reira, W. Lee, R. A. Singer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1 17, the cDEAtays wEAs2-doxribxclsiely-phopaealdola-odc
5.6C.9Y1Lai5
5. C.Y. Li, NNaa,D
.
hn,Sine13
aki, D Chan, 24
Scence183,1204 possessing the (5) configuration at 0-4 [see (6)]. The
aldol product generated by DERA consists of a 1: 4.5
the diastereoselective addition of acetone (1 974); A. J. Morris and D. R. Tolan, Biochemistry 33, mixture of (4S5,R)-6 (92% diasteriomeric excess, de)
tothe re-face
tO of 5 regardless of the stereo- 06.12291
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.-H. (1994).and G. M. Whitesides, Enzymes in Syn-
~ 6 Wong ad(S5)6(9%d) h kinetic
tipandti4ular- (>95%frmde)oThre iei parameterso
aaeeso
chemistry at C-2 of this substrate. The aldol thetic Organic Chemistry (Pergamon, Oxford, 1994); this-partcua transformationwrM.45x1-
reactions follow the Cram-Felkin (23)
mode of attack on (S-5 to generate the
M. 0. Bednarski, in Comprehensive Organic Synthe-
2isppM.455473t, Fd. BaerbasaIll OxfodWang,0.-H. minD1JCa andK A.3400 p.M.z .Am hm.Sc
74, 5828 (1952); M. Ch6rest, H. Felkin, N. Prudent,
(4S,5S )-6 product adteatCrmFl and
the
anti-ram-Eel- Won,
WogJ.A.Ce.Sc Hag. C.-M.
455m73Che. So.Babs112,2013(990)
pp. 1221 90)H..M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 2199 (1 968); N. T. Ahn, Top.
Currn Chem. 88,145 (1980).
kin mode of attack on (R)-5 to generate the Gijsen and 0.-H. Wong, ibid. 11 7, 2947 (1995); C.- 4 .D ad,C .Seln .A enr cec
(4S,5R-6 product. The products formed H. Wonget et al., ibid., p. 3333; L. Chen, D. P. Du- 24.2KD04 Janda, C.GF.Sheavain,R. A.Lerner,Scienc
mas, 0. -H. Wong, ibid. 1 14, 741 (1992).26,24(93;BF.rvatJ.AAslyK.0
w7ith similar y7ields-,so thre)n was. no k-ine-tic 7.AWIJ.Ruter Fed. Proc Am.CSc.- ExpBiol 231248 Janda, D. L. Boger, R. A. Lerner, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Efficient Aldolase Catalytic Antibodies That Use the Enamine
Mechanism of Natural Enzymes
Jürgen Wagner, Richard A. Lerner and Carlos F. Barbas III (December
15, 1995)
Science 270 (5243), 1797-1800. [doi: 10.1126/science.270.5243.1797]
Editor's Summary
Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in
December, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20005. Copyright 2016 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science;
all rights reserved. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.