Cloud Computing Adaption and Assessment Model
Cloud Computing Adaption and Assessment Model
net/publication/254008035
CITATIONS READS
14 277
2 authors, including:
Mahmood Niazi
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
100 PUBLICATIONS 2,805 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mahmood Niazi on 10 May 2015.
Categories and Subject Descriptors Small and medium scale firms and start-ups adopt Clouds as it
D. Software D.2 Software Engineering D.2.0 General provides access to best available IT resources in low capital
expenditure. Technological adoption issues of a large scale
H. Information Systems H.4 Information Systems Applications organisation with Enterprise IT are different from small-scale
H.4.0 General organisation [Kim et al. 2009]. Several significant barriers exist
for an enterprise once it plans the adoption of the Cloud
General Terms Computing. The challenges are multi-dimensional as they are
Management financial, technical, operational and organisational in nature
[McKinsey & Co. 2009].
34
The overarching objective of this research project is to develop a The adoption of the Clouds will have an impact on accounting,
Cloud Adoption Assessment Model (CAAM) to help security, compliance, project management, system support, work
organisations in assessment and improvement of their readiness of end users, authority of the IT department, IT governance, IT
for Clouds. In accordance to above following research questions provisioning, IT procurement, and IT policies [Khajeh-Hosseini,
are proposed for investigation: Greenwood and Sommerville 2010; Yanosky 2008 ]. There exists
a need to identify capabilities and practices that will have an
RQ1: What are the challenges in the adoption of Cloud effect before the adoption of the Clouds within existing Enterprise
Computing within enterprises? IT. Therefore, there is a need for a comprehensive adoption
RQ2: How can an enterprise identify the challenges they face in assessment framework that would assess an organisation, its key
the adoption of Clouds? capabilities, identify levels of organisational readiness, and
provide strategies for successful adoption.
RQ3: What are the key organisational capabilities and practices
that facilitate successful adoption of Cloud Computing?
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
RQ4: How can a Cloud Computing Adoption Assessment Model is The proposed study design combines multiple techniques for data
developed, such that it is theoretically and practically robust? collection, validation, and framework development for answering
RQ5: Is the Cloud Computing Adoption Assessment Model the research questions presented in section 1. The study will
practically vigorous in terms of measuring organisational empirically investigate the perceptions and viewpoints of
readiness for Clouds? organisational stakeholders regarding challenges, hurdles/barriers
of adoption of the Clouds. The study design has been divided in
three distinct phases.
2. SIGNIFICANCE
Neal reported technological shortcomings such as control issues, 3.1 Primary data collection
clouds’ performance issues, latency, reliability, vendor lock-in Primary data in this research includes the challenges, user
and lack of standards which are barriers in the adoption of Clouds concerns and issues that are barrier in the adoption of Cloud
[Leavitt 2009]. Kim has reported user concerns as availability Computing. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology
(outage), security, privacy issues, support and interoperability will be used to collect primary data. SLR is a mean of evaluating
[Kim 2009]. Several challenges such as technological uncertainty, and interpreting all available research relevant to a particular
demand uncertainty for (software) functionality, institutional research question, topic area, or phenomenon of interest
influence, strategic importance of the IT application, application [Kitchenham and Charters 2007]. SLR has three main phases:
integration are reported in the adoption of the Cloud services [Xin planning, conducting and reporting data analysis of the review,
and Levina 2008]. Legal compliance, absence or presence of making them different from ordinary literature surveys [Brereton
innovation champions within the IT departments, difficulties in et al. 2007]. The SLR will extract the challenges in the adoption
cost benefit evaluation of Cloud services, fear of organisational of the Cloud Computing within enterprise, from existing
change and issues in Cloud vendor selection are reported in literature. The choice to carry out SLR is based on the premise
literature [Heinle and Strebel 2010]. Besides technological issues that SLR provides greater level of validity of its findings than any
several socio-technical factors such as concerns about cost, other studies [Mulrow 1994].
confidentiality, control, impact on work practice and limitation of
business models pose challenges when considering adoption of Interviews with C-level Executives (CIOs, CTOs etc) and IT
the Clouds [Khajeh-Hosseini et al. 2010]. Many feel that even a Managers are planned for validation of the adoption challenges
lack of an understanding of Cloud Computing itself is a barrier in extracted by the SLR. Interviewees will be provided with a
its enterprise-wide adoption [Misra and Mondal 2010]. These comprehensive list of challenges identified through the SLR and
challenges and issues are more of viewpoints and lack empirical will be briefed on importance of their opinion as contribution in
evidence. overcoming the challenges of the adoption of Clouds in an
enterprise. To avoid selection bias, IT Manager/C-Level
Technology adoption has always been considered as a social issue Executives will be selected thru a criterion of experience with
putting user’s acceptance as a significant issue. Technology enterprise IT and Clouds’ implementation.
Acceptance Model (TAM), proposed by Davis, has been widely
used for investigating user adoption of technology, information The interview questionnaire will be designed to elicit enterprise
systems and Enterprise Resource Planning systems. The original demographics (companies’ capital, employees etc), respondents
TAM measures impact of four variables, perceived ease of use experience, challenges/ barriers faced by them in the adoption of
(PEU), perceived usefulness (PU), attitude towards use and Cloud Computing and their views on the practices, which could
behavioral intention to use (BI) upon actual usage of the help in overcoming the challenges of the adoption of Clouds.
technology [Davis 1989]. It has been reported that PEU & PU are Thus, an expert-opinion on the capabilities and practices for
worse predictors of actual usage than BI [Turner et al. 2010]. assessment framework will be available. Pilot study will be
However due to TAM’s limitations, researchers have extended conducted to validate questionnaire.
TAM for evaluating Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
application adoption, reporting their model ability to asses user
3.2 Development of CAAM
The Cloud Computing Adoption Assessment Model (CAAM)
but not organisation as a whole [Amoako-Gyampah and Salam
shall be developed using top-down approach. Firstly, the CAAM
2004]. It is difficult to carry out an organisational assessment
will assist in the identification of the challenges within an
using the existing technology adoption models; as they
organisation that is seeking integration of Clouds within
specifically do not address Clouds or its services.
enterprise IT and secondly it would define capabilities and
practices that will help to overcome the identified challenges.
35
CAAM will define higher-order capabilities, sub-capabilities and [2] Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A.D., Katz, R.,
operational routines that are required to integrate Cloud Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I.
Computing within Enterprise IT for an organisation. This and Zaharia, M. 2010. A view of cloud computing. Commun.
approach is an adaptation from Feeny and Willcocks [1998] and ACM 53, 50-58.
Ranganathan and Balaji [2007] approaches for developing and [3] Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M. and
defining IT capabilities within organisation. Khalil, M. 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic
literature review process within the software engineering
3.3 CAAM’s evaluation domain. Journal of Systems and Software 80, 571-583.
The case study method is a powerful evaluation tool that provides
useful real world information [Yin 2002]. The CAAM will be [4] Chen, R. 1996. Technological Expansion: the Interaction
evaluated using case study approach carried out in conjunction Between Diversification Strategy and Organizational
with organisations willing to adopt Cloud Computing for their IT Capability. Journal of Management Studies 33, 649-666.
needs. Three case studies are planned to validate higher-order [5] Creeger, M. 2009. CTO Roundtable: Cloud Computing.
capabilities and the implementation of operational routines Queue 7, 1-2.
developed under CAAM. Case studies will help to evaluate the
effectiveness of CAAM in the adoption of Cloud Computing. [6] Damanpour, F. and Schneider, M. 2006. Phases of the
Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of
To reflect on CAAM’s shortcomings and further improvement, Environment, Organization and Top Managers1. British
focus group sessions with case study participants will be Journal of Management 17, 215-236.
conducted. The evaluation criteria will be ease of use and user
[7] Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of
satisfaction of CAAM to keep focus group sessions structured.
Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS
Conducting focus groups is a choice because it helps in openness
Quarterly 13, 319-340.
in interaction with group members [Morgan and Spanish 1984].
The case study research method will illustrate CAAM’s suitability [8] Feeny, D.F. and Willcocks, L.P. 1998. Core IS capabilities
in the real world environment and point out room for for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management
improvements. Review 39, 9-21.
[9] Feuerlicht, G., Snášel, V., Szczepaniak, P., Abraham, A. and
4. EXPECTED OUCOME Kacprzyk, J. 2010. Next Generation SOA: Can SOA Survive
The anticipated outcome of this project will be Cloud Computing Cloud Computing? In Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering
Adoption Assessment Model (CAAM) to assist enterprises in the - 2 Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 19-29.
adoption of Cloud Computing. This work aims to develop a well- [10] Heinle, C. and Strebel, J. 2010. IaaS adoption determinants
understood and rational adoption assessment model, grounded on in enterprises. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th
expert views, supported by case studies generalized to real world international conference on Economics of grids, clouds,
companies. This will help companies to avoid unsuccessful systems, and services, Ischia, Italy 2010 Springer-Verlag, 93-
adoption of Clouds rather than integrating it with existing IT. The 104.
newly promised framework will help this transition via
[11] Henry, E.S. 2009. X as a Service, Cloud Computing, and the
publication in magazines and industry newsletters.
Need for Good Judgment, IT Professional 11, 4-5.
Organisations will benefit by having access to the CAAM that [12] Khajeh-Hosseini, A., Greenwood, D. and Sommerville, I.
defines capabilities and measures their readiness for cloud 2010. Cloud Migration: A Case Study of Migrating an
computing. This will provide IT Managers with the ability to Enterprise IT System to IaaS. In 3rd International
understand the strengths and weaknesses of current Cloud service Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2010 IEEE 450-
offering, implement Clouds and to address areas that require 457.
attention. The CAAM will assist organisations in gaining business
benefits improving their international competitiveness. [13] Kim, W. 2009. Cloud Computing: Today and Tomorrow.
Ultimately, this work will put enterprises in a better position to Journal of Object Technology 8, 66-72.
deliver what customer wants. [14] Kim, W., Kim, S.D., Lee, E. and Lee, S. 2009. Adoption
issues for cloud computing. In Proceedings of the
Theoretically and practically robust framework that helps in
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on
defining capabilities and process is non-existent, as it will be an
Information Integration and Web-based Applications
advancement of existing knowledge seeding Clouds growth.
Services, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2009 ACM.
“Everything as a Service” is not far from becoming a reality as
Cloud Computing and it services are increasing [Henry 2009]. [15] Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. 2007. Guidelines for
Thus the development of CAAM is indeed timely to support performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software
adoption of this beneficial technology paradigm. Engineering. EBSE Technical Reports.
[16] Leavitt, N. 2009. Is Cloud Computing Really Ready for
5. REFERENCES Prime Time? Computer 42, 15-20.
[17] McKinsey & Co. 2009. Clearing the air on cloud computing
[1] Amoako-Gyampah, K. and Salam, A.F. 2004. An extension McKinsey and Co. USA
of the technology acceptance model in an ERP [18] Misra, S.C. and Mondal, A. 2010. Identification of a
implementation environment. Information & Management company's suitability for the adoption of cloud computing
41, 731-745. and modelling its corresponding Return on Investment.
36
Mathematical and Computer Modelling In Press, Corrected predict actual use? A systematic literature review.
Proof. Information and Software Technology 52, 463-479.
[19] Morgan, D.L. and Spanish, M.T. 1984. Focus groups: A new [24] Xin, M. and Levina, N. 2008. Software-as-a Service Model:
tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology 7, 253- Elaborating Client-Side Adoption Factors. In Proceedings of
270. the International Conference on Information Sysytems ICIS,
[20] Mulrow, C.D. 1994. Rationale For Systematic Reviews. Paris 2008.
BMJ: British Medical Journal 309, 597-599. [25] Yanosky, R. 2008 From Users to Choosers: The Cloud and
[21] NIST 2009. Draft NIST Working Definition of Cloud the Changing Shape of Enterprise Authority. In The Tower
Computing Information Technology Laboratory,National and the Cloud, EDUCASE, 126 - 136.
Institute of Standards and Technology, USA. [26] Yin, R. 2002. Case Study Research: Design and Methods,
[22] Ranganathan, C. and Balaji, S. 2007. Critical Capabilities for Third Edition, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol
Offshore Outsourcing of Information Systems. Sprouts: 5. Sage Publications, Inc.
Working Papers on Information Systems 7.
[23] Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S. and
Budgen, D. 2010. Does the technology acceptance model
37