Steve Lacy Interview
Steve Lacy Interview
SOPRANO SAXOPHONIST
[1934- 2004]
Legendary soprano saxophonist Steve Lacy died in Boston of liver cancer on June 4, 2004. Born in New
York, Steve Lacy was originally inspired by the great Sidney Bechet, and played in the New Orleans –
Dixieland tradition. In the early- mid fifties he played with the traditional groups of Max Kaminsky,
Jimmy McParland, Rex Stewart, Buck CIayton, Charlie Shavers, Zooty Singleton and Hot Lips Page
among others.
This was till he met avant - garde pianist Cecil Taylor. He gave up all his earlier work to study, practice
and play with the Cecil Taylor quartet in 1956 - 57. After Taylor he fell under the influence of another
piano giant, Thelonious Monk, and spent some twelve years concentrating on the Monk repertoire.
Jazz historian James Lincoln Collier in his book 'The Making of Jazz' explains Lacy's subsequent influence
over John Coltrane's taking up the soprano saxophone in addition to the tenor saxophone he was
already playing : "My Favourite Things" represented Coltrane's recording debut on the soprano
saxophone. Coltrane had been listening to Sidney Bechet, and through his association with Monk he had
become aware of the work of Steve Lacy, who had played soprano with Monk. In 1959 Coltrane
acquired a soprano saxophone and began practising on it, mainly, he said, because he kept hearing
higher notes than he could get on the tenor. The rest is history.
In 1965, Lacy went to Europe, and had been based in Paris since 1970. He explains in the following
interview what caused him to move to Europe. For the last ten years or so, Lacy had consistently been
placed number one in the Downbeat International Critics' Poll in the soprano saxophone category.
In 2002, finding gradual acceptence of his music in America, he moved back to New York, and
ultimately settled in Boston where he was a New England Conservatory faculty member.
In early - 1980, Lacy toured South Asia as a member of the multinational Globe Unity Orchestra,
under the leadership of German Alexander Schippelbach. On the night of their performance in Calcutta
on the lawns of St. Paul's Cathedral, prior to the main programme, a jam session was held with some
local Indian Classical musicians on stage. Among the participants from the Globe Unity Orchestra were
German trombonist Albert Mangelsdorff, British soprano saxophonist Evan Parker, and Lacy.
The following interview was conducted over breakfast with Lacy next morning on 28th February, 1980
at Hotel Hindustan International, Calcutta. Ajoy Ray, an avid jazz lover, and Arthur Gracias, professional
guitarist, conversed with him.
The Steve Lacy Interview
Arthur: How did you feel when you played with Indian Musicians like the thavil player…..
Lacy: It was a great honour. A pleasure and an honour, but a challenge too, because it
was not easy to do as their methods were completely different. In other words,
they have their methods of rhythm and way of counting, and their musical values
are really different than mine, and so, it was not easy to arrive at an accord. I could
not possibly play their stuff and they couldn‟t play my stuff, so we had to arrive at a
sort of a juxtaposition and a sort of a point where the two heads are embracing and
yet they are themselves together. We did it in 3 days, but if we had 3 weeks or 3
months or 3 years, we would have got further. But as it was, it a was a great
experience for me. Fantastic! I‟ll never forget it. Beautiful!
Ajoy: In music……
Lacy: Ah, in music! I was about to be a baby again (laughter). Well, growing up in New
York there‟s a lot of music everywhere. There‟s a lot of jazz, there always was and
still is. And when I was a kid, I was always into piano, classical music, and I didn‟t
like it very much. When I was a teenager, I heard some Jazz and I started to get
very interested in that. And then I heard the piano player Art Tatum and I gave up
the piano because I realised I‟d never be able to play like that. I didn‟t even have
the hands - my hands are too small.
Lacy: 16
Ajoy: You are one of the first musicians besides (Sydney) Bechet who has taken up the soprano sax
as a solo instrument. Generally, people double on it. Do you have anything to say on it? Why
didn’t you take up any other horns?
Lacy: Because I found out how hard it was and therefore, I needed all my time to devote
to that, do what I wanted to do, and I didn‟t have the time to do it. It‟s like having
two wives, or 3 wives or 4 wives: couldn‟t do it, couldn‟t handle „em.
Ajoy: What was the first gig you played and who with?
Lacy: Of course it was with some amateurs, like in between a Dixieland band and a small
dance group, just paying old tunes, like teenagers, like jazz standards, old songs,
“Honeysuckle Rose”, and “Ain‟t Misbehaving”… stuff like that. With kids, for kids,
you know. That would have been the first. But I can‟t remember too well.
Arthur: Steve, did you find Coltrane as any sort of an influence on your playing?
Lacy: Very big, but that came later, because in the early 50s, I was really concentrating
on New Orleans style, all the ancient stuff, Bechet and Louis Armstrong, Duke
Ellington and all that, Jelly Roll Morton, Bessie Smith. I was really very deep into
the history of jazz, reading all the books, listening to all records.
Ajoy: So you start off in the New Orleans vein. After that….?
Lacy: Well, I went through all the different schools, the Chicago style, the St. Louis style,
the New York - still in history really. I‟m just dabbling in the history and copying
the different ways of doing, and sort of improvising. And then, in the middle of all
that, I met Cecil Taylor and he just plucked me right out of all that and put me in
the fire! Put me right into the deep waters you know! And I didn‟t know how deep
the water was! So I swum across there for about 6 years with him. From „53 to „59.
That was where I learnt a lot of stuff, playing with him.
Ajoy: Wasn’t it a big switch; from the New Orleans style to C.Taylor? From one extreme to another?
Lacy: Yeah, again I didn‟t know how big a switch it was! Didn‟t seem so big to me. And it
still doesn‟t, in a way, because Jazz is much the same really. Surface characteristics
and all that, it still contains the same spirit. Not so far really.
Ajoy: In New York, yeah, that was the time when music was ……..
Lacy: Drying up. Terrifying.
Ajoy: There were a lot of folks who left during that period, a lot of folks, from the late ‘50s and the
late ‘60s.
Arthur: At that time I found even a lot of jazz guitarists started commercialising and playing a lot of
pop, like (Wes) Montgomery, and Gabor Gzabo……
Lacy: I had already been through the working days and sacrificing and all that for the
music, and I had done that for years and I didn‟t want to do it anymore. I wanted
to play and not do that anymore. In Europe, it seemed I wouldn‟t have to do that. I
could get a little work there so I stayed.
Ajoy: How did Ornette (Coleman) hit you when he came on first?
Lacy: Oh that was a revelation for everybody in New York. That was like the Message, the
Writing on the Wall. Nobody could ignore that really. Either you‟re against it or for
it. I mean it was like a big flash. Everybody was talking about it. You either liked it
or you didn‟t. I liked it right away. But I had already played with Cecil (Taylor) for 6
years by the time I heard that. So it was revolutionary all right. But I had been
involved in another revolution, or may be the same revolution. So I felt right at
home with that. We loved it.
Ajoy: What do you find is the difference between working in America and working in Europe?
Lacy: Well, in a way, the Europeans are more comfortable, just listening to music. It‟s an
older culture, so it‟s more natural for them. Art is a more natural thing for
Europeans because it‟s older, more established. Whereas America‟s a young
country, only a few 100 years old. Art is a sort of a strange thing. Everything is
young.
Ajoy: Did you attempt fusing free jazz with Western Classical music?
Lacy: Well, jazz…..music will contain anything. You can just put anything you want in
music if you really feel it, if you really believe in it. So we make music out of all
kinds of things really. I can write a song out of a menu. I can take a box top and
write a song out of it. In the same way, you can take anything and adapt it and use
it, if you really want to. But I never made any conscious attempts to fuse anything.
But everything I like is in what I do naturally. And that‟s why I showed you, those
that I like are dedicated and paid back to certain people. We have 100s of pieces
that I wrote and each one contains some aspect of somebody‟s style, somebody‟s
way of playing, somebody‟s way of phrasing. So these elements are incorporated,
but it‟s not a fusion. It‟s just a containment. It‟s like if you live in a certain country
you pick up the way they speak, and it becomes a natural part of the way you
speak. It just gets in, the accent. So you don‟t have to fuse it. It just happens.
Ajoy: What about the situation in Paris from the jazz point of view?
Lacy: Well, I‟ve been living there ten years now and the first five years were murder! But
the last five years have been great. It started to get better and now it‟s getting
better and better. Well, we don‟t stay too much in Paris. We work out of Paris. It‟s
just like the centre of Europe, so we can get to Belgium and Holland, and Italy and
Germany and sometimes Paris, but not all the time.
Ajoy: Paris, I felt, had it’s peak period in jazz in the late‘50s - early’60s. A lot of Americans went
over….
Lacy In the late „50s, „58-„59 there was a big movement there….
Ajoy: Which country in Europe do you find your music the most acceptable?
Lacy I think Italy is No. 1 for us now. And France too.
Ajoy: Germany?
Lacy: We get less of a chance to play in Germany. Usually when I go to Germany, I either
do solos or I collaborate with some German musicians or work with Mal Waldron.
But I haven‟t had much of a chance to take my group there. Just once in a while.
But Germany is very fantastic. There‟s a big public there, some good musicians, but
it‟s not so easy to take a whole group there. So I do a lot of solos and duos there,
and work with Mal Waldron. You know Mal Waldron? The pianist.
Ajoy : Did you learn anything new from this trip in India?
Lacy (Whistles) Yeah, I‟ll have to think about it for a few years but I definitely did. I
think it‟s an overwhelming experience for me. First of all, just to be in this Country,
see what‟s happening, meet all the people, and finally to play even a little bit with
the musicians like that. It was a great experience, really profound, because I‟ve
been listening to Indian music on records, and a few concerts, for about 25 years, I
think. In New York, we heard Shankar, Ravi Shankar. Actually the one who showed
me about Indian music was Gil Evans back in the 50s. He gave me a record of Ravi
Shankar back in ‟57, and I started to get interested in that. Got some other records
and a lot of us were really deeply into those records you know. But then, a few
years later we stopped, but then we started again. And now, having come here and
seen the stuff in person – well, I‟ve always been interested in the music, but now
I‟m a little closer to it than before.
Arthur: Could you say that you were manly interested in the rhythmic cycles rather than……….
Lacy: No! It‟s the scales, the melodies, the moods, the whole thing, and the spirit! The
whole thing, it‟s not just the rhythm at all. Because I don‟t think you can separate
an element from music and just be interested in one. I mean if a music is
interesting, it‟s the whole thing really. The thing that struck me here is, for
example, Bismillah Khan. I heard him in Paris. These people, what they play outside
of India is one thing and what they play inside India for their own public is another
story completely. So that was a revelation for me because I saw how much the
rapport between the public and the music, how clear it is, how intimate the people
are with the music. And this is beautiful, this is what we want to achieve with jazz
also but it‟s a dream. It used to be like that with jazz. A small public but the people
knew the music, and it was all very direct. There were no cultural problems. It was
no trying to figure out “What do they mean by that, what do they mean by that?”.
It was just like somebody hungry eating food, simple like that, and that‟s what
we‟re trying to do in jazz. To get to that point where the people and the music are
one. So maybe it‟ll happen sometime.