X Rays
X Rays
X-ray Imaging
Images are characterized by the interaction of x-ray photons and tissue.
Physics
Definition: Radiation – a stream of particles or photons.
Particles: α (2+He), e- (electrons), β (electrons emitted from nuclei),
β+ (positrons), p+ (proton), n0 (neutrons)
Photons: x-ray, γ, annihilation photons, etc.
2. Scattering
The charged particles above (α, e-, β, β+, p+) interact very strongly with tissue and
typically do not pass completely through the human body and thus cannot be used for
imaging. Of the above particles photons and neutrons(n0) pass through the body with an
appropriate amount of interaction for imaging (too little is also bad).
1. Matter consists of discrete particles separated by distances that are large compared to
the size of the particles.
2. For a given path length along a line, an x-ray photon either interacts (with prob. p) or
it doesn’t and all interactions are independent.
3. Scattered photons scatter at a different angle and don’t contribute to the continuing
flux of photons along the line.
(
I d ( x, y ) = I 0 exp − ∫ μ ( x, y, z )dz )
Generation of x-rays
We assume that all electrons interact. For a thick target, it is often modeled as a series of
thin targets where the highest energy impinging upon subsequent stages is reduced by the
interactions. Each thin target produces a new uniform spectrum, but with a lower peak
energy. The resultant spectrum is approximately linear from a peak at 0 keV to 0 at E.
Noll (2006) X-ray Notes 1: Page 5
The x-ray attenuation coefficient μ is, of course, also a function of material properties.
Two of the most important properties that affect the attenuation coefficient are tissue
density, ρ, and the atomic number Z. As most x-ray photon/tissue interactions are
photon/electron interactions both ρ and Z will influence μ.
For x-ray photons, there are 4 main types of interactions (listed in order of increasing
likelihood with increasing photon energy, E):
1. Rayleigh-Thompson Scattering
2. Photoelectric Absorption
3. Compton Scattering
4. Pair Production
In general, we can write an expression for the attenuation coefficient as the some of these
constiuent parts:
μ ( E ) = μ rt ( E ) + μ pe ( E ) + μ cs ( E ) + μ pp ( E ) +…
1. Rayleigh-Thompson Scattering or “coherent” scattering – atomic absorption with
spontaneous emission at the same energy E. This is the same effect as is seen in x-ray
Noll (2006) X-ray Notes 1: Page 7
diffraction in crystals. This term is rarely important in the diagnostic energy range
(50-200 keV).
The photoelectric effect increases rapidly with atomic number, Z, and with decreasing
energy. The photoelectric effect dominates μ in the lower part of the diagnostic
spectrum.
For high Z materials (e.g. Lead, Iodine, Tungsten), the shell energy boundaries are
evident in the μ vs. E plots. When the energy gets high enough to make that shell’s
electrons available to the PE effect (when E exceeds the binding energy), then the
probability of a PE interaction increases.
(m − m0 )c 2 = m(1 − 1 − v 2 / c 2 )c 2
.
1 v2 2 1 2
≈ m(1 − (1 − ))c = mv
2 c2 2
Conservation of momentum in x and y directions:
E E'
= cos θ + mv cos φ
c c
E'
sin θ = mv sin φ
c
solving these equations we get the energy of the scattered photon:
E
E' =
E
1+ (1 − cos θ )
Ee
where Ee = m0c2 = 511 keV, the rest energy of an electron.
Comments:
- For E << Ee, there is very little change in energy with angle.
- For higher E:
Noll (2006) X-ray Notes 1: Page 9
In this interaction, photon energy in transferred to mass energy in the electron and
positron. Since the rest energy of each is 511 keV, pair production cannot occur for
x-ray photons below 1022 keV (not in the diagnostic spectrum). Positrons will
wander around until they bump into an electron, which will result in mutual
annihilation and the emission of two 511 keV photons:
The ejected photons from a positron/electron annihilation is the basis for positron
emission tomography [more on this later].
Noll (2006) X-ray Notes 1: Page 10
where mi are the masses of the components and M is the total mass.
Beam Hardening
Because the attenuation spectrum is not uniform across the diagnostic energy spectrum,
the output spectrum will have a different intensity distribution than the input spectrum,
I0(E).
If we split an object into several smaller parts, and look at then energy spectrum at for
each part:
Noll (2006) X-ray Notes 1: Page 11
E=
∫ EI ( E )dE
∫ I ( E )dE
will increase (get harder) as we move through the object:
E0 < E1 < E2 < ... < En .
For medical imaging, this has the unfortunate consequence that a particular tissue type
will have a μ that changes as a function of position along the path.
In particular, as we move deeper into the object, we will find that there is less attentuation
than expected, given the initial spectrum, I0(E).
One solution is to make the beam “hard” to begin with. This is often accomplished by
filtering out the low E photons with a thin metal plate (often use aluminum).