Rectangular Channel Design
Rectangular Channel Design
Package 3
Rectangular Channel Design
Offsite Flows
The offsite hydrology was done by CH2MHill within a separate report. The following describes the flow patterns, utilizing CH2MHill’s results, as the flow
progresses through the system of RCB’s and rectangular concrete channels. Please see the following table for the description of flows.
CP2
CP3 CP7
CP5
CP4 CP6
CP1
CP8
CP9
CP14
CP15
CP11 CP13
CP12
CP10
CP16
CP17
CP18
Entrance to the System
There are four major areas in which flow enters the system, which are CP1, CP8, CP10, and CP17. All other locations are considered minor. All four locations
have tapered inlets to minimize the size of the necessary downstream facility. HY-8 analyzes tapered inlets well, and so each inlet location was analyzed with
HY-8 using a rectangular channel for the tail water. This was converged with the HEC-RAS model to make a complete system, analyzing the entrance losses as
appropriately as possible.
CP1
CP10
CP8
CP17
Bends in the System
In order for HEC-RAS to be utilized as a design tool, the system must never be in pressure flow. The HEC-RAS was analyzed to ensure that the depth of the water
does not exceed the depth of the channel/RCB. Bends in a system cause superelevation of the water. Each bend was analyzed to ensure that the water depth,
including the superelevation, does not exceed the depth of the channel/RCB.
𝑉 2 ∗𝑇
∆𝑑 = ∆𝑑 = 0.88 𝑓𝑡
𝑔∗ 𝑅𝐶
HEC-RAS Allowable
Water True Water Water
Location V T Rc ∆d ∆d/2 Depth Depth Depth
"F" 11+85 to "F" 12+09 23.47 6 200 0.51 0.26 3.47 3.73 4.00
"F" 14+17 to "F" 14+24 24.39 6 200 0.55 0.28 3.79 4.07 4.00*
"P" 144+22 to "P" 141+42 26.29 6 200 0.64 0.32 3.97 4.29 5.00
"P" 147+38 to "P" 147+46 31.87 6 200 0.95 0.47 3.27 3.74 4.00
"P" 153+28 to "P" 153+63 34.60 10 200 1.86 0.93 3.84 4.77 5.00
"P" 161+26 to "P" 161+51 41.35 15 200 3.98 1.99 4.46 6.45 7.00
"F" 26+22 to "F" 26+12 26.30 10 200 1.07 0.54 5.43 5.97 8.00
"R2" 5+59 to "R2" 6+95 33.51 10 200 1.74 0.87 4.34 5.21 8.00
* Considered a negligible difference and impact
Energy Dissipator Design
A Tumbling Flow energy dissipator was utilized in the design as the final outlet. The design was run by manipulating HY-8, and by doing hand calculations.
The following requirements exist in order to use the dissipator:
Froude Number > 3
Channel slope must be between 4% and 25%
q = Unit Discharge Q = Channel Flow (cfs) B = Channel Width (ft) D = Channel Depth Before Dissipator Ns = Number of Slots S0 = Slope of Dissipator
Yc = Critical Depth Vc = Critical Velocity Yn = Normal Depth n = Manning’s “n” Value Vn = Normal Depth
Hand Calculations
Step 1
The facility is a long concrete channel and the outlet condition does not impact the inlets in any way.
Step 2
From the HEC-RAS model: Yn = 3.26 ft; Vn = 44.03 fps; Yc = 8.59 FT; Vc = 16.7 fps. Energy dissipation is required.
Step 3
𝑄 4,018 𝑞2 1442
𝑞=𝐵 Q = 4,018 cfs; B = 28 ft; 𝑞= 28
q = 144 ft2/s; 𝑦𝑐 = 𝑔
; 𝑦𝑐 = 32.2
; yc = 8.60 ft (matches the HEC-RAS model)
Step 4
Utilize procedure for 5 rows of equal height. S0 = 0.04 ft/ft. Spacing of rows will be set to 8.5.
𝑦𝑐 8.60
ℎ= 2 ; ℎ= 2 ; h = 4.28 ft
( ) ( )
(3−3.7𝑆0 ) 3 (3−3.7(0.04)) 3
ℎ 4.28
𝐿 = 8.5 ∗ ℎ; 𝐿 = 8.5 ∗ 4.28; L = 36.38 ft; 𝑊2 = ; 𝑊2 = ; W2 = 2.14 ft
2 2
The ultimate outlet flow will be at critical depth and critical velocity.
L = 36.38 ft; W2 = 2.14 ft; W1 –Row1 = 7.91 ft; W1 –Row2 = 7.19 ft; h = 4.28 ft; h1 = 10.75 ft; h2 = 1 ft; L/2 = 18.19 ft; LT = 182’
HY-8 Manipulation Calculations
Riprap Size at Outlet
GIVEN : CALCULATE :
Match “A”
HEC-RAS Station: 1848, 6x4 Chnl 1
(Start Flow CP3)
HY-8
6’ x 4’ RCB
Length = 291’
Treat Entrance as Tapered Inlet, Side Tapered, Square Edge Top (26-900) Wingwall, 11.5 Face Width, 4:1 Side Taper
Profile Sheet 9
HY-8
6’ x 4’ RCB
Length = 151’
Treat Entrance as Tapered Inlet, Side Tapered, Square Edge Top (26-900) Wingwall, 11.5 Face Width, 4:1 Side Taper