0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views

Bias & Linearity

This document summarizes the results of a measurement systems analysis conducted on May 10, 2001. The analysis evaluated gauge TESEC #14 measuring part 0600004 to a nominal value of 100 with a tolerance of 6 units

Uploaded by

Vbaluyo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views

Bias & Linearity

This document summarizes the results of a measurement systems analysis conducted on May 10, 2001. The analysis evaluated gauge TESEC #14 measuring part 0600004 to a nominal value of 100 with a tolerance of 6 units

Uploaded by

Vbaluyo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Bias & Linearity

Measurement Systems Analysis


Analysis
Unit
Part: 0600004 Date: 10-May-2001 Lower Reference Value: 10 V
Nominal Reference Value: 100 V
Appraiser/Operator: Upper Reference Value: 200 V
2480 Process Variation/Tolerance: 6 V

Group 1 Data Group 2 Data Group 3 Data

Observed Measurements: Lower Range Observed Measurements: Nominal Range Observed Measurements: Upper Range

X1 10 X6 10 X1 100 X6 100 X1 200 X6 200


X2 10 X7 10 X2 100 X 100 X2 200 X 200
7 7

X3 10 X8 10 X 100 X8 101 X 200 X8 200


3 3

X4 10 X9 10 X4 100 X 100 X4 200 X 200


9 9

X5 10 X10 10 X 101 X10 100 X 200 X10 200


5 5

Observed Average: 10 Observed Average: 100.2 Observed Average: 200


Bias: 0 Bias: 0.2 Bias: 0
% Bias: 0 % Bias: 3.3333333 % Bias: 0

Calculated Values Compute bias at a given reference value

Linearity = 0.000 Reference Value = 3


% Linearity = 0.004 Bias ... 0.070369
Fit (R2) = 0.001 % Bias ... 0.0117282

C R..
Linearity Plot
0.25

0.2
Bias

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 50 100
Reference Value 150 200 250

% Bias 1: Bias error is acceptable.


% Bias 2: Bias error is acceptable.
% Bias 3: Bias error is acceptable.
% Linearity: Percent linearity is acceptable.
Sub Group
1
2
3
1
137
137
137
2
Reading No.

138
138
138
3
139
139
138
4
139
139
139
5
139
139
139
Average Range
(x-bar)
138.4
138.4
138.2
(R)
2
2
2
Co...
Stability Study
Measurement Systems Analysis

Grand Average =

Average Range =
138.416

1.28
Date of Initial Study:

UCLx =

LCLx =
10-May-2001

139.1584

137.6736
4 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1
5 138 138 139 139 139 138.6 1 Count = 125 UCLr = 2.7008
6 137 138 138 139 139 138.2 2
7 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1 Constant Used LCLr = 0
8 137 138 138 139 139 138.2 2 A2 = 0.58
9 138 138 139 139 139 138.6 1 D4 = 2.11
10 137 138 138 139 139 138.2 2
11 137 138 138 139 139 138.2 2
12 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1
13 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1 Constants
14 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1 n 2 3 4 5 Note:
D4 For sample sizes below 7, there is no
15 138 138 139 139 139 138.6 1 3.27 2.57 2.28 2.11
lower control limit for the range chart.
16 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1 D3
17 138 138 139 139 139 138.6 1 A2 1.88 1.02 0.73 0.58
18 138 138 139 139 139 138.6 1
19 138 138 139 139 139 138.6 1
20 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1 Note:
21 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1 1 Control limits calculated in this worksheet shall be used in the actual control
22 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1 charting of the subsequent readings taken from this gage.
23 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1 2 The readings in the 25 subgroups shall be transferred to the control chart
24 138 138 138 139 139 138.4 1 and shall form part of the initial data.
25 138 138 139 139 139 138.6 1
Count Rdgs count Ave Count Range
5 25 25
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Gauge: TESEC # 14 Performed by: Ruel Soriano SPC Coord. Dexter Duremdes
Id no: 0600004 Date Performed: 10-May-2001 Date Due: 10-May-2002
5/8/2019
SPEC LIMITS UNIT
Upper 11 No. of Operators 3 Part used for Gage Study:
Lower 9 Volts No. of Trials 3 100k resistor with 10% tolerance
TOLERANCE 2 No. of Parts 10

PART
Average
OPERATOR Trial 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Badge #: 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
5319 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Avg #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! XA = 10.00
R #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! RA = #VALUE!
B 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10.000
Badge #: 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10.000
1450 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10.000
Avg #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! XB = 10.000
R #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! RB = #VALUE!
C 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10.000
Badge #: 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10.000
2758 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10.000
Avg #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! XC = 10.000
R #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! RC = #VALUE!
Part Average XP #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! RP
Grand Average Range: [ RA = #VALUE!+ RB = #VALUE! + RC = #VALUE! ] / [ # of operators = 3 ] = R R
[ Max X = 10 +] - [ Min X = + 10 ] = XDIFF XDIFF 0.000
[ R = ] * [ D4 = 2.575 ] = UCLR UCLR
[ R = ] * [ D3 = 0 ] = LCLR LCLR

*Note:
D4 = 3.27 for two trials and 2.575 for three trials; D3 = 0 for up to 7 trials. UCLR represents the limit of individual R's. Circle those that are beyond
this limit. Identify the cause and correct. Repeat these readings using the same appraiser and unit as originally used or discard values and re-average
and re-compute R and the limiting value from the remaining observations.
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Gage/Eqpt.: TESEC # 14 Date: 10-May-01 Performed by: Ruel Soriano

Measurement Unit Analysis % Total Variation % Process Tolerance


Repeatability - Equipment Variation (EV)
% EV = 100 [EV / TV] % EV = 100 [EV / Tolerance]
EV = R x K1 = 100* ### / ### = 100 * ### / 2
= x 3.05
= #VALUE! = #VALUE! = #VALUE!

Reproducibility - Appraiser Variation (AV)


%AV = 100 [AV / TV] %AV = 100 [AV / Tolerance]
= [ (XDIFF x K2) - (EV / nr) ]
2 2
AV = 100* ### / ### = 100 * ### / 2
2.7
= ### = #VALUE! = #VALUE!

Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R)


%R&R = 100 [R&R / TV] %R&R = 100 [R&R / Tolerance]
R&R= (EV + AV )
2 2
= 100* ### / ### = 100 * ### / 2
Parts K3
= ### 2 3.65 = #VALUE! = #VALUE!
3 2.70
Part Variation (PV) 4 2.30
5 2.08 % PV = 100 [PV/TV] % PV = 100 [PV/Tolerance]
PV = RP x K3 1.62 6 1.93 = 100* ### / ### = 100 * ### / 2
= x 1.62 7 1.82
= ### 8 1.74 = #VALUE! = #VALUE!
9 1.67
Total Variation (TV) 10 1.62 No. of Data Categories - Measurement System Precision-Over-Tolerance (P/T) Ratio
Discrimination = [ Tolerance / EV ]
TV = (R&R)2 + PV2 = [ PV / R&R ] * d2 = 2 / ###
= ### + #VALUE! = #VALUE! ### * 1.91 = #VALUE!
= ### = #VALUE!
#VALUE!
#VALUE!

#VALUE!

Summary of Results
Based on %Total Variation Based on Process Tolerance P/T Ratio
#VALUE! #VALUE!
% R&R #VALUE!
#VALUE! #VALUE!
Based on data categories, the GAGE SYSTEM is #VALUE!
Measurement System Discrimination
Data Impact of Discrim
Comments
Categories Process Control
1 Measurement system does not have adequate Can be used for control only if:
discrimination. -the process variation is small vs. specification
-loss function is flat over the expected process
variation
-the main source(s) of variation causes a mean shift

2 to 4 Measurement system does not have adequate Can be used with semi-variable control techniques
discrimination. based on the process distribution
Can produce insensitive variables control charts
Gage system O.K. for attributes data
5 Measurement system has an adequate Can be used with variables control charts
or more discrimination
categories

% Repeatability and Reproducibility Criteria (% R & R)


% R&R Value Comments Remarks
Less The measurement system is acceptable PASS
than 10%

10 % to 30% May be acceptable based upon importance of MARGINAL


Error application, cost of repairs, etc.

Over 30% Measurement system needs impvt. FAIL


Error Identify problems and have them corrected.
Impact of Discrimination on:
cess Control Analysis
Unacceptable for estimating parameters and
small vs. specification indices.
er the expected process Only indicates whether the process is producing
conforming or non-conforming parts
ariation causes a mean shift

variable control techniques Generally unacceptable for estimating process


parameters and indices
variables control charts Only provides coarse estimates

les control charts Recommended for estimating process parameters


and indices

You might also like