Interpretasi Geologi Data Refleksi: Geological Interpretation of Reflection Data
Interpretasi Geologi Data Refleksi: Geological Interpretation of Reflection Data
INTERPRETASI
GEOLOGI DATA
REFLEKSI
Geological interpretation of
reflection data
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
Geological interpretation of
reflection data
o Seismic data are usually interpreted by geophysicists
or geologists. The ideal interpreter in both combines
training fields
STRUCTURAL TRAPS
Impermeable rocks
Gas-oil
contact
Spill point
Oil-water
contact
2080 m
2060 m
STRUCTURAL TRAPS
Vertical section
through fault
trap
Subsurface Map of
the middle
permeable bed
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
STRUCTURAL TRAPS
Possible traps
associated with
thrust faulting
Stratigraphic traps
produced by
lithologic change and
pinchout
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
STRUCTURAL TRAPS
Unconformity
traps
A trap in reef
and in draping
above the reef
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
STRUCTURAL TRAPS
SALT
INTERPRETATION
PROCEDURES
GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
The coherent event seen on seismic records or on
processed seismic section are reflection from acoustic
impedance contrasts in the earth
These contrast are associated with bedding that represent
the geologic structure
Mapping the arrival times of coherent events is related to
the geologic structure, and by allowing for velocity and
migration effects, we obtain a map showing the geologic
structure
Seismic detail (wave shape, amplitude, and so on) is
related to the geologic detail, that is, to the stratigraphy
and the nature of the interstitial fluids
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
INTERPRETATION
PROCEDURES
Collecting and Examination data
The relevant data to the interpretation such as: geologic
data, well data and so on. The relevant seismic data are
seismic section, a base map, velocity and other data
from the field or generated in processing.
Ambiguity in seismic interpretation is less than with most
geophysical and geological data. Ambiguity arises
because data are incomplete and/or inaccurate, and the
best way to reduce ambiguity is to add more data.
The regional geologic setting and concepts about the
tectonic stresses to which the region has been subjected
should also be used as a check on seismic information
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
INTERPRETATION
PROCEDURES
EXAMINING THE SEISMIC SECTIONS
One of the first tasks of an interpreter is to examine the
data for evidences of mis-location (do section tie
properly?) or improper acquisition or processing.
INTERPRETATION APPROACH:
Focusing to the object (only prospective reservoirs are
in one part of the object
Builds up a complete interpretation of an entire section
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
INTERPRETATION
PROCEDURES
PICKING REFLECTION
Making a seismic structure map generally consist of four
operations:
Selecting which events, and what point (peak, trough,
zero crossing) on each even are to be mapped (picking)
Measuring the arrival time of each pick (timing)
Writing the value on a base map (posting)
Connecting the posting values to represent the structure
(contouring)
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
PULL-APART ZONES
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
PULL-APART ZONES
Structural Characteristics Dominant Plate tectonic habitat
style deformational
stress
WRENCH –FAULT
ASSEMBLAGES
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
WRENCH –FAULT
ASSEMBLAGES
Structural Characteristics Dominant Plate tectonic habitat
style deformational
stress
BASEMENT WARPS
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
BASEMENT WARPS
Structural Characteristics Dominant Plate tectonic habitat
style deformational
stress
THRUST ASSEMBLAGES
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
THRUST ASSEMBLAGES
Structural style Characteristics Dominant Plate tectonic habitat
deformational
stress
SALT STRUCTURES
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
SALT STRUCTURES
Structural Characteristics Dominant Plate tectonic habitat
style deformational
stress
Salt Pillows, domes, Plastic flow Divergent boundaries (rifts
structures salt walls Solution provide venue for salt
deposition)
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
SHALE STRUCTURES
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
SHALE STRUCTURES
Structural Characteristics Dominant Plate tectonic habitat
style deformational stress
DRAPE FEATURES
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
DRAPE FEATURES
Structural Characteristics Dominant Plate tectonic habitat
style deformational stress
50
Depth (km)
100
150
100 200
Distance (km)
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
INTERPRETASI
STRATIGRAFI
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
CLASSIFICATION OF STRATIGRAPHIC
TRAPS (after Rittenhouse, 1972)
STRATIGRAPHIC TRAPS
C. Diagenetic traps
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
(2) Transgressive
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
SOME TYPES OF
STRATIGRAPHIC TRAPS
SOME TYPES OF
STRATIGRAPHIC TRAPS
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
EROSIONAL TRUNCATION
CONCORDANCE
TOPLAP
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
DOWNLAP
ONLAP
CONCORDANCE
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
TRUNCATION
DOWNLAP
SEQUENCE DOWNLAP APPARENT
BOUNDARY SURFACE TRUNCATION
EXAMPLES OF DIAGNOSTIC
REFLECTION CONFIGURATIONS
SUB-PARALLEL
PARALLEL / EVEN
WAVY DIVERGENT
MODIFYING SEISMIC
REFLECTION CONFIGURATIONS
HUMMOCKY LENTICULAR
DISRUPTED CONTORTED
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM
Complex sigmoid-oblique
Oblique
Singled
Tangensial
Hummocky clinoforms
Parallel
TEKNIK GEOLOGI FT-UGM