0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views5 pages

Pathintegral in Quantum Mechanics

The document summarizes the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics. It shows that the transition amplitude between two configurations can be written as a sum over all possible paths between the configurations, with each path weighted by the action for that path. Specifically: (1) The transition amplitude is expressed as an integral over all intermediate paths. (2) Each path is weighted by the exponential of the action for that path. (3) In the limit of many intermediate paths, this gives the path integral formulation with the action appearing in the exponent.

Uploaded by

Sarthak
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views5 pages

Pathintegral in Quantum Mechanics

The document summarizes the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics. It shows that the transition amplitude between two configurations can be written as a sum over all possible paths between the configurations, with each path weighted by the action for that path. Specifically: (1) The transition amplitude is expressed as an integral over all intermediate paths. (2) Each path is weighted by the exponential of the action for that path. (3) In the limit of many intermediate paths, this gives the path integral formulation with the action appearing in the exponent.

Uploaded by

Sarthak
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Path integral in Quantum Mechanics

Sarthak Duarya
a
International Centre for Theoretical Sciences,Tata Institute of Fundamental Research,Shivakote,
Bengaluru 560089, India.

E-mail: [email protected]
Contents

1 Path integral in quantum mechanics 1

1 Path integral in quantum mechanics

Consider the Hamiltonian-


p̂2
Ĥ = + V (q̂). (1.1)
2m
2p
Classical Hamiltonian is 2m + V (q).
1 2
Classical Lagrangian is 2 mq̇ − V (q).
Action Principle
R
Equation of motion follow from extremizing the action S = dtL.
Imagine,tinitial = t0 , tfinal = t00 . qinitial = q 0 , qfinal = q 00 . Varying this path till S is extremised
which means that for classical path δS = 0 to first order for any variation of the path.
Define,
q̂(t) = eiĤt q̂(0)e−iĤt = eiĤt q̂e−iĤt
p̂(t) = eiĤt p̂(0)e−iĤt = eiĤt p̂e−iĤt .
Now,
q̂ |qi = q |qi , hq|pi0 = eiqp ,
p̂ |pi0 = p |pi0 ,0 hp|qi = e−iqp .
Define,
|q, ti ≡ eiĤt |qi .
Now,

q̂(t) |q, ti = eiĤt q̂e−iĤt eiĤt |qi

= eiĤt q̂
e−i
Ĥt eiĤt |qi
 

= eiĤt q̂ |qi
= q |q, ti .

Define, for t00 > t0

K(q 0 , t0 ; q 00 , t00 ) ≡ q 00 , t00 q 0 , t0



00 0
= q 00 e−iĤ(t −t ) q 0 .

–1–
Define
t00 − t0
∆= .
N
where N is large integer.

K(q 0 , t0 ; q 00 , t00 ) = q 00 e−iN ∆Ĥ q 0



= q 00 |e−i∆Ĥ e−i∆{zĤ
· · · e−i∆Ĥ} q 0

N-factors
R
Inserting I = dqi |qi i hqi |, where i = N − 1, N − 2, · · · 1.
Therefore,

K(q 0 , t0 ; q 00 , t00 ) = q 00 e−iN ∆Ĥ q 0



= q 00 |e−i∆Ĥ e−i∆{zĤ
· · · e−i∆Ĥ} q 0

N-factors
Z NY−1
= dq1 . . . dqN −1 hqi+1 |e−i∆Ĥ |qi i
i=0

where qN ≡ q 00 , q0 ≡ q 0 .

Z N
Y −1
0 0 00 00
K(q , t ; q , t ) = dq1 . . . dqN −1 hqi+1 |e−i∆Ĥ |qi i . (1.2)
i=0

Now we want to calculate hqi+1 |e−i∆Ĥ |qi i.


 
p̂ 2
−i∆ V (q̂)+ 2m
hqi+1 |e−i∆Ĥ |qi i = hqi+1 |e |qi i (1.3)

–2–
1
Using, BCH lemma eA eB = eA+B+ 2 [A,B]+··· ,we get
 
p̂ 2
−i∆ V (q̂)+ 2m p̂2 2 ×(··· )
hqi+1 |e |qi i = hqi+1 |e−i∆V (q̂) e−i∆ 2m e∆ |qi i
p̂2
= hqi+1 |e−i∆V (q̂) e−i∆ 2m |qi i
p̂2
= e−i∆V (qi+1 ) hqi+1 |e−i∆ 2m |qi i
Z
Inserting I = dp |pi0 0 hp|
Z
p2
= e−i∆V (qi+1 ) dpe−i∆ 2m hqi+1 |pi0 0 hp|qi i
| {z } | {z }
=eipqi+1 =e−ipqi
Z
p2
= e−i∆V (qi+1 ) dpe−i∆ 2m eip(qi+1 −qi )

Completing the squares


h i2
i∆ m im
Z
− p− (qi+1 −qi ) + 2∆ (qi+1 −qi )2
= e−i∆V (qi+1 ) dpe 2m ∆

Performing gaussian integral


im 2
= Ae−i∆V (qi+1 )+ 2∆ (qi+1 −qi )

From eq.(1.2) we get,


Z N −1
Y im 2
0 0 00 00
K(q , t ; q , t ) = dq1 . . . dqN −1 Ae−i∆V (qi+1 )+ 2∆ (qi+1 −qi )
i=0
N −1 N −1
" #
∆m X  qi+1 − qi 2
Z X
N
= dq1 . . . dqN −1 A exp − i∆ V (qi+1 ) + i
2 ∆
i=0 i=0
Z
= dq1 . . . dqN −1 AN eiS

R R 1 2 
Here, S = Ldt = 2 mq̇ − V (q) dt.
Let’s check this.
Z t00 N
X −1
− V (q)dt = −∆ V (qi+1 ).
t0 i=0

Z t00 N −1
1 2 1 X 2
mq̇ dt = m∆ q̇|t0 +i∆
t0 2 2
i=0
N −1 h
1 X qi+1 − qi i2
= m∆ .
2 ∆
i=0

–3–
Therefore, h i2
PN −1 PN −1 qi+1 −qi
−i∆ V (qi+1 )+i 2i m∆
eiS = e
i=0 i=0 ∆
.
Formally,
Z
00 00
0 0 00 00
K(q , t ; q , t ) = N
|{z} [Dq]qq0 ,t,t0 eiS . (1.4)
Normalization constant
| {z }
Integral over paths

Integral over Paths: First we break a path into many continuous segments. Path is a
collection of q− values at regular intervals. We represent S as a sum which is function of the
q−values at those segments. Once we discretize S, it depends on the q-values at these points
q 0 , q1 , q2 , · · · , q 00 . Integrate over path precisely means integrate over each of the qi ’s. As we
vary a path each of these qi ’s change.

–4–

You might also like