The Synthesis of Gliflozins
The Synthesis of Gliflozins
LARSON
Gelest Inc., 11 East Steel Road, Morrisville, PA 19067, USA
Gerald L. Larson
Abstract Some of the general approaches to the key steps in the synthesis of gliflozins, a class of glucose
transporters, are discussed. In particular the glycosidation step for the introduction of the key aryl moiety
onto the glucose and the reduction steps are presented.
Monographic special issue: Oligos & Peptides - Chimica Oggi - Chemistry Today - vol. 33(2) March/April 2015 37
SYNTHESIS OF GLIFLOZINS Alternatively, a Friedel-Crafts acylation/reduction sequence
can be used as was employed in the preparation of 14 via
The synthetic approaches to the gliflozins essentially the formation and reduction of intermediate 13, in a synthesis
consist of three general steps: 1) construction of the aryl of dapagliflozin, 4. In this approach the acid chloride required
substituent, 2) introduction of the aryl moiety onto the sugar for the Friedel Crafts acylation is prepared in-situ and reacted
or glucosylation of the aryl substituent, and 3) deprotection directly with ethylphenyl ether to give the required 4-acylated
and modification of the arylated anomeric center of the derivative (11). The direct organosilane reduction of ketone
sugar to the final desired product. carbonyls, especially acetophenone derivatives, to a
methylene group is well documented (12) (Figure 2d).
Synthesis of the aryl group
The synthetic approach to the gliflozins first involves the
construction of the aryl substituent with a suitable handle
to allow its attachment to the sugar. There are two classical
entries into the diarylmethylene units, namely, reaction of
an organometallic reagent with an aldehyde to give the
diaryl carbinol or a Friedel-Crafts acylation to provide a
diaryl ketone. Both of these intermediates would then be
followed by a reduction of the functionalized carbon to the
requisite methylene. The former of these is exemplified in a
Figure 2d. Friedal-Crafts approach to aryl portion of Gliflozins.
synthetic route to 12 wherein aldehyde 9 was reacted with
the Grignard reagent 10 to form the diarylmethanol 11, which
was then reduced with triethylsilane to the diarylmethane 12 Reduction of the carbonyl functionality to the methylene
(6).It is worth noting that organosilanes have been shown to can be accomplished in a number of ways, but it has been
be excellent reagents for the reduction of benzylic alcohols to shown that the reduction of aryl ketones to the corresponding
the corresponding alkanes (7,8) (Figure 2a). methylenes can be conveniently done with an organosilane
and an acid catalyst. The reduction of benzyl alcohols
or aryl ketones to the corresponding methylene group
is a particularly efficient process due in large part to the
enhanced stability of the benzyl cationic intermediate. In
a related case triethylsilane, and with greatly improved
selectivity and the avoidance of a hazardous intermediate,
tetramethyldisiloxane, TMDS, have been used in the reduction
of an acetophenone derivative in the synthesis of the key
intermediate 15 in a synthesis of ziprasidone, a Pfizer anti-
psychotic drug (13). In this case the use of TMDS resulted
Figure 2a. Grignard approach to aryl portion of a Gloflozins. in the avoidance of the hazardous chloromethyl ketone
intermediate as well as the partially- and over-reduced by-
A similar approach was employed in procuring the aryl products. Pentamethyldisiloxane and dimethylethoxysilane
substrate in a synthesis of ipragliflozin (9) (Figure 2b). were less selective than TMDS for this process. Common
catalysts for these organosilane reductions are trifluoroacetic
acid or boron trifluoride etherate among others. The yields for
these reductions are typically high and offer a facile isolation
of the final product (Figure 3a).
38 Monographic special issue: Oligos & Peptides - Chimica Oggi - Chemistry Today - vol. 33(2) March/April 2015
It had been shown that the reaction of an aryllithium reagent
with gluconolactone resulted in the hemiketal, which could
in turn be reduced with triethylsilane (14). Thus, lithium-
bromine exchange of 12 and reaction of the lithium reagent
with gluconolactone 16 followed by triethylsilane reduction
provided the C1-arylated glycopyranoside 17 (9). In a similar
vein lithium reagent 19 was reacted with trimethylsilyl-protected
gluconolactone 18 and the resulting hemiketal reduced with
triethylsilane to dapagliflozin 4. The reduction step is based
on the findings of Kraus and Molina as well as those of Kishi
and coworkers, who showed that triethylsilane reduction
of glucose hemiketals leads to β−C-glycopyranosides with
high stereoselectivity (6,15). The selective reduction of ketals
and hemiketals as well as aminals and hemiaminals with the
Figure 4b. Zinc cross-coupling approach to Dapagliflozin.
weakly hydridic organosilanes is well documented and can
be attributed to the stability of the resulting α−oxygenated
carbocationic intermediate (12) (Figure 3b/4a). The tribenzyl glycal 23 was converted to the gliflozin structures in
Thus, the triethylsilane reduction of the initially formed hemiketal a couple of ways. One of these is via the corresponding epoxide
followed by deprotection provided the desired gliflozin 24, which serves to place the 3-hydroxyl group on the sugar
derivative. This reduction has been studied in a number of cases as well as provide a route for the introduction of the aryl unit
with varying degrees of stereoselectivity with triethylsilane/ (22). Reaction of 24 with 2-lithiofuran leads to the β−substituted
BF3•OEt2 giving rather poor β:α ratios and the more hindered benzyl-protected glucose 25. On the other hand reaction of the
triisopropylsilane providing a high β:α ratio (16) (Figure 4a). epoxide with the corresponding zinc reagent 26 results in the
introduction of the aryl group in the α−position. This is based on
the earlier work of Halcomb and Danishefsky (23) (Figure 5a).
Monographic special issue: Oligos & Peptides - Chimica Oggi - Chemistry Today - vol. 33(2) March/April 2015 39
2. S. Nomura S. (2010) Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 10, 411.
3. Chan S.S., Lotspeich W.D. (1962) Am. J. Phys. Legacy Content 203, 975.
4. Mackenzie B., Loo D.D.F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32678.
5. Kanai Y., Lee W.S., You G., et al. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 93, 397.
6. Lewis M.D., Cha J.C., Kishi Y. (1982) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 4976.
7. Carey F.A., Tremper H.S. (1968) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 2578.
Figure 5c. Organozinc cross-coupling approach to Gliflozins.
8. Adlington M.G., Orfanopoulos M., Fry J.L. (1976) Tetrahedron Lett.
17, 2955.
9. Imamura M., et al. (2012) Bioorg. Med. Chem. 20, 3263.
CONCLUSIONS
10. Fürstner A., Krause H. (2001) Adv. Synth. Catal. 343, 343.
11. Meng W., et al. (2008) J. Med. Chem. 51, 1145.
A number of gliflozins has now been approved for prescription
12. Larson G.L., Fry J.L., Denmark S.E. (2008) Ed. “Ionic and
use in the dosage control of diabetes 2. The most general and
Organometallic-Catalyzed Organosilane Reductions” Organic
flexible synthetic approaches to this class of drugs are outlined
Reactions, Wiley, New York, 71.
herein and follow a similar three-step sequence of preparation of 13. Nadkarni D., Hallissey J.F. (2008) Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 12, 1142.
the appropriate aryl substituent, attachment of the aryl moiety to 14. Czernecki S., Ville G. (1989) J. Org. Chem. 54, 610.
a protected glucose followed by deprotection and modification 15. Kraus G.A., Molina M.T. (1988) J. Org. Chem. 53, 752.
of the anomeric center of the arylated glucose. The use of the 16. Ellsworth B.A., et al. (2003) Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 14, 3243.
gluconolactone intermediate does have the disadvantage of 17. Lemair S., et al. (2012) Org. Lett. 14, 1480.
carrying out an oxidation step to the lactone and a subsequent 18. Nomura S., et al. (2010) J. Med. Chem. 53, 6355.
reduction step, usually carried out with an organosilane. 19. Lee J., et al. (2010) Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18, 2178.
20. Kraus G.A., Frazier K.A., Roth B.D., et al. (1981) J. Org. Chem. 46, 2417.
21. Lemair S., et al. (2012) Org. Lett. 14, 1480.
REFERENCES AND NOTES 22. Xue S., Han K.-Z., He L., et al. (2003) Synlett 870.
23. Halcomb R.L., Danishefsky S.J. (1989) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 6661.
1. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas, 3rd Ed.; 24. Dubbaka S.R., Steunenberg P., Vogel P. (2004) Synlett 1235.
International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2006. 25. Gong H., Gagné M.R. (2008) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 12177.
40 Monographic special issue: Oligos & Peptides - Chimica Oggi - Chemistry Today - vol. 33(2) March/April 2015