High Performance Austenitic Stainless Steel
High Performance Austenitic Stainless Steel
General characteristics
Characteristic properties High performance austenitic stainless steels differ substantially
from more conventional grades with regard to resistance to corro-
• Very good resistance to uniform corrosion sion and, in some cases, also mechanical and physical properties.
• Good to exceptionally good resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion This is mainly due to the high contents of chromium, nickel, molyb-
• Very good resistance to various types of stress corrosion cracking denum and nitrogen. High performance austentic stainless steels
• Very good ductility have good weldability and excellent formability.
• Good weldability Outokumpu manufactures a number of steels of this type:
• Excellent formability 4438, 4439, 904L, 254 SMO®, 4529, 4565 and 654 SMO®.
904L 1.4539 904L N08904 4539-089–04-I 0.01 20.0 25.0 4.3 1.5Cu
254 SMO® 1.4547 – S31254 4547-312-54-I 0.01 0.20 20.0 18.0 6.1 Cu
4529 1.4529 – N08926/N08367 4529-089-26-I 0.01 0.20 20.5 24.8 6.5 Cu
4565 1.4565 – S34565 4565-345-65-I 0.02 0.45 24.0 17.0 4.5 5.5Mn
654 SMO®
1.4652 – S32654 4652-326-54-I 0.01 0.50 24.0 22.0 7.3 3.5Mn Cu
Duplex
Minimum values
according to EN 10088 Typical values
P H C P (15 mm) H (4 mm) C (1 mm)
4438 Proof strength Rp0.2 MPa 220 220 240 300 – –
Proof strength Rp1.0 MPa 260 260 270 340 – –
Tensile strength Rm MPa 520 550 550 610 – –
Elongation A5 % 40 35 35 1
50 – –
Hardness HB – – – – – –
4439 Proof strength Rp0.2 MPa 270 270 290 310 – 415
Proof strength Rp1.0 MPa 310 310 320 350 – 430
Tensile strength Rm MPa 580 580 580 640 – 700
Elongation A5 % 40 35 35 1
50 – 461
Hardness HB – – – – – 862
904L Proof strength Rp0.2 MPa 220 220 240 260 280 340
Proof strength Rp1.0 MPa 260 260 270 285 330 375
Tensile strength Rm MPa 520 530 530 600 600 655
Elongation A5 % 35 35 35 1
50 45 381
Hardness HB – – – 155 150 822
254 SMO® Proof strength Rp0.2 MPa 300 300 320 320 390 375
Proof strength Rp1.0 MPa 340 340 350 350 440 415
Tensile strength Rm MPa 650 650 650 680 740 735
Elongation A5 % 40 35 35 1
50 45 411
Hardness HB – – – 160 190 872
4529 Proof strength Rp0.2 MPa 300 – – 320 – *
Proof strength Rp1.0 MPa 340 – – 340 – *
Tensile strength Rm MPa 650 – – 700 – *
Elongation A5 % 40 – – 50 – *
Hardness HB – – – 180 – *
4565 Proof strength Rp0.2 MPa 420 420 420 440 – *
Proof strength Rp1.0 MPa 460 460 460 480 – *
Tensile strength Rm MPa 800 800 800 825 – *
Elongation A5 % 30 30 30 1
55 – *
Hardness HB – – – 200 – *
654 SMO ®
Proof strength Rp0.2 MPa 430 430 430 460 – 520
Proof strength Rp1.0 MPa 470 470 470 490 – 590
Tensile strength Rm MPa 750 750 750 860 – 950
Elongation A5 % 40 40 40 1
60 – 59
Hardness HB – – – 200 – 226
P=hot rolled plate. H=hot rolled strip. C=cold rolled coil and sheet. *new product, typical values under establishment. 1A80. 2HRB.
Tensile properties at elevated temperatures, minimum values according to EN, MPa Table 3
Physical properties
In Table 4 typical values of some physical properties are given for
grades 4438, 4439, 904L, 254 SMO®, 4565 and 654 SMO®.
Uniform corrosion
The high content of alloying elements gives the steels 4438, 80
4439, 904L, 254 SMO®, 4565 and 654 SMO® exceptionally good
resistance to uniform corrosion.
60
904L was originally developed to withstand environments 654 SMO®
involving dilute sulphuric acid and it is one of the few stainless
254 SMO®
steels that, at temperatures of up to 35°C, provides full resistance 40
in such environments within the entire range of concentration, from
4404
0 to 100%, Figure 1. 904L also offers good resistance to a number 904L
of other inorganic acids, e.g., phosphoric acid, as well as most 20
2
0 4 6 8 10
organic acids. Acids and acid solutions containing halide ions can HCl, weight-%
be very aggressive and the corrosion resistance of grades 4438,
4439 and 904L may be insufficient. Examples of such acids are Fig. 3. Isocorrosion curves, 0.1 mm/year, in pure hydrochloric acid.
hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, chloride contaminated sulphuric
acid, phosphoric acid produced according to the wet process (WPA)
at elevated temperatures, and also pickling acid based on nitric Temperature, °C
acid and hydrofluoric acid mixtures. In these cases 254 SMO®, 100
4529, 4565 and 654 SMO® are preferable and in certain cases
they can be an alternative to other considerably more expensive
80
alloys, Figures 2-5 and Tables 5 and 6.
60
4404
Fig. 4. Isocorrosion curves, 0.1 mm/year, in pure hydrofluoric acid.
40
4404 4565
254 SMO®
20 Temperature, °C
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 100
H2SO4%
80
Fig. 1. Isocorrosion curves, 0.1 mm/year, in pure sulphuric acid.
60
254 SMO®
4404 904L
80
20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
254 SMO® H2SiF6, weight-%
654 SMO®
60
904L Fig. 5. Isocorrosion curves, 0.1 mm/year, in pure fluosilicic acid.
4565
40
4404
20
0 10 20 30 40 50
H2SO4, weight-%, + 2000 ppm Cl-
Fig. 2. Isocorrosion curves, 0.1 mm/year, in sulphuric acid containing 2000 ppm
chloride.
254 SMO ®
0.01
50
4404
4432
4438
4439
904L
254 SMO®
4529
4565
654 SMO®
LDX 2101®
2304
LDX 2404®
2205
2507
Grades 4529, 4565, and especially 654 SMO®, have such a good
resistance to pitting that common test methods are not sufficiently
aggressive to initiate any corrosion. A better measure of resistance
is given by evaluating the results of various crevice corrosion tests.
= less than
70
Temperature, °C
90
60
80
904L c
254 SMO® c
50 70
60
40 904L p
50
254 SMO® p
30
4404 c
40
2205 c
4404 p 2205 p
30
20
20
100 1000 10000 100000
10
Cl- ppm
p=pitting, full line c=crevice corrosion, broken line
0
4307
4404
4432
4438
4439
904L
254 SMO®
4529
4565
654 SMO®
LDX 2101®
2304
LDX 2404®
2205
2507
Fig. 8. Engineering diagram illustrating the risk of pitting and crevice corrosion
on high performance stainless steel in water of different chloride content or
temperature.
Austenitic Duplex
80
60
40
20
<10
0
4404
904L
2507
254 SMO®
654 SMO®
2205
Fig. 9. Typical threshold stresses determined using the drop evaporation test.
Erosion corrosion
Unlike copper alloys, stainless steel generally offers very good
resistance to impingement attack and there are no motives for
limiting the velocity of water, e.g. in piping systems that convey
seawater. Further, stainless steel is not sensitive to seawater that
has been contaminated by sulphur compounds or ammonia.
In systems subjected to particles causing extreme wear, e.g.,
sand or salt crystals, the higher surface hardness of duplex steels
can in some cases be an advantage.
proof strength, work hardening rate and elongation, make the high 100
nitrogen containing grades 4565 and 654 SMO® excellently suited
for light weight and cost effective applications with complex shapes. 0
0 20 40 60
The impact of a high strength varies for different forming tech-
Engineering Plastic Strain (%)
niques. Common for all high performance austenitic grades are that
the estimated forming forces will be higher than for the standard
Fig. 11. Enginering stress-strain curves for high performance austenitic grades
austenitic stainless steel grades. This effect will be reduced if down and standard austenitic grade 4404 (1.0 mm thick cold rolled).
gauging is possible. A common issue for the high strength steels
is the high proof strength which may result in higher demands on
the tool materials and the lubricant. Also in this respect attention 1.4
should be given to the possibility of down gauging.
For more information on forming properties, please contact 1.2
Outokumpu.
1
Cold forming
The high strength of the high nitrogen containing grades 4565 0.8
r-value
and 654 SMO® is clearly demonstrated when the stress- strain 4404
curves of high performance austenitic stainless steel grades are 0.6
904L
compared with the standard austenitic grade 4404, Figure 11. The
deformation hardening rate is almost similar for all the austenitic 0.4 254 SMO®
grades presented in Figure 11.
4565
The formability of Outokumpu’s high performance 0.2
austenitic stainless steel grades can be characterized in several 654 SMO®
ways. A sheet materials ability to withstand thinning during forming 0
is demonstrated by the r-value in different tensile directions and 0 45 90
the higher the r-value the better, 654 SMO® shows excellent Angle to rolling direction
austenitic grades are comparable in that about the same limiting 0.9
drawing ratio can be drawn. 0.8
0.7
Hot forming 0.6
Suitable temperatures for hot forming are shown in Table 9. Higher 0.5
temperatures cause a deterioration in ductility and an increase in 0.4
the formation of oxides (scaling). Normally hot working should be 0.3
followed by solution annealing and quenching but, for 904L, if the 0.2
hot forming is discontinued at a temperature above 1100°C and 0.1
the material is quenched directly thereafter the material may be
0.0
used without subsequent heat treatment. It is important that the 904L 254 SMO® 4565 654 SMO® 4404
entire workpiece has been quenched from temperatures above
1100°C. In the case of partial heating or partial cooling below Fig. 13. Formability ranking of high performance austenitic grades in relation
1100°C or if the cooling has been too slow, hot working should to standard austenitic grade 4404.
always be followed by solution annealing and quenching.
254 SMO®, 4565 and 654 SMO® should be quenched at a
temperature of at least 1150°C after hot working to remove inter-
metallic phases formed during the hot working operation. These
phases can also reoccur if the subsequent cooling process is too
slow, resulting in impaired corrosion resistance.
Rod coil
Bars
Semifinished (bloom, billet, ingot, slab)
Pipe
See also outokumpu.com.
Information given in this brochure may be subject to alterations without notice. Care has been taken to ensure that the contents of this publication are
accurate but Outokumpu and its affiliated companies do not accept responsibility for errors or for information which is found to be misleading. Suggestions for
or descriptions of the end use or application of products or methods of working are for information only and Outokumpu and its affiliated companies accept no
liability in respect thereof. Before using products supplied or manufactured by the company the customer should satisfy himself of their suitability.
[email protected]
outokumpu.com