0% found this document useful (0 votes)
455 views

Assignment 2 Solution (Doctor) PDF

This document provides the solution to an assignment on optimal power flow. It examines three cases: 1) with no line limits where generation is supplied by the cheapest generator, 2) determining line flows by superimposing loads, and 3) imposing a line flow limit that requires a second generator to provide counter-flow. The social welfare problem is formulated and the KKT conditions are derived. Finally, the problem is solved using matrix methods while also considering an alternative approach using previous methods.

Uploaded by

Ahmed Khairi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
455 views

Assignment 2 Solution (Doctor) PDF

This document provides the solution to an assignment on optimal power flow. It examines three cases: 1) with no line limits where generation is supplied by the cheapest generator, 2) determining line flows by superimposing loads, and 3) imposing a line flow limit that requires a second generator to provide counter-flow. The social welfare problem is formulated and the KKT conditions are derived. Finally, the problem is solved using matrix methods while also considering an alternative approach using previous methods.

Uploaded by

Ahmed Khairi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

1 Solution:
a) No line limits:
G1 will supply the total load of 500 MW, since it is cheaper of the two.
Hence, LMP1=LMP2=LMP3=LMP4=10 $/MWh
b) To determine the line flows, consider the two loads separately:
Case 1: with load 320 MW

320 MW

1 2
2z

z z-path z
5z-path

2z
3 4

320 MW

Case 2: with load 180 MW

180 MW

180 MW

1 2
2z

2z-path
z z
4z-path

2z
3 4

1
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

Taking a superposition of the two flows, we have,

500 MW

180 MW

1 2
173.33 MW
2z
326.67 z z
MW 6.67 MW
2z
6.67 MW
3 4

320 MW

c) Line flow limit: 250 MW on all lines:

When the line flow limit is imposed, G1 will not be able to support all the power, G4 needs to be
scheduled. G4 will generate that much power, such that a counter-flow is produced to keep P13
line flow within limits.
PG1=500-x

1 2
2z

3z-path
z z
3z-path

2z
3 4

PG4=x

If PG4=x MW

counter flow is produced.

And to help P13 within the limits, the counter-flow required is,

2
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

( )

Or, x=153.34 MW generation at G4

And 500-x=346.66 MW generation at G1.

Now, LMP1=10$/MWh : 1MW extra load at Bus-1 is served by G1

LMP4=20 $/MWh : 1MW extra load at Bus-4 is served by G4

For 1 MW extra load at Bus-3:

Solving, we have: PG1=-2/3 MW, PG4=5/3 MW

For 1MW extra load at Bus-2:

Solving, we have: PG1=1/3 MW, PG4=2/3 MW

3
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

2 Solution:
The social welfare is defined as,

( ) ( ) ( )

We consider the objective ―-SW‖ for minimization,

Min, ( ) ( ) ( )

Or

( ) ( ) ( )

Now given that

̅̅̅̅ and ̅̅̅̅

thus, the Y-Bus matrix is:

[ ]

And accordingly, the susceptance matrix [B] is,

[ ]

The dc load flow equations are given by

[ ] [ ][ ]

that is,

[ ] [ ][ ]

Considering Bus-1 as the reference bus, i.e., δ1=0, we have,

( )

4
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

Thus, the Lagrangian function is formulated as,

( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )

The KKT conditions so obtained are,

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

From (3) we have, = 4.25 $/MWh, and (4) gives = 4.25 $/MWh

Substituting and in (5), we get = 4.25 $/MWh.

Thus, from (1) and (2) we have,

MW, and MW

From (6), we have,

and from (7), we get,

5
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

Finally, from (8),

MW

Now the line flows can be obtained as,

( )

( )

We see that line 1—3 is congested, thus the new Lagrangian, considering line flow limit on line
1—3, is given by:

( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )

The KKT conditions so obtained are,

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

6
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

Using matrix to solve (1) – (9): [A][x]=[b]

[ ][ ] [ ]

then, [x]=[A]-1[b] gives:

[ ] [ ]

Power Flows:

( )

( )

******************************************************************************

The problem can also be solved in the previous method (as used for the case of without line
limits):

From (3) and (4), $/MWh.


From (9), rad, and then (6) gives MW, and (2) gives MW.
Thus, from (1), $/MWh, and from (5) $/MWh.
From (7), rad, and thus, from (8), MW.

7
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

3 Solution:

a) Perfect competition, Demand = 500MW

( ) ( ) ( )

b) East: , ; West: , .
With no transmission limit: All generators and demands work as a single system.

Similarly,

With transmission limit:


a. West side:
( ) ( )
Solving, we get:

b. East side:
Solving, we get:

8
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

4 Solution:
a)

With no transmission limit:

b) With transmission limit: Line 2-1 is congested. So the market is split as East and West,
where Area-2 as East and Areas 1 and 3 as West.

 East side:

Solving, we get:

9
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

 West side:

( ) ( )
( ) ( )
Solving, we get:

c)
( )
( )

Customer-Y pays $1465.65/h


( )

Customer-X receives $1,465.65/h


*********************************************************************
5 Solution:
;

$/MWh
MW ; MW

10
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

6 Solution:
a)

( ) ( )

b) Power flows from Region-2 to Region-1 = 75.38 MW


c) Maximum line capacity = 50 MW
Region-1

; ;
Region-2

; ;
Congestion rent: ( )

11
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

7 Solution:

12
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

13
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

14
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

ii) Congestion charge for customer at bus-3 = (30 – 20)*200 = 2000 $/h
FTR credit = 200*(30 – 20) = 2000 $/h
Net payment = 0 $/MWh

15
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

8 Solution:

16
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

East side:

DFEE = 1; GSFE = 0 (as East is the reference).


( )

17
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

West side

FTR credit = FTR amount * ( ) ( )


Total benefit to E and F = 1210.4 – 1068 = $ 142.4
Customer D:
No congestion rent.
FTR credit = FTR amount * ( ) ( )
Customer D will receive $ 1602 from transmission operator.

18
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

9 Solution:
a)

 With no transmission limit:

 With transmission limit:

o West side:

( )
Solving, we get:

o East side:

( ) ( )
Solving, we get:

b)
( )

( )

19
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

( )

Customer-X receives $1,079/hr

10 Solution:

Available Loading Capacity System or Area-1 to


System or Network
on Limiting Facility (ALC), Path ATC, Area-4
Path Response (%)
MW MW ATC
Area-1 5 70 1400
Area-2 10 200 2000
Area-3 14 130 928.6
Area-4 11 175 1590.9
Tie 1-2 20 400 2000 928.6 MW
Tie 1-3 80 1200 1500
Tie 2-3 15 250 1666.67
Tie 2-4 10 200 2000
Tie 3-4 90 900 1000

a) The transaction of 1000 MW between Area-1 to Area-4 is not feasible.


b) The ATC for the interconnection is 928.6 MW and the limiting facility of Area-3
determines the ATC.

20
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

11 Solution:

21
ECE 666 Assignment 2 Solution Winter 2014

ii) ACE for both the areas will be zero as all generators are on AGC.
Thus, the loss of load in Area-A will be taken care of generators in that area, and generation in
area A will be 2900 MW with 3400 MW of load, while area B generation and loads, and the tie-
line power flow will remain unchanged.

22

You might also like