A STUDY ON EMPLOYEES JOB SATISFACTION IN IRRULPPA MILL IN

DINDUGAL DISTRICT

PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED TO MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY IN PARTAIL

FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR

THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF

BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTATION OF

MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY, MADURAI

SUBMITTED BY

R.Tamilselvan
(Reg.No:B5B12828)

PROJECT GUIDE

N.BALA MURUGAN MBA PGDHRM

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES

MARY MATHA COLLEGE
PERIYAKULAM- 625604

MARCH- 2018
 CERTIFICATE

This is certify that the project Title” EMPLOYEES JOB SATIFSFACTION IN

IRULLUPPA MILL Dindugal district submitted to Madurai Kama raj University in
partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of BACHELOR
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION TAMILSELVAN.R (Reg. No: B5B12828) of
BBA during the year 2017-2018.

HOD PROJECT GUIDE

Submitted for the Viva – Voice Examination held on …………………….

Internal Examiner External Examiner

 DECLARATION

I hereby that the project entitled A Study On Employees Job satisfaction in Dindugal
district“ is my original report study work for the award of Bachelor of Business
Administration. It has not previously formed as the basis for the award of any degree fellowship
or any other similarities.

Place: Mary Matha College

Date: Signature of the candidate

 BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the project entitled, “A Study on Employees Job

Satisfaction

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would to express my sincere thanks to Rev. Fr. ISSAC PJ. CMI, Principal, Mary
Matha Arts and Science College, Nallakaruppanpatti for providing necessary arrangement to
perform this study.

I sincerely express my profound gratitude to head of the Department, Business

Administration, for his initiating support extent me to undertake this study.

It is my immense pleasure to express my grateful thanks to my faculty guide

N.BALAMURUGAN M.BA PGDHRM for his inspiration and valuable guidance in completions
of this project successf I convey my sincere thanks to Dr. S. JOSEPH XAVIER
M.com., MBA.,M.Ed., M.phil., Ph.D., Head of the department of Management Studies. Who
gave him invaluable tips to take to make this research work.

I thank my Department staff Mr. DR.SRITHER M.A M.PHIL PHD SET&Mr.

J.PRAWIN.MBA., Mphil.,SET(Ph)&Ms.B.BALADEEPIKA.MBA.,MPhil., for his support of
the research work. I thank beloved parents, family and friends.

ully.
 CONTENTS

CHAPTER TITLE Page No

Introduction

2 Objective of the Study

3 Scope of the Study

4 Limitation of study

5 Industry Profile

6 Company Profile

7 Research Methodology

8 Data analysis and Interpretation

9 Findings

10 Suggestion

11 Conclusion
 LIST OF TABLE

S .NO LIST OF TABLE PAGE NO

1) Gender of the respondents

2) Age of the respondents

3) Married status

4) Salary of the respondents

5) Qualification of the respondents

6) How many years working in IRULAPPA MILLS

7) Your work is according to qualification and skills

8) You satisfied with top management

9) Satisfied with the working hours at IRULAPPA MILLS

10) Level of satisfaction for performance appraisal

11) Criteria of performance evaluation

12) Authority to performance duties effectively

13) Feel of your present work load

14) Motivating factors

15) Satisfaction level of lunch and break

16) Level of job secured

17) Retirement benefits are sufficient

18) Satisfaction level of Medical benefits

19) I feel that my work recognizes

20) Your overall satisfaction of IRULAPPA MILLS

 LIST OF CHART

S.NO LIST OF CHART PAGE

NO
1) Gender of the respondents

2) Age of the respondents

3) Married status

4) Salary of the respondents

5) Qualification of the respondents

6) How many years working in IRULAPPA MILLS

7) Your work is according to qualification and skills

8) You satisfied with top management

9) Satisfied with the working hours at IRULAPPA MILLS

10) Level of satisfaction for performance appraisal

11) Criteria of performance evaluation

12) Authority to performance duties effectively

13) Feel of your present work load

14) Motivating factors

15) Satisfaction level of lunch and break

16) Level of job secured

17) Retirement benefits are sufficient

18) Satisfaction level of Medical benefits

19) I feel that my work recognizes

20) Your overall satisfaction of IRULAPPA MILLS

1. INTRODUCTION OF THE EMPLOYEES JOB SATISFACTION

 Employee job satisfaction is the terminology used to describe whether

employee are happy contented and fulfilling their desires and needs at work

many measures purpose that employee job satisfaction is a factor in

employee motivation, employee goal achievement and positive employee

morale in the work place.

 Employee job satisfaction refers to a person feeling of satisfaction on

the job. Which act of a motivation to work. It is not self – satisfaction,

happiness or self contentment but it deals with satisfaction on the job.

 The job satisfaction relates to the total relationship between an

individual and the employee for which he paid satisfaction Does mean for

which he is paid satisfaction mean the simple feeling – state accompanying

the attainment by an impelled objective.

 OBJECTIVES ON THE STUDY:

 To measure the employee job satisfaction level of IRULAPPA Mills.

 To study the employee perception towards organization.

 To identify the factors that motivates the employees.

 To give suggestions for the growth & perspective of the company.

 Know the satisfaction level of existing reward system.

SCOPE ON THE STUDY:

 Job satisfaction is an important output employee work for

organization.

 The report is useful to the management of the company to know the

satisfaction levels of employee and they can take measure to increase

productivity.

 This report may be useful to the management students for reading, and

may be useful in preparing their report on the job satisfaction “in

business concerns public organization.

 A study made on the topic of job satisfaction will reveal the factor of

feeling of Employees.
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

 There were many procedural and bureaucratic delays in getting the

questionnaire filled.

 Due to the vast area the arability of few respondents was difficult.

 It time at disposal of the researcher was limited

 The perception of the individual employees defers.

 There was only limited time to conduct the survey.

1.5 RESEARCH METHODSOLOGY

Primary data:

 Primary data’s are collected from the respondents through structured

interview schedule.

Secondary data:

 Secondary data’s are collected from various material magazines and

internet.

Sampling methods:

 The main objective of the study is to measure the attitude of the customer
towards IRULAPPA MILLS INDIA PVT LTD for this purpose sample
of 50 customers were selected through convenience sampling method.
These 50 sample respondents belongs to various socio – economic status
favouring the objective of the study
Sample size:

 The researcher has takes the sample size 50 respondents for the research
purpose. Sample size has been decided with a consideration of the
available time and the Expenses for the researchers.
Sample Area:
 The Sample area is IRULAPPA MILLS INDIA PVT LTD
SEVUGAMPATT

Tools:

 Tables

 Pie chart

 Bar chart

 Column chart
 1. REVIEW OF LITERATURE:

Casiemik.R.Adams D.W (2002) spiritually and work [Electronic version]

Employee Assistance Quarterly 18-2-2937 Deben .G.Willensen T.M. Sanders

K.Veldboron M.J.P.M (2009) Emotional.

Exhaustion and mental health problem among employee doing “people work”

The impart of job resource and family-to-work conflict [Electronic

version].International Archives of occupational and Environment Health 82.3, 291-
303

Doolittle B.R (2007) Burnout and aping Parish-based chergy [Electronic version]
mental Health Religion &Culture 10.1.31-38 frame M.W SheehanC.L (1994) work
and Well-being in the two-person career Relocation stress and coping among
clergy husbands and wives [Electronic version]. Family Relation 43.196-205

Hang – java X.FoleySlopR (2005) work role stressors and turnover intentions a
study of professional cherry in Hong Kong [Electronic version] International
Journal of HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 16.11.2133-2146

Lee.solshfski D (2002) Employee Commitments and fire fighters it’s my job

[Electronic version] Public Administration Review 62.108-114
Lewis C.A Tuition D.W Francis L.J.2007 clergy work –related psychology health
stress and burnout an introduction to this special issue of mental health. Religion
and culture [Electronic version] mental health religion & culture 10, 1, 1-8

Laurel M. AbdellaouiS.ChavaleyreS.PaltierM.GanaK (2008) Relation between

Psychological jobs controls

Minor’s (2007) change in burnout over. The first 12 month in ministry link with

stress and orientation to ministry [Electronic version] Mental Health Religion &

Culture
INDUSTRIAL PROFILE

 In modern fashion technology the demand for perfection begins right at the

birth if the raw material, permeates through every single process, till the highly

discerning customer dons the finished garment. It is this demand for perfection

that has spurred the growth of an organization and its corporate philosophy.

 Those who can furnish clients with the best quality, competitive price excellent

customer service and prompt delivery can only survey in the market super

spinning mills limited take immense pride in perceiving its role as the

comprehensive architect of every single yarn that its produces.

 Sara Elgin is a multi – unit multi – interest business group with a wide range of

industrial activity, an organisation that has founded its evolution on value –

based commercial practice. Super spinning mills limited was established in

1962 with an initial capacity of 12,000spindles.

 Over its four decades of chequered growth it has expanded to 1, 66,526 spindles

spread over 4 operational unit the company commenced operations with the

manufacture of grey, gassed mercerised and dyed cotton yarn. Today, the

company has carved a niche on the textile map of the country.

 India spinning industry has gone from strength to strength since a very long

time now as it was the hub of cotton manufacturing

 . Cotton is not only consumed to the highest extent in India but it has also

become one of the most profitable textiles in the export industry.

 Spinning in India can be classification into 2 categories: medium and long

staple but here was a shortfall in the extra – long categories that continued for

continued for many years. There was a massive downfall in the cotton spinning

in India during 2004 – 2005. The production rate of cotton was about 4 lakh

bales. Mr. P. D Patodai, the Chair

 man of the standing Committee on cotton, CITI – CDRA said that the

manufacturing of cotton will rise to 11 – 12 lakes bales in 2010.

 The present downfall in the cotton production has witnessed a 50 % increase in

the price of India varieties of ELS, which is detrimental for the spinning

industry in India. Spinning mills require domestic accessibility of ELS cotton in

increased quantity and of better fibbers qualities.

To survive this downfall in the cotton trade which is a highly profitable textile in
the India spinning industry, CITI - CDRA is conducting a conference with various
research organizations such as CICR (Nagpur), JNKVV (KHANDWA) USA
(award) and Regional Textile Mills’ Association in R&D activities. It conducted a
discussion pertaining to the development of new varieties or seeds and adopting
the advanced procedure of cultivation which will add to the profit in the cotton
textile sector of the spinning industry. The most important and
 Efficient step towards the resurgence of cotton manufacturing of cotton develop

the ELS varieties with lesser duration crops and yield to cost effectiveness and

consistency in cultivation. This will not only motivate the farmers but will also

make them stick to the desired sector of cotton crop.

 The yarn spinning industry covers almost 25 percent of the total industrial

production of one of the words 10 largest economics. Trends are reviewed

every year in accordance with the needs and fashion. An elaborate and detailed

assessment is made on various sectors of the yarn spinning such as, production

consumption, and materials. The legislative and the political consequences are

also reviewed at the same time. In addition to it, other areas that are being

reviewed in the yarn spinning sector are export, import, price, advertising, and

sales promotion patterns.

 COMPANY PROFILE

NAME : IRULAPPA MILLS INDIA PVT ltd.,

LOCATION : SEVUGAMPATTI.

LINE OF ACTIVITY : TEXTILE SPINNING.

DATE OF INCORPORATION : 1994.

MANAGING DIRECTOR : Mr. PRAPU.

BANKERS : STATE BANK OF INDIA.

SECTOR : PRIVATE SECTOR.

CAPACITY OF THE MILLS : 1200 TONS PERANNUM.

NUMBER OF SPINDER : 11000.

NUMBER OF WORKERS : 300 WORKERS.

OFFICE :1

NUMBER OF SHIFT : 3 SHIFTS.

SHIFT TIME OF THE WORKER : 1st SHIFT 8 AM TO 4 PM.

2nd SHIFT 4 AM TO 12 PM.

3rd SHIFT 12 AM TO 8 AM.

CAPTION : “QUALITY TO YOURS

SATISFACTION OUR PROFESSION”.
 TABLE: 4.1

1. GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS.

SNO GENDER NO OF PERCENTAGE

REAPONDENCE (%)

1 Male 35 70

2 Female 15 30

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 70% of the respondents of male, 44%

respondents are Female.

Majority of the respondents are Male.

 CHART: 4.1

1.GENDREN OF THE RESPOND

70
80

60
30
40

20
PERCENTAGE (%)

0
Male Female
 TAPLE: 4.2

2. AGE GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

SNO AGE NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENCE (%)

1 Below 25 9 18

2 25 to 30 31 62

3 More than 10 20

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 62% of the age group 25 to 30, 20% of the

more than, 18% of the age group below25.

Majority of the respondents are 25-30

 CHART:4.2

2. AGE GROUP OF THE RESPONDENTS

20 18

Below 25
25 to 30
More than
62
 TABLE: 4.3

3. Married status OF THE RESPONDENTS

SNO MARRIED NO OF PERCENTAGE

STATUS RESPONDENCE (%)

1 Married 26 52

2 Un married 24 48

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 52% of the respondents of married, 48%

respondents are Unmarried.

Majority of the respondents are Married.

 CHART: 4.3

3. Married status OF THE RESPONDENTS

PERCENTAGE (%)
Married Un married

48%

52%
 TABLE: 4.4

4. SALARY OF THE RESPONDENTS

S.N0 PARTICULAR NO.OFRESPONDENS PERCENTAGE

1 4000 to 5000 19 38

2 5000 to 6000 25 50

3 Above 6000 6 12

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above showing that 50% of the respondents are salary 5000 to 6000,

38% of the respondents is salary 4000 to 5000, 12%of the respondents above

6000.

Majority of the respondents are from the salary 5000 to 6000

 CHART:4.4

4. SALARY OF THE RESPONDENTS

50
50

45
38
40

35

30

25

20
12
15

10

0
1 2 3
TABLE: 4.5

5. Qualification OF THE RESPONDENTS

SNO QUALIFICATION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENCE (%)

1 SSLC 8 16

2 HSC 22 44

3 Other 20 40

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 44% of the respondents HSC, 40% of the

respondents other, 16% of the respondents are SSLC.

Majority of the respondents are from the other Qualification HSC.

 CHART: 4.5

5. Qualification OF THE RESPONDENTS

45

40

35

30

25
44
40
20

15

10 16

0
SSLC HSC Other
 TABLE: 4.6

6. How many years working in IRULAPPA MILLS

SNO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENCE (%)

1 Less than 11 22

2years

2 2-4 years 28 56

3 More than 4 11 22

years

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 56% of the respondents are 2-4years, 22% of

the respondents are less than 2 years, 22% of the respondents are more than

4 years.
 6. How many years working in IRULAPPA MILLS

PERCENTAGE (%)

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
Less than 2years 2-4 years More than 4 years

PERCENTAGE (%)
 TABLE:4.7

7. Your work is according to qualification and skills

SNO OPINION NO OF PRCENTAGE

RESPONDENCE (%)

1 Yes 30 60

2 No 20 40

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

1. The above table showing that 60% of the respondents are Yes, 40% of

the respondents are No

2. Majority of the respondents are Y

 CHART :4.7

7. Your work is according to qualification and skills

PRCENTAGE (%)

No
40%

Yes
60%
 TABLE: 4.8

8. You satisfied with top management

SNO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENCE (%)

1 Yes 21 42

2 No 29 58

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 58% of the respondents are No, 48% of the

respondents Yes.

Majority of the respondents are No

 CHART:4.8

8. You satisfied with top management

PERCENTAGE (%)

No

Yes

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

PERCENTAGE (%)
 TABLE:4.9

9. Satisfied with the working hours at IRULAPPA MILLS

S NO OPINION NO PERCENTAGE

OFRESPONDENCE (%)

1 Yes 33 66

2 No 17 34

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 66% of the respondents are yes, 34% of the

respondents are No either yes

 CHART:4.9

9. Satisfied with the working hours at IRULAPPA MILLS

34
No

66
Yes

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
 TABLE:4.10

10. Level of satisfaction for performance appraisal

S OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

NO RESPONDENCE (%)

1 Highly 9 18

satisfied

2 Satisfied 36 72

3 Dissatisfied 5 10

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 72% of the respondents are Satisfied, 18% of

the respondents are Highly satisfied,10% of the respondents are Dissatisfied.

 CHART: 4.10

10. Level of satisfaction for performance appraisal

Dissatisfied 10

Satisfied 72

Highly satisfied 18

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
 TABLE :4.11

11. Criteria of performance evaluation

S NO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE(%)

RESPONDENCE

1 Skills 8 16

2 Performance 15 30

3 Qualification 21 42

4 Experience 6 12

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 42% of the respondents are Qualification, 30% of the

respondents are Performance, 16% of the respondents are Skills,12% of the respondents

are Experience.

Majority of the respondents are Qualification.

 CHART: 4.11

11. Criteria of performance evaluation

12 16

Skills
Performance
Qualification
Experience
30
42
 TABLE:4.12

12. Authority to performance duties effectively

S NO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENCE (%)

1 Yes 43 86

2 No 7 14

TOTAL 50 1OO

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above table showing that 86% of the respondents are Yes, 32% of the respondents

are No.

Majority of the respondents are yes.

 CHART:4.12

12. Authority to performance duties effectively

PERCENTAGE (%)
Yes No

14%

86%
 TABLE:4.13

13. Feel of your present work load

S NO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENCE

1 Heavy 5 10

2 Neutral 25 50

3 Low 20 40

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above showing that 50% of the respondents are Neutral, 40% of the respondents

are Low, 10% of the respondents are Heavy.

Majority of the respondents are Neutral.

 CHART: 4.13

13. Feel of your present work load

10

40

50
 TABLE:4.14

14. Motivating factors

SNO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPONDENCE (%)

1 Agree 6 12

2 Neutral 19 38

3 Low 25 50

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above showing that 50% of the respondents Low, 38% of the respondents are

Neutral, 12% of the respondents are Agree.

Majority of the respondents areLow

 CHART: 4.14

14. Motivating factors

50

45

40

35

30

25
50
20
38
15

10
12
5

Agree
Neutral
Low
 TABLE: 4.15

15. Satisfaction level of lunch and break

S NO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPOANDENCE (%)

1 Strongly agree 15 30

2 Agree 20 40

3 Neither agree or 5 10

disagree

4 Disagree 10 20

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above showing that 40% of the respondents are Agree, 30% of the respondents are

Strongly agree, 20% of the respondents are Disagree, 10% of the respondents are Neither

agree or disagree.Majority of the respondents areAgr

 CHART4.15

15. Satisfaction level of lunch and break

PERCENTAGE (%)
Strongly agree Agree Neither agree or disagree Disagree

40

30

20

10

Strongly agree Agree Neither agree or Disagree

disagree
 TABLE:4.16

16. Level of job secured

S NO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPOANDENCE (%)

1 Strongly agree 17 34

2 Agree 23 46

3 Neither agree or 7 14

disagree

4 Disagree 3 6

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above showing that 46% of the respondents are Agree, 34% of the respondents are

Strongly agree, 14% of the respondents are Neither agree or disagree, 6% of the

respondents are Disagree.

Majority of the respondents areAgree.

 CHART: 4.16

16. Level of job secured

PERCENTAGE (%)
Strongly agree Agree Neither agree or disagree Disagree

6%

14%

34%

46%

TABLE: 4.17
17. Retirement benefits are sufficient

S NO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPOANDENCE (%)

1 Strongly agree 18 36

2 Agree 20 40

3 Neither agree or 9 18

disagree

4 Disagree 3 6

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above showing that 40% of the respondents are Agree, 36% of the respondents are

Strongly agree, 18% of the respondents are Neither agree or disagree, 6% of the

respondents are Disagree.

Majority of the respondents are Agree

.
 CHART: 4.17

17. Retirement benefits are sufficient

36 40
40
35
30
25
20
15 18
10
5
0
6
Strongly agree
Agree

Neither agree or
disagree Disagree

TABLE:4.18
18.Satisfaction of Medical benfit

S NO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPOANDENCE (%)

1 Strongly agree 18 36

2 Agree 19 38

3 Neither agree or 8 16

disagree

4 Disagree 5 10

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above showing that 38% of the respondents are Agree, 36% of the respondents are

Strongly agree, 16% of the respondents are Neither agree or disagree, 10% of the

respondents are Disagree.

Majority of the respondents are Agree.

 CHART: 4.18

18. Satisfaction level of Medical benef

40
38
36

35

30

25

20

16
15

10
10

Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree or
disagree Disagree
 TABLE:4.19

19. I feel that my work recognizes

S NO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE

RESPOANDENCE (%)

1 Strongly agree 16 32

2 Agree 13 26

3 Neither agree or 17 34

disagree

4 Disagree 4 8

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above showing that 34% of the respondents are Neither agree or disagree, 32% of

the respondents are Strongly agree, 26% of the respondents are Agree , 8% of the

respondents are Disagree.

Majority of the respondents areNeither agree or disagree.

 CHART:4.19

19. I feel that my work recognizes

8
Disagree

34
Neither agree or disagree

26
Agree

32
Strongly agree

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
 TABLE: 4.20

20. Your overall satisfaction of IRULAPPA MILLS

S NO OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE (%)

RESPONDENCE

1 Highly satisfied 16 32

2 Satisfied 24 48

3 Average 10 20

4 Dissatisfied 0 0

TOTAL 50 100

Source: primary data

Interpretation:

The above showing that 48% of the respondents are Satisfied, 32% of the respondents are

highly Satisfied, 20% of the respondents are Average, 0% of the respondents are

Dissatisfied.

Majority of the respondents are Satisfied.

 CHART: 4.20

20. Your overall satisfaction of IRULAPPA MILLS

50

45

40

35

30

25 48

20
32
15

20
10

0
0
Highly satisfied Satisfied Average Dissatisfied
5.1 Finding

1. Majority of the respondents are Male.

2. Majority of the respondents are 25-30 Age groups.

3. Majority of the respondents are Married.

4. Majority of the respondents are from the salary 5000 to 6000.

5. Majority of the respondents are from the other Qualification HSC.

6. Majority of the respondents are 2-4 years.

7.Majority of the respondents are yes.

8. Majority of the respondents are No.

9. Majority of the respondents are Yes

10. Majority of the respondents are Satisfied.

11. Majority of the respondents are Qualification.

12. Majority of the respondents are Yes.

13. Majority of the respondents are Neutral.

14. Majority of the respondents are Low

15. Majority of the respondents are Agree.

16. Majority of the respondents are Agree.

17. Majority of the respondents are Agree.

18. Majority of the respondents are Agree.

19. Majority of the respondents are neither agree or disagree.

20. Majority of the respondents are Satisfied

SUGGESTION

 Suggestion of the superior should solve employee grievance effectively.

 Monthly once should be meeting conducted between HR and the employee

monthly once.

 Need much more effective training.

 Proper award (both monetary & non-monetary).

 Should be provided to extra ordinary performance.

 Provide all kinds of loans with low interest to the employees.

CONCLUSION

 A study on employee job satisfaction in IRULAPPA MILLS SEVUGAMPATTI.

From the study we understand that the majority of worker as colliding production

department, worker mostly are in the age group of above 40 years and most them

are female. They get marketing and workers. Most of the workers get between

8000 to 10000 and they are married. They come to work for maintaining their

nuclear family.

 Most of the workers opinion about their fob and job related questions were

strongly agree and agree that their relationship with their superiors. Sub-ordinates

and co-workers are good.

Bibliography

Improve employee satisfaction by ochallaryan.

Publication: credit union management,#

Date: Thursday, January 1, 2018

Employee job satisfaction in work groups with different gender composition.

Author’ Blum, terry, c.Fieldsdaill

Publisher: John Wiley & sons, Inc.,

Publication Name: journal of organization behavior

 EMPLOYEE ON JOB SATISFACTION

QUESTIONAIRES:

1) Gender:

A) Male b) Female

2) Age:

a) Below25 b) 25to30 c) More than

3) Married status:

a) Married b) Unmarried

4) Salary:

a) 4000to5000 b) 5000to6000 c) Above 6000

5) Qualification:

a) SSLC b) HSC c) Other

6) Since how many years have you been working with IRULAPPA MILLS?

a)Less than 2 years b) 2-4years c) More than 4 years

7) Do you think your work is according to your Qualification and skills?

a) Yes b) No
8) Are you satisfied with the top management?

a) Yes b) No

9) Are satisfied with the working hours at IRULAPPA MILLS?

a) Yes b) No

10) State your level of satisfaction towards the performance appraisal?

a) Highly satisfied b) Satisfied c) Dissatisfied

11) Rank the criteria used for the performance evaluation?

a) Skills b) Performance c) Qualification d) Experience

12) Do you have necessary authority to perform your duties effectively?

a) Yes b)No

13) What do you feel above the present work load?

a) Heavy b) Neutral c)Low

14) Which of the following factor which motivates your most?

a) Agree b) Neutral c) Disagree

15) I am satisfied with the lunch break rest breaks and leaves given in the Organization?

a) Strongly agree b) Agree c) Neither agree nor disagree d) Disagree

16) The employee in the organization feels secured in their job?

 a) Strongly agree b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree d) Disagree

17) The retirement benefits available are sufficient?

a) Strongly agree b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree d) Disagree

18) The medical benefits provided in organization are satisfactory?

a) Strongly agree b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree d) Disagree

19) I feel that my superior always recognizes the work done by me

a) Strongly agree b) Agree

c) Neither agree nor disagree d) Disagree

20) Your overall satisfaction as an employee of IRULAPPA MILLS?

a) Highly satisfied b) Satisfied

c) Average d) Dissatisfied