Scribd
Upload
3K views

Experts Validation Instrument For Student Checklist

The document is an evaluation instrument for experts to rate a competency-based learning module in ICT. It contains three sections for evaluation: format and design, language and style, and content. Experts are asked to rate each criteria on a 5-point scale from very highly effective to not effective. The instrument also provides space for comments and suggestions from evaluators. It collects the evaluator's name, position, school, and address.

Uploaded by

Emarilyn Bayot
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views

Experts Validation Instrument For Student Checklist

The document is an evaluation instrument for experts to rate a competency-based learning module in ICT. It contains three sections for evaluation: format and design, language and style, and content. Experts are asked to rate each criteria on a 5-point scale from very highly effective to not effective. The instrument also provides space for comments and suggestions from evaluators. It collects the evaluator's name, position, school, and address.

Uploaded by

Emarilyn Bayot
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Appendix C

EXPERTS VALIDATION INSTRUMENT FOR STUDENT CHECKLIST


DIRECTIONS: Listed are criteria for evaluating the Competency-Based Learning Module in ICT – CSS NC II.
Please rate each item by choosing the corresponding equivalent on the five-point scale.

CRITERIA
Very Highly Highly Moderately Less Not
Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
5 4 3 2 1
I. FORMAT AND DESIGN
1). The appearance is neat and
organize.
2). The layout is legible and
presented in appropriate
format.
3). The layout is attractive and
uniform.
4). The font style and size used are
comprehensible and
understandable.
5). Variety of sentence structure
and
length contributes to the ease
of
reading and responding.
II. LANGUAGE AND STYLE
1). The paper is free of misspelling
and words are capitalized
correctly.
2). Language used are precise and
rich.
3). The vocabulary or word choice
used to convey meaning are
specific and carefully chosen.
4). Sentences are punctuated
correctly and free of fragments
and run-ons.
5). The checklist is free from
grammatical error.
III. CONTENT
1). The items clearly defines the
topic and its significance.
2). Thorough and detailed
explanations and concepts
about
71
Authentic Performance Task are
given.
3). The content of the paper goes
beyond superficial discussion of
the Competency-Based Learning
Module and includes actual
connections to practice and
experiences.
4). Each statements reflect actual
learning and teaching
situations.
5). The items are sound convenient,
useful, and proper for a
learning/teaching style
checklist.

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS:
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________

EVALUATOR’S NAME: __________________________________ POSITION: ________________________


SCHOOL: ____________________________________________ ADDRESS: ________________________

You might also like