Mendiguchia 2012 Rectus Femoris Muscle Injuries in Football-A Clinically Relevant Review of Mechanisms of Injury, Risk Factors and Preventive Strategies PDF
Mendiguchia 2012 Rectus Femoris Muscle Injuries in Football-A Clinically Relevant Review of Mechanisms of Injury, Risk Factors and Preventive Strategies PDF
net/publication/230619088
CITATIONS READS
37 2,497
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Genetic and Environmental Causes of Overweight and Obesity in Children View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Fernando Idoate on 28 January 2015.
Br Copyright Articledoi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091250
J Sports Med 2012;0:1–9. author (or their employer) 2012. Produced by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd under licence. 1
Downloaded from bjsm.bmj.com on September 10, 2012 - Published by group.bmj.com
Review
Figure 1 Three-dimensional reconstructions (A: anteroposterior proyection, B: lateral proyection) of muscle (blue) and tendons of rectus femoris,
and iliac and femur bones (orange) obtained from segmentation of multiple series of MRI of a professional soccer player. Surface models of the
bones, tendons and muscles were generated from two-dimensional outlines (C: image obtained at the level of proximal coxofemoral joint, green
arrow at A; D: image obtained at level of distal major trochanter, grey arrow at B) that were drawing manually using an specific software
(SliceOmatic, Montreal). The proximal tendon is composed of a superficial, anterior portion from the direct head (yellow) that originates from the
anterior-inferior iliac spine, and a deep intramuscular portion from the indirect head (red) emerging from the posterior-superior acetabular ridge. This
figure is only reproduced in colour in the online version.
myotendinous junction is maintained is defined by the presence to unrestricted activity have been recently demonstrated after a
of a high-intensity signal either focally or diffusely at the myo- non-operative treatment.30–32
tendinous junction on fluid-sensitive images. A feathery appear- Hughes et al22 defined the term ‘bull’s eye sign’, to describe
ance of the muscle on all pulse sequences is consistent with the increased signal around the rectus femoris intrasubstance
interstitial haemorrhage and oedema. Acute grade II tears show tendon, seen in 65% of players (figure 3). Gyftopoulos et al10
partial disruption of the myotendinous junction with interstitial suggested this sign represented evolving stages of injury (early
feathery high-intensity signal or haematoma. Low signal repre- oedema and haemorrhage, later increased vascularity and scar-
senting either fibrosis or haemosiderin can be seen in chronic ring) around the deep tendon. A bull’s eye sign with secondary
injuries (figure 2). Grade III tears are complete myotendinous atrophy and fatty infiltration of the muscle around the tendon
disruption with or without retraction, and even that surgical reflects an old injury. Occasionally, a pseudo cyst, produced by
intervention has been classically recommended, successful return serous fluid in the haematoma, is noted at the site of tear.
Review
Review
these forces must be absorbed is short.44 Body positioning in Ground contact phase
the deceleration phase is adjusted to allow for the substantial The association between muscle injuries and dry weather sug-
eccentric forces to be absorbed and dispersed throughout the gests that the mechanism of quadriceps muscle strain may
body. The trunk assumes a more erect posture (in relation to involve a closed kinetic chain activity. In fact, foot to ball
the lower body) and posterior lean during deceleration, moving contact is much lower than ground reaction forces in the decel-
the centre of mass posterior to the base of support.45 46 This eration at the final step of the kicking leg. Ground contact
results in additional horizontal braking forces and consequently during kicking is associated with high external forces (ground
more eccentric force imposed on the quadriceps, though reaction force) but at the same time less angular velocity
increasing its moment arm in actions like kicking or sudden because the large muscle moments are opposed by the ground
changes of direction hypothetically predisposing the rectus reaction forces. Deceleration during a kicking motion causes
femoris to injury. the body to lean backwards and the leg to move farther
behind the body than normal, which places extra stress and
Kicking strain on the rectus femoris. Upper body extension may result
The most common mechanism of rectus femoris muscle injury in increased external knee flexion and internal quadriceps
in soccer is kicking.13 47 Kicking is a momentum-assisted moments during kicking. This may be explained by an increase
motion, with much of the work performed eccentrically in the in the quadriceps moment arm and may be related to
early phases by proximal muscle groups and the resulting injury.1 51
momentum transferred to distal segments just before ball
contact. Although quadriceps strains related to kicking were RISK FACTORS
thought to occur on the kicking leg side, controversy exists as Several risk factors have been suggested for quadriceps muscle
to whether rectus femoris muscle strains primarily occur during injuries. These factors may be classified in intrinsic and
ball contact, swing phase of kicking or ground contact phase extrinsic.
during the step before the backswing.
Intrinsic factors
Ball contact Age
During the ball contact phase of kicking the rectus femoris is Although the incidence of muscle injuries in the athletic popu-
in a relatively shortened state, and muscles need to be in a rela- lation generally increases with age,1 this does not seem true of
tively stretched state to induce a strain injury.48–50 Although the quadriceps muscle. Three large prospective studies including
maximum knee extension moment occurs during the ball one of 485 injures in almost 2300 players found no association
contact phase, the quadriceps muscles are not in danger of between age and this muscle injury.1 51 61
strain injury because they are not lengthened or eccentrically
contracting during this phase. This may be modified by varia- Previous injury
tions in ball-foot impact forces that depend on the distance Previous muscle injury is a risk factor for quadriceps muscle
kicked and the weight of the ball, which would be greater in strains.51 Increased risk of rectus femoris injury was found in
wet conditions. The fact that most injuries occur in preseason players with a previous injury of the quadriceps muscle. Also, a
(good weather) and after low rainfall argues against an associ- recent hamstring strain significantly increases the risk of quadri-
ation between increased impact forces generated by ball ceps strain.51 Altered gait patterns that occur after hamstring
wetness and ball contact mechanism.51 muscle strains, such as a reduction in the stride length, may
Conversely, lower ball pressure has been shown to decrease protect the injured hamstring muscle from re-strain but
impact forces and increase contact time but a study of increase the chance of a quadriceps strain.51
Australian Rules Football players found no correlation between
muscle injuries and ball pressure.52 Short height and high body weight
Two studies suggested a potential relationship between height
Swing phase and weight, and rectus femoris injuries.51 62 A recent study fol-
The rectus femoris is contracted eccentrically during the early lowed 100 professional soccer players (aged 19.4–27.8 years) for
swing phase and the wind-up phase of the swing phase of a season where a trend ( p=0.06) was observed for shorter
kicking where it may be predisposed to injury. During the back- players (OR=0.08; 95% CI 0.00 to 1.35) and heavier players
swing phase (early swing phase), the thigh angular velocity is (OR=10.70; 95% CI 0.73 to 156.37) to suffer more muscle
minimal while the shank velocity is negative due to its back- strains compared to taller and thinner subjects.62 The authors
ward movement, rectus femoris acts to decelerate hip extension attributed the lack of statistical significance to the small
and knee flexion.53 54 Furthermore, the thigh was mainly decel- number of injuries (seven rectus femoris injuries). Similarly,
erated by interactive moments exerted by the shank rather Orchard et al51 reported that Australian football players with a
than a hip extension or flexion moment.55 height below 1.82 cm had a significant increase in the risk of
During the initial part of the forward swing phase (wind-up quadriceps muscle injury (relative risk of 1.48 (95% CI 1.09 to
phase), the hip starts to flex and the thigh angular velocity is 2.02) 183 quadriceps muscle injuries) compared to taller indivi-
positive whereas the knee is still flexing and a negative shank duals. In contrast, Bradley and Portas61 in a one season pro-
angular velocity is observed.56 At maximal knee flexion (85–90° spective study in 36 English premier league soccer players
at 70% of swing phase), the rectus femoris contracts eccentric- found weight was not a significant contributing factor for
ally to counteract excessive knee flexion (wind-up phase).54 57–60 injury.
Because slightly greater angular velocities and greater knee
flexion are present during the wind-up phase, we believe that Dominance
this part of the kicking action may be related to rectus femoris Leg dominance may be a risk factor for injury, as the majority of
injury. quadriceps muscle strains (60%) involve the dominant leg
Review
( preferred kicking leg), whereas only 33% affect the non- phase, the hip flexors utilise the stretch-shortening cycle,
dominant leg (7% were reported in both legs or the leg domin- thereby enhancing their capacity to generate greater hip flexion
ance was unknown).1 Quadriceps muscle strains in Australian moment. A lack of hip extension may require rectus femoris to
Rules football players were more common in the dominant generate more hip flexion force, and fatigue and overload of the
kicking leg (relative risk 2.13, 95% CI 1.59 to 28.6), whereas rectus femoris may occur. Second, roots of the femoral nerve
hamstring and calf injuries were almost equally distributed.51 directly pass through the psoas muscle. A restricted psoas may
mechanically irritate the femoral nerve and cause tension
Flexibility further down the neurodynamic chain. Repeated lumbar exten-
Witvrouw et al63 and Fousekis et al62 examined whether a rela- sion and hip flexion, as required during kicking, has been impli-
tive lack of quadriceps muscle flexibility before the Belgium and cated in femoral nerve injury with concomitant weakness of
Greek seasons could identify a professional soccer player at risk the quadriceps strength in a modern dancer.65 Therefore, the
for a quadriceps muscle strain. A total of 146 and 100 male pro- femoral nerve may be implicated in rectus femoris injuries in a
fessional soccer players were assessed during each respective similar way that the sciatic nerve is implicated in hamstring
preseason. Results revealed that 13 of 146 players in the strains.
Belgium league and 7 of 100 players in Greek league sustained a Therefore, knee extensors and hip flexors flexibility training
clinically diagnosed quadriceps muscle injury. Witvrouw et al63 in order to achieve optimal levels may be an appropriate focus
found statistically significant lower quadriceps flexibility in the in preventive programmes that aim to reduce rectus femoris
injured players. Fousekis et al62 found a trend toward flexibility muscle injuries in kicking sports.
asymmetries in those players who sustained an injury. In con-
trast, Bradley and Portas61 registered 6 injuries in 36 premier Strength
league soccer players and found flexibility was not a significant Improving proximal hip strength and knee extension strength
risk factor for quadriceps injury. at long muscle length may be areas to target to reduce rectus
femoris injury.
Strength
One hundred professional soccer players had isokinetic concen- Hip flexor strength
tric and eccentric knee extensor strength measures in preseason Kicking performance is influenced by both knee extension
and were monitored until the end of the competition period. moment,53 66 and hip flexion moment.67 68 Some investigations
Seven players suffered a quadriceps muscle strain during the have demonstrated that hip flexion moments were almost
season. Concentric strength was not a risk factor for quadriceps twice the corresponding knee extension moments during
injury.62 Eccentric strength differences at preseason were found kicking.57 69–71 In fact, peak hip flexion moment of the kicking
between those injured compared to uninjured players limb was the strongest predictor of peak foot velocity, suggest-
(OR=5.01; 95% CI 0.92 to 27.14), although the difference was ing that the ability to generate a greater hip flexion moment is
not statistically significant, probably due to the low number of critical to achieve a high foot velocity during kicking.
injuries.62 Further investigations are required. Conversely, Naito et al68 reported that centrifugal force-
dependent moment of the kicking leg at the knee as a conse-
quence of the hip flexion angular velocity was the primary con-
Extrinsic factors
tributor to rapid knee extension and, thus, foot velocity.
Dry field Studies using electromyography and MRI for the evaluation of
Quadriceps muscle strains are more common after a week with kicking motion support this finding, and show a high activa-
low rainfall.64 A study of Australian Rules football players tion of iliacus and psoas muscles during kicking concomitantly
revealed that quadriceps strains (like many other non-contact with rectus femoris.60 72
lower-limb injuries) were relatively more likely on dryer and Both iliopsoas and rectus femoris muscles generate hip
harder northern grounds where ground traction was a greater. flexion force. Recently, the contribution of the proximal rectus
Moreover, Woods et al13 found more rectus femoris strains asso- femoris to hip flexion moment suggest that divergent regions of
ciated with a dry field during preseason of two consecutive muscle fibres within rectus femoris have different functions
English soccer seasons involving 1200 players. depending on force direction.73 As a consequence, a reduction
in the strength and/or activation of the iliopsoas muscle may
PREVENTION OF RECTUS FEMORIS INJURY result in rectus femoris compensation to generate more hip
Intervention studies that specifically alter risk factors for rectus flexion force, and has been recently demonstrated through
femoris injury in football players are sparse, therefore one pre- three-dimensional musculoskeletal models.74 When the iliop-
vention strategy is to address known risk factors and injury soas muscle force contribution was reduced by 50%, rectus
mechanism biomechanics. The parameters that may afford the femoris force increased to compensate for the iliopsoas weak-
best opportunity to prevent rectus femoris injury are flexibility, ness.74 In football, this may result in an overload of the rectus
strength and core stability. Because of the lack of data, we share femoris and, thus, increase the risk of injury. Therefore, good
recommendations that are largely ‘expert opinion’ (level 5 function of hip flexor muscles is necessary to prevent quadri-
evidence). ceps muscles injuries.
The conjoined distal tendon of the iliopsoas muscle crosses
Flexibility anterior and slightly medial to the femoral head as it courses
Quadriceps muscle flexibility (>128°) should be a cornerstone downward to its insertion on the lesser trochanter. In this
of any prevention programme targeted to reduce rectus femoris distal part, the broad tendon is deflected posteriorly at 35°–45°
injury, at least in soccer.62 63 However, we believe that hip as it crosses the superior ramus of the pubis. With the hip
flexor length must be optimal too as for the following reasons. in full extension, this deflection raises the tendon’s angle of
First, tight iliopsoas muscle restricts hip extension. As the insertion relative to the femoral head, thereby increasing
kicking action requires hip extension during the early swing the muscle’s leverage for hip flexion.75 As the hip flexes to 90°,
Review
Review
Training parameters
No studies in the literature compare different eccentric exercise
training protocols to prevent rectus femoris strains. Volume and
loading are often to the discretion of the strength and condi-
tioning coach or sport rehabilitation clinician. However, even
though we consider length more important than strength, we
strongly advise that training parameters should follow the
common guidelines applied to any strength or rehabilitation
programme.92 The optimal intensity of eccentric training pro-
grammes is not yet clear. Whereas some authors claim that
intensity should be high to provide the stimulus necessary to
produce further adaptations,93–95 others have found that the
protective effect of eccentric training may be observed even
using light resistance.96 97 If strength gains are required to
address a strength deficit, eccentric actions should be overloaded
from 20% to 80% beyond the maximal isometric strength.92
However, the volume and intensity of preseason eccentric train-
ing programmes should be gradually progressed to minimise the
effect of exercise-induced muscle soreness and to provide the
stimulus necessary to produce ongoing adaptations.98–100
Muscle fatigue should also be considered with implementing
a training programme, especially when dealing with eccentric
exercises because several studies have reported less energy costs
for eccentric contractions compared with concentric exer-
cise.101 102 However, given the important strength and neuro-
muscular impairments present immediately after eccentric
Review
exercise, we advocate the use eccentric exercise at the end of 12. Hawkins RD, Hulse MA, Wilkinson C, et al. The association football medical
training sessions.103–105 research programme: an audit of injuries in professional football. Br J Sports Med
2001;35:43–7.
On the basis of the literature and our clinical experience, we 13. Woods C, Hawkins RD, Hulse M, et al. The Football Association Medical Research
recommend strength and conditioning coaches reserve the Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football—analysis of preseason
highest intensities of eccentric exercise with athletes who are injuries. Br J Sports Med 2002;36:436–41.
familiar with this type of training. An advanced programme of 14. Hasselman CT, Best TM, Hughes C, et al. An explanation for various rectus
femoris strain injuries using previously undescribed muscle architecture. Am J
new exercises could cause injury. Also, avoid high-intensity and
Sports Med 1995;23:493–9.
long-length eccentric exercise during important competition 15. Bordalo-Rodriguez M, Rosenberg ZS. Magnetic resonance imaging of the
phases as the side effects of transient muscle soreness and proximal rectus femoris musculotendinous unit. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am
strength deficits may impair performance. 2005;13:717–25.
In the context of relatively limited evidence, we recommend 16. Shu B, Safran MR. Hip instability: anatomic and clinical considerations of traumatic
and atraumatic instability. Clin Sports Med 2011;30:349–67.
a greater use of concentric hip flexion strengthening exercises in 17. Johnson MA, Polgar J, Weightman D, et al. Data on the distribution of fibre types
the preseason, and athletes should be limited in the number of in thirty-six human muscles. An autopsy study. J Neurol Sci 1973;18:111–29.
kicks in the first few days of training, which can be progres- 18. Gallant S. Assessing adverse neural tension in athletes. J Sports Rehab
sively increased. After the first weeks of training, hip flexor 1998;7:128–39.
19. Comtet JJ, Genety J, Brunet B, et al. Traitement chirurgical des ruptures du droit
training should take place during warm-ups. The flexibility
anterieur (rectus femoris) chez le sportif. Nouv Presse Med 1978;7:2387–90.
training should occur before and after each training session in 20. Chammout MO, Skinner HB. The clinical anatomy of commonly injured muscle
order to mitigate the decreased range of motion effects pro- bellies. J Trauma 1986;26:549–52.
duced by training. 21. Wittstein J, Klein S, Garrett WE. Chronic tears of the reflected head of the rectus
In summary, rectus femoris injury in athletes has a multifac- femoris: results of operative treatment. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:1942–7.
22. Hughes C, Hasselman CT, Best TM, et al. Incomplete, intrasubstance strain
torial aetiology but occurs mainly during sprinting and kicking. injuries of the rectus femoris muscle. Am J Sports Med 1995;23:500–6.
In sprinting, the risk for rectus femoris injuries may be highest 23. Burns BJ, Sproule J, Smith H. Acute compartment syndrome of the anterior thigh
during acceleration (eccentric muscle actions in the early swing following quadriceps strain in a footballer. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:218–20.
phase) and deceleration phases. In kicking, which is the most 24. Järvinen TA, Järvinen TL, Kääriäinen M, et al. Muscle injuries: biology and
treatment. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:745–64.
common mechanism of injury for rectus femoris muscle, the
25. Beiner JM, Jokl P. Muscle contusion injury and myositis ossificans traumatica.
risk of rectus femoris injury during kicking is during the back- Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;403:S110–19.
swing and the wind-up phases for the kicking leg, and ground 26. Booth DW, Westers BM. The management of athletes with myositis ossificans
contact for the stance leg. The most likely intrinsic risk factors traumatica. Can J Sport Sci 1989;14:10–16.
for rectus femoris muscle injuries include previous muscle injur- 27. Ryan JB, Wheeler JH, Hopkinson WJ, et al. Quadriceps contusions: west point
update. Am J Sports Med 1991;19:299–304.
ies, shorter players, dominant leg and knee extensor flexibility 28. Aronen JG, Garrick JG, Chronister RD, et al. Quadriceps contusions: clinical results
and strength. The most likely extrinsic risk factors for rectus of immediate immobilization in 120 degrees of knee flexion. Clin J Sport Med
femoris muscle injuries include a dry playing field. 2006;16:383–7.
Prevention strategies for rectus femoris muscle injuries 29. Boutin RD, Fritz RC, Steinbach LS. Imaging of sports-related muscle injuries.
Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:333–62.
include general flexibility of muscles of the thigh and leg,
30. Irmola T, Heikkilä JT, Orava S, et al. Total proximal tendon avulsion of the rectus
adequate balance of concentric and eccentric strength of the femoris muscle. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2007;17:378–82.
hip flexors and knee extensors and adequate core stability. 31. Gamradt SC, Brophy RH, Barnes R, et al. Nonoperative treatment for proximal
Exercises based on deceleration under specific sport situations avulsion of the rectus femoris in professional American football. Am J Sports Med
should be included in prevention programmes for rectus 2009;37:1370–4.
32. Hsu JC, Fischer DA, Wright RW. Proximal rectus femoris avulsions in National
femoris muscle injuries. Football League kickers: a report of 2 cases. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:1085–7.
33. Glick J. Muscle strains: prevention and treatment. Physician Sportsmed
Contributors All the authors contributed to writing and structure. 1980;8:73–7.
Competing interest None. 34. Zarins B, Ciullo JV. Acute muscle and tendon injuries in athletes. Clin Sports Med
1983;2:167–82.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
35. Stanton P, Purdham C. Hamstring injuries in sprinting—the role of eccentric
exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1989;10:343–9.
36. Stauber WT. Eccentric action of muscles: physiology, injury, and adaptation. Exerc
REFERENCES Sport Sci Rev 1989;17:157–85.
1. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Walden M. Epidemiology of muscle injuries in 37. Garrett WE. Muscle strain injuries: clinical and basic aspects. Med Sci Sports
professional football (soccer). Am J Sports Med 2011;39:1226–32. Exerc 1990;22:436–43.
2. Ekstrand J, Hägglund M, Walden M. Injury incidence and injury patterns in 38. Garrett WE. Muscle strain injuries. Am J Sports Med 1996;24:S2–8.
professional football: the UEFA injury study. Br J Sports Med 2011;45:553–8. 39. Kellis E, Baltzopoulos V. Isokinetic eccentric exercise. Sports Med
3. Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Soccer injuries and their mechanisms: a prospective study. 1995;19:202–22.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983;15:267–70. 40. Kujala UM, Orava S, Järvinen M. Hamstring injuries. Current trends in treatment
4. Inklaar H. Soccer injuries. I: incidence and severity. Sports Med 1994;18:55–73. and prevention. Sports Med 1997;23:397–404.
5. Brophy RH, Wright RW, Powell JW, et al. Injuries to kickers in American football: 41. Riley PO, Franz J, Dicharry J, et al. Changes in hip joint muscle-tendon lengths
the National Football League experience. Am J Sports Med 2010;38:1166–73. with mode of locomotion. Gait Posture 2010;31:279–83.
6. Balius R, Maestro A, Pedret C, et al. Central aponeurosis tears of the rectus 42. Schache AG, Dorn TW, Blanch PD, et al. Mechanics of the human hamstring
femoris: practical sonographic prognosis. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:818–24. muscles during sprinting. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;44:647–58.
7. Orchard J, Seward H. Epidemiology of injuries in the Australlian Football League 43. Novacheck TF. The biomechanics of running. Gait Posture 1998;7:77–95.
seasons 1997–2000. Br J Sports Med 2002;36:39–44. 44. Hewit J, Cronin J, Button C, et al. Understanding deceleration in sport. Strength
8. Cross TM, Gibbs N, Houang MT, et al. Acute quadriceps muscle strains: magnetic Conditioning J 2011;33:47–52.
resonance imaging features and prognosis. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:710–19. 45. Kreighbaum E, Barthels K. A qualitative approach for studying human movement.
9. Ouellette H, Thomas BJ, Nelson E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of rectus Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1996:138–43.
femoris origin injuries. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35:665–72. 46. Andrews J, McLeod W, Ward T, et al. The cutting mechanism. Am J Sports Med
10. Gyftopoulos S, Rosenberg ZS, Schweitzer ME, et al. Normal anatomy and strains 1977;5:111–21.
of the deep musculotendinous junction of the proximal rectus femoris: MRI 47. Orchard J, Wood T, Seward H, et al. Comparison of injuries in elite senior and
features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W182–6. junior Australian football. J Sci Med Sport 1998;1:83–8.
11. Speer KP, Lohnes J, Garrett WE. Radiographic imaging of muscle strain injury. Am 48. Garrett WE, Safran MR, Seaber AV, et al. Biomechanical comparison of stimulated
J Sports Med 1993;21:89–95; discussion 96. and nonstimulated skeletal muscle pulled. Am J Sports Med 1987;15:448–54.
Review
49. Liebers RL, Friden J. Muscle damage is not a function of muscle force but active 80. Brughelli M, Mendiguchia J, Nosaka K, et al. Effects of eccentric exercise on
muscle strain. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:520–6. optimum length of the knee flexors and extensors during the preseason in
50. Lieber RL, Friden J. Mechanisms of muscle injury gleaned from animal models. professional soccer players. Phys Ther Sport 2010;11:50–5.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:S70–9. 81. LaStayo PC, Woolf JM, Lewek MD, et al. Eccentric muscle contractions: their
51. Orchard J. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for muscle strains in Australian contribution to injury, prevention, rehabilitation, and sport. J Orthop Sports Phys
football. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:300–3. Ther 2003;33:557–71.
52. Orchard J, McIntosh A, Landeo R, et al. Biomechanics of the running drop punt 82. Bigland-Ritchie B, Woods JJ. Integrated electromyogram and oxygen uptake
kick with respect to the development of quadriceps strains. Sports Med Aust during positive and negative work. J Physiol 1976;260:267–77.
2007;25:18–24. 83. Visser JJ, Hoogkamer JE, Bobbert MF, et al. Length and moment arm of human
53. Nunome H, Ikegami Y, Kozakai R, et al. Segmental dynamics of soccer instep leg muscles as a function of knee and hip-joint angles. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup
kicking with the preferred and non-preferred leg. J Sports Sci 2006;24:529–41. Physiol 1990;61:453–60.
54. Levanon J, Dapena J. Comparison of the kinematics of the full-instep and pass 84. Prior BM, Jayaraman RC, Reid RW, et al. Biarticular and monoarticular muscle
kicks in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:917–27. activation and injury in human quadriceps muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol
55. Lees A, Nolan L. Three dimensional kinematic analysis of the instep kick under 2001;85:185–90.
speed and accuracy conditions. In: Spinks W, Reilly T, Murphy A, eds. Science and 85. Mendiguchia J, Ford KR, Quatman CE, et al. Sex differences in proximal control
football IV. London: E & FN Spon, 2002:16–21. of the knee joint. Sports Med 2011;41:541–57.
56. Lees A, Nolan L. The biomechanics of soccer: a review. J Sports Sci 1998;16:211–34. 86. Goldman EF, Jones DE. Interventions preventing hamstring injuries. Cochrane
57. Nunome H, Asai T, Ikegami Y, et al. Three-dimensional kinetic analysis of side-foot Database Syst Rev 2010;(1):CD006782.
and instep soccer kicks. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:2028–36. 87. Prassas SG, Terauds J, Nathan T. Three dimensional kinematic analysis of high
58. Kellis E, Katis A. The relationship between isokinetic knee extension and flexion and low trajectory kicks in soccer. In: Nosek N, Sojka D, Morrison W, et al., eds.
strength with soccer kick kinematics: an electromyographic evaluation. J Sports Proceedings of the VIII sympsium of the International Society of Biomechanics in
Med Phys Fitness 2007;47:385–94. Sports. Prague: Conex, 1990:145–9.
59. Charnock BL, Lewis CL, Garrett WE. Adductor longus mechanics during the 88. Orloff H, Sumida B, Chow J, et al. Ground reaction forces and kinematics of plant
maximal effort soccer kick. Sports Biomech 2009;8:223–34. leg position during instep kicking in male and female collegiate soccer players.
60. Brophy RH, Backus SI, Pansy BS, et al. Lower extremity muscle activation and Sports Biomech 2008;7:238–47.
alignment during the soccer instep and side-foot kicks. J Orhop Sports Phys Ther 89. McGill S, Juker D, Kropf P. Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of
2007;37:260–8. quadratus lumborum during a wide variety of tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
61. Bradley PS, Portas MD. The relationship between preseason range of motion and 1996;11:170–2.
muscle strain injury in elite soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2007;21:1155–9. 90. Hides J, Fan T, Stanton W, et al. Psoas and quadratus lumborum muscle
62. Fousekis K, Tsepis E, Poulmedis P, et al. Instrinsic risk factors of non-contact asymmetry among elite Australian Football League players. Br J Sports Med
quadriceps and hamstring strains in soccer: a prospective study of 100 professional 2010;44:563–7.
players. Br J Sports Med 2011;45:709–14. 91. Shan G, Westerhoff P. Full-body kinematic characteristics of the maximal instep
63. Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Asselman P, et al. Muscle flexibility as a risk factor for soccer kick by male soccer players and parameters related to kick quality. Sports
developing muscle injuries in male professional soccer players. Am J Sports Med Biomech 2005;4:59–72.
2003;31:41–6. 92. Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Designing resistance training programs. 3 ed. Colorado
64. Orchard J. The ‘northern bias’ for injuries in the Australian Football League. Aust Springs: Human Kinetics, 2003:40–50.
Turfgrass Manag 2000;23:36–42. 93. Brughelli M, Cronin J. Altering the length-tension relationship with
65. Sanmarco GJ, Stephens MM. Neuropraxia of the femoral nerve in a modern eccentric exercise: implications for performance and injury. Sports Med
dancer. Am J Sports Med 1991;19:413–14. 2007;37:807–26.
66. Kellis E, Katis A, Vrabas IS. Effects of an intermittent exercise fatigue protocol on 94. Hortobagyi T, Barrier J, Beard D, et al. Greater initial adaptations to
biomechanics of soccer kick performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports submaximal muscle lengthening than maximal shortening. J Appl Physiol
2006;16:334–44. 1996;81:1677–82.
67. Dorge HC, Andersen TB, Sorensen H, et al. Biomechanical differences in soccer 95. Friedmann-Bette B, Bauer T, Kinscherf R, et al. Effects of strength training with
kicking with the preferred and the non-preferred leg. J Sports Sci 2002;20:293–9. eccentric overload on muscle adaptation in male athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol
68. Naito K, Fukui Y, Maruyama T. Multijoint kinetic chain analysis of knee extension 2010;108:821–36.
during the soccer instep kick. Hum Mov Sci 2010;29:259–76. 96. Chen TC, Chen HL, Lin MJ, et al. Potent protective effect conferred by four bouts
69. Dorge HC, Andersen TB, Sorensen H, et al. Electromyographic activity of the of low-intensity eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:1004–12.
iliopsoas muscle and leg kinetics during the soccer place kick. Scand J Med Sci 97. Lavender AP, Nosaka K. A light load eccentric exercise confers protection against
Sports 1999;9:195–200. a subsequent bout of more demanding eccentric exercise. J Sci Med Sport
70. Luhtanen P. Kinematics and kinetics of maximal instep kicking in junior soccer 2008;11:291–8.
players. In: Reilly T, Lees A, Davids K, Murphy W.J., eds. Science and Football. 98. Friedmann B, Kinscherf R, Vorwald S, et al. Muscular adaptations to
London: E & FN Spon, 1988:441–8. computer-guided strength training with eccentric overload. Acta Physiol Scand
71. Putnam CA. A segment interaction analysis of proximal-to-distal sequential 2004;182:77–88.
segment motion patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;23:130–44. 99. Cheung K, Hume P, Maxwell L. Delayed onset muscle soreness: treatment
72. Baczkowski K, Marks P, Silberstein M, et al. A new look into kicking a football: strategies and performance factors. Sports Med 2003;33:145–64.
an investigation of muscle activity using MRI. Australas Radiol 2006;50:324–9. 100. Dudley GA, Tesch PA, Miller BJ, et al. Importance of eccentric actions in
73. Hagio S, Nagata K, Kouzaki M. Region specificity of rectus femoris muscle for performance adaptations to resistance training. Aviat Space Environ Med
force vectors in vivo. J Biomech 2012;45:179–82. 1991;62:543–50.
74. Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA, Moran DW. Anterior hip joint force increases with hip 101. Ryschon TW, Fowler MD, Wysong R, et al. Efficiency of human skeletal muscle in
extension, decreased gluteal force, or decreased iliopsoas force. J Biomech vivo: comparison of isometric, concentric, and eccentric muscle action. J Appl
2007;40:3725–31. Physiol 1997;83:867–74.
75. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the hip: a focus on muscular actions. J Orthop 102. Kraemer WJ, Gardiner DF, Gordon SE. Differential effects of exhaustive cycle
Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:82–94. ergometry on concentric and eccentric torque production. J Sci Med Sport
76. Brockett CL, Morgan DL, Proske U. Predicting hamstring strain injury in elite 2001;4:301–9.
athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:379–87. 103. McHugh MP. Recent advances in the understanding of the repeated bout effect:
77. Brooks JH, Fuller CW, Kemp SP, et al. Incidence, risk, and prevention of hamstring the protective effect against muscle damage from a single bout of eccentric
muscle injuries in professional rugby union. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:1297–306. exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2003;13:88–97.
78. Bowers EJ, Morgan DL, Proske U. Damage to the human quadriceps muscle from 104. Proske U, Morgan DL. Muscle damage from eccentric exercise: mechanism,
eccentric exercise and the training effect. J Sports Sci 2004;22:1005–14. mechanical signs, adaptation and clinical applications. J Physiol 2001;537:333–45.
79. Yeung SS, Yeung EW. Shift of peak torque angle after eccentric exercise. Int 105. Allen DG. Eccentric muscle damage: mechanisms of early reduction of force. Acta
J Sports Med 2008;29:251–6. Physiol Scand 2001;171:311–19.
These include:
References This article cites 99 articles, 31 of which can be accessed free at:
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2012/08/02/bjsports-2012-091250.full.html#ref-list-1
Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in
service the box at the top right corner of the online article.
Notes
Advance online articles have been peer reviewed, accepted for publication, edited and
typeset, but have not not yet appeared in the paper journal. Advance online articles are
citable and establish publication priority; they are indexed by PubMed from initial
publication. Citations to Advance online articles must include the digital object identifier
(DOIs) and date of initial publication.