Stipulation and Order Ex Parte Stipulated Protective Order GRANTED by Judge Pierce
05/22/2019 Stipulation and Order: Ex Parte: stipulated protective order - GRANTED by Judge Pierce Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, Case No. 18-CV-334547 Plaintiff: Jonathan Del Arroz Defendant: San Francisco Science Fiction Conventions, Inc., et al.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views7 pages
Stipulation and Order Ex Parte Stipulated Protective Order GRANTED by Judge Pierce
05/22/2019 Stipulation and Order: Ex Parte: stipulated protective order - GRANTED by Judge Pierce Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, Case No. 18-CV-334547 Plaintiff: Jonathan Del Arroz Defendant: San Francisco Science Fiction Conventions, Inc., et al.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
You are on page 1/ 7
toe)
ANN AP, Saas {SBN 178712)
[email protected]
Nose V. PHO [SBN 291881]
0@
MBssNeR
160 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 1000
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone: (408) 298-7120
Facsimile: (408) 298-0477
Attorneys for Defendant
SAN FRANCISCO SCIENCE FICTION
CONVENTIONS, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
JONATHAN DEL ARROZ, Case No, 18-CV-334547
Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
v,
SAN FRANCISCO SCIENCE FICTION
CONVENTIONS, INC. (“SFSFC") aka
“WORLDCON76” David W. Gallaher (2019),
President; David W. Clark (2020), Vice
President; Lise Detusch Hetrigan (2020),
‘Treasurer, Kevin Standlee (2018), Secretary;
Sandra Childress (2019); Bruce Farr (2018),
Chair; 2018 SMOF Con Committee; Chery!
Morgan (2020); Kevin Roche (2018), Chairs
2018 Worldcon (Worldcon 76) Committee:
Cindy Scott (2018); Randy Smith (2019),
Chair; New Zealand 2020 Worldcon Agent
Committee; Andy Trembley (2020); Jennifer
“Raclar” Wylie (2019), Chair; CostumeCon
2021 Organizing Committee: Lori
Buschhaum; Susie Rodriguez. and DOES 1
through 30, inclusive
Defendants.
The patties, by and through their respective attomney of record, hereby stipulate and agree
as set forth herein.
‘The parties represent that this litigation does not present any public health or safety
concerns and this Order does not deviate from the Model Confidentiality Order published by the
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
¥VW4d ASoseen0es 1)
Santa Clara County Task Force on Complex Litigation Procedures and Technology. In order to
protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained by the parties in connection with
this case, the parties hereby agree as follows:
Part One: Use of Confidential Materials in Discovery.
1. Any party or non-party may designate as “Confidential Information” (by stamping
the relevant page or as otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which
that party or non-party considers in good faith to contain information involving trade secrets, or
confidential business or financial information, subject to Rules 8.45, 8.46, 8.47, 8.490, 2.550,
2.551, 2.580, and 2.585 of the California Rules of Court, or under other provisions of California
law. Where a document or response consists of more then one page, the first page and each page
‘on which confidential information appears shall be so designated.
2. A party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or in
response to written discovery as “confidential” by so indicating in said responses or on the record
at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such materiel, In
addition, a party or non-party may designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt of
said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific
pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as “Confidential Information.” Any
other party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the
parties shall follow the procedures described in paragraph 8 below. After any designation made
according to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information
shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the
procedures described in paragraph 8 below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for
marking all previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control
with the specified designation.
3. All Confidential Information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (not
including information that is publicly available) shall be used by the party or parties to whom the
{information is produced solely for the purpose of this case,
ti
2 Case No. 18.CV-334547
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDERsosacnossn)
25
26
a
28
5. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such
information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set
forth herein.
6. _Inconnection with discovery proceedings as to which a party submits Confidential
Information, all documents and chamber copies containing Confidential Information which are
submitted to the Court shall be filed with the Court in sealed envelopes or other appropriate sealed
containers. On the outside of the envelopes, a copy of the first page of the document shall be
attached. [f Confidential Information is included in the first page attached to the outside of the
envelopes, it may be deleted from the outside copy. The word “CONFIDENTIAL? shall be
stamped on the envelope and a statement substantially in the following form shall also be printed
on the envelope:
“This envelope is sealed pursuant to Order of the Cour, contains Confidential Information
and is not to be opened or the contents revealed, except by Order of the Court or agreement by the
parties.”
7. A party may designate as "Confidential Information” documents or discovery
reterials produced by a non-party by providing written notice to all parties of the relevant
document numbers or other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such documents,
or discovery materials, Any perty of non-party may voluntarily disclose to others without
restriction any information designated by that party or non-party as Confidential Information,
although a document may lose its confidential status if it is made public.
8. Ifa party contends that any material is not entitled to confidential treatment, such
party may at any time give written notice to the party or non-party who designated the material.
The party or non-party who designated the material shall have twenty-five (25) days from the
receipt of such written notice to apply to the Court for an order designating the material as
confidential. The party or non-party seeking the order has the burden of establishing that the
document is entitled to protection.
ut
wt
4 Case No, 18-CV-334547
SFIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER