Proposal On Drought Stress
Proposal On Drought Stress
ABSTRACT
Biochar is a black carbon formed through the pyrolysis of organic materials such as
plants and organic wastes. It is mainly used in agriculture to improve the production of various
crops. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are widely used due to their role in
improving growth and yield of crops. Drought is one of the main problems of soils under
semiarid and arid region and a major threat to production of valuable crops. In order to mitigate
this problem, it would be imperative to evaluate the combine effect of algal biochar and PGPR
on growth of purslane under drought stress. Based on this hypothesis, a pot experiment will
be conducted with four different combinations of algal biochar and PGPR treatments under
following level of water; one will be 75% and other will be 50% of field capacity and one level
will be normal. Pre and post soil analysis for physiochemical and biological properties will be
conducted. Growth and yield parameters will be recorded after harvesting the crop. Biochar
will be prepared from algae. The strain of PGPR will be used with seed of Purslane. The data
collected will be analyzed for analysis of variance and means will be compared using least
significance (LSD) test. The result will help to formulate approach for the use of bio-inoculants
for improving growth Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) crop drought stress.
BIOCHAR PREPARATION
The dried algal biomass will be placed in muffle furnace at 300 ̊ C for 60 minutes and
BIOCHAR APPLICATION
Biochar will be applied at a rate of 0.4% per kg of soil, i.e 4g per 1000g of soil.
Soil samples will be collected and will be air dried and sieved through 2mm stainless
steel sieve and stored in plastic container. The physio-chemical properties of soil samples will
be measured including pH, EC, organic matter and soil bulk density. The nutrients of soil K, P
PLANT PARAMETER
fluorescence, stomatal density and transpiration will be measured by infrared gas analyzer
(IRGA). Data regarding growth parameters like plant height, root length, fresh and dry weight
of root and shoot; will be recorded using standard methods. Total nitrogen and total
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
Four treatments were applied with 3 level of water according to field capacity. The
experiment will be comprised of four different combinations of algal biochar and PGPR, with
each combination at three water levels according to field capacity. One group of plants will be
given a water level 75% water level and other group has 50% of the normal while the remaining
T 1: Control
T 3: PGPR alone
will be carried out with four replications. The experiment will be completely randomized
design (CRD). The data regarding growth parameters will be collected in response to applied
ratio. The data will be analyzed using statistical software statistix 8.2 and 9.1 and resultant
The bacterial inoculum will be produced by taking a loop of PGPR strain to 200 ml of
LB liquid medium in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask, incubated for 48 h at 28 ̊ C and 150 rpm. The
optical density of broth will be adjusted to 0.5 calculated λ 535 nm using spectrophotometer
and will obtain a uniform population of bacteria (108-109) colony-forming units (CFU) mL-1 in
the broth at the time of inoculation. For inoculation, the obtained suspension of inoculum will
be mixed with sterilized algal biochar (200 mL kg-1 algal biochar) and will be incubated for 24
h at 28 ̊ C before being used for seed coating (seed to algal biochar ratio 1.25:1 w/w). Purslane
seed dressing will be done with the inoculated algal biochar mixed with 10 % sterilized sugar
(sucrose) solution in 10:1 ratio. In the case of the non-inoculated control, the seeds will be
coated with the sterilized algal biochar treated with sterilized broth and 10 % sterilized sugar
solution.
References
S. Lee and Y. S. Ok. 2014. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil
growth, physiology and yield of wheat under salt stress. Agric Water Manage, 158 61-
68.
Aslam, M., M. Zamir, I. Afzal, M. Yaseen, M. Mubeen and A. Shoaib. 2013. Drought stress,
Atkinson, C. J., J. D. Fitzgerald and N. A. Hipps. 2010. Potential mechanisms for achieving
agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil,
Ballard, T. 2000. Impacts of forest management on northern forest soils. For Ecol Manage,
Barrow, C. 2012. Biochar: potential for countering land degradation and for improving
Bird, M. I., C. M. Wurster, P. H. de Paula Silva, N. A. Paul and R. de Nys. 2012. Algal
Chan, K., L. Van Zwieten, I. Meszaros, A. Downie and S. Joseph. 2008. Using poultry litter
Chen, P., D. Haboudane, N. Tremblay, J. Wang, P. Vigneault and B. Li. 2010. New spectral
indicator assessing the efficiency of crop nitrogen treatment in corn and wheat.
2010. Insights into the effect of soil pH on N2O and N2 emissions and denitrifier
Davies, B. E. 1974. Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of soil organic matter. Soil Sci Soc Am J,
38 (1): 150-151.
DeLuca, T. H., M. D. MacKenzie and M. J. Gundale. 2009. Biochar effects on soil nutrient
251-270.
Demirbas, A. and G. Arin. 2002. An overview of biomass pyrolysis. Energy sources, 24 (5):
471-482.
Draper, K. and T. Tomlinson. 2012. Poultry litter biochar—a US perspective. Int Biochar
Initiat,
Earl, H. J. and R. F. Davis. 2003. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation
Gaunt, J. and A. Cowie. 2009. Biochar, greenhouse gas accounting and emissions trading.
Glaser, B., J. Lehmann and W. Zech. 2002. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of
highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal–a review. Biol Fertility Soils, 35
(4): 219-230.
Godfray, H. C. J., J. R. Beddington, I. R. Crute, L. Haddad, D. Lawrence, J. F. Muir, J.
Guo, Y., H. Tang, G. Li and D. Xie. 2014. Effects of cow dung biochar amendment on
adsorption and leaching of nutrient from an acid yellow soil irrigated with biogas
chemical, biological, and physical aging as well as soil addition on the sorption of
pyrene to activated carbon and biochar. Environ Sci Technol, 45 (24): 10445-10453.
Hiltner, L. 1904. Über neuere Erfahrungen und Probleme auf dem Gebiete der
Effect of drought on yield variability of key crops in Czech Republic. Agric For
Initiative, I. B. 2012. Standardized product definition and product testing guidelines for
biochar research: targeting trade‐offs between the potential wins. GCB Bioenergy, 7
(1): 1-13.
John, R. P., G. Anisha, K. M. Nampoothiri and A. Pandey. 2011. Micro and macroalgal
biomass: a renewable source for bioethanol. Bioresour Technol, 102 (1): 186-193.
Joseph, S., C. Peacocke, J. Lehmann and P. Munroe. 2009. Developing a biochar
Technology, 107-126.
Kallarackal, J., J. Milburn and D. Baker. 1990. Water Relations of the Banana. III. Effects of
Kitchen, N., K. Sudduth and S. Drummond. 1999. Soil electrical conductivity as a crop
responses in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) compared with rot pathogens. Curr
MICHAEL, I., M. W. CHRISTOPHER and H. PEDRO. 2011. Algal biochar: effects and
applications.
Mishra, A. K. and V. P. Singh. 2010. A review of drought concepts. J HYDROL, 391 (1):
202-216.
Mohan, D., C. U. Pittman and P. H. Steele. 2006. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a
evaluation of chromium remediation from water using low cost bio-char, a green
contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable
Neori, A., M. Troell, T. Chopin, C. Yarish, A. Critchley and A. H. Buschmann. 2007. The
176.
Packer, M. 2009. Algal capture of carbon dioxide; biomass generation as a tool for
greenhouse gas mitigation with reference to New Zealand energy strategy and policy.
Rani, M. U., A. Arundhath and G. Reddy. 2014. Screening of rhizobacteria containing plant
growth promoting (PGPR) traits in rhizosphere soils and their role in enhancing
Roberts, K. G., B. A. Gloy, S. Joseph, N. R. Scott and J. Lehmann. 2009. Life cycle
produced from oil palm and rice husks and their adsorption capacities for heavy
Sayre, R. 2010. Microalgae: the potential for carbon capture. Bioscience, 60 (9): 722-727.
Smith, J. L., H. P. Collins and V. L. Bailey. 2010. The effect of young biochar on soil
Sohi, S., E. Krull, E. Lopez-Capel and R. Bol. 2010. A review of biochar and its use and
and B. Johri. 2005. Diversity of plant growth and soil health supporting bacteria. Curr
Van Zwieten, L., S. Kimber, S. Morris, K. Chan, A. Downie, J. Rust, S. Joseph and A.
Cowie. 2010. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic
salicylic acid. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 21 (13-16): 1705-
1713.
Walkley, A. and I. A. Black. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining
soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method.