1.

BASIC IDEAS

1.1 History
Although this course will not follow a strict historical development, I will start with a few
brief remarks about the origins of nuclear and particle physics.

In the 19th century, atoms were considered indivisible and were the elementary particles of
-
their day. This view changed in 1897 with Thomson’s discovery of the electron ( e ),
followed 14 years later by the classic experiments of Rutherford, in which a beam of
electrons was fired into a thin gold foil. You will recall from your atomic physics lectures
that from the angular distribution of the scattered electrons, Rutherford deduced that atoms
consisted of a tiny positively charged central nucleus, orbited by electrons. This led to the
Bohr model of the atom, which is familiar to you from atomic and quantum physics lectures.
Later experiments further shattered the 19th century view by showing that the nucleus was
itself composite, in fact a bound state of two particles: the proton (p) with electric charge +e
(where e is the magnitude of the charge on the electron) and the electrically neutral neutron
(n). (Protons and neutrons are collectively called nucleons.) Thus, by the early 1930s, atoms
had been replaced as elementary particles by a larger group of smaller entities: electrons,
protons and neutrons. To these we should add two electrically neutral particles: the photon
( g ) (postulated in 1900 by Planck to explain black-body radiation), and the neutrino ( n )
(postulated by Fermi in 1930 to explain the apparent non-conservation of energy observed in
the decay products of some unstable nuclei, so-called b - decays , which we discuss later in
this course). All this changed again in the late 1960s by a series of experiments analogous to
those of Rutherford, where high-energy beams of electrons and neutrinos were scattered from
nucleons. Analysis of the angular distributions of the scattered particles showed that the
nucleons were themselves bound states of three point-like charged entities, which we now
call quarks ( q ), with the unusual property of having fractional electrical charges – in practice
-e 3 and 2e 3 . This is essentially the picture today, where elementary particles are
considered to be a small number of entities, including quarks, the electron, neutrinos, the
photon and a few others we shall meet, and nuclei are bound states of protons and neutrons.

1.2 The Standard Model

The best theory of elementary particles we have today is called the standard model. This
aims to explain all the phenomena of particle physics, except gravity, in terms of the
properties†and interactions of a small number of elementary (or fundamental) particles, which
we now define as being point-like, without internal structure or excited states. Such a particle
is characterised by, amongst other things, its mass, its electric charge and its spin. You will
recall from quantum mechanics lectures that spin is a permanent angular momentum
possessed by particles in quantum theory, even when they are at rest, and that the maximum
value of the spin angular momentum about any axis is sh 2p , where h is Planck’s constant
and s is the spin quantum number , or spin for short. It has a fixed value for particles of any
given type (for example s = 1 2 for electrons) and general quantum mechanical principles
restrict the possible values of s to be 0, 1 2 ,1, 3 2 , ..... Particles with half-integer spin are called
fermions and those with integer spin are called bosons. In the standard model there are three
families of elementary particles: two spin-1/2 families of fermions called leptons and quarks;
and one family of spin-1 gauge bosons. In addition, at least one other spin-0 particle, called
the Higgs † boson, is postulated to explain the origin of mass within the theory. The latter will
be discussed in the 4th Yr lectures on elementary particle physics, although I will say a few
brief words about it later in the course.

1.1
 The most familiar example of a lepton is the electron. This is bound in atoms by the
electromagnetic interaction, one of the three forces of nature. (There is also a fourth force –
gravity – but this is so small for elementary particles that I will neglect it.) Another lepton is
the neutrino, which was mentioned earlier as a decay product in b -decays. (Strictly this
particle should be called the electron neutrino, written ne , because it is always produced in
association with an electron – more about why this happens later in the course.) The force
responsible for beta decay is an example of a second fundamental force, the weak interaction.
Finally, there is the third force, the strong interaction, which, for example, binds quarks in
nucleons.

In classical physics the electromagnetic interaction is propagated by electromagnetic waves,

which are continuously emitted and absorbed. While this is an adequate description at long
distances, at short distances the quantum nature of the interaction must be taken into account.
In quantum theory, the interaction is transmitted discontinuously by the exchange of photons,
which are spin-1 bosons. Photons are referred to as the gauge bosons, or “force carriers”, of
the electromagnetic interaction. The weak and strong interactions are also mediated by the
+ - 0
exchange of spin-1 gauge bosons. For the weak interaction these are the W , W and Z
bosons (the superscript denotes the electric charge) with masses about 80-90 times the mass
of the proton. For the strong interaction, the force carriers are called gluons. There are eight
gluons, all of which have zero mass and are electrically neutral. Note that I have used the
word ‘electric’ when talking about ‘charge’. This is because the weak and strong interactions
also have associated ‘charges’ which determine the strengths of the interactions, just as the
electric charge determines the strength of the electromagnetic interaction. I will say more
about this later in the course.

In addition to the elementary particles of the standard model, there are other important
particles we will be studying. These are the hadrons, the bound states of quarks. Nucleons are
examples of hadrons, but there are several hundred more, not including nuclei, most of which
are unstable and decay by one of the three interactions. A very common example is the pion,
which exists in three electrical charge states, written (p +,p 0 ,p - ) . Hadrons are important
† because free quarks are unobservable in nature (we will discuss the reason for this later) and
so to deduce their properties we are forced to study hadrons. (The analogy would be having
to deduce the properties of protons and neutrons by studying the properties of nuclei.) Since
nucleons are bound states of quarks and nuclei are bound states of nucleons, the properties of
nuclei should in principle be deducible from the properties of quarks and their interactions,
i.e. from the standard model. In practice, however, this is far beyond present calculational
technique (an analogy might be to deduce the behaviour of the human body solely from its
biochemical reactions) and often nuclear and particle physics are treated as two almost
separate subjects.

1.3 Relativity and antiparticles

Elementary particle physics is often called high-energy physics. One reason for this is that if
we wish to produce new particles in a collision between two other particles, then because of
2
† the † mass-energy relation E = mc , high energies are needed, at least as great as
† relativistic
the rest masses of the particles produced. The second reason is that to explore the structure
of a particle requires a probe whose wavelength l is at least as small as the structure to be
explored. By the de Broglie relation l = h p , this implies that the momentum p of the
probing particle, and hence its energy, must be large. For example, to explore the internal
structure of the proton using electrons requires wavelengths that are much smaller than the
-15
radius of the proton, which is roughly 10 m . This in turn requires electron energies that are
3
greater than 10 times the rest energy of the electron, implying electron velocities very close

1.2
 to the speed of light. Hence any explanation of the phenomena of elementary particle
physics must take account of the requirements of the theory of special relativity, in addition
to those of quantum theory.

Constructing a quantum theory of elementary particles which is consistent with special

relativity leads to the conclusion that for each particle of nature, whether it is an elementary
particle or a hadron, there must exist an associated particle, called an antiparticle, with the
same mass as the corresponding particle. If the particle is electrically charged, then the
antiparticle will have the opposite charge. Experimental evidence confirms this important
theoretical prediction. If we write the particle as P , then the antiparticle is in general written
with a bar over it, i.e. P . For example, associated with every quark, q , is an antiquark, q .
However, for very common particles the bar is often omitted. Thus, for example, the
- +
negatively charged electron e has an antiparticle e , called the positron. In this case the
superscript denoting the charge makes explicit the fact that the antiparticle has the opposite
electric charge to that of its associated particle. Electric charge is just one example of a
quantum number (spin, introduced earlier, is another) that characterises a particle, whether it
is elementary or composite (i.e. a hadron). Many quantum numbers differ in sign for particle
and antiparticle, and electric charge is an example of this. We will meet others later. When
brought together, particle-antiparticle pairs can annihilate each other, releasing their
2
combined rest energy 2mc as photons or other particles. Finally, we note that there is
symmetry between particles and antiparticles, and it is a convention which is which; for
example, we could call the positron the particle, and the electron the antiparticle. That we do
not do so merely reflects the fact that the matter around us contains electrons rather than
positrons, rather than the other way round.

1.4 Particle reactions

Reactions involving elementary particles and/or hadrons are summarised by equations by
analogy with chemical reactions, in which the different particles are represented by symbols,
which sometimes, but not always, have a superscript to denote their electric charge. In the
reaction
ne + n Æ e - + p
-
for example, an electron neutrino ne collides with a neutron n to produce an electron e and
a proton p; while the equation

e- + p Æ e- + p

† represents an electron and proton interacting to give the same particles in the final state, but
travelling in different directions. This latter type of reaction, in which the particles remain
unchanged, is called elastic scattering, while the first reaction is an example of inelastic
scattering. Collisions between given initial particles do not always lead to the same final
state, but can lead to different final states with different probabilities. For example, an
electron-positron collision can give rise to elastic scattering

e+ + e- Æ e+ + e-

or annihilation, an inelastic reaction, to give either two or three photons in the final state

e+ + e- Æ g + g or e+ + e- Æ g + g + g

1.3
Finally, some particles are unstable and spontaneously decay to other, lighter particles. An
example of this is the neutron, which decays by the b-decay reaction

n Æ p + e- + ne

with a mean lifetime of about 900 seconds. (The reason that this involves an antineutrino
rather than a neutrino will become clear presently.) Many nuclei also decay via the b-decay
reaction. Thus, denoting a nucleus with Z protons and N nucleons as (Z, N), we have, for
example
(Z, N ) Æ (Z + 1,N) + e - + n e

This reaction is, in effect, the decay of a neutron bound in a nucleus.

1.5 Feynman diagrams

Particle reactions, like those above, are brought about by the fundamental forces between the
elementary particles involved. A convenient way of illustrating this is to use Feynman
diagrams. There are mathematical techniques associated with these, which enable them to
be used to calculate the quantum mechanical probabilities for given reactions to occur, but in
these lectures they will only be used as a convenient pictorial description of reaction
mechanisms. We first illustrate them for the case of electromagnetic reactions, which arise
from the emission and/or absorption of photons. For example, the dominant interaction
between two electrons is due to the exchange of a single photon, which is emitted by one
electron and absorbed by the other. This mechanism, which gives rise to the familiar
Coulomb interaction at large distances, is illustrated in the Feynman diagram Fig.1.1a.

+ - - - + + + +
Fig.1.1 One-photon exchange in (a) e + e Æ e + e and (b) e + e Æ e + e

In such diagrams, by convention, the initial particles are shown on the left and the final
particles to the right. Spin-1/2 fermions (such as the electron) are drawn as solid lines and
photons are drawn as wiggly lines. The arrow heads pointing to the right indicate that the
solid lines represent electrons. In the case of photon exchange between two positrons, which
is shown in Fig.1.1b, the arrowheads on the antiparticle (positron) lines are conventionally
shown as pointing to the left.

The dominant contribution to the annihilation reaction e +e - Æ gg is shown in Fig.1.2. The

positron emits a photon and then annihilates with an electron to produce the second photon.
(You could also draw another diagram where the electron emits the photon before
annihilating with the positron to produce the second photon.) In interpreting these diagrams,
it is important to remember that the direction of the arrows on fermion lines do not indicate
their direction of motion, but merely whether the fermions are particles or antiparticles; and
that the initial particles are always to the left and the final particles to the right.
1.4
 Fig.1.2 The reaction e + + e - Æ g + g

A feature of the above diagrams is that they are constructed from a single fundamental three-
line vertex. This is characteristic of electromagnetic processes. Each vertex has a line
corresponding to a single photon being emitted or absorbed; while one fermion line has the
arrow pointing toward the vertex and the other away, guaranteeing charge conservation at
the vertex, which is one of the rules of Feynman diagrams (c.f. Kirchhoff’s laws in
electromagnetism.) For example, a vertex like Fig.1.3 would correspond to a process in
which an electron emitted a photon and turned into a positron. This would violate charge
conservation and is therefore forbidden.

Fig.1.3 The forbidden vertex e - Æ e + + g

Feynman diagrams can also be used to describe the fundamental weak and strong
interactions. This is illustrated by Fig.1.4, which shows the dominant contributions to the
elastic scattering reaction n e + e - Æ ne + e - and Fig.1.5, which shows the exchange of a
single gluon (represented by a coiled line) between two quarks.

0
Fig.1.4 W and Z exchange contributions to the reaction n e + e - Æ ne + e -

1.5
 Fig.1.5 Single-gluon exchange in the reaction q + q Æ q + q

1.6 Particle exchange – range of forces

At each vertex of a Feynman diagram, charge is conserved. We will see later that, depending
on the nature of the interaction (strong, weak or electromagnetic), other quantum numbers
are also conserved. However, it is easy to show that energy and momentum cannot be
conserved simultaneously.

Fig.1.6 Exchange of a particle X in the reaction A + B Æ A + B

Consider a general case of a reaction A + B Æ A + B mediated by the exchange of a particle

X, as shown in the Feynman diagram of Fig.1.6. In the rest frame of the incident particle A,
the lower vertex represents the process,

A(M A c 2 , 0) Æ A(E A ,pA c) + X(E X ,- pA c)

where E A is the total energy of particle A. Thus, if we denote by Pi the 4-vector for particle
A, then
† PA = (E A , pA c )

and for two particles A and B, the 4-vector product is

PA PB = E A E B - pA pB c 2
so that
PA 2 = E A 2 - pA 2 c 2 = MA 2c 4

Applying this to the diagram, gives E A = (p 2c 2 + MA 2c 4 )1/2 , E X = (p2 c 2 + M X 2c 4 )1/2 , p = p

and momentum conservation has been imposed. This is called a virtual process because X
does not appear as a real particle in the final state. The energy difference between the final
and initial states is given by

1.6
 DE = E X + E A - M A c 2 Æ 2pc , pÆ •
2
Æ MX c , p Æ0

Thus DE ≥ M X c 2 for all p, i.e. energy is not conserved. However, by the Heisenberg
uncertainty principle, such an energy violation is allowed, but only for a time t ª h DE ,
where h ≡ h 2p , so we immediately obtain

r ª R ≡ h MX c

as the maximum distance over which X can propagate before being absorbed by particle B.
This maximum distance is called the range of the interaction.

The electromagnetic interaction has an infinite range because the exchanged particle is a
massless photon. In contrast, the weak interaction is associated with the exchange of very
heavy particles – the W and Z bosons. This leads to ranges that are of order
RW,Z ª 2x10 -18 m . In many applications, this range is very small compared to the de Broglie
wavelengths of all the particles involved. The weak interaction can then be approximated by
a zero range or point interaction, corresponding to the limit as shown in Fig.1.7.

Fig.1.7 Zero-range interaction in the limit M X Æ •

The fundamental strong interaction has infinite range because, like the photon, gluons have
zero
† mass. However, hadrons experience a strong short-range interaction, which in the case
-15
of two nucleons, for example, has a range of about 10 m , corresponding to the exchange
of a particle with an effective mass of about 1/7 of the mass of the proton. This should
properly be called a “residual”, or nuclear, strong interaction. It is a complicated effect due
to the interactions between the charge distributions within the two hadrons. Two neutral
atoms also experience an interaction (van der Waals force), which although it has its origins
in the fundamental Coulomb forces, is of much shorter range. Although an analogous
mechanism is not in fact responsible for the nuclear strong interaction, it does illustrate that
the force between distributions of particles can be much more complicated than the simpler
forces between their components. We will return to the nature of the nuclear force later in
this course.

1.7 Yukawa potential

In the limit that M A becomes large, we can regard B as being scattered by a static potential
of which A is the source. This potential will in general be spin dependent, but its main
features can be obtained by neglecting spin and considering X to be a spin-0 boson, in which
case it will obey the Klein-Gordon equation.

1.7
 ∂ 2f (x,t)
-h 2 2 = -h 2c 2— 2f (x,t) + M X 2 c 4 f (x,t)
∂t

This is a relativistic equation, which is derived by starting from the relativistic mass-energy
relation E 2 = p 2c 2 + M 2 c 4 and using the usual quantum mechanical operator substitutions

∂ ∂
p = -ih and E = ih
∂x ∂t

The static solution of the Klein-Gordon equation satisfies

M X 2c 2
— 2f (x) = f (x)
h2

where we interpret f(x) as a static potential. For M X = 0 this equation is the same as that
obeyed by the electrostatic potential, and for a charge -e interacting with a point charge +e
at the origin, the appropriate solution is the Coulomb potential

e2 1
V(r) = -ef (r) = -
4pe 0 r

where r = x and e0 is the dielectric constant. The corresponding solution in the case where
M X 2 ≠ 0 is
g 2 e - r /R
V(r) = -
4p r

where R is the range defined earlier and g, the so-called coupling constant, is a parameter
associated with each vertex of a Feynman diagram and represents the basic strength of the
interaction. (Although we call g a constant, in general it will have a dependence on the
momentum carried by the exchanged particle. We ignore this in what follows.) For
simplicity we have assumed equal coupling strengths for the coupling of particle X to the
particles A and B.

This form of potential is called a Yukawa potential, after Hideki Yukawa who first
introduced the idea of forces due to massive particle exchange in 1935. For M X = 0 , it
reduces to the familiar Coulomb form, while for very large masses the interaction is
approximately point-like. It is conventional to introduce a dimensionless parameter a X by

g2
aX =
4phc

which characterises
† the strength of the interaction at short distances r £ R . For the
electromagnetic interaction this is the fine structure constant

a ≡ e 2 4pe 0 hc ª 1 137

although recall the earlier remark that in general a X will have a dependence on the
momentum carried by particle X. In the case of the electromagnetic force this dependence is
relatively weak.

1.8
 1.8 The scattering amplitude
We have mentioned earlier that Feynman diagrams can be turned into probabilities for a
process by a complicated set of mathematical rules. We will not pursue this in detail in this
course, but I will show in principle the relation to observables, i.e. things that can be
measured, concentrating on the case of a two-body scattering reaction. The intermediate step
is the amplitude f, the modulus squared of which is directly related to the probability of the
process occurring. It is also called the invariant amplitude because it should be the same in
all inertial frames of reference. To get some idea of the structure of f, we will use non-
relativistic quantum mechanics and assume that the coupling constant g is small compared to
4phc so that the interaction is a small perturbation on the free particle solution, which we
take as plane waves. In lowest order perturbation theory (i.e. in an expansion of the
amplitude in powers of g2 , we keep only the first term), the amplitude for a particle to be
scattered from an initial momentum qi to a final moment q f by a potential V(x) is
proportional to

f (q) = Ú d 3 xV (x)exp[iq.x / h]

i.e. the Fourier transform of the potential, where q = qi - q f is the momentum transfer from
initial to final states. (If you have not seen this before, you can find a derivation in many
quantum mechanics books, e.g. F Mandel, Quantum Mechanics, sec 10.2.2.)

The integration may be done by using the substitutions

q.x = q r cosq
and
d 3 x = r2 sinq dq dr df

where r = x . For the Yukawa potential, this gives

-g 2 h 2
f (q) = 2
q + M X 2c 2

This amplitude corresponds to the exchange of a single particle, as shown for example in
Figs.1.2 and 1.4. The structure of the amplitude is a numerator, which is proportional to the
product of the couplings at the two vertices (or equivalently a X in this case), and a
denominator which depends on the mass of the exchanged particle and the momentum
transfer squared. The denominator is called the propagator for particle X. In a relativistic
2
calculation,
† the term q becomes q 2 , where q is the four-momentum transfer.
†
All the above is for the exchange of a single particle. It is also possible to drawn more
complicated Feynman diagrams, that correspond to the exchange of more than one particle.
- -
An example of such a diagram for elastic e e scattering is shown in Fig.1.8

1.9
 - - - -
Fig.1.8 Two-photon exchange in the reaction e + e Æ e + e

The number of vertices in any diagram is called the order n, and when the probability
n
associated with any given Feynman diagram is calculated, it always contains a factor of a .
The probability associated with the single-photon exchange diagrams of Fig.1.1 thus contain
2 4
a factor of a and the contribution from two-photon exchange is of order a . The latter is
very small compared to the contribution from single-photon exchange because a is a small
number. This is again a general feature of electromagnetic interactions. Because the fine
structure constant is very small, only the lowest-order diagrams which contribute to a given
process need be taken into account, and more complicated higher-order diagrams with more
vertices can to a good approximation be ignored in most applications.

1.9 Cross-sections
The next step is to relate the amplitude to measurables. For scattering reactions the
appropriate observable is the cross-section. In a typical scattering experiment, a beam of
particles is allowed to hit a target and the rates of production of various particles in the final
state are counted. (We will discuss more about the practical aspects of experiments later in
the lectures.) The rates will be proportional to: (a) the number N of particles in the target
illuminated by the beam; and (b) the rate per unit area at which beam particles cross a small
surface placed in the beam at rest with respect to the target and perpendicular to the beam
direction. The latter is called the flux and is given by

J = nb vi

where nb is the density of particles in the beam and vi their velocity in the rest frame of the
target. Hence the rate Wr at which a specific reaction occurs in a particular experiment can be
written in the form
Wr = JNs r

where s r is called the cross-section for reaction r. The product JN is called the luminosity L,
i.e. †
L≡ JN
†
and contains all the dependencies on the densities and geometries of the beam and target. The
†
cross-section is independent of these factors. You can see from the above equations that the
cross-section has the dimensions of area; and the rate per target particle Js r at which the
reaction occurs is equal to the rate at which beam particles would hit a surface of area s ,
placed in the beam at rest with respect to the target and perpendicular to the beam direction.
Since the area of such a surface is unchanged by a Lorentz transformation in the beam

1.10
direction, the cross-section is the same in all inertial frames of reference; i.e. it is a Lorentz
invariant.

The quantity s r is better named as the partial cross-section, because it is the cross-section
for a particular reaction r. The total cross-section s is defined by

s ≡ Â sr
r

Another useful quantity is the differential cross-section, ds r (q,f ) dW , which is defined by

ds r (q ,f )
dWr ≡ JN dW
dW

where dWr is the measured rate for the particles to be emitted into an element of solid angle
dW = d cosq df in the direction (q ,f ) . The partial cross-section may be obtained by
integrating over angles, i.e.

2p 1 ds r (q ,f)
sr = Ú df Ú d cosq
0 -1 dW

The final step is to write these formulas in terms of the scattering amplitude f (q) we
defined earlier as appropriate for describing the scattering of a non-relativistic spinless
particle from a potential. To do this it is convenient to consider a single beam particle
interacting with a single target particle and to confine the whole system in a cube of
arbitrary volume V, which cancels in the calculation and which we will take to be a cube of
side L. The incident flux is then given by

J = nb vi = v i V

and since the number of target particles is N = 1, the differential rate is

vi ds r (q ,f )
dWr = dW
V dW

In quantum mechanics, provide the interaction is not too strong, the transition rate for any
process is given in perturbation theory by

2p 2
dWr =
h Ú d 3xy f *V (x)y i r(E f )
This equation is a form of Fermi’s Second Golden Rule, which you will meet in quantum
mechanics. The term r(E f ) is the density-of-states factor and we take the initial and final
state wavefunctions to be plane waves:

1 1
yi = exp[iqi .x / h] , yf = exp[iqf .x / h]
V V

1.11
 where the final momentum q f lies within a small solid angle dW located in the direction
(q ,f ) . Thus,
2p 2
dWr = 2 f (q) r(E f )
hV

where f (q) is the scattering amplitude defined previously. The density of states r(E f ) is
calculated by setting r(E)dE equal to the number of possible quantum states of the final-
state particles which have a total energy between E and E + dE . It is found by firstly
evaluating r(q) where r(q)dq is the number of possible final states with q = q lying
between q and q + dq and then changing variable using

dq
r(q) dE = r( E)dE
dE

The possible values of the momentum q are restricted by the boundary conditions to be

Ê 2ph ˆ Ê 2ph ˆ Ê 2ph ˆ

qx = n , qy = n , qz = n
Ë L ¯ x Ë L ¯ y Ë L ¯ z

where nx etc are integers. Hence the number of final states with momentum lying in the
momentum space volume
d 3q = q2 dq dW

corresponding to momenta pointing into the solid angle dW with momentum between q and
q + dq is given by

3
† Ê L ˆ 3 V
r(q)dq = Ë d q = q 2 dqdW
2ph ¯ (2ph) 3

The derivative
dq 1
=
† dE v
and so
2
V qf
r(E f ) = dW
† (2ph) 3 v f

If we use this in the expression for dWr , we have

ds 1 qf 2 2
= 2 4 f (q)
dW 4p h vi v f

This is the final result and is actually also true for the general two-body relativistic scattering
process

A(qi ) + B(-q i ) Æ A(q f ) + B(-q f )

although the precise form of the external factors depend on the spins of the particles.

1.12
1.10 Unstable particles
In the case of an unstable state, the observable of interest is its lifetime at rest t , or
equivalently its natural decay width, given by G = h t which is a measure of the rate of the
decay reaction. In general, an initial unstable state will decay to several final states and in
this case we define G f as the partial width for channel f and

G = Â Gf
f

as the total decay width, while

Bf ≡ Gf G

is defined as the branching ratio for decay to channel f.

The energy decay distribution of an unstable state has the characteristic Breit-Wigner form

Gf
Pf (W ) µ
(W - M) 2 c 4 + G 2 4

where M is the mass of the decaying state and W is the invariant mass of the decay products.
(The overall factor depends on the spins of the particles involved.). This form arises from a
state that decays exponentially with time, although a proper proof of this is quite lengthy.
(See e.g. Appendix B of Martin and Shaw, Particle Physics.) A plot of this formula is shown
in Fig.1.9. This is the same formula that describes the widths of atomic spectral lines.

Fig.1.9 The Breit-Wigner formula

If an unstable state is produced in a scattering reaction, then the cross-section for that
reaction will show an enhancement described by the Breit-Wigner formula. In this case we
say we have produced a resonance state. In the vicinity of a resonance of mass M, the cross-
section for the reaction i Æ f will have the form

1.13
 Gi G f
s if µ
(E - Mc 2 )2 + G 2 4

where E is the total energy of the system. Again, the form of the overall constant will
depend on the spins of the particles involved.

1.11 Units: length, mass and energy

Most branches of science introduce special units that are convenient for their own purposes.
Nuclear and particle physics are no exceptions Distances tend to be measured in
femtometres or, equivalently fermis, with 1fm ≡ 10-15 m . In these units, the radius of the
proton is about 0.8 fm. The range of the nuclear force between protons and neutrons is of
-3
order 1–2 fm, while the range of the weak force is of order 10 fm . For comparison, the
5
radii of atoms are of order 10 fm . A common unit for area is the barn defined by
-28 2
1b = 10 m . For example, the total cross-section for pp scattering (a strong interaction) is
a few tens of millibarns (mb) (nuclear cross-sections are very much larger), whereas the
same quantity for np scattering (a weak interaction) is a few tens of femtobarns (fb),
depending on the energies involved.

Energies are invariably specified in terms of the electron volt, eV, defined as the energy
required to raise the electric potential of an electron or proton by one volt. In terms of S.I.
12
units, 1eV = 1.6x10-19 joules. The units MeV = 106 eV , GeV = 10 9 eV and TeV = 10 eV
are also often used. In terms of these units, atomic ionization energies are typically a few
eV, nuclear binding energies are typically 8 MeV per particle, and the highest particle
energies produced in present accelerators are of order 1 TeV.
2
In order to create a new particle of mass M, an energy at least as great as its rest energy Mc
must be supplied. The rest energies of the electron and proton are 0.51 MeV and 0.94 GeV
0
respectively, whereas the W and Z bosons have rest energies of 80 GeV and 91 GeV,
respectively. Correspondingly their masses are conveniently measured in MeV c 2 or
2
GeV c , so that, for example,

M e = 0.51MeV c 2 , M p = 0.94 GeV c 2 , MW = 80.3 GeV c 2 , M Z = 91.2 GeV c 2

In terms of S.I. units, 1MeV c 2 = 1.78x10 -30 kg .

Although practical calculations are expressed in the above units, it is usual in particle
physics to make theoretical calculations in units chosen such that h ≡ h 2p = 1 and c = 1
† (called natural units) and some books you meet will do this. However, in these lectures, as I
will also be talking about nuclear physics, I will use only practical units.

Some useful conversion factors are:

h = 6.58x10 -25 GeV.s ; hc = 1.97x10 -16 GeV.m

You can find others in the recommended books.

1.14
†