Scribd
Upload
53 views

IP Digest

asdf

Uploaded by

Adi Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
53 views

IP Digest

asdf

Uploaded by

Adi Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Close Reader

SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 550

Information | Reference
Copy Selection
Case Title: Select some text within a
EDUARDO BUGHAW, JR., paragraph and click here to
petitioner, vs. TREASURE ISLAND copy the selected text. Citation
INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, included.
respondent.

Citation: 550 SCRA 307


Judgment affirmed in full.
More...
Notes.·A notice of appeal may be validly substituted by
Search Result an appeal brief. (Pahilan vs. Tabalba, 230 SCRA 205
[1994])
In this jurisdiction, a fine delineation exists between
renewal of a contract and extension of its period·a clause
in a lease providing for an extension operates of its own
force to create an additional term, but a clause providing
for a renewal merely creates an obligation to execute a new
lease contract for the additional term. (Buce vs. Court of
Appeals, 332 SCRA 151 [2000])
··o0o··

G.R. No. 173151. March 28, 2008.*

EDUARDO BUGHAW, JR., petitioner, vs. TREASURE


ISLAND INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, respondent.

Labor Law; Substantial Evidence; Words and Phrases; Where the


Labor Arbiter and the NLRC, on one hand, and the Court of
Appeals, on the other, arrived at divergent conclusions although
they considered the very same evidences submitted by the parties, it
becomes incumbent upon the Supreme Court to determine whether
there is substantial evidence to support the finding of the Labor
Arbiter and the NLRC that petitioner was illegally dismissed;
Substantial evidence is such amount of relevant evidence which a
reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion,
even if other equally reasonable minds might conceivably opine
otherwise.·The Labor Arbiter and the NLRC both ruled that
petitioner was illegally dismissed from employment and ordered the
payment of his unpaid wages, backwages, and separation pay, while
the Court of Appeals found otherwise. The Labor Arbiter and the
NLRC, on one hand, and the Court of Appeals, on the other, arrived
at divergent conclusions although they considered the very same
evidences submitted by the

_______________

* THIRD DIVISION.

308

308 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

Bughaw, Jr. vs. Treasure Island Industrial Corporation

parties. It is, thus, incumbent upon us to determine whether there


is substantial evidence to support the finding of the Labor Arbiter
and the NLRC that petitioner was illegally dismissed. Substantial
evidence is such amount of relevant evidence which a reasonable
mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, even if
other equally reasonable minds might conceivably opine otherwise.
Same; Termination of Employment; The two (2) facets of a valid
termination of employment are: (a) the legality of the act of
dismissal, i.e., the dismissal must be under any of the just causes
provided under Article 282 of the Labor Code, and (b) the legality of
the manner of dismissal, which means that there must be observance
of the requirements of due process, otherwise known as the two-
notice
© Copyright 2019 Central rule.·Under
Book the reserved.
Supply, Inc. All rights Labor Code, the requirements for the lawful

You might also like