Scribd
Upload
22 views

Population: No Y N U

This document summarizes the results of a critical appraisal of a study on rhinovirus wheezing illness and the generic risk of childhood-onset asthma. The critical appraisal assessed several criteria across four domains: population, data collection, study design, and results. For the population domain, the study was found to have a representative population, clearly defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, and a large enough sample size. However, the population choice was found to be biased. For data collection, data collection methods were clearly described but biases were not reduced for face-to-face surveys. The instrument was validated but those involved in data collection also delivered services. For study design, the study type was appropriate and outcomes were clearly stated

Uploaded by

Sutisna Nisa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
22 views

Population: No Y N U

This document summarizes the results of a critical appraisal of a study on rhinovirus wheezing illness and the generic risk of childhood-onset asthma. The critical appraisal assessed several criteria across four domains: population, data collection, study design, and results. For the population domain, the study was found to have a representative population, clearly defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, and a large enough sample size. However, the population choice was found to be biased. For data collection, data collection methods were clearly described but biases were not reduced for face-to-face surveys. The instrument was validated but those involved in data collection also delivered services. For study design, the study type was appropriate and outcomes were clearly stated

Uploaded by

Sutisna Nisa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Population

No Y N U
1. Is the study population representative of all users, actual and Y
eligible, who might be included in the study?
2. Are inclusion and exclusion criteria definitively defined? Y
3. Is the sample size large enough for sufficiently precise estimates? Y
4. Is the response rate large enough for sufficiently precise estimates? Y
5. Is the choice of population bias-free? N
6. If a comperative study :
Were participants rendomized into groups? Y
Were the groups comparable at baseline? Y
If groups were not comparable at baseline, was incomparability
addressed by the authors in the analysis?
7. Was informed consent obtained? Y

Yes :7

No :1

U :0

Y/N : 7/8 X 100 = 87,5 % (VALID)

Data Collection
No Y N U
1. Are data collectoin methods clearly described? Y
2. If a face-to-face survay, were intra-observer and intra-observer bias N
reduced?
3. Is the data collection instrument validated? Y
4. Is based on regularly collected statistics, are the statistics free from Y
subjectivity?
5. Does the study measure the outcome at a time appropriate for Y
capturing the intervention’s effect?
6. Is the instrument included in the publication? Y
7. Are questoins posed clearly enough to be able to elicit precise Y
answers?
8. Were those involved in data collection not involved in delivering a N
service to the target population?

Yes :6

No :2

U :0

Y/N : 6/8 X 100 = 75 % (VALID)


Study Design
No Y N U
1. Is the study type/methodology utilized appropriate Y
2. Is there face validity?
3. Is the research methodology clearly stated at alevel of dertail that Y
would allow its replication?
4. Was ethics approval obtained? Y
5. Are the outcomes clearly stated? Y
6. Are the outcomes clearly discussed in relation to the data Y
collection?
Yes :5

No :0

U :0

Y/N : 5/5 X 100 = 100% (VALID)

Results
No Y N U
1. Are all the results clearly outlined? Y
2. Are confounding variables accounted for? Y
3. Do the conclusions accurately reflect the analysis? Y
4. Is subset analysis a minor, rather than a major, focus of the article? Y
5. Are suggestions provided for further areas to research? Y

Yes :5

No :0

U :0

Y/N : 5/5 X 100 = 100 % (VALID)

HASIL AKHIR
POPULATION + DATA COLLECTION + STUDY DESIGN + RESULT

YES : 7 + 6 + 5 + 5 =24

NO :1+2=3

JUMLAH AKHIR : 24/27 X 100 = 88,89 % (VALID)


TUGAS CRITICAL APPRAISAL
RHINOVIRUS WHEEZING ILLNESS AND GENERIC
RISK OF CHILDHOOD-ONSET ASTHMA

SARA ASHARI
G1A113047

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN DOKTER


FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN DAN ILMU
PENDIDIKAN

UNIVERSITAS JAMBI

You might also like