Track & Trace PDF
Track & Trace PDF
IMPROVING MANUFACTURING
ENTERPRISE EFFICIENCIES THROUGH
TRACK AND TRACE TECHNOLOGIES
Abstract
Manufacturing enterprises are increasingly becoming global and face intense
pressure to improve efficiencies, enhance quality and reduce cost. This necessitated
the need to embrace new technologies continuously. ‘Track and trace’ is one such
technologies that can improve efficiencies across the manufacturing enterprise.
Tracking is popularly used to know the exact location of a product during transport
while traceability is a static approach and is usually preferred for stationary goods
or products. Several track and trace technologies are now available which include
Radio-frequency Identification (RFID), satellite navigation systems and barcodes that
monitor the movement of goods in real time. These technologies help organizations
plan and optimize their value chain in real time. This white paper presents an
overview of popular track and trace technologies, use cases in the manufacturing
industry and a perspective on how they will evolve in coming years.
Need for Track and Trace and manually, posing several challenges does require timely arrival of all inputs
Technologies for the manufacturing enterprise such such as raw materials, components,
as excessive or sub-optimal inventory etc. This is where the proper tracking of
A typical manufacturing enterprise of raw materials as well as finished goods from all suppliers and inventory
consists of supplier ecosystems, goods. Operators or machines are becomes important. Manufacturing
manufacturing facilities and end-product unable to run owing to late arrival of products within stringent timelines
distribution ecosystems. Raw materials, goods, raw materials, components, could result in issues of non-compliance
components, sub-systems, and finished and other production inputs. As most and poor quality, leading to the recall
goods flow across the manufacturing current manufacturing organizations of components or even fatal accidents.
enterprise – from suppliers to are global, the entire ecosystem is In USA, the number of recalled food
manufacturing facilities and, finally, to spread across regions, countries and products and its associated costs have
the end-users as shown in Figure 1. These continents. Products are distributed
[1]
doubled since 2005 . Instances of fatal
goods and items are tracked continuously across this ecosystem based on demand- errors from well-known brands raise
through various systems such as supply supply dynamics. Thus, there are many the question: How can manufacturers
chain management (SCM), enterprise industry-specific nuances that need and supply chain executives ensure the
resource planning (ERP), manufacturing to be addressed such as ensuring the two main components of food safety,
execution systems (MES), and other quality of perishable goods before they namely, prevention and timely response?
information technology (IT) systems to reach processing factories. This makes it While some players still use antiquated,
improve overall efficiency. essential to synchronize the flow of these error-prone and manual methods, others
However, many of these systems are not materials or goods across the value chain are able to effectively leverage track and
connected to operational technology in real-time to improve overall efficiency. trace methods to reduce cost and ensure
(OT) assets on the manufacturing shop efficiency and quality.
Time-to-market is critical in the
floor. This means that the data flow from manufacturing industry. While this Once products are manufactured, they
OT systems to IT systems is done offline does not entail faster production, it are sent into the distribution chain for
Supplier 1 Customer 1
Supplier 3 Customer 3
Figure 1: Manufacturing ecosystem
transport to various locations and clients car manufacturers need to recall all the Current Technology
across countries. Keeping track of all cars manufactured during a particular Landscape
these products and their servicing is a period or in a specific plant even though
significant challenge, particularly when the actual number of defective cars could The advent of the Industrial Internet of
the product is immobile. In cases of faulty be much lesser. In the pharmaceutical Things (IIoT) is helping manufacturers
manufacturing practices or products, supply chain, the high demand for drugs, overcome these challenges through
organizations are forced to expend online drug shopping and inability to track and trace technologies such
significant time and money to inform trace a drug’s origins make it easy to as RFID, satellite navigation systems
affected customers and carry out repairs counterfeit drugs. Unfortunately, most and barcodes. Tracking is popularly
or replacements. supply chain executives are unable used to know the exact location when
to determine where, when and what transporting goods while traceability is
For example, in the automotive a static approach for immobile goods or
quantities of products are shipped. Thus,
industry, there are innumerable products. Location-based services (LBS)
the lack of real-time visibility during the
instances of product recall due to faulty can include geographical location-based
product lifecycle can impose a high cost
components. Without proper tracking, solutions for outdoor applications. These
on manufacturing companies.
Selecting the right track-and-trace technology depends on many factors as shown in Table 1.
Line of Sight Scanner must physically Can only be used within Needs to be within the Long range is allowed
see and scan the bar the read range read range of about 4
code inches
Ambient lighting Works well in well-lit No ambient lighting No ambient lighting No ambient lighting
arrangement areas needed needed needed
Durability Is easily scratched and Has better protection Not durable and is Can be kept inside a
cannot be read if the barcode and can withstand harsh mainly used for strong container or box
is dirty, greasy or wet environments smartphones
Ability to store Read-only Includes a read-write tag Includes a read-write tag N/A
information
Cost Cheaper than RFID Costlier than bar code Costlier than RFID tags Most expensive option
technology but cheaper than GPS
devices
Security Highly secure Possible security risk due More secure than RFID Secure
to wireless technology tags
Handheld device Easy to support a bar code Extra hardware needed, NFC device can be a tag Supported by mobile
support reader on any camera-ena- which can be costly as well as a reader devices
bled mobile
Typically used in Non-critical assets, preferred Can easily handle Smartphones and for Logistics-related work,
in the retail industry industrial and harsh credit card payments navigation and military
environments applications
RFID Tag,
• Reduced number of foreign object
Barcode, damage (FOD) incidents
Serial Number server
Attachment Database server
• Quick asset search
Figure 2: Asset Service tracking system
• Optimized production process and
process visibility
Gateway
Gateway
SCADA / HMI
Mobile MOM / MES PLC / DCS Historian Smart Devices
Sensor / Device
Connectivity
Sensor Actuator 2D Code RFID
Analytics
Service Apps
Presentation
Analytics
Devices
Cloud Analytics
Gateway Web App
Web Dashboards
Event Hub
RFID Tags and
RFID Reader
HDInsight Storage
Storage
External Systems
Web Dashboards
Figure 5: Functional architecture
Web Service
2. Gordana M., Mirjana C. and Tadija L., RFID and Supply Chain Management for Manufacturing Digital
Enterprise, In: Supply Chain Management – New Perspectives, ISBN 978-953-307-633-1, 2011
We thank Santosh Kumar C. H. for meticulously compiling the available literature for this paper. We also
Acknowledgments thank Amrit Raj (Senior Project Manager, Engineering Services, Infosys) and Deepa Bellary (Technology
Architect, Engineering Services, Infosys) for their valuable inputs and reviews.
About the Authors Kumar Vikas Singh is a Senior Technology Architect with Infosys from the Advanced
Engineering Group (AEG). He has 12 years of experience in the energy sector across
various projects such as oil and gas data acquisition, optimization, digitization of oil
fields, and asset tracking and management. Kumar holds a degree in metallurgical
engineering from BIT Sindri, Dhanbad.
Dr. Ravi Kumar G.V.V. is Associate Vice President and Head of Advanced Engineering
Group (AEG) at Infosys with 24 years of research and industrial experience. His areas
of interest include aircraft structures, knowledge-based engineering, composites,
structural health monitoring, and Industrial IoT. He has authored more than 40
technical papers and has filed a patent. He has worked on various prestigious projects
related to engineering design and development as well as KBE tool development
for military and commercial aircraft programs. He holds a PhD from IIT, Delhi and
has worked with Tata Research Design and Development Center (TRDDC), Pune, and
Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), Bangalore, before joining Infosys.
© 2018 Infosys Limited, Bengaluru, India. All Rights Reserved. Infosys believes the information in this document is accurate as of its publication date; such information is subject to change without notice. Infosys
acknowledges the proprietary rights of other companies to the trademarks, product names and such other intellectual property rights mentioned in this document. Except as expressly permitted, neither this
documentation nor any part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, printing, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the
prior permission of Infosys Limited and/ or any named intellectual property rights holders under this document.