CSIS Manual v2019.
CSIS Manual v2019.
Index System
Manual for Implementation in Municipalities
2019
VERSION 2019.0.2
No part of this Manual may be reproduced in any form for commercial purposes without
any written consent from the Bureau of Local Government Supervision,
Department of the Interior and Local Government,
Quezon City, Philippines.
To verify if this is the latest edition of this manual and for further inquiries, you may send an
e-mail to the CSIS National Team at [email protected].
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1
2. PROJECT MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................... 3
2.1. Project Cycle ............................................................................................................... 3
2.2. The LRI Team .............................................................................................................. 4
2.2.1. The Project Manager (PM)............................................................................... 4
2.2.2. The Field Supervisor (FS) ................................................................................ 5
2.2.3. The Field Interviewer (FI) ................................................................................. 6
2.2.4. The Data Processor (DP)................................................................................. 7
2.3. Translation of the Questionnaire .............................................................................. 7
2.4. LGU Service Delivery Baseline Data ........................................................................ 8
3. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................... 10
3.1. Service Areas and Service Indicators .................................................................... 11
3.1.1. Health Services .............................................................................................. 11
3.1.2. Support to Education ..................................................................................... 11
3.1.3. Social Welfare Services ................................................................................. 11
3.1.4. Governance and Response ........................................................................... 11
3.1.5. Public Works and Infrastructure ..................................................................... 12
3.1.6. Environmental Management .......................................................................... 12
3.1.7. Economic and Investment Promotion ............................................................ 12
3.2. LGU Service Delivery Profile................................................................................... 12
3.3. CSIS Core Concepts ................................................................................................ 13
3.4. Reasons for Non-Availment and Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction ............................ 14
3.5. Socio-Demographic and Housing Profile .............................................................. 15
3.6. Perception of Corruption ......................................................................................... 16
3.7. Attitudes Toward the LGU ....................................................................................... 16
3.8. Overall Satisfaction .................................................................................................. 17
3.9. Overall Need for Action ........................................................................................... 18
3.10. Recommendations for Improvement ..................................................................... 18
4. MULTI-STAGE PROBABILITY SAMPLING ........................................................................... 19
4.1. Probability Sampling Proportional to Size ............................................................ 19
4.1.1. Generating Sample Spots .............................................................................. 20
4.2. Sampling BEFORE Field Coverage ........................................................................ 21
4.3. Sampling DURING Field Coverage ......................................................................... 22
4.3.1. Dispatching .................................................................................................... 22
4.3.2. Interviewing .................................................................................................... 25
4.3.3. Replacement .................................................................................................. 28
4.3.4. Callbacks ........................................................................................................ 28
4.3.5. Substitution .................................................................................................... 28
5. INTERVIEWING PROCEDURES ............................................................................................. 30
5.1. Before Leaving for Area Coverage ......................................................................... 30
5.2. Upon Arrival at an Area before Interviewing ......................................................... 30
5.3. Introducing Yourself to the Respondent ............................................................... 31
5.4. Socio-Demographic Page ........................................................................................ 31
5.5. Probability Respondent Table / Kish Grid ............................................................. 32
5.5.1. Six-Month Residency Requirement for PRs .................................................. 32
5.5.2. Eighteen (18) and Above Age Requirement .................................................. 32
5.6. Interview Proper ....................................................................................................... 33
5.6.1. After Interviewing ........................................................................................... 35
5.6.2. After Area Coverage ...................................................................................... 35
5.7. Data Editing............................................................................................................... 35
5.7.1. Control Pages ................................................................................................ 36
5.7.2. Probability Respondent Table/Kish Grid ........................................................ 36
5.7.3. Back checking ................................................................................................ 36
6. DATA PROCESSING ............................................................................................................... 37
6.1. Coding ....................................................................................................................... 37
6.1.1. Adding New Codes ........................................................................................ 38
6.1.2. Standard Codes ............................................................................................. 38
6.2. Encoding / Data Entry .............................................................................................. 38
6.3. Data Cleaning............................................................................................................ 39
6.4. Generating Frequency Distribution Tables ........................................................... 39
6.5. Processing Qualitative Responses ........................................................................ 39
7. Analysis Plan and Procedure ................................................................................................ 40
7.1. Percentage Scores ................................................................................................... 40
7.1.1. Percentage Scores for Service Indicators ..................................................... 40
7.1.2. Overall Service Area Percentage Scores ...................................................... 40
7.1.3. Citizen’s Overall Satisfaction and Need for Action Percentage Score .......... 41
7.2. Adjectival Ratings .................................................................................................... 41
7.3. Action Grid ................................................................................................................ 42
7.3.1. Continued Emphasis ...................................................................................... 43
7.3.2. Exceeded Expectations ................................................................................. 43
7.3.3. Secondary Priority .......................................................................................... 43
7.3.4. Opportunities for Improvement ...................................................................... 43
7.4. Analysis and Discussion of Processed Qualitative Data .................................... 44
8. Report Preparation ................................................................................................................. 45
8.1. Citizen Satisfaction Report Preparation ................................................................ 45
8.1.1. Outline ............................................................................................................ 45
Continuation… CS Report Outline .............................................................................................. 46
Continuation… CS Report Outline .............................................................................................. 47
Continuation… CS Report Outline .............................................................................................. 48
8.1.1. Service Indicator Discussion .......................................................................... 48
8.1.2. General Guidelines ........................................................................................ 49
8.2. Project Implementation Report Preparation ......................................................... 50
Attachments................................................................................................................ 50
9. Project Completion and Evaluation ...................................................................................... 51
10. Utilization Conferences .......................................................................................................... 52
10.1. Objectives ................................................................................................................. 52
10.2. Participants ............................................................................................................... 52
10.3. Technical Input ......................................................................................................... 53
10.4. Roles of the DILG and the LRI ................................................................................ 53
11. Annexes……………………………………….…………………………………………………55
A. Interviewer’s Kit Per Spot………………..………..………………….……………………56
B. Spot Allocation for LGUs with more than 30 barangays……..…………………...........57
C. Spot Allocation for LGUs with 30 or less barangays…….……………………………...59
D. Allocation of Samples to Barangays………………………………………………..…….60
E. SP-RS and FI Control………………………………………………………………….......61
F. Spot Map With Details……...………………………………………………………...........62
G. Spot Map Without Details…………………………………………………………..……...63
H. Expanding the Coverage Area…………………………………………...…………….....64
I. Randomized Control for Household Number and Service Area……………………….65
J. Sample Call Sheet (After Area Coverage)……………………………………………….67
K. Fieldwork Diary…………………..…………………………………………......................68
L. Project Implementation Report…………………..…………………………...…………...69
M. Service Delivery Baseline Data Template………………………………………………..72
N. Questionnaire……………………………………………………………….......................75
O. Technical Notes…………………………………………………………………………...100
Figures
Figure 1. The CSIS Project Cycle ......................................................................................... 3
Figure 3. LGU Service Delivery Baseline Data Collection and Utilization Process ................ 8
Figure 8. The Action Grid divides the services and service areas into four groups based on
adjectival ratings on satisfaction and need for action........................................................... 42
Charts
Table 1. Reference on Questions on Qualitative Data in the Questionnaire ........................ 14
Table 4. Reference on Overall Service Area Need for Action Questions in the Questionnaire
........................................................................................................................................... 18
Table 8. Derivation of Percentage Scores per Core Concept for Service Indicators ............ 40
Table 9. Adjectival ratings for the Percentage Scores and their Score Cut-offs and
Interpretations ..................................................................................................................... 41
Table 10. Summary of the Action Grid Quadrant’s General Directions ................................ 44
1. INTRODUCTION
The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) envisions local government units
(LGUs) to be self-reliant, development-oriented, safe, peaceful, socially protective, business
friendly, environmentally protective, as well as transparent, accountable and participative.
These challenges inspire the local government sector of the DILG to keep up with the trends
in governance and public management by setting higher standards in performance
management that target fulfilment of actual needs of the citizens. If citizens are able to avail
and maximize services that promote basic human development conditions, they are more
likely to participate in economic and civil life.
LGUs in the Philippines, under the Local Government Code of 1991, are mandated to provide
basic services that are responsive to the needs of their citizens. Section 16 of the same law
states that:
Every local government unit shall exercise the powers expressly granted, those necessarily
implied therefrom, as well as powers necessary, appropriate, or incidental for its efficient
and effective governance, and those which are essential to the promotion of the general
welfare. (…)
This describes the potent and central role of local governments in propelling and ushering in
local economic and social development in the communities.
This Department has been utilizing performance management tools for LGUs as early as the
1980s. As local governance is a vast domain in terms of conceptual breadth, programs were
focused on building the internal capacity of LGUs and on developing outcome indicators on a
number of thematic performance areas. These tools like the Local Governance Performance
Management System (LGPMS), Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG), and Transcending
Accountable and Responsive Governance through Empowerment and Teamwork (TARGET)
have been and are excellent diagnostic tools for LGUs to assess their readiness in providing
services to their people. However, given the high mandate to LGUs in ensuring the people’s
general welfare, it is only reasonable that the clients’ or the citizens’ perspective should also
be part of the equation in so far as local government performance is concerned.
As the intended recipients and end-users of public services, the citizens are deemed in a
better position to determine whether or not these services are delivered according to their
needs and to an extent fulfill their everyday and long-term human development requirements.
Thus, getting their sentiments, opinions and insights based on their own perception and
evaluation as consumers of local public services is a logical method of shaping what local
governments need to do to ensure welfare of the citizens, without neglect of statutory
requirements expected from them.
This context provides the reason for the interest of this Department to develop and implement
the Citizen Satisfaction Index System to serve as a tool for drawing in applicable information
for gauging citizen satisfaction that can be used for agenda-setting of economic and human
development plans and goals of LGUs. The revival of the CSIS was in the context of the DILG’s
renewed and expanded commitment towards widening the spaces for participation in local
governance to ultimately pave ways to the development of a more transparent, accountable
and highly performing local governments.
The CSIS uses a mix of quantitative and qualitative research methods through face-to-face
interviews with actual residents randomly sampled from the barangays of the target LGUs.
Through DILG Memorandum Circular 2019-12, the Citizen Satisfaction Index System will be
implemented in municipalities targeted by the DILG Regional Offices in order to equip them
with tools and procedures needed for implementation. Local Resource Institutes are
contracted by the Department as partners in gathering data and interpreting results for
development and research purposes.
The CSIS data have a number of potential uses for many stakeholders pursuing valuable
contribution in local and national socio-economic development. The CSIS data provide the
stakeholders, most importantly the LGUs, basis for crafting well-informed policies and
management decisions in their mandate of providing basic services to the people. LGUs may
benefit from the CSIS by capturing the pulse of the people towards achieving responsiveness
to wider parts of the population. The data can help them strengthen their decisions on policies
and programs that focus on services deemed to be areas for development and those that
strongly drive citizen satisfaction. With a knowledge base citizen-driven assessment of basic
services, the DILG, for example, can provide more well-informed oversight supervision and
technical-administrative support to the LGUs.
National Government Agencies (NGAs) and the legislature may also target specific service
areas deemed weak or need complementation from national programs. Civil Society
Organizations (CSOs) may also gain insights on which service areas they can refocus their
efforts on for complementation in the delivery of basic services. The CSIS data can also be a
starting point also for academic institutions in providing research, learning and extension
services.
The Department invests in the CSIS to empower citizens and communities by making them
the center of governance and local administration towards achieving equitable, sustainable
and inclusive local development.
Utilization
Conference
The CSIS Project Cycle is composed of six (6) major processes. First, the Orientation of
Regional Focal Persons (RFPs) is conducted to capacitate DILG personnel on institutional
preparations for the conduct of fieldwork and utilization conferences. The Service Delivery
Baseline Data Collection, on the other hand, is necessary to generate background data on
the service delivery profile of the LGUs being covered. The baseline data sheet, as an output
of data collection, will be an input to the edited questionnaire.
The Training of Local Resource Institutes (LRIs) is conducted to prepare and capacitate
the LRI key personnel on the procedures and processes necessary for the fieldwork.
Knowledge products and tools essential for fieldwork activities are turned over to the LRIs
during this activity. Questions and concerns are also discussed in detail in order to anticipate
particular issues that may affect the said implementation. At the end of the training, timelines
for each key deliverables of the fieldwork implementation are identified and submitted to the
DILG.
The Fieldwork processes can further be divided into sub-processes, namely: sampling, data
gathering/interviewing, data processing, analysis, report preparation, and completion and
evaluation. These will further be explained in detail in this manual. At the end of fieldwork, the
Citizen Satisfaction Report and the Project Implementation Report shall be submitted to the
DILG for evaluation. Finally, when all reports are deemed final and approved, Utilization
Conferences shall be held in order to present the CSIS results to the respective local
government units (LGUs) and to utilize results into concrete action plans in furthering the
development of local services.
The last process in the CSIS cycle involves Monitoring and Evaluation of the action plans
identified by the LGUs.
Data Processors
- encoders
- coders
The Project Manager (PM) heads and supervises the entire CSIS team. His/her duties
compose of the following:
BEFORE FIELDWORK
1. Attends general field training; ensures complete coverage and discussion of project
details during training of Field Interviewers (FIs),
2. Prepares a checklist of project materials needed and schedule of activities,
3. Ensures that Field Supervisors (FSs) are accurately and completely provided with
project materials and logistics,
Checklist of materials needed before fieldwork include:
• Team line-ups
• Fieldwork itineraries/schedule of activities of all FSs and FIs
• Transport needs of FIs and FSs
• Permit letters / Letters of endorsement (when applicable only)
• Valid IDs of all FSs and FIs (to be issued by LRI)
• Fieldwork controls
• Complete FI kits (see Annex A)
4. Assigns to FSs actual accomplishment of items in the checklist, and;
5. Ensures complete designation of logistics before dispatching FSs and FIs.
AFTER FIELDWORK
10. Monitors progress of data processing (coding, encoding, and other data processing
outputs),
11. Analyzes data processing outputs and writes needed reports, and;
12. Submits to DILG RO agreed upon outputs on or before the designated deadline.
The field supervisor is in charge of managing the tasks and assignments of the Field
Interviewers. They report to the Project Manager on concerns pertaining to fieldwork
operations.
BEFORE FIELDWORK
5. Ensures that kits assigned to FIs are complete (see Annex A), and;
6. Dispatches FIs.
DURING FIELDWORK:
AFTER FIELDWORK:
14. Retrieves all project documents or records, diaries and project materials from FIs,
15. Ensures the immediate and complete liquidation of project cash advances,
16. Summarizes relevant issues or problems or concerns from FI Diaries and reports actions
taken and recommendations to the PM
17. Endorses completed questionnaires to DP personnel and maintains a list indicating
numbers of questionnaires already endorsed to DP,
18. Assists the PM and implements all other functions assigned by the PM, and;
19. When in doubt, consults the fieldwork manual or asks the PM.
OUTPUTS:
• Completed kits of all sample spots (to be submitted to DP)
• Completed Project Documentation Matrix (to be submitted to PM)
BEFORE FIELDWORK:
DURING FIELDWORK:
10. Implements 100% editing/logic checks on interviews s/he completes then signs on the
blank provided for the FI,
11. Complies with the specified transmittal schedule,
12. Prepares a complete account/diary of relevant field coverage experiences, and;
13. Accomplishes and returns all documents/reports/project paraphernalia to FS at the end
of fieldwork.
The data processor acts as the encoder and/or coder. The DP also conducts other data
processing activities, as may be assigned, and performs the following duties and
responsibilities:
The LGU service delivery baseline data collection is part of the CSIS project cycle. It aims to
collect information about:
a) existence of programs/services,
b) local names of such programs/services,
c) responsible person/office and
d) other details of the different services provided by the local government.
The said data collection is to be undertaken by the concerned DILG Field Officer in the target
municipalities. Contextualizing the tools with the service delivery profile of the LGU will greatly
increase relevance and impact of services when presented to LGU functionaries.
Figure 3. LGU Service Delivery Baseline Data Collection and Utilization Process
The role of the LRI team is to undertake a limited customization of the translated questionnaire
and other tools based on the information suggested by the baseline data. This will help the
LRI substantiate the concepts with actual services being provided in the communities which
will help in the interview process.
1. Acquire a copy of the accomplished baseline data sheet from your partner DILG
Regional Office.
2. Examine the “Service Provided” or Column A. Note those services which the LGU
answered “No” or “N” in the said column.
3. In the questionnaire and in other tools (report outline for example), delete the services
identified as not being provided by the LGU per the Baseline Data Sheet.
* Note that in the score generator, services not provided by the LGU should be
left blank and indicate ‘Not provided as per Baseline Data’ in the ‘Remarks’
column.
4. Copy and append the specific programs, projects and services, and other pertinent
information cited in column D-F under each of the service indicator in your edited
Technical Notes.
5. Copy and append the specific programs, projects and services cited in column D under
each of the service indicator in the questionnaire, as examples.
Notes:
1. When any part of the baseline data needs clarification, you may coordinate with the
DILG Regional Office to help you contact the Field Office or any office/person in the
LGU authorized or capable to answer your concern.
2. Do not go to fieldwork without the edited questionnaire based on the baseline data.
The conceptual framework above defines the scope of concepts used in measuring citizen
satisfaction in so far as the CSIS is concerned. The group bound by the dotted line is
composed of the core concepts in measuring satisfaction in the service or program level. The
core concepts have logical relationships with each other (as discussed below). The dashed
line defines the boundary of citizen perception of service delivery, separating the inner
concepts from the socio-demographic profile and the services actually being provided by their
local governments.
Inside the citizen’s perception domain are the core concepts; reasons that substantiate the
core concepts; general attitudes of citizens toward the LGU; overall satisfaction; overall need
for action; and recommendations for improvement. These concepts compose the key results
of the CSIS survey because they are the main information gathered from the citizens to assess
how well public services by their LGUs are received or perceived in their point of view. Above
it are the: the socio-demographic profile and the housing profile that provide background about
the citizen.
On the left of Figure 4 are the service areas that will be assessed by the respondents based
on actual services being provided by the LGUs. The service areas and service indicators are
customized based on actual services, as discussed in 2.4. LGU Service Delivery Baseline
Data.
1. Delivery of Frontline services (retrieval of birth and marriage certificates, public records, land titles, etc.)
2. Local government’s response or action on complaints against an office, official or personnel of the LGU
3. Mobile LGU services; Provision of municipal services to the barangays
4. Conflict and dispute resolution in the barangays
5. Timely Response on Peace and Order and Public Safety-related incidents
6. Traffic Management
7. Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
8. Public Information Services
1. Barangay roads
2. Municipal roads and bridges
3. Barangay hall
4. Multipurpose halls or civic centers
5. Public markets and satellite markets
6. Public parks and open spaces
7. Road Safety
8. Sports centers and facilities
9. Information and reading center
10. Municipal Government Buildings
11. Public Cemetery
12. Flood Control Management System
The above are the initial and exhaustive structure of the services and service areas. Final
indicators shall be a result of customization of the exhaustive list based on the service delivery
baseline data submitted by the LGU (See 2.4. LGU Service Delivery Baseline Data).
1. Awareness refers to the respondent’s presence of knowledge to the service being offered
by the local government unit. Before delving with satisfaction, there is a need in the first
place to know if they are aware that the service is being provided by their local government
unit.
1. Availment refers to the contact of the respondent to local government through programs,
projects and services being implemented or offered. This may suggest the demand or
utilization of public services by the citizens. For service indicator level assessments, only
those who said they were aware of the service will be asked with the availment questions.
2. Satisfaction refers to the citizen’s contentment with their experience in availing or contact
with the local government’s services. In some cases this can also reflect the citizen’s
fulfilment of expectations with the services they were able to experience. For service
indicator level assessments, only those who have availed of the particular service are
asked with the satisfaction question. On the service area level, satisfaction is gathered
regardless of their awareness and availment of any of the service indicators.
3. Need for Action refers to the citizen’s assessment on whether or not a particular service
requires specific and decisive actions for improvement or reform. This concept is paired
with satisfaction to provide readers an additional dimension that could help refine
prioritization of services for further development and reform.
a) non-availment of a service,
b) satisfaction, and;
c) dissatisfaction with their experience with the service.
While some studies on citizen satisfaction may suggest that there are associations between
citizen satisfaction and socio-economic status (SES), the CSIS Conceptual Framework does
not focus on finding out these relationships. Further studies with theoretical focus on the
subject matter or that research problem are best to answer such inquiry.
Neglect represents passive and non-participative behaviors such as non-voting, feeling that
participating in debates in the LGU does not bring in impact and distrust of local authorities.
In summary, voice and loyalty are positive behaviors while exit and neglect are negative and
passive behaviors relative to citizen satisfaction.
Neglect I believe that any problem will be solved by the authorities in our locality
In addition, the mission and vision statements also are used to gauge whether or not the LGUs
are able to perform and achieve them, respectively.
Section L (on page 24) of the questionnaire contains the questions that ask about the citizens’
attitude about their LGU.
The level of overall satisfaction is not derived from mathematical operations based on the
responses of the citizens from the particular services or programs. Rather, regardless of their
ratings in the particular availed services, they are asked again whether or not they were
satisfied with the services under a particular service area or the entirety of the service delivery
performance of their local government.
Table 3. Reference on Overall Service Area and Overall Satisfaction Questions in the Questionnaire
Description Question ID Page Number
Overall Service Area Satisfaction
Health D12 5
Support to Education E10 8
Social Welfare Services F5 10
Governance and Response G5 12
Public Works and Infrastructure H5 15
Environmental Management I5 17
Economic and Investment Promotion J5 20
Overall Satisfaction M1 25
Questions asking about the overall need for action are the following:
Table 4. Reference on Overall Service Area and Overall Need for Action Questions in the Questionnaire
Description Question ID Page Number
Overall Service Area Need for Action
Health D13 5
Support to Education E11 8
Social Welfare Services F6 10
Governance and Response G6 12
Public Works and Infrastructure H6 15
Environmental Management I6 17
Economic and Investment Promotion J6 20
Overall Need for Action M2 25
This part of the framework is very valuable for the local government authorities and other
audiences because those services categorized as low satisfaction but high need for action
can be supplemented with directions that citizens actually would want their local governments
to pursue.
How will this be operationalized in the CSIS? The entire process is composed of the following
steps and the corresponding procedures and preparations:
The latest 2015 census data on population and housing shall be the basis for allocating the
spots among the barangays according to population share.
Step A: Retrieve the 2015 Census Population and Housing data from the Philippine
Statistical Authority website: https://psa.gov.ph/content/highlights-philippine-
population-2015-census-population (see Column [A] of Annex B). Ensure that
the total population of all barangays is equal to the population of the municipality.
Step B: Use sampling with probability proportional to size (pps) to generate the needed
sample barangays.
1. Derive the share of each barangay (rounded off to 1 significant digit) to the
population of the municipality. Ensure that the total of all barangay shares is
100% (see column [B] of Annex B).
3. Set the cumulative % intervals (lower and upper limit) of each barangay by:
• For lower limit: adding .1% to the upper limit of the preceding barangay
(see column [D] of Annex B)
• For upper limit: copying all the cumulative % of each barangay
(see column [E] of Annex B)
NOTE: By doing this, larger barangays are allocated more numbers than
smaller ones.
4. Generate a random start ranging from 1 to 100 (see Step 4 of Annex B).
5. Compute for the interval by dividing 100 (total shares) by 30 (number of spots
to be generated) (see Step 5 of Annex B).
7. Since the intervals set range from .1% to 100.0%, convert numbers exceeding
100% by subtracting 100.0 from them (see Step 5 of Annex B).
8. Based on [F] and [G], select the needed sample barangays by looking for the
interval to which each generated sample number belongs to (see Step 5 of
Annex B).
Step C: List down all the sample barangays together with their corresponding population
then proceed to the procedure for LGUs with less than 30 barangays.
Step A: Compute for the total of all the barangay population in the list. If the LGU has
less than 30 barangays, ensure that the sum of the population of all barangays
is equal to the population of the municipality.
1. Divide each barangay population by the municipal population then multiply by 30.
2. Round-off all derived values to whole numbers.
3. Ensure that the total number of spots is 30.
Step C: List down all the 30 spots and proceed to preparation of SP-RS Control.
After allocation of respondents to the barangays of the LGU to be surveyed is derived, set
up the following controls:
• 1 Spot Map (where the LGU, name of sample spot, SP-RS are specified)
• 1 Call Sheet
• 5 questionnaires (with 1 Questionnaire Number and 1 Kish Grid Household
Number per questionnaire)
• 1 Interviewer’s Diary
Since each interviewer is assigned to cover 10 respondents, give 2 kits per FI. During
dispatching, write the name of the FI assigned to each sample spot in the SP-RS and FI
Control (see Annex E).
4.3.1. Dispatching
Continuing from the sampling procedures undertaken, this is a preparatory activity prior to the
actual conduct of interviewing. All the inputs/materials are prepared for the Field Interviewers
by the Project Manager and/or Field Supervisors.
After preparing all the spot map controls (sample spots, SP-RS), another primary responsibility
of the PM / FS is to accomplish the following:
Based on each of the 30 lines of the SP-RS control, prepare a page where the following are
specified:
• Name of sample spot (barangay/purok)
• Starting Point (SP)
• Random Start
• Interval (interval is always 1 for this project)
• Name of Municipality
• Name of Province
• Questionnaire numbers assigned to the spot
The 30 spot maps will be used during dispatching. It is recommended that the LRI
Team obtain detailed spot maps (see Annex F), to easily locate the Starting Point,
which will be any identifiable corner based on the street names.
Comparison of two (2) sample spot maps with and without details (after field coverage)
In rare cases wherein none of the above-mentioned choices are present, any permanent
landmark in the area will be used and will be indicated in the map.
Based on Annex I, randomized controls per questionnaire (HH, service area) shall be
encircled.
Annex I indicates all the questionnaire numbers and the corresponding household (HH)
number (in the Kish Grid) and service area codes (at the bottom of page 1) to be encircled in
the CSIS questionnaire.
The encircled service area code will be used as guide for the Field Interviewers to know which
among the service areas the interview should start on.
Note that the following codes correspond to the order of the service areas in the questionnaire.
For example, Health Service is on Part D. of the questionnaire. The order of the service area
shall proceed in the order shown below:
It is also important to remember to go back to the other service area should the start falls on the
last service area (i.e: J. Economic and Investment Program).
For example:
On Questionnaire Number 87, its corresponding service
area code is F. Therefore, it must be encircled on the
questionnaire. The Field Interviewer shall start with Social
Welfare Services, then with Governance and Response, and
so on. After completing Part J. Economic and Investment
Program, FI shall go back D and E before proceeding to the
next parts of the questionnaire.
The Kish Grid (on page 1 of the questionnaire) is a pre-assigned table of random numbers to
select the member within a household to be interviewed.
Using the same randomized control for the HH and service area (Annex I), encircle the
corresponding household number (in horizontal position) in the Kish Grid of each printed
questionnaire (numbered from 1 to 150). To illustrate:
For easier reference, the last digit in the questionnaire number is the number to be encircled.
For numbers ending with zero (0), encircle number 10.
Again, once all of the above-mentioned controls are prepared, the Interviewer’s Kit must be
collated. The PM / FS must prepare each Interviewer’s Kit with the following:
a) One (1) Spot Map (where the Municipality, name of sample spot, SP-RS are
specified)
b) One (1) Call Sheet*
c) Five (5) Questionnaires (with questionnaire number and encircled Kish Grid HH number, per questionnaire)
d) One (1) Interviewer’s Diary**
* Call Sheet – contains the details of field coverage for each of the probability
respondents corresponding to the questionnaire numbers (Annex J)
** Interviewer’s Diary – where the FIs will narrate their experiences during the
fieldwork (Annex K)
After preparing the Interviewer’s Kits, give two (2) kits per Field Interviewer, since each of
them is assigned to cover ten (10) respondents. The name of the FI assigned to each sample
spot must be written in the SP-RS and FI Control (see Annex E).
4.3.2. Interviewing
Upon preparation of all controls and requirements, the Field Interviewers, under the Field
Supervisors’ guidance, will be ready to do the interviews.
The following steps are to be undertaken for the pre-interview or area coverage phase:
Step A: Upon reaching the designated sample spot, locate the Starting Point (SP) and
the Random Start (RS) specified in the provided spot maps. All information on
the top grid of the call sheet must be recorded.
Step B: Follow the arrow indicated in the map and observe the right coverage rule. To
be specific, orient or “stick” the right shoulder to the sidewalk and then walk
forward.
Once the sample household is determined, identify the sample probability respondent.
Remember that in using the Kish Grid (see page 4 of the questionnaire), qualified respondents
should be household members who are 18 years old or older, and that even-numbered
questionnaires are for female respondents, while odd-numbered questionnaires are for male
respondents.
Step A: Interview a responsible adult member of the household who could give accurate data
on other household members (include family members, household help, boarders,
transient, etc., who have been staying with the household for 6 months or more)
needed in the probability respondent (PR) table.
Step B: Write on the following blanks after the Kish Grid the following: a) the name of the
probable respondents, b) number of years as resident of the locality (if less than 6
months, exclude PR from Kish Grid and re-draw), c) gender, actual age, and working
status. All these information will be used during substitution if the original respondent
is not interviewed after two (2) valid callbacks.
John Rene 21 3
Juan Diego 54 1
** Say for example the above illustration is for Questionnaire 17, it is in #3 that the horizontal line (QM number) and vertical
line (HH number) intersected. Therefore it is John Rene, the 3rd on the list (under the No. column), who will be the probable
probability respondent in the specific household.
Note:
Establish five (5) original respondents. Depending on the SP and RS, there should be one
(1) house between each sample household (i.e.: interval of 1). However, there are instances
of replacements or substitution on the original respondents.
If there is NQR, look for a replacement, regardless of respondent profile, only after the
established original households.
On the other hand, if the target household gives an OR, this should be replaced, but the only
criterion to be considered will be the gender depending on the number of the questionnaire.
4.3.4. Callbacks
When the target respondent is not available during the first visit, the interviewer makes an
appointment for a second call. If after two (2) calls after the first visit the respondent is still not
available, substitution shall take place.
4.3.5. Substitution
If after two (2) callbacks the target respondent is still not available for interview, the Field
Interviewer will look for a substitute, with the same sex, age group, and working status as
that of the original respondent. Substitution shall only take place after respondents needing
replacements have been established.
As such, a 20-year old can be a substitute for an 18-year old since they are of the same age
group.
• 1-C : the first interview (Questionnaire #1) was done on the 3rd house from the
Barangay Captain’s House (BCH) and the interview was completed (C) at 8:30AM
(see Annex J)
• Since for this project, the interval between sample houses is 1, thus the 2nd interview
is 1 house away from the house where the 1st interview was done (see Annex J). Also,
1 house is between each of the houses where an interview is done, from 1-C to R2-C
(see Annex J).
• 2-NQR means that the 2nd interview (Questionnaire #2) has “no qualified respondent”
(NQR). This information should be written in both the spot map and call sheet. Since
this is an NQR, Questionnaire #2 is to be replaced, and thus replaced by R2-C in
Burgos St. (see Annex J and G) and in line 6 of the call sheet.
• 3-C means that the 3rd interview (Questionnaire #3) is completed (C) at 9:10AM (see
Annex J and G).
• 5-C means that Questionnaire #5 was completed (Annex G) at 10:15AM (Annex J).
• After the 5 original respondents are determined, the FI will now look for replacements;
e.g: Questionnaire #2 (see line 2) needs a replacement and is replaced with an
interview of respondent living 1 house away from the house where the respondent for
Questionnaire #5 lives (see R2-C of spot map); interview of the replacement for
Questionnaire #2 was completed at 11:15AM (see line 6 of the call sheet); R2-C means
that this is a replacement (R) for Questionnaire #2 and the interview was completed
(C).
• S4-C means that the substitute (S) for Questionnaire #4 is in Bonifacio St. (see sample
spot map) and was completed at 2:00PM (see the last line of Annex J).
2. Fully charge and load your cell phone. Bring cell phone charger.
3. Bring necessities that you think will be necessary while on field (e.g.: medicines,
umbrella, flashlight, bottled water, etc.).
2. Plan your itinerary so you would not need to travel at night in unsafe areas. In some
cases, it would be better to stay in the area overnight.
3. When covering far flung rural places, bring something to eat and overnight wear in
case you get stranded.
4. Ensure that you start at the correct starting point/random start corner before beginning
area coverage.
5. As much as possible, interview within the premises of the house and not outside where
you are exposed to unwanted audience and unsolicited remarks.
• Your name and that of your school (you can show your CSIS ID)
• Objective of your interview
o “Nagsasagawa po kami ng pag-aaral tungkol sa pang-araw araw na pamumuhay ng mga
tao at ng kanilang mga opinion sa mga usapin na nakaka-apekto sa mga mamamayan.”
o “Pwede po bang malaman kung kuntento o nasisiyahan ba kayo o hindi sa mga
pangunahing serbisyo ng ating pamahalaang lokal tulad ng kalusugan, edukasyon at iba
pa?”
3. Ask the rest of the information on the Socio-demographic Page after the interview
proper as some of these are “sensitive” questions (e.g.: toilet facilities).
Before starting to establish the Probability Respondent (PR), ensure that the household has
been residing in the locality for at least 6 months.
1. For each household included in the sample, interview a responsible adult member
of the household who could give accurate data on other household members (include
family members, household help, boarders, transients, etc.) needed in the probability
respondent table.
2. Include household help, drivers, boarders and transients with the following
qualifications:
• Helpers or drivers who have been staying with the family for six (6) months or more
• Boarders or transients who have been staying with the household members for six (6)
months or more
Before establishing the probability respondent, ensure that all household members listed in
the Grid are 18 years or over and that none of the following information is left blank:
In accomplishing the Kish Grid or establishing the PR, refer to Part 4.3 Sampling during
Field Procedure.
After establishing the PR, write down the following on blanks after the Kish Grid:
✓ the name of the PR
✓ number of years as resident of the locality (if less than 6 months, exclude PR from the
Kish Grid and redraw)
✓ sex
✓ actual age
✓ working status
These sets of information will be used during substitution if the original respondent is not
interviewed after two (2) valid callbacks.
2. If the sample respondent for the interview proper is not the same as the one who was
interviewed while establishing the probability respondent, verify the age of the
probability respondent.
4. It is important to know that aside from the questions to be asked to the respondents,
the questionnaire has instructions for the FIs such as skipping questions and other
important notes. The following are the symbols in the questionnaires which must be
remembered:
signifies that the following sentence is a question and/or statement that needs
to be read aloud and/or asked to the respondent,
signifies the English translation of the above questions and/or statements, and;
signifies instruction/s to the FI, which should NOT be read aloud to the
respondent.
5. Take extra care of your field paraphernalia. Bring out from the kit only the required
numbered questionnaire and the needed interviewing aids. All documents regarding
the project are strictly confidential.
a) WRITE LEGIBLY.
b) Write down on the sides of the pages of your questionnaire all side comments
and other pertinent observations as you proceed with the interview. After the
interview, transfer these to your FI Diary.
c) Do not express or offer your personal opinion about the current state of affairs.
Stick to the questionnaire. Should respondent ask you questions as to who
commissioned the survey, go back to your introduction spiel.
With skipping A7, D1, D3, D4, E1, E4, G8, G11,
Obey skipping questions.
instructions G13, G18, I8, K1, K3, L2
“Pangunahin” o D6, D14, E12, F7, G7, H7, I7, Encircle the corresponding code or
“pinaka___” questions J7, K3, K4 write only one response.
A1-A9, B2-B6, E5, D2, D5, G12, Only one answer should be
Single Responses
G14, I9, I11, K4 considered.
1) Record in detail and accurately – the result/s of calls on the questionnaire versus the
result/s of calls on the call sheet and on the spot map.
2) Ensure that the addressing of completed questionnaires is done in such a way that it
will be easy and possible for back checkers to go back to them at any given time.
3) Edit 100% your completed questionnaires before leaving the area so that those needed
to be re-asked can be accomplished.
1) Report at the designated time and place for update and transmittal of completed
sheets.
3) Immediately accomplish and submit cash advance liquidations at the end of fieldwork.
Data editing ensures the completeness and logical consistency of the data recorded in the
questionnaire. This should strictly be practiced in order to avoid cases wherein the Field
Interviewers will have to return to the respondent when there are missing data identified during
data coding and encoding.
Documenting area coverage will be done by accomplishing the call sheet and the spot map.
These documents will be used by the FS for backchecking 20% of each FI’s output. This is
part of the Quality Control Procedures.
Since the 2018 implementation, the use of the CSIS Portal is being introduced in the
implementation to aid in the data entry, processing, and generation of data output. However,
it will cover only the quantitative data processing. Qualitative data will still have to be
undertaken by the LRI separately for now.
6.1. Coding
Coding is the process of assigning a unique number to a specific answer in the questionnaire.
It is done because it is easier and faster to encode 1-3 digit numeric data rather than answers
of respondents in words or sentences.
The CSIS questionnaire was drafted in such a way that it is “codebook-ready.” The data
processor can already use the numbers assigned in each answer or option as codes.
Example A:
Codes 1 to 10 represent the common illnesses while 99 is the code used for other
responses not found in the list.
If an answer mentioned by a respondent is not yet in the list or does not have an existing code,
the data processor should first use the code assigned for “Others” which is “99”.
• If the last code in the questionnaire is 10 (see Example A), then the new code will be 11.
Note that the CSIS questionnaire provides standard codes for specific answers. Aside from
these, there are also CSIS codes that are to be applied when encoding the responses in the
raw data file. This is a repository of all the responses and information in all CSIS questions
asked in all the 150 successful interviews.
CSIS codes are standardized to avoid blank fields in the raw data, except those questions
referring to household with students (E2-E5 in the questionnaire) and those with multiple
responses. The data processor should not deviate from these codes so that it is easier to
consolidate and to have a common understanding in all different data sets from different LGUs
if needed.
ANSWER CODE
Not Applicable 95
(ie: if not aware, columns under availment, satisfaction, reasons, and need for action should have codes with 95)
Others
99
(standard code in the questionnaire)
The CSIS portal will cover the process of generating frequency distribution tables for
quantitative responses except for those with responses coded 99. Qualitative data processing
will follow a different process, as to be discussed under Chapter 6.5.
Since the CSIS portal can readily generate these tables, there is no need to submit to the
DILG an excel file consolidating all the said tables.
Table 8. Derivation of Percentage Scores per Core Concept for Service Indicators
SCORE DIVIDEND BASE / DIVISOR FORMULA
N = 150 Aware
Awareness Number of those who are aware
(all respondents) 150
Number of those who said service Number of those who have Needs action
Need for Action
needs appropriate action availed of the service Availed
Notice that the formulas of the different core concepts are almost unique to each other. These
follow the logical relationships between the said core concepts as explained in Figure 5.
The Score Generator automatically generates the percentage scores when the frequencies
are entered in.
Percentage scores for service areas use the total number of respondents as the base. The
Data Processor shall input the frequencies of the responses from the seven (7) overall service
area questions.
Note: Do not compute the average of the indicator level scores to arrive at the service
area level percentage score.
The Overall Percentage Score for Health (for example) has its own corresponding question,
found on the last part of each service area section in the questionnaire. These questions
should be asked to all respondents (150), except in rare instances that there is/are
respondent/s who are not aware on any service indicator under a specific service area. In
this case, the Questionnaire Number corresponding the respondent/s should be indicated in
the column under “Quest. # with those not aware of any service indicator” in the sheet
SA_overall of the score generator.
The citizen’s overall satisfaction and need for action percentage scores refer to the overall
services provided by the LGU to the citizens during the past twelve (12) months. Questions
on the last part, Part M, of the CSIS questionnaire refer to these. All 150 respondents should
be asked of these questions.
The percentage scores will be derived by dividing the number of those who said yes to the
question and divide them by the total number of respondents who answered the question
(150). Express it in percentage.
Categorization is based on passing the test of 50%+MoE. A cutoff is computed for every
indicator which is determined by the base.
𝐶𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑓𝑓 = 0.5 + |𝑴𝒐𝑬|
𝟎. 𝟗𝟖
𝐶𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑓𝑓 = 0.5 + | |
√𝒏
Notes:
• The 0.5 represents 50% of the sample.
• As discussed in the sampling procedures, the following derived formula for the
margin of error will be used:
𝟎. 𝟗𝟖
𝑀𝒐𝑬 =
√𝒏
• As the base (𝑛) of the percentage score becomes smaller, the cutoff will be larger.
This suggests that will require larger percentage score to satisfy it.
Following the above, the percentage score being tested should be equal or greater than the
cutoff in order to obtain a high percentage. Therefore, the following condition can be derived:
Table 9. Adjectival ratings for the Percentage Scores and their Score Cut-offs and Interpretations
Adjectival Rating Condition Interpretation
• Adjectival ratings however will not be valid in cases when cut-offs are equal to or
more than 100%. They will be given an ‘INVALID’ adjectival code.
* The CSIS Score Generator automatically converts the percentage scores into adjectival ratings.
The LRI no longer needs to individually compute each of the cutoffs.
Figure 8. The Action Grid divides the services and service areas into four groups based on adjectival
ratings on satisfaction and need for action
The different quadrants represent different areas for prioritization that local authorities and
other stakeholders can assign to the services.
Services or service areas that belong to this quadrant are those that were rated high in
satisfaction and high in need for action. This may suggest that the quality of service delivery
may be good enough but there is still a need to take action on specific aspects.
As a general direction for this group, the service or service area should sustain positive
aspects of service delivery as cited by the respondents. However, since services under this
group are identified as those requiring action from the local government, there is still a need
to act on aspects on improvement or reform. Therefore, while sustaining the current service
quality, the LGU may still fine-tune on very specific facets of its delivery which can be
suggested by reasons for non-availment or satisfaction/dissatisfaction as cited by the
respondents.
Services or service areas that belong to this quadrant are those that were rated high in
satisfaction but low in need for action. The general direction suggested for these service areas
is to sustain positive aspects of service delivery that were cited by the respondents.
Since this group is relatively rated low in the need for action, less attention on service delivery
reform may be expected. Additionally, certain priority commitments of the local government
specific to the service or service areas but were not cited in the CSIS as strong points for
satisfaction may be identified as areas for savings or reallocation to other more critical
services.
Services and service areas falling under Secondary Priority are those that were relatively rated
low both in satisfaction and need for action. This may suggest that citizens view the services
as low performing based on their expectations but relatively do not need urgent action from
the local government as much as the others.
As a general direction, the negative aspects of the services as cited by respondents are
suggested to be addressed but not necessary as urgent or as high-priority as those rated high
in need for action. This may suggest that need for action may be minimal in terms of the cost
and utilization of other resources.
Services and service areas falling under Opportunities for Improvement are those targeted as
critical areas for improvement because they were rated relatively low in satisfaction but were
deemed to highly require local government action.
As a general direction, these services are deemed to be critical points for serious quality
improvements. The negative aspects of delivery of these services can be presumed as drivers
for dissatisfaction; but if addressed, they can be potential drivers for satisfaction. Therefore,
services falling under this quadrant should be given the highest priority and attention than
those in other quadrants. These services or service areas may also suggest or reflect local
issues in the communities that demand attention of local authorities.
The general directions are suggestions only. The LRI can suggest expansion of the directions
into more specific steps. The qualitative data may hint general themes on how LGU can better
improve across services.
2. Classify the service indicators based on the groups represented by the four
quadrants with reference to the adjectival rating conditions specified above.
3. Visually represent the service indicator in the chart similar in that of Figure 8.
4. Discuss the results by comparing the services or service indicators based on their
adjectival ratings. Relate the general directions with themes and nuanced details
from qualitative responses from the reasons for non-availment,
satisfaction/dissatisfaction and general service area recommendations.
Two major reports are expected to be prepared by the LRI team: the Citizen Satisfaction
Report (CS Report) and the Project Implementation Report. The following sections explain
the basic requirements and guidelines of the report preparation.
8.1.1. Outline
1. About CSIS
2. Methodology
a. Sampling Procedures
b. Fieldwork Highlights
3. About the LGU
a. Basic Information
b. Service Delivery Profile
4. Profile of the Respondents
a. Distribution per barangay
b. Socio-demographic profile
c. Housing profile
5. Health Service: Detailed Findings
a. Health Profile of Respondents
b. Vaccination for infants/children
c. Pre-natal/post-natal/child birth services
d. Free General Consultations/Access to Secondary and/or tertiary health care
e. Free Basic Medicine or Low Cost Program
f. Prevention and Management of Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases
g. Basic dental/oral hygiene
h. Family Planning/ Reproductive Health
i. Overall Service Area Assessment
i. Comparative Results
ii. Action Grid
iii. Overall Satisfaction Rating
iv. Overall Needs for Action
v. Recommendations from Citizens
a) Awareness
i. Percentage Scores
b) Availment
i. Percentage Scores
ii. Reasons for Non-Availment
c) Satisfaction
i. Percentage Scores
ii. Reasons for Satisfaction
iii. Reasons for Dissatisfaction
1. In introducing the CSIS in the CS Report, it is not required to copy and paste everything
from this Manual. Discuss only the relevant information for the LGU.
2. Percentage scores that should reflect in the CS Report should be similar with those with
the score generator. Do not round-off scores.
3. The service indicators in the CS Report should reflect those specified in the service
delivery baseline data.
4. Charts and/or tables are highly encouraged to be used when presenting the frequencies
of the variables.
5. Should ‘small sample’ appear to be the adjectival rating, make sure to explain in the report
what this means. Again, this should not be interpreted as high or low.
7. Do not get stuck with a very rigid format of discussion. Let the data determine how you
discuss the results.
8. If there are insightful responses or thick descriptions from the qualitative data, allocate
more space to discuss them.
9. It is suggested that information is limited only to the names of the barangays drawn as samples.
The number of spots, number of respondents drawn, and questionnaire number assigned to
the barangays are not anymore required to be presented.
10. When stating the LGU in the report, it is encouraged that we address it as “Municipality of
XXX,” instead of “LGU XXX.”
Attachments
Documents used and/or accomplished by the LRI team in carrying out all the fieldwork
activities are also required to be attached to the PIR, to wit:
It is important that before submitting the CS Report and Project Implementation Report, the LRI
Team ensures the completeness of all parts of the reports, logical consistency of all data
presented, accuracy of CSIS results, and reliability of information. Even the structure, format, and
grammar of the reports should be checked by the LRI. The reports are considered as the LRI’s
final output. Therefore, the LRI team is encouraged to accomplish the CSIS Project Completion
and Evaluation Form as a self-evaluation to prevent repetitious submission of project output to
the DILG.
The ROs will be responsible in ensuring that all the reports, including all attachments required,
are already final, accurate, correct, and complete. They will ensure that all errors, if any, have
already been addressed before transmitting all the reports to the BLGS. Should the BLGS find
any correction, the reports will be endorsed to the ROs recommending revisions for the LRI. Once
the reports have complied with the standards based on the final evaluation, the RO and the LRI
may already proceed towards setting up the CSIS Utilization Conference.
The DILG’s role is to check the completeness of the information in the report and on how the
essential data is interpreted and analyzed. While sometimes some recommendations are
directed on finer details such as basic grammar, formatting and pagination, these are only
secondary. Please allocate time to review the report.
It is an activity that serves as the highlight of the CSIS implementation, wherein the findings are
presented to concerned local chief executives (LCEs), vice mayor, Sanggunian members,
department heads and local functionaries, academe partners, and representatives from locally-
based National Government Agencies (NGAs) and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs).
The main output of the UC is the formulation of the Citizen-driven Priority Action Plans (CPAPs),
which mainly contains the LGU’s response (plans and interventions) on the generated results of
the CSIS.
10.1. Objectives
The Utilization Conference aims to provide an avenue to undertake the following objectives:
• Formulate strategies/interventions on how the LGU can utilize the results presented to
improve the delivery of local public services, and;
10.2. Participants
The following are the participants in each UC to be conducted:
The BLGS:
• Formulates and disseminates policies, guidelines, procedures and work
instructions to govern the conduct of the UC,
• Funds the cost of the UCs, and;
• Provides technical assistance before and during the conduct of the UCs.
The LRI:
• Attends consultation meetings with the LCE and other stakeholders of the target
municipality, as may be necessary, and;
• Serves as Resource Persons during the Utilization Conferences to present the
CSIS results and actual implementation procedures conducted in the field.
9:45 AM – 10:00 AM Introduction and Overview of the CSIS Regional Office (RFP)
Moderator:
11:00 AM – 11:30 AM Open Forum
MLGOO
11:30 AM -12:00 NN Focused Group Discussion (FGD) on the Results BLGS, RFPs and PD
98 8 J 118 8 I 138 8 H
99 9 D 119 9 J 139 9 I
100 10 E 120 10 D 140 10 J
Status
Q# NAME ADDRESS TIME
C CB Ref
001 Name A 367 Rizal St Complete 8:30am
002 Name B 50 Luna St. (NQR) 8:35
003 Name C 54 Luna St. Complete 9:10
004 Name D 58 Luna St. Callback 11:30 9:15
005 Name E 2 Burgos St. Complete 10:15
002 Name B 6 Burgos St. Complete 11:15
004 Name D 58 Luna St. Callback 11:45 11:45
004 Name D 58 LunJa St. Callback 11:55 11:55
004 Name F 4. Bonifacio St. Complete 2:00pm
DATE ENTRIES
d. Others
2. Dispatching
a. Preparation of materials and requirements for data gathering
b. Area Assignment
3. Data Gathering
a. Introduction to the respondent
b. Questionnaire administration
c. Recording of responses
4. Codebook Development
5. Data Encoding
6. Output Generation
[NAME OF LRI]
Citizen Satisfaction Index System 2019
[Name of Municipality]
Project Manager
Field Supervisors
Data Processor
Field Interviewers
Technical Support
[NAME OF LRI]
Citizen Satisfaction Index System 2019
[Name of Municipality]
VISION STATEMENT
MISSION STATEMENT
Noted by:
QUESTIONNAIRE
CITIZEN SATISFACTION INDEX SYSTEM (CSIS) SURVEY
INTERVIEW RECORD GEOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION
Date of Interview Province
Start Time Municipality
End Time Barangay
Length of Interview Minutes Purok
Spot
*DD Coordinates Lat. Long.
INTERNAL CONTROL
CSIS Name Signature
Field Interviewer
Field Supervisor
Project Manager
SUMMARY OF VISITS
Date/Time Result of Call Interviewer
Original
First call
Second call (max)
Substitute (after 2 unsuccessful callbacks):
INTRODUCTION OF FIELD INTERVIEWER
Refer to the CSIS Manual for the full introduction spiel.
Magandang umaga/hapon po. Ako po ay si (pangalan) na taga (name of institute/organization). Nagsasagawa po kami ng pag-aaral tungkol sa pang-
araw araw na pamumuhay ng mga tao at ng kanilang mga opinyon sa mga usapin na nakaaapekto sa mga mamamayan. Ito po ay tinatawag na Citizen
Satisfaction Index System o CSIS. Maaari po bang malaman kung sinu-sino ang miyembro ng samabahayan ninyo na lalaki o babae (refer to the Questionnaire
number) ang labingwalong (18) taong gulang pataas, at kasalukuyang naninirahan dito ng hindi kukulang sa anim na buwan?
Good morning/afternoon. I am (name) from (name of institute/organization). We are conducting a study about people’s everyday lives and their opinions that
affect citizens. We would like to study your opinions, views and feelings regarding different things. This study is called the Citizen Satisfaction Index System or the
CSIS. May I ask who are the members of the household who are male or female (refer to questionnaire number) aged 18 years old and above and residing in this
household for at least 6 months?
SUBSTITUTION VARIABLES:
Sex: Working Status: Working 1 (codes 1-2 of A7 on page 2)
Actual age: Not working 2 (codes 3-6 of A7 on page 2)
Age Groups: 18 – 24 45 – 54
25 – 29 55 – 64
30 – 34 65 – 74
35 – 39 75 & above
40 – 44
SERVICE AREA ORDER
TO THE INTERVIEWER: Start from the Service Area corresponding to the encircled letter.
D E F G H I J
1
2019 CSIS MANUAL - Annexes 75
A. RESPONDENT’S SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
A1. Relationship to HH Head A6. Still goes to school?
(Kaugnayan sa puno ng sambahayan) (Pumapasok pa ba sa paaralan?)
(ENCIRCLE CODE. SINGLE RESPONSE ONLY) (ENCIRCLE CODE. SINGLE RESPONSE ONLY)
HOUSING OCCUPANCY
B2 Do you own this house? OWNER, OWNER-LIKE POSSESSION OF HOUSE AND LOT.......... 1
(Pag-aari niyo ba ang bahay na ito?) RENT HOUSE/ROOM, INCLUDING LOT............................................ 2
OWN HOUSE, RENT-FREE LOT WITH OWNER’S CONSENT......... 3
OWN HOUSE, RENT-FREE LOT WITHOUT OWNER’S CONSENT.. 4
RENT-FREE HOUSE AND LOT WITH OWNER’S CONSENT........... 5
RENT-FREE HOUSE AND LOT WITHOUT OWNER’S CONSENT... 6
OTHERS (Specify) 99
BASIC UTILITIES
B3 What kind of toilet facility does your household have? FLUSH/WATER-SEALED TOILET
(Anong klase ng palikuran ang mayroon kayo?) OWN TOILET........................................................................... 1
SHARED TOILET..................................................................... 2
PIT TOILET/LATRINE......................................................................... 3
DROP/OVERHANG............................................................................. 4
NO TOILET/OPEN FIELD................................................................... 5
OTHERS, (Specify) 99
D3. Kumunsulta ba kayo sa manggagamot noong kayo ay nagkasakit ng (most serious disease)? Did you consult a
medical/health service provider when you got sick of (most serious sickness)?
Oo (Yes) 1
Hindi (No) 2 →GO TO D8
D4. Kumunsulta ba kayo sa isang pampublikong manggagamot noong kayo ay nagkasakit ng (most serious sickness)?
Did you consult a public service provider when you got sick of (most serious sickness?)
Oo (Yes) 1
Hindi (No) 2 →GO TO D8
D5. Saan po kayo kumunsulta o nagpagamot noong kayo ay nagkasakit ng (most serious sickness)?
Where did you go first to seek medical consultation when you got sick of (most serious illness)?)
(DON’T READ CHOICES; PROBE, IF NECESSARY.)
If not sure which category the health facility falls under, write the name of the public health facility below and
seek assistance from project team after the interview.
D7. Matapos kayong kumunsulta sa (ANSWER IN D5), sumangguni pa ba kayo sa ibang pampublikong pagamutan?
After consulting with (ANSWER IN D5), did you still consult other public health facilities?
Oo (Yes) 1
Hindi (No) 2
4
2019 CSIS MANUAL - Annexes 78
D8. Sa inyong pagkakaalam, anu-anong mga programang pangkalusugan ang ipinatutupad ng inyong lokal na
pamahalaan? Based on what you know, what are the health programs implemented by your local government?
MULTIPLE RESPONSE: MENTION EACH PROGRAM/SERVICE ONE BY ONE AND ASK IF RESPONDENT IS AWARE. IF NOT AWARE OF ANY
GO TO D14.
FOR EACH PROGRAM/ SERVICE AWARE OF, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWER UNDER D8 OF
THE ANSWER GRID. FOR EACH PROGRAM/SERVICE THAT THE RESPONDENT IS AWARE OF, ASK D9-D11, THEN GO TO D12.
D9. Napakinabangan ba ninyo o ng sino mang miyembro ng inyong sambahayan ang (STATE SERVICE) sa nakalipas na 12
buwan? Did you or any of your household members avail of (state service) in the past 12 months?
IF AVAILED OF THE SERVICE/PROGRAM, PROCEED TO D10-D11, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT PROGRAM/SERVICE THE RESPONDENT
SAID THEY WERE AWARE OF.
IF DID NOT AVAIL OF THE PROGRAM/SERVICE, PROCEED TO D9.1, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SERVICE THE RESPONDENT SAID THEY
WERE AWARE OF.
D10. Kayo po ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa naibigay na serbisyo ng pamahalaang lokal sa (STATE SERVICE)?
Were you satisfied or not with (service/program availed)?
IF SATISFIED, ASK (REASON) D10.1, OTHERWISE ASK (REASON) D10.2; FOR EITHER RESPONSE, PROCEED TO D11.
D11. Masasabi niyo bang kailangan o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang (STATE
THE SERVICE/PROGRAM)?
Would you say that the (service/program) needs or does not need appropriate action from your local government?
UNDER D9-D11 OF THE ANSWER GRID, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBERS CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWERS.
Nasiyahan (Satisfied) 1
Hindi nasiyahan (Not satisfied) 2
D13. Sa inyong palagay, kailangan ba o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang
pangkalahatang serbisyong/programang pangkalusugan? On the overall, would you say that the health services/programs
need or do not need appropriate action from the local government?
D14. Sa inyong pananaw, ano ang pangunahing dapat gawin ng inyong pamahalaang lokal para masiguro ang maayos na
kalusugan ng mga naninirahan sa inyong lugar? In your opinion, what should your local government primarily do to take care
of the health of those who reside in your locality?
E1. Mula sa nakalipas na 12 buwan hanggang sa kasalukuyan, mayroon bang miyembro ng inyong sambahayan ang nag-
aral sa elementarya at/o mataas na paaralan dito sa inyong bayan? (During the past 12 months and at present, was/is
there a member of your household who studied/studies in an elementary and/or high school within your town?)
Mayroon (Yes) 1
Wala (None) 2→GO TO E6
E2. Maari po bang malaman kung sino sa inyong sambahayan ang nag-aral/nag-aaral sa elementarya at/o mataas na
paaralan sa nakalipas na labing-dalawang buwan? (May we know who among your household studied/studies in elementary
and/or high school in the past 12 months?)
GET THE NAME(S) FIRST BEFORE PROCEEDING TO E3 TO E5.
E4. Si (ANSWER IN E2) ba ay nag-aral sa pampubliko o pribadong paaralan? (Did (name) study in a public or private school?)
(IF PRIVATE, GO TO NEXT NAME/E6)
E5. Ano ang pangunahing dahilan at sa pampublikong paaralan nag-aral si (ANSWER IN E2)?
(What is the primary reason why (ANSWER IN E2) studied in this public school?)
E3 E4 TYPE
E2 E5
LEVEL Pu Pr
Name Reasons
(K-12)
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2
CODES FOR E5
1 – Libre ang tuition 6 – Sapat/maayos ang mga pasilidad ng paaralan
2 – Mababa ang tuition 7 – Maganda ang pangangasiwa ng paaralan
8 – Libre ang mga kagamitan tulad ng libro at iba pang pangangailangan ng mag-
3 – Sapat ang mga silid-aralan
aaral
4 – Maganda ang kalidad ng pagtuturo 9 – Malapit ang paaralan sa aming tirahan
5 – Sapat ang mga teachers 99 – Others (Specify)
E6. Sa inyong pagkakaalam, anu-anong mga programa/serbisyo ang ipinatutupad ng inyong pamahalaang lokal para
tugunan ang pangangailangan ng mga pampublikong paaralan sa inyong bayan?
Based on what you know, what are the programs/services implemented by your local government to support the needs of the
public schools in your municipality?
MULTIPLE RESPONSE: MENTION EACH PROGRAM/SERVICE ONE BY ONE AND ASK IF RESPONDENT IS AWARE. IF NOT AWARE OF ANY
GO TO E12.
FOR EACH PROGRAM AWARE OF IN E6, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWER. FOR EACH
PROGRAM/SERVICE, ASK E7-E9 THEN GO TO E10.
E8. Kayo ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa naibigay na serbisyo ng pamahalaan lokal sa (STATE SERVICE)?
Were you satisfied or not with (service/program availed)?
IF SATISFIED, ASK (REASON) E8.1, OTHERWISE ASK (REASON) E8.2; FOR EITHER RESPONSE, PROCEED TO E9.
E9. Masasabi niyo bang kailangan o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang (STATE
THE SERVICE/PROGRAM)? Would you say that the (service/program) needs or does not need appropriate action from your
local government?
UNDER E7-E9 OF THE ANSWER GRID, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBERS CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWERS.
E10. Kayo ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa pangkalahatang suporta sa edukasyon na binigay ng inyong lokal na
pamahalaan? On the overall, were you satisfied or not with the support to education services/programs provided by your local
government?
Nasiyahan (Satisfied) 1
Hindi nasiyahan (Not Satisfied) 2
E11. Sa inyong palagay, kailangan ba o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang
pangkalahatang serbisyong/programang sumusuporta sa edukasyon? On the overall, would you say that the support to
education services/programs need or do not need appropriate action from the local government?
E12. Sa inyong pananaw, ano ang pangunahing dapat gawin ng inyong lokal na pamahalaan upang masuportahan ang mga
serbisyo ng pampublikong paaralan sa inyong lugar? In your opinion, what should your local government primarily do to
support or augment the service delivery of public schools in your locality?
F1. Sa inyong pagkakaalam, anu-anong mga programang kaugnay ng kagalingang panlipunan ang ipinatutupad ng inyong
lokal na pamahalaan? Based on what you are aware of, what are the social welfare programs implemented by your local
government?
MULTIPLE RESPONSE: MENTION EACH PROGRAM ONE BY ONE AND ASK IF RESPONDENT IS AWARE. IF NOT AWARE OF ANY
PROGRAM, GO TO F7.
FOR EACH PROGRAM/ SERVICE AWARE OF IN F1, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWER. FOR
EACH PROGRAM/SERVICE THAT THE RESPONDENT IS AWARE OF, ASK F2-F4, THEN GO TO F5.
F2. Napakinabangan ba ninyo o ng sinumang miyembro ng inyong sambahayan ang (STATE SERVICE) sa nakalipas 12 na
buwan? Did you or any of your household members avail of (service) in the past 12 months?
IF AVAILED OF THE SERVICE/PROGRAM, PROCEED TO F3-F4, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT PROGRAM/SERVICE THE RESPONDENT
SAID THEY WERE AWARE OF.
IF DID NOT AVAIL OF THE PROGRAM/SERVICE, PROCEED TO F2.1, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SERVICE THE RESPONDENT SAID THEY
WERE AWARE OF.
F3. Kayo po ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa naibigay na serbisyo ng pamahalaang lokal sa (STATE SERVICE)?
Were you satisfied or not with (service/program availed)?
IF SATISFIED, ASK (REASON) F3.1, OTHERWISE ASK (REASON) F3.2; FOR EITHER RESPONSE, PROCEED TO F4.
F4. Masasabi niyo bang kailangan o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang (STATE
THE SERVICE/PROGRAM)? Would you say that the (service/program) needs or does not need appropriate action from your
local government?
UNDER F2-F4 OF THE ANSWER GRID, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBERS CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWERS.
F5. Kayo ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa kabuuang serbisyo/programa sa social welfare na binigay ng inyong lokal na
pamahalaan? On the overall, were you satisfied or not with the social welfare services provided by your local government?
Nasiyahan (Satisfied) 1
Hindi nasiyahan (Not satisfied) 2
F6. Sa inyong palagay, kailangan ba o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang
pangkabuuang serbisyo sa social welfare? On the overall, would you say that the social welfare services/programs need or do
not need appropriate action from the local government?
Kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Need appropriate action) 1
Hindi kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Do not need appropriate action) 2
F7. Sa inyong pananaw, ano ang pangunahing dapat gawin ng inyong pamahalaang lokal para mas mapabuti pa ang mga
programang may kinalaman sa kagalingang panlipunan sa inyong lugar? In your opinion, what should your local government
primarily do to improve the social welfare services in your locality?
10
2019 CSIS MANUAL - Annexes 84
ANSWER GRID FOR F. SOCIAL WELFARE SERVICES/PROGRAM
F1 F2 F3 F4
Awareness Availment Satisfaction Reasons
(Program/service...)
CODES Social Welfare Services/ Programs (Of program/ (Availed program (Of program/ (F2.1/F3.1/F3.2)
service) or not) service)
Needs Action
YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
11
G1. Sa inyong pagkakaalam, anu-ano ang mga programa, serbisyo o transaksyong isinasagawa sa inyong lokal na
pamahalaan? (Based on what you know, what are the services/transactions delivered by your local government?)
MULTIPLE RESPONSE: MENTION EACH PROGRAM ONE BY ONE. IF NOT AWARE OF ANY PROGRAM, GO TO G7
FOR EACH PROGRAM THAT RESPONDENT IS AWARE OF, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWER
UNDER D8 OF THE ANSWER GRID. FOR EACH PROGRAM/SERVICE THAT THE RESPONDENT IS AWARE OF, ASK G2-G4, THEN GO TO G5.
G2. Napakinabangan ba ninyo o ng sino mang miyembro ng inyong sambahayan ang (STATE SERVICE) sa nakalipas na 12
na buwan? Did you or any of your household members avail of (state service) in the past 12 months?
IF AVAILED OF THE SERVICE/PROGRAM, PROCEED TO G3-G4, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT PROGRAM/SERVICE THE RESPONDENT
SAID THEY WERE AWARE OF.
IF DID NOT AVAIL OF THE PROGRAM/SERVICE, PROCEED TO G2.1, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SERVICE THE RESPONDENT SAID
THEY WERE AWARE OF.
G3. Kayo po ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa naibigay na serbisyo ng pamahalaang lokal sa (STATE SERVICE)?
Were you satisfied or not with (service/program) that you have availed?
IF SATISFIED, ASK (REASON) G3.1, OTHERWISE ASK (REASON) G3.2; FOR EITHER RESPONSE, PROCEED TO G4.
G3.2. Maari po bang malaman kung bakit kayo hindi nasiyahan sa (STATE SERVICE)?
Why were you not satisfied with (state service)?
RECORD RESPONSES IN VERBATIM UNDER “REASONS” OF THE ANSWER GRID. USE EXTRA SHEET IF NECESSARY.
G4. Masasabi niyo bang kailangan o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang
(STATE THE SERVICE/PROGRAM)? Would you say that the (service/program) needs or does not need appropriate action
from your local government?
UNDER G2-G4 OF THE ANSWER GRID, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBERS CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWERS.
G5. Kayo ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa kabuuang serbisyong/programang may kinalaman sa governance and
response na binigay ng inyong lokal na pamahalaan? On the overall, were you satisfied or not with the governance and
response services provided by your local government?
Nasiyahan (Satisfied) 1
Hindi nasiyahan (Not Satisfied) 2
G6. Sa inyong palagay, kailangan ba o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang
pangkabuuang serbisyong/programang may kinalaman sa governance and response? On the overall, would you say that
governance and response services/programs need or do not need appropriate action from the local government?
Kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Need appropriate action) 1
Hindi kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Do not need appropriate action) 2
G7. Sa inyong pananaw, ano ang pangunahing dapat gawin ng inyong lokal na pamahalaan para mas mapabuti ang
kanilang pagtugon sa mga transaksyong or serbisyong nabanggit? In your opinion, what should your local government
primarily do to improve its response to transactions or services mentioned?
12
Traffic Management
GGPvi. 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
(Pagpapanatili ng maayos na daloy ng trapiko)
13
G8. Sa inyong pagkakaalam, may mga krimen bang naganap dito sa inyong bayan sa nakalipas na 12 buwan?
To your knowledge, has there been any crime committed in your municipality in the past 12 months?
G9. Sa inyong pagkakaalam, anu-anong mga krimen ang naganap dito sa inyong lugar?
To your knowledge, what were the crimes committed here in your locality?
DISASTER MANAGEMENT
G10. Nakaranas ba kayo o ang inyong komunidad ng G12. May tumugon ba sa pangangailangan
anumang sakuna/kalamidad sa nakalipas na 12 ng mga naapektuhan ng sakuna/kalamidad?
Did anyone respond to the victims of the
buwan? Did you or your community experienced any
disaster/calamity?
disaster/calamity in the past 12 months?
Oo (Yes) 1 Mayroon (Yes) 1
Hindi (No) 2 →GO TO H1 Wala (No) 2 →GO TO H1
G11. Ano po ang pinakamalubhang sakuna/kalamidad G15. Kung mayroon, sino po ang unang tumugon sa
ang naranasan ninyo o ng inyong komunidad sa pangangailangan ng mga naapektuhan?
nakalipas na 12 buwan? What was the worst Who responded first to the needs of those affected?
disaster/ calamity that you or your community experienced (SINGLE RESPONSE ONLY)
in the past 12 months?
Barangay ......................................................... 1
Typhoon ................................... 1 Muncipal Gov’t .....................................................2
Flood ........................................ 2 Provincial Gov’t ....................................................3
Landslide ................................. 3 National Gov’t .................................................. 4
Fire .......................................... 4 Non-government sector (incl. NGOs, relief,
Earthquake .............................. 5 volunteer, media, religious groups, etc.) ................5
Drought .................................... 6 Others (Specify) ................................................. 99
Others 99
G16. Bago mangyari ang nasabing kalamidad,
DON’T READ CATEGORIES. ACCEPT ONLY ONE ANSWER. IF
RESPONDENT GIVES MORE THAN ONE, ASK WHICH WAS
nakatanggap ba kayo ng anumang anunsyo o
CONSIDERED THE WORST IN TERMS OF IMPACT? paunang paghahanda mula sa lokal na
pamahalaan?
Before the calamity, did you receive any warning,
information or any form of preparation from the local
government?
Oo (Yes) 1
Hindi (No) 2
14
2019 CSIS MANUAL - Annexes 88
H. PUBLIC WORKS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Pag-usapan naman po natin ang mga pagawaing bayan at proyektong pang-imprastruktura sa inyong lugar sa nakalipas na
12 buwan. Now let us talk aboutthe public works and infrastructure in your locality during the past 12 months.
H1. Sa inyong pagkakaalam, anu-ano ang mga imprastrukturang pinapanatili/pinagagawa/isinasaayos ng inyong lokal na
pamahalaan? Based on what you know, what are the public works and infrastructure being constructed/repaired/maintained by
your local government?
MULTIPLE RESPONSE: MENTION EACH PROGRAM ONE BY ONE. IF NOT AWARE OF ANY PROGRAM, GO TO H7.
FOR EACH PROGRAM/ SERVICE AWARE OF, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWER UNDER H1 OF
THE ANSWER GRID. FOR EACH PROGRAM/SERVICE THAT THE RESPONDENT IS AWARE OF, ASK H2-H4, THEN GO TO H5.
H2. Napakinabangan ba ninyo o ng sino mang miyembro ng inyong sambahayan ang (STATE INFRASTRUCTURE) sa
nakalipas na 12 na buwan? Did you or any of your household members benefited from (state service) in the past 12 months?
IF BENEFITED FROM THE SERVICE/PROGRAM, PROCEED TO H3-H4, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT PROGRAM/SERVICE THE RESPONDENT
SAID THEY WERE AWARE OF.
IF DID NOT BENEFIT FROM THE PROGRAM/SERVICE, PROCEED TO H2.1, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SERVICE THE RESPONDENT SAID
THEY WERE AWARE OF.
H3. Kayo po ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa proyektong pang-imprastruktura tulad ng (mention the infrastructure
availed of)? Were you satisfied or not with the (STATE INFRASTRUCTURE) by your local government?
IF SATISFIED, ASK (REASON) H3.1, OTHERWISE ASK (REASON) H3.2; FOR EITHER RESPONSE, PROCEED TO H4.
H4. Masasabi niyo bang kailangan o hindi kailangan bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng pamahalaang lokal ang (STATE
THE INFRASTRUCTURE)? Would you say that the (infrastructure) needs or does not need appropriate action from your local
government?
UNDER H2-H4 OF THE ANSWER GRID, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBERS CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWERS.
H6. Sa inyong palagay, kailangan ba o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang
pangkalahatang proyektong pang-imprastruktura sa inyong bayan? On the overall, would you say that public works and
infrastructure programs need or do not need appropriate action from the local government?
Kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Need appropriate action) 1
Hindi kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Do not need appropriate action) 2
H7. Sa inyong pananaw, ano ang pangunahing dapat gawin ng inyong pamahalaang lokal para mas mapabuti ang mga
proyektong pang-imprastruktura sa inyong bayan? (In your opinion, what should the local government primarily do to improve
the public works and infrastructure in your municipality?)
15
Road Safety
HPIvi. 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
(Traffic signals, road signs and street lights)
16
2019 CSIS MANUAL - Annexes 90
I. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Pag-usapan naman po natin ang mga programang pangkapaligiran na ipinatutupad ng inyong pamahalaang lokal sa nakalipas
na 12 buwan. Now let us talk about the environmental programs implemented by your local government in the past 12 months.
I1. Sa inyong pagkakaalam, anu-anong mga programang pangkapaligiran ang ipinatutupad ng inyong pamahalaang lokal?
Based on what you know, what are the environmental programs being implemented by your local government?
MULTIPLE RESPONSE: MENTION EACH PROGRAM ONE BY ONE. IF NOT AWARE OF ANY PROGRAM, GO TO I7.
FOR EACH PROGRAM/ SERVICE AWARE OF, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWER UNDER I1 OF
THE ANSWER GRID. FOR EACH PROGRAM/SERVICE THAT THE RESPONDENT SAID THEY WERE AWARE OF, ASK I2-I4, THEN GO TO I5.
I2. Napakinabangan ba ninyo o ng sino man sa inyong sambahayan ang (STATE SERVICE) sa nakalipas na 12 na buwan?
Did you or any of your household members avail of (state service) in the past 12 months? (READ THE PROGRAMS THAT THE
RESPONDENT HAVE AVAILED OF OR HAVE BENEFITED FROM; MULTIPLE RESPONSE)
IF AVAILED OF THE SERVICE/PROGRAM, PROCEED TO I3-I4, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT PROGRAM/SERVICE THE RESPONDENT SAID
THEY WERE AWARE OF.
IF DID NOT AVAIL OF THE PROGRAM/SERVICE, PROCEED TO I2.1, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SERVICE THE RESPONDENT SAID THEY
WERE AWARE OF.
I2.1. Maari po bang malaman kung bakit hindi ninyo napakinabangan ang (STATE SERVICE)?
Why were you not able to avail of the said service?
I3. Kayo po ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa pagpapatupad ng lokal na pamahalaan sa (STATE SERVICE)?
Were you satisfied or not satisfied with the implementation of the said environmental program(s)?
IF SATISFIED, ASK (REASON) I3.1, OTHERWISE ASK (REASON) I3.2; FOR EITHER RESPONSE, PROCEED TO I4.
I4. Masasabi niyo bang kailangan o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal ng pamahalaan ang (STATE
SERVICE)? State whether the (environmental program/service) needs or does not need appropriate action from your local
government?
UNDER I2-I4 OF THE ANSWER GRID, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBERS CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWERS.
I5. Kayo ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa kabuuang serbisyong pangkapaligiran na binigay ng inyong lokal na
pamahalaan? On the overall, were you satisfied or not with the evironmental management services provided by your local
government?
Nasiyahan (Satisfied) 1
Hindi nasiyahan (Not satisfied) 2
I6. Sa inyong palagay, kailangan ba o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang
pangkabuuang serbisyong pangkapaligiran? On the overall, would you say that the environmental management
services/programs need or do not need appropriate action from the local government?
Kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Need appropriate action) 1
Hindi kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Do not need appropriate action) 2
I7. Sa inyong pananaw, ano ang pangunahing dapat gawin ng inyong lokal pamahalaan para mas mapabuti ang mga
programang pangkapaligiran sa inyong lugar? In your opinion, what should the local government primarily do to improve the
environmental programs in your municipality?
17
Clean-up Programs/Projects
IEMv. (Paglilinis sa mga pook at mga anyong tubig; 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
tulad ng adopt-an-estero/waterbody program)
18
I8. Paano ninyo dinidispatsa ang inyong basura? How do you dispose of your garbage? (MULTIPLE RESPONSE)
Kinokolekta ang basura (Collect) 1 – (GO TO I9; FOR OTHER ANSWERS, PROCEED TO J1)
Sinusunog (Burn) 2
Binabaon sa hukay (Bury) 3
Tinatapon sa isang lugar sa pamayanan (Throw) 4
Iba pa (Pakitukoy) 99
I9. Sino po ang pangunahing kumukolekta ng inyong basura? Who is the MAIN collector of your garbage?
Kolektor ng basura ng bayan (Municipality) 1
Kolektor ng basura ng barangay (Barangay) 2
Pribadong kolektor (Private collector) 3
Iba pa (Pakitukoy) 99
I10. Ginagawa po ba ninyo ang waste segregation o ang paghihiwalay ng nabubulok sa hindi nabubulok na basura?
Do you practice waste segregation; i.e., segragating biodegradable from non-biodegradable waste?
Oo (Yes) 1
Hindi (No) 2
I11. Gaano kadalas po ang pagkokolekta ng inyong basura? How often is your garbage collected?
Araw araw (Everyday) 1
Tatlong beses sa isang linggo (3x a week) 2
Dalawang beses sa isang linggo (2x a week) 3
Isang beses sa isang linggo (Once a week) 4
Iba pa (Pakitukoy) 99
19
J2. Napakinabangan ba ninyo o ng sinuman sa inyong sambahayan ang (STATE SERVICE) sa nakalipas na 12 na buwan?
Did you or any of your household members avail of (STATE SERVICE) in the past 12 months?
IF AVAILED OF THE SERVICE/PROGRAM, PROCEED TO J3-J4, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT PROGRAM/SERVICE THE RESPONDENT
SAID THEY WERE AWARE OF.
IF DID NOT AVAIL OF THE PROGRAM/SERVICE, PROCEED TO J2.1, THEN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SERVICE THE RESPONDENT SAID THEY
WERE AWARE OF.
J2.1. Maari po bang malaman kung bakit hindi ninyo napakinabangan ang (STATE SERVICE)?
Why were you not able to avail of the said service?
J3. Kayo po ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa (STATE SERVICE)? Were you satisfied or not satisfied with the (state the
service availed of)?
IF SATISFIED, ASK (REASON) J3.1, OTHERWISE ASK (REASON) J3.2; FOR EITHER RESPONSE, PROCEED TO J4.
J4. Masasabi niyo bang kailangan o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang
(STATE THE SERVICE)? Would you say that the (service/program) needs or does not need appropriate action from your local
government?
UNDER J2-J4 OF THE ANSWER GRID, ENCIRCLE THE NUMBERS CORRESPONDING TO THE RESPONDENT’S ANSWERS.
J5. Kayo ba ay nasiyahan o hindi nasiyahan sa kabuuang serbisyo sa pagpapalago ng ekonomiya at pamumuhunan na
binigay ng inyong pamahalaang lokal? On the overall, were you satisfied or not with the economic and invesment promotion
programs/services provided by your local government?
Nasiyahan (Satisfied) 1
Hindi nasiyahan (Not satisfied) 2
J6. Sa inyong palagay, kailangan ba o hindi kailangang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng lokal na pamahalaan ang
pangkabuuang serbisyong/programang pagpapalago ng ekonomiya at pamumuhunan? On the overall, would you say that
the economic and investment promotion programs/services need or do not need appropriate action from the local government?
Kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Need appropriate action) 1
Hindi kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Do not need appropriate action) 2
J7. Sa inyong pananaw, ano ang pangunahing dapat gawin ng inyong lokal na pamahalaan para mas mapabuti ang mga
programa o serbisyong may kinalaman sa pagpapalago ng ekonomiya at pamumuhunan sa inyong bayan?
In your opinion, what should your local government primarily do to improve services related to economic and investment promotion
in your municipality?
20
2019 CSIS MANUAL - Annexes 94
ANSWER GRID FOR J. ECONOMIC AND INVESTMENT PROMOTION
J2
J1 Availment J3 J4
Awareness (Benefited from the Satisfaction REASONS (Of program/
CODES PROGRAMS AND SERVICES (Of program/ implementation/ (Of program/ (J2.1 / J3.1 / J3.2) service)
service) Covered by the service) Needs Action
program
YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
Employment, Livelihood and Business
Promotion
Public Employment Services
JEEi. (Mga serbisyong naguugnay sa mga negosyo at sa 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
mga nangangailangan ng trabaho)
21
22
2019 CSIS MANUAL - Annexes 96
K. PERCEPTION OF CORRUPTION
K1. Sa nakalipas na 12 na buwan, nakaranas o nakasaksi ba kayo (o ang sinuman sa mga miyembro ng inyong kasambahayan)
ng anumang gawain ng sinumang opisyal o kawani ng inyong pamahalaang bayan o barangay na maari ninyong masabing
isang uri ng korapsyon? In the past 12 months, did you (or any of your household members) experience or encounter any practice
of your municipal or barangay officials that you would consider as a form of corruption?
Oo (Yes) 1 → GO TO K2
Hindi (No) 2 → GO TO NEXT SECTION
K2. Ano ang partikular na gawain ang inyong naranasan o nasaksihan? What practice of municipal officials or staff did you
experience or encounter?
PROBE FOR THE PARTICULAR SERVICE AVAILED. MAKE SURE FIRST-HAND EXPERIENCE FROM THE RESPONDENT OR ANY MEMBER OF
THE HOUSEHOLD IS BEING PROVIDED. HEARSAYS ARE NOT VALID AS RESPONSE.
K3. Idinulog ba ninyo sa sinumang awtoridad sa pamahalaan ang inyong nasaksihan o naranasan? Did you report your
experience to any government authority?
Oo (Yes) 1 → GO TO K5
Hindi (No) 2 → GO TO K4
K4. Ano ang pangunahing dahilan bakit hindi ninyo naidulog/idinulog ang inyong naranasan o nasaksihan? What primarily
prevented you from reporting the incident?
K5. Tumugon ba ang mga awtoridad sa inyong idinulog? Did the authorities respond to your complaint?
Oo (Yes) 1
Hindi (No) 2
23
Masasabi ko, nang walang takot sa aking kaligtasan, ang aking hinaing tungkol sa
LATi. lokal na pamahalaan o mga opisyal nito. I can declare my complaints about the local 1 2
government and its officials without being afraid for my safety.
LATvii. Ang [LGU] ay ginagawa ang makakaya nito upang… (Mention LGU MISSION) 1 2
The [LGU] is doing its part in… (MISSION STATEMENT)
LATviii. Malaki ang aking pakinabang mula sa mga serbisyo ng aming lokal na pamahalaan. 1 2
I greatly benefit from the services provided by our local government.
L2. Sa susunod na limang taon, mas pipiliin niyo po bang manatili sa inyong bayan o lumipat sa iba?
(In the next five years, will you choose to stay in your current municipality or transfer to another one?)
Manatili (Stay) 1 GO TO L3
Lumipat (Transfer) 2 GO TO L4
24
Nasiyahan (Satisfied) 1
Hindi nasiyahan (Dissatisfied) 2
M2. Sa inyong pananaw, kailangan bang bigyan ng karampatang aksyon ng pamahalaang lokal ang mga serbisyong
ipinatutupad nito? On the overall, would you say that local programs/ services need or do not need appropriate action from the
local government?
Kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Need appropriate action) 1
Hindi kailangang bigyan ng aksyon (Do not need appropriate action) 2
M3. Kung ikukumpara sa nakaraang taon, masasabi ba ninyo na ang kalidad ng mga buhay sa bayan ng (LGU) ay
(READ CHOICES)? Would you say that your life in (LGU) has (READ CHOICES) in the past year?
M4. Alin sa mga sumusunod na serbisyong hindi o hindi pa ipinapatupad ng inyong lokal na
pamahalaan ang sa tingin ninyo dapat ipatupad? (READ LIST BELOW) Which among the following
services that are not being implemented do you think are needed to be implemented by your municipal government?
(READ LIST BELOW)
[TO INTERVIEWER: PROCEED TO SECTIONS A & B (PAGES 2-3), CONTROLS (PAGE 1)]
TECHNICAL NOTES
I. HEALTH SERVICES
Examples:
Communicable: TB-DOTS, awareness, prevention and
management programs for TB, influenza, HIV/STI, hepatatitis,
Prevention and management of
malaria and polio, etc.
DHSv. Communicable and Non-Communicable
Diseases
Non-Communicable: Healthy Lifestyle Programs, Dengue
prevention programs, awareness and prevention of respiratory
diseases
Sports programs and activities Conduct of Palarong Bayan and representation of delegates to
EBSii.
(Programa sa palakasan) higher levels
Alternative Learning System and / or other Special Alternative Learning Systems, special education programs
EBSiv. Education Programs (Alternatibong Sistema ng and curriculum and adult education, salaries of supplementary
Pagkatuto at iba pang katulad na programa) teachers
Persons with Disabilities (PWD) Welfare Program PWD awareness activities, Magna Carta of PWD-related
FSSiii. (Programa para sa mga indibidwal na may programs, discounts, Self and social enhancement service,
kapansanan) referral services, training and employment support services
Traffic Management
GGPvi. (Pagpapanatili ng maayos na daloy ng trapiko sa mga Traffic enforcement
komunidad)
Road Safety Street lights, road signs and line markings near schools,
HPIvi.
(Traffic signals, road signs and street lights) allowable speed limits in barangay and local roads, etc.);
HPIvii. Sports centers and facilities
Municipal library, municipal reading centers; can be located
HPIviii. Information and reading center (public library)
within or outside of schools
Municipal Government Buildings
HPIix.
(Munisipyo o bahay pamahalaan)
Public Cemetery
HPIx. (Pampublikong sementeryo)
Flood Control Management System
HPIxi.
(Seawalls, dikes, drainage and sewerage)
Waste Water Management Water quality management thru water treatment facilities;
(Sewerage/septage system o pagpapanatili ng wastong
IEMiv. Waste water management thru sewerage system, drainage,
daluyan ng maruming tubig; paghihigop ng mga septic
tank, water treatment) septic tanks treatment, prevention of water pollutants
Tourism Promotion
Product/Brand marketing and promotion of local “One Town, One Product (OTOP),” tourist information
JETii.
goods and tourist attractions kiosks/brochures, souvenir shops, etc.
Investment promotion activities such as trade fairs, Festivals and events organized and facilitated by LGUs,
JETiii.
fiestas, business events, and similar events Cultural and Heritage Tourism Program
Organization and development of farmers, Presence and functionality of farmer and fishermen
JEAi.
fishermen and their cooperatives cooperatives and organizations
Prevention and control of plant and animal pests Prevention and control of insect pests; anti-rabies vaccinations
and diseases; fish kills and diseases for animals; spray/neuter; treatment of sick animals (Municipal
JEAiii.
(Pagsugpo ng mga peste sa mga sakahing tanim at Agriculturist/Veterinarian functions combined); actions to
alagang hayop; pag-iwas sa fishkill) prevent fish kills and diseases
Access to facilities that promote agricultural Existence of fish hatcheries and breeding stations, as well as
JEAv. production such as fish hatcheries and breeding various agricultural machineries for production; access to
stations farm-to-market roads