Scribd
Upload
1K views1 page

Tan Tiong Bio vs. CIR, G.R. No. L-15778, April 23, 1962

(1) Central Syndicate purchased surplus goods from Dee Hong Lue and assumed the obligation to pay sales tax on the goods. (2) Central Syndicate requested a refund from the Collector on the sales tax paid, which was denied as Central Syndicate was determined to be the importer liable for the tax. (3) By 1954, Central Syndicate had dissolved due to the expiration of its corporate existence, so the case proceeded with its former officers and directors as petitioners. (4) The Court ruled that the sales tax obligation could be enforced against the successors of the dissolved Central Syndicate, as creditors may follow the assets of a dissolved corporation.

Uploaded by

Lizzy Way
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views1 page

Tan Tiong Bio vs. CIR, G.R. No. L-15778, April 23, 1962

(1) Central Syndicate purchased surplus goods from Dee Hong Lue and assumed the obligation to pay sales tax on the goods. (2) Central Syndicate requested a refund from the Collector on the sales tax paid, which was denied as Central Syndicate was determined to be the importer liable for the tax. (3) By 1954, Central Syndicate had dissolved due to the expiration of its corporate existence, so the case proceeded with its former officers and directors as petitioners. (4) The Court ruled that the sales tax obligation could be enforced against the successors of the dissolved Central Syndicate, as creditors may follow the assets of a dissolved corporation.

Uploaded by

Lizzy Way
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

TAO TIONG BIO V CIR

GR No. L-15778 April 23, 1962

FACTS
Central Syndicate a corporation, sent a letter to CIR advising the latter that (1) it purchased from
Dee Hong Lue the surplus properties which the said Dee Hong Lue had bought from the
Foreign Liquidation Commission (2) that it assumed Dee Hong Lue's obligation and would pay
a portion of the sales tax on said surplus goods (3) it was paying P43,750.00 in behalf of Dee
Hong Lue as deposit to answer for the payment of said sales tax

The syndicate again wrote the Collector requesting a refund for the purchase price of goods
obtained from Dee Hong Lue was adjusted and reduced. The CIR investigated the matter and
the Collector decided that the Central Syndicate was the importer and original seller of the
surplus goods in question and, therefore, the one liable to pay the sales tax.

November 5, 1954, syndicate is already a non-existing entity due to the expiration of its
corporate existence. The syndicate was later substituted by its officers and directors (petitioners
herein). Court of Tax Appeals proceeded to hear the case.

ISSUE:
Whether the sales tax in question can be enforced against the corporation’s successors-in-
interest who are the present petitioners since the Central Syndicate has already been dissolved
because of the expiration of its corporate existence.

Ruling: YES. The creditor of a dissolved corporation may follow its assets once they passed
into the hands of the stockholders.

The dissolution of a corporation does not extinguish the debts due or owing to it because a
creditor of a dissolved corporation may follow its assets, as in the nature of a trust fund, into the
hands of its stockholders.

With reference to the effect of dissolution upon taxes due from a corporation, "that the hands of
the government cannot, of course, collect taxes from a defunct corporation, it loses thereby
none of its rights to assess taxes which had been due from the corporation, and to collect them
from persons, who by reason of transactions with the corporation, hold property against which
the tax can be enforced and that the legal death of the corporation no more prevents such
action than would the physical death of an individual prevent the government from assessing
taxes against him and collecting them from his administrator, who holds the property which the
decedent had formerly possessed".

WHEREFORE, with the above modification, we hereby affirm the decision appealed from, with
costs against petitioners.

You might also like