0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Perawatandiri Kecacatan: Case Processing Summary

The document is a case processing summary that analyzes data on disability cases. It contains frequency tables and crosstabulations analyzing the relationships between various variables like self-care ability, age, education level, and disability status. The tables show that all 35 cases in the dataset were valid with no missing data. Relationships between variables like age and disability status or self-care ability and disability status were also examined.

Uploaded by

Puji Melati
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Perawatandiri Kecacatan: Case Processing Summary

The document is a case processing summary that analyzes data on disability cases. It contains frequency tables and crosstabulations analyzing the relationships between various variables like self-care ability, age, education level, and disability status. The tables show that all 35 cases in the dataset were valid with no missing data. Relationships between variables like age and disability status or self-care ability and disability status were also examined.

Uploaded by

Puji Melati
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

perawatandiri * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%


Umur * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
pendidikan * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
status * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
pendapatan * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
tipekusta * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%
lamapengobatan * kecacatan 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 35 100.0%

perawatandiri * kecacatan

Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

perawatandiri kurang baik Count 1 17 18

% within perawatandiri 5.6% 94.4% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 70.8% 51.4%

% of Total 2.9% 48.6% 51.4%

baik Count 10 7 17

% within perawatandiri 58.8% 41.2% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 90.9% 29.2% 48.6%

% of Total 28.6% 20.0% 48.6%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within perawatandiri 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 11.511 1 .001
b
Continuity Correction 9.172 1 .002
Likelihood Ratio 12.815 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 11.182 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for perawatandiri


.041 .004 .385
(kurang baik / baik)
For cohort kecacatan = cacat .094 .013 .661
For cohort kecacatan = tidak 2.294 1.285 4.093
N of Valid Cases 35

Umur * kecacatan
Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

Umur 13 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

15 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

16 Count 0 2 2

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%


% within kecacatan 0.0% 8.3% 5.7%

% of Total 0.0% 5.7% 5.7%

17 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

18 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

20 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

21 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

23 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

26 Count 1 1 2

% within Umur 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

31 Count 1 2 3

% within Umur 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 8.3% 8.6%

% of Total 2.9% 5.7% 8.6%

33 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

34 Count 0 2 2

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%


% within kecacatan 0.0% 8.3% 5.7%

% of Total 0.0% 5.7% 5.7%

35 Count 1 1 2

% within Umur 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

38 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

39 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

41 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

43 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

44 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

45 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

47 Count 1 1 2

% within Umur 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

50 Count 2 1 3
% within Umur 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 18.2% 4.2% 8.6%

% of Total 5.7% 2.9% 8.6%

60 Count 1 0 1

% within Umur 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

63 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

65 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

66 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

73 Count 0 1 1

% within Umur 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within Umur 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 21.853 25 .644
Likelihood Ratio 27.618 25 .326
Linear-by-Linear Association .023 1 .880
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 52 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .31.

Risk Estimate

Value
a
Odds Ratio for Umur (13 / 15)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.

pendidikan * kecacatan

Crosstab
kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

pendidikan tidak sekolah Count 0 1 1

% within pendidikan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

tidak tamat SD Count 4 1 5

% within pendidikan 80.0% 20.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 36.4% 4.2% 14.3%

% of Total 11.4% 2.9% 14.3%

SD Count 7 5 12
% within pendidikan 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 63.6% 20.8% 34.3%

% of Total 20.0% 14.3% 34.3%

SMP Count 0 10 10

% within pendidikan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 41.7% 28.6%

% of Total 0.0% 28.6% 28.6%

SMA Count 0 6 6

% within pendidikan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 25.0% 17.1%

% of Total 0.0% 17.1% 17.1%

PT Count 0 1 1

% within pendidikan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within pendidikan 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 17.754a 5 .003


Likelihood Ratio 22.269 5 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 9.835 1 .002
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .31.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for pendidikan
a
(tidak sekolah / tidak tamat
SD)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.

status * kecacatan

Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

status belum menikah Count 4 7 11

% within status 36.4% 63.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 36.4% 29.2% 31.4%

% of Total 11.4% 20.0% 31.4%

menikah Count 6 16 22

% within status 27.3% 72.7% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 54.5% 66.7% 62.9%

% of Total 17.1% 45.7% 62.9%

janda/duda Count 1 1 2

% within status 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within status 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .621 2 .733
Likelihood Ratio .599 2 .741
Linear-by-Linear Association .012 1 .911
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .63.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for status (belum a

menikah / menikah)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.

pendapatan * kecacatan

Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

pendapatan < UMR Count 11 16 27

% within pendapatan 40.7% 59.3% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 66.7% 77.1%

% of Total 31.4% 45.7% 77.1%

> UMR Count 0 8 8

% within pendapatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 33.3% 22.9%

% of Total 0.0% 22.9% 22.9%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within pendapatan 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4.753 1 .029
b
Continuity Correction 3.051 1 .081
Likelihood Ratio 7.075 1 .008
Fisher's Exact Test .037 .031
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.617 1 .032
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.51.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

For cohort kecacatan = tidak .593 .433 .810


N of Valid Cases 35

tipekusta * kecacatan

Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

tipekusta tipe PB Count 0 3 3


% within tipekusta 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 12.5% 8.6%

% of Total 0.0% 8.6% 8.6%

tipe MB Count 11 21 32

% within tipekusta 34.4% 65.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 87.5% 91.4%

% of Total 31.4% 60.0% 91.4%


Total Count 11 24 35

% within tipekusta 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.504a 1 .220


b
Continuity Correction .332 1 .565
Likelihood Ratio 2.391 1 .122
Fisher's Exact Test .536 .309
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.461 1 .227
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .94.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

For cohort kecacatan = tidak 1.524 1.186 1.958


N of Valid Cases 35

lamapengobatan * kecacatan
Crosstab

kecacatan

cacat tidak Total

lamapengobatan 1 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

2 Count 1 3 4

% within lamapengobatan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 12.5% 11.4%

% of Total 2.9% 8.6% 11.4%

3 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

4 Count 1 3 4

% within lamapengobatan 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 12.5% 11.4%

% of Total 2.9% 8.6% 11.4%

5 Count 1 1 2

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

6 Count 2 2 4

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 18.2% 8.3% 11.4%

% of Total 5.7% 5.7% 11.4%

7 Count 1 1 2

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

8 Count 2 1 3

% within lamapengobatan 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%


% within kecacatan 18.2% 4.2% 8.6%

% of Total 5.7% 2.9% 8.6%

9 Count 1 1 2

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

10 Count 1 1 2

% within lamapengobatan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 4.2% 5.7%

% of Total 2.9% 2.9% 5.7%

11 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

12 Count 0 5 5

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 20.8% 14.3%

% of Total 0.0% 14.3% 14.3%

13 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

15 Count 1 0 1

% within lamapengobatan 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 9.1% 0.0% 2.9%

% of Total 2.9% 0.0% 2.9%

17 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%

18 Count 0 1 1

% within lamapengobatan 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 0.0% 4.2% 2.9%

% of Total 0.0% 2.9% 2.9%


Total Count 11 24 35
% within lamapengobatan 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

% within kecacatan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 11.026 15 .751
Likelihood Ratio 14.122 15 .516
Linear-by-Linear Association .202 1 .653
N of Valid Cases 35

a. 32 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is .31.

Risk Estimate

Value

Odds Ratio for a

lamapengobatan (1 / 2)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be


computed. They are only computed for a
2*2 table without empty cells.

You might also like