Problem 10-18 (60 minutes)

1. Total standard cost for units produced during August:

500 kits × $42 per kit.......................................................... $21,000
Less standard cost of labor and overhead:
Direct labor........................................................................ (8,000)
Variable manufacturing overhead......................................... (1,600)
Standard cost of materials used during August......................... $11,400

2. Standard cost of materials used during August (a).................... $11,400

Number of units produced (b)................................................ 500
Standard materials cost per kit (a) ÷ (b).................................. $ 22.80

Standard materials cost per kit $22.80 per kit

= =3.8 yards per kit
Standard materials cost per yard $6 per yard

3. Actual cost of material used $10,000

Standard cost of material used 11,400
Total variance $ 1,400 F
The price and quantity variances together equal the total variance.
If the quantity variance is $600 U, then the price variance must be
$2,000F:
Price variance $ 2,000 F
Quantity variance 600 U
Total variance $ 1,400 F
Problem 10-18 (continued)
Alternative Solution:
Actual Quantity of Actual Quantity of Standard Quantity
Inputs, at Inputs, at Allowed for Output,
Actual Price Standard Price at Standard Price
(AQ × AP) (AQ × SP) (SQ × SP)
2,000 yards × 2,000 yards × 1,900 yards** ×
$5 per yard $6 per yard* $6 per yard*
= $10,000* = $12,000 = $11,400

  
Price Variance, Quantity Variance,
$2,000 F $600 U*

Total Variance, $1,400 F

*Given.
**500 kits × 3.8 yards per kit = 1,900 yards

4. The first step in computing the standard direct labor rate is to

determine the standard direct labor-hours allowed for the month’s
production. The standard direct labor-hours can be computed by
working with the variable manufacturing overhead cost figures,
since they are based on direct labor-hours worked:
Standard manufacturing variable overhead cost for
August (a)................................................................... $1,600
Standard manufacturing variable overhead rate per
direct labor-hour (b)..................................................... $2
Standard direct labor-hours for the month (a) ÷ (b)......... 800

Total standard labor cost for the month $8,000

=
Total standard direct labor-hours for the month 800 DLHs

= $10 per DLH

Problem 10-18 (continued)
5. Before the labor variances can be computed, it is necessary to
compute the actual direct labor cost for the month:
Actual cost per kit produced ($42.00 + $0.14).................. $ 42.14
Number of kits produced................................................. ×  500
Total actual cost of production........................................ $21,070
Less: Actual cost of materials..........................................
$10,000
Actual cost of manufacturing variable
overhead............................................................
1,620 11,620
Actual cost of direct labor................................................ $ 9,450

With this information, the variances can be computed:

Actual Hours of Actual Hours of Standard Hours
Input, at the Input, at the Allowed for Output,
Actual Rate Standard Rate at the Standard Rate
(AH × AR) (AH × SR) (SH × SR)
$9,450 900 hours* × $8,000*
$10 per hour
= $9,000

  
Rate Variance, Efficiency Variance,
$450 U $1,000 U

Total Variance, $1,450 U

*Given.
Problem 10-18 (continued)
6. Actual Hours of Actual Hours of Standard Hours
Input, at the Input, at the Allowed for Output,
Actual Rate Standard Rate at the Standard Rate
(AH × AR) (AH × SR) (SH × SR)
$1,620* 900 hours* × $1,600*
$2 per hour*
= $1,800

  
Spending Variance, Efficiency Variance,
$180 F $200 U

Total Variance, $20 U

*Given.

7. Standard Standard
Quantity or Standard Price Cost per
Hours per Kit or Rate Kit
Direct materials 3.8 yards 1
$ 6 per yard $22.80
Direct labor 1.6 hours 2
$10 per hour 3
16.00
Variable manufacturing
overhead 1.6 hours $ 2 per hour 3.20
Total standard cost per kit $42.00
1
From part 2.
2
800 hours (from part 4) ÷ 500 kits = 1.6 hours per kit.
3
From part 4.
Problem 10-20 (75 minutes)
1. Actual Quantity of Actual Quantity of Standard Quantity
Inputs, at Inputs, at Allowed for Output,
Actual Price Standard Price at Standard Price
(AQ × AP) (AQ × SP) (SQ × SP)
290,000 feet × 290,000 feet × 300,000 feet* ×
$2.10 per foot $2.00 per foot $2.00 per foot
= $609,000 = $580,000 = $600,000

  
Price Variance, Quantity Variance,
$29,000 U $20,000 F

Total Variance, $9,000 U

*20,000 units × 15 feet per unit = 300,000 feet

Alternative Solution:
Materials Price Variance = AQ (AP – SP)
290,000 feet ($2.10 per foot – $2.00 per foot) = $29,000 U
Materials Quantity Variance = SP (AQ – SQ)
$2 per foot (290,000 feet – 300,000 feet) = $20,000 F
Yes, the decrease in waste is apparent because of the $20,000
favorable quantity variance.
If the company wants to continue to compute the material price
variance, then the standard price per board foot should be
changed to reflect current JIT purchase costs. The old standard
price of $2 per board foot is no longer relevant.
Problem 10-20 (continued)
2. Actual Hours of Actual Hours of Standard Hours
Input, at the Input, at the Allowed for Output,
Actual Rate Standard Rate at the Standard Rate
(AH × AR) (AH × SR) (SH × SR)
35,000 hours × 35,000 hours × 30,000 hours* ×
$9.80 per hour $10.00 per hour $10.00 per hour
= $343,000 = $350,000 = $300,000

  
Rate Variance, Efficiency Variance,
$7,000 F $50,000 U

Total Variance, $43,000 U

*20,000 units × 1.5 hours per unit = 30,000 hours

Alternative Solution:
Labor Rate Variance = AH (AR – SR)
35,000 hours ($9.80 per hour – $10.00 per hour) = $7,000 F
Labor Efficiency Variance = SR (AH – SH)
$10 per hour (35,000 hours – 30,000 hours) = $50,000 U
Problem 10-20 (continued)
No, the labor efficiency variance is not appropriate as a measure
of performance in this situation. The reasons are:
• Labor is largely a fixed cost rather than a variable cost since the
company maintains a stable work force to operate its flow line.
Thus, the variance is not a valid measure of efficiency.
• In a JIT environment the goal is not to have high efficiency in
the use of labor if such efficiency results in the production of
unneeded goods. The goal is to produce only as needed to
meet demand. Tom Hanson is tied to the past in that he is
focusing solely on the utilization of labor time and is overlooking
the impact of unneeded goods on the organization.
Unfortunately, the situation posed in the problem is a common
one as companies switch from a traditional system to JIT, and
sometimes JIT doesn’t work because of misplaced emphasis on
efficiency variances. In a JIT setting, it is an interesting paradox
that one of the “costs” of greater efficiency on the production
line is greater “inefficiency” on the part of labor as it is
occasionally idle or as it spends time at various tasks other than
producing goods.
Problem 10-20 (continued)
3. Actual Hours of Actual Hours of Standard Hours
Input, at the Input, at the Allowed for Output,
Actual Rate Standard Rate at the Standard Rate
(AH × AR) (AH × SR) (SH × SR)
$118,000 35,000 hours × 30,000 hours* ×
$4.00 per hour $4.00 per hour
= $140,000 = $120,000

  
Spending Variance, Efficiency Variance,
$22,000 F $20,000 U

Total Variance, $2,000 F

*20,000 units × 1.5 hours per unit = 30,000 hours

Alternative Solution:
Actual variable overhead cost..........................................
$118,000
Actual hours × standard rate:
(35,000 hours × $4.00 per hour)..................................
140,000
Spending variance..........................................................
$ 22,000 F
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance = SR (AH – SH)
$4.00 per hour (35,000 hours – 30,000 hours) = $20,000 U
It is doubtful that direct labor and variable manufacturing
overhead costs are still correlated. Direct labor time is now largely
a fixed cost. Variable manufacturing overhead, however, will tend
to rise and fall with actual changes in production. If variable
manufacturing overhead cost were indeed correlated with direct
labor, then the actual variable manufacturing overhead cost for
June should have been about $140,000 (35,000 hours × $4.00 per
hour). But actual variable manufacturing overhead cost was far
below this figure, as shown by the large favorable spending
variance for the month. Indeed, the actual variable overhead cost
figure—$118,000—is very near the $120,000 standard cost
allowed for the month’s output. Thus, it appears that as
production has been cut back, variable manufacturing overhead
cost has also decreased, but direct labor has remained stable.
Problem 10-20 (continued)
4. a. and b.
Month
April May June
Throughput time—hours:
Processing time (x)......................................................
1.6 1.5 1.3
Inspection time............................................................
0.3 0.2 0.1
Move time...................................................................
3.2 2.7 1.2
Queue time..................................................................
14.9 10.6 3.9
Total throughput time (y).............................................
20.0 15.0 6.5

Manufacturing cycle efficiency (MCE):

Processing time (x) ÷ Throughput time (y)....................
8% 10% 20%
Note that the manufacturing cycle efficiency has improved
dramatically over the last three months. This means that non-
value-added time is being pared out of the production process.

5. Under JIT the goal of the company is to produce to meet demand

rather than to just fill labor time. Thus, the traditional labor
variances are often unfavorable. Throughput time and MCE focus
on all elements of manufacturing—not just labor time. These other
elements, which are independent of labor time, are showing
greater efficiency each month as the company pares out non-
value-added activities in the plant.
Throughput time and MCE are more appropriate in this situation
since they focus on those elements that are of greatest
importance in a JIT environment such as now being developed by
PC Deco. The labor efficiency variance has little or no significance
in such an environment.