Scribd
Upload
25 views

Name of Employee: Name of Rater: Position: Position: Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review: Rating Period

The document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) used to evaluate teachers. It includes sections for the employee and rater information, performance indicators with objectives and timelines, and a section to rate performance and actual results on quality, efficiency, and timeliness. Scores are calculated on a scale of 1 to 5, with adjectival ratings of outstanding, very satisfactory, satisfactory, unsatisfactory, and poor. The form is used to plan objectives and evaluate performance during the rating period.

Uploaded by

Geraldine Mina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
25 views

Name of Employee: Name of Rater: Position: Position: Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review: Rating Period

The document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) used to evaluate teachers. It includes sections for the employee and rater information, performance indicators with objectives and timelines, and a section to rate performance and actual results on quality, efficiency, and timeliness. Scores are calculated on a scale of 1 to 5, with adjectival ratings of outstanding, very satisfactory, satisfactory, unsatisfactory, and poor. The form is used to plan objectives and evaluate performance during the rating period.

Uploaded by

Geraldine Mina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHER I-IV

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight per
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
Objective Outstanding Very Satisfactory Q E T
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (4) ( 2) (1)

Quality
Efficiency
Quality
1 Efficiency
Timeliness
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
2
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
3
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
4
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
5

RATING FOR OVERALL 0


ACCOMPLISHMENTS

0
Rater Ratee Approving Authority

#RSH#
RATING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight per
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Objective QET ACTUAL RESULTS SCORE
Q E T
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENT
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500- 5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Outstanding
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.4999 Poor

#RSH#
#RSH#
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHER I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
RATING SCORE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight per
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE QET ACTUAL RESULTS
Objective Outstanding Very Satisfactory Q E T
Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory Poor
(5) (4) ( 2) (1)

Quality
Efficiency
Quality
1
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
2
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
3
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
Quality
Efficiency
4
Timeliness
Quality
Efficiency
Timeliness
5
RATING FOR OVERALL 0
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

0
Rater Ratee Approving Authority

#RSH#
RATING SCORE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weight per
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Objective QET ACTUAL RESULTS
Q E T
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENT
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500- 5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Outstanding
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.4999 Poor

#RSH#
#RSH#

You might also like