The Promise of The College Readiness of The Grade 12 Graduate: Issues and Concerns
The Promise of The College Readiness of The Grade 12 Graduate: Issues and Concerns
Higher Education
(Pursues and communicates truth in academic freedom)
College Readiness Standards (in implementation preparation documents)
(CMO 20 s.2013)
21st Century Skills
set of abilities that students need to develop in order to succeed in
the information age (with a connection with local, national and
global communities concerns and challenges)
(CMO 20 s.2013)
Therefore, Grade 12 graduates (K to 12 Curriculum completers)
(CMO 20 s.2013)
Therefore, Grade 12 graduates (K to 12 Curriculum completers)
(CMO 20 s.2013)
Therefore, Grade 12 graduates (K to 12 Curriculum completers)
5. Interact meaningfully in a social
setting and contribute to the
fulfillment of individual and shared
goals, respecting the fundamental
humanity of all persons and the
diversity of groups and
communities.
(CMO 20 s.2013)
WHY?
GE Goals (CMO 20 S.2012)
Enable student to locate her/himself in the community and the world and
engage in it meaningfully
General outcomes (CMO 20 S.2012)
Capacity to personally
Appreciation of the
interpret the human
human condition
experience
Ability to contribute
personally and
meaningfully to the
country’s development
people from different disciplines viewing one integrating knowledge and creating a unity of
working together, each drawing on discipline from the methods from different intellectual frameworks
their disciplinary knowledge. perspective of disciplines, using a real beyond the disciplinary
another synthesis of approaches. perspectives.
Relating to, or making use of several Coordinated effort The process of combining two approaches that
working within disciplines at once. This involving two or or more disciplines, fields of transcend boundaries of
a single acknowledges that there are more academic study or professions., but is contentional approaches
discipline differences between disciplines in disciplines. Finding a also attempting to synthesis this attempts to get
“how the work is done”, but doesn’t middle ground of them into something new. around the issue of
have a way to bridge these sorts? methods of
differences. How do you know thinking completely by
which discipline is more important working from the
at any one time? problem space out.
Disciplinarities intra, cross, multi, inter, trans ARJ.htm; Harvard T.H. Chan
Issues and Concerns
1. COLLEGE ELIGIBILITY and
QUALIFICATION to PROGRAM CHOICE
Subject
directlytoaligned with Policies ofdirectly
Institutional aligned with
the accepting HEI
his/her program choice?
my program choice?
Subject to Institutional Policies of the accepting HEI
(respecting the articulation of SHS Core Learning Areas with NGEC Core Courses)
Elective 2 3
Elective 1 3
TOTAL UNITS 17 21 6
2.Preparation for multi-/inter-/cross- disciplinary learning
Philo – Science
approaches in –
Nature of
understa
identity; factors understanding
nding
and forces that self History, Sociology
Understan self
affect the – Cultural Identity,
4 ding the being in 3 3
development Theology –
Self the
and Understanding world;
maintenance of through the
care for
personal identity image & likeness
environ
of God ment
HEI Concern: FACULTY LOADING MECHANISM (for NGEC )
Interdisciplinary
Connected Shared Partnership
Teaching
Complex
Simple
Similar Concepts Equal
What is it ? Connection of or Skills from any representation
Content from two or more
of any two or
any two subject areas are
taught by more subject
subject areas
teachers as part areas in a
of a collaborative curricular
process during
the same
effort
appropriate time
period
Teacher One teacher Team
Involvement Two or more teaching
teachers
Which model to follow?
HEI Concern: FACULTY LOADING MECHANISM for NGEC