2005 Lin
2005 Lin
www.elsevier.com/locate/cplett
Abstract
ZnO quantum dots were synthesized successfully via a simple sol–gel method. The average size of quantum dots can be tailored
using well-controlled concentration of zinc precursor. Size-dependent blue shifts of photoluminescence and absorption spectra
revealed the quantum confinement effect. The band gap enlargement is in agreement with the theoretical calculation based on
the effective mass model. Furthermore, as the particle size decreases, we observed an increase in the size-dependent Stokes shift
of the photoluminescence peak relative to the absorption onset.
Ó 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0009-2614/$ - see front matter Ó 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2005.05.027
K.-F. Lin et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 409 (2005) 208–211 209
2. Experimental
spectra all coincide with JCPDS card no. 36-1451, so 3.5 nm. Since the exciton Bohr radius, aB, of bulk
that the observed patterns can be unambiguously attrib- ZnO is 2.34 nm [25], the Coulomb interaction should
uted to the presence of hexagonal wurzite crystallites be relatively small as compared to the kinetic energy
with cell constants of a = 3.251 Å and c = 5.208 Å. No resulting from confinement in our samples and the
excess peaks detected, which indicates that all the pre- ZnO QDs are in the moderate to strong confinement re-
cursors have been completely decomposed and no other gime. In general, quantum confinement shifts the energy
complex products were formed. It should be noted here levels of the conduction and valence bands apart, giving
that the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the rise to a blue shift in the transition energy as the particle
diffraction peaks increase while decreasing the concen- size decreases. Such phenomenon is also revealed in the
tration of zinc precursor duo to the size effect. Further- absorption spectra, although the faint excitonic absorp-
more, the crystalline size can be estimated to be 12, 7.4, tion peaks due to the moderate size distribution of ZnO
6.5, 5.3, 4.2 and 3.5 nm, for concentration 0.32, 0.16, QDs. However, from this figure, it can clearly be seen
0.1, 0.08, 0.06 and 0.04 M, respectively, by using the De- that the absorption onset exhibits a progressive blue
bye–Scherer formula. The statistical result is consistent shift from 3.43 to 3.65 eV as the size of ZnO QD de-
with the observation from TEM. creases. Similar observations of such size dependence
Fig. 3 shows typical PL and absorption spectra of upon optical properties have been made previously for
samples with different average QD sizes. The UV emis- other semiconductor quantum dots [26–28].
sion represents a relaxed state of exciton near the band The relationship between band gap and size of QD
edge in ZnO QDs. The nature of the UV-PL from can be obtained using a number of models [29–32].
ZnO QDs itself is still a matter of controversy. Some Using the effective mass model for spherical particles
authors attributed the UV-PL to the recombination of with a Coulomb interaction term [29], the band gap
confined excitons [14], while others argued that the emis- Eg ½eV can be approximately written as
sion comes from surface impurities or defects [15]. In
bulk h2 p2 1 1 1.8e2
our case, high efficient UV emission near band edge is Eg ffi Eg þ þ ; ð1Þ
attributed to free exciton emission with high electronic 2er2 me mh 4pee0 r
density of states, which shift to higher energies from where Ebulk
g is the bulk energy gap, r is the particle ra-
3.30 to 3.43 eV as the QD size decreases from 12 to dius, me is the effective mass of the electrons, mh is the
effective mass of the holes, e is the relative permittivity,
e0 is the permittivity of free space, h is PlanckÕs constant
divided by 2p , and e is the charge of the electron. The
polarization term included in this model is usually
12 nm negligible.
Fig. 4 shows both the UV emission peaks, absorption
onsets and the dependence of the band gap enlargement
7.4 nm
4.0
0.24
PL Intensity (arb. units)
3.9 0.22
6.5 nm
0.20
3.8
0.18
3.7 0.16
Eg* (eV)
5.3 nm 0.14
3.6 4 6 8 10 12
Diameter (nm)
3.5
4.2 nm
3.4
3.3
3.5 nm 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Diameter (nm)
2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 Fig. 4. The dependence of the band gap enlargement versus the ZnO
Photon Energy (eV) QDs diameter as calculated from the effective mass model and the
corresponding experimental data of PL peak maximum (h) and the
Fig. 3. PL (solid line) and absorption (dashed line) spectra near the absorption onset (n). The inset shows the size-dependent Stokes shift
band edge of various ZnO QD size. of various QD diameter.
K.-F. Lin et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 409 (2005) 208–211 211