Scribd
Upload
29 views

Nonparametric Correlations

This document contains the results of statistical analyses examining the relationship between two variables: interest in learning (MINAT2) and psychomotor ability (PSIKO2). A Spearman's rho correlation found a strong positive correlation between the two variables (rho=0.667, p<0.01). Frequency tables show the distribution of scores on each variable. A crosstabulation found no students with low scores on both variables. Measures of association between the variables were all statistically significant.

Uploaded by

Muhammad Yakub
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views

Nonparametric Correlations

This document contains the results of statistical analyses examining the relationship between two variables: interest in learning (MINAT2) and psychomotor ability (PSIKO2). A Spearman's rho correlation found a strong positive correlation between the two variables (rho=0.667, p<0.01). Frequency tables show the distribution of scores on each variable. A crosstabulation found no students with low scores on both variables. Measures of association between the variables were all statistically significant.

Uploaded by

Muhammad Yakub
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations

Kemampuan
Minat Belajar Psikomotor
Spearman's rho Minat Belajar Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .667**
Sig. (2-tailed) . .000
N 79 79
Kemampuan Psikomotor Correlation Coefficient .667** 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .
N 79 79
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Nonparametric Correlations
Frequencies
Statistics

MINAT2 PSIKO2
N Valid 79 79
Missing 0 0

Frequency Table
MINAT2

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 10 12.7 12.7 12.7
2 14 17.7 17.7 30.4
3 55 69.6 69.6 100.0
Total 79 100.0 100.0

PSIKO2

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 10 12.7 12.7 12.7
2 8 10.1 10.1 22.8
3 61 77.2 77.2 100.0
Total 79 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
MINAT2 * PSIKO2 79 100.0% 0 .0% 79 100.0%
MINAT2 * PSIKO2 Crosstabulation

PSIKO2
1 2 3 Total
MINAT2 1 Count 10 0 0 10
% of Total 12.7% .0% .0% 12.7%
2 Count 0 8 6 14
% of Total .0% 10.1% 7.6% 17.7%
3 Count 0 0 55 55
% of Total .0% .0% 69.6% 69.6%
Total Count 10 8 61 79
% of Total 12.7% 10.1% 77.2% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Asymp.
a b
Value Std. Error Approx. T Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .776 .000
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .929 .030 21.948 .000c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .871 .050 15.566 .000c
N of Valid Cases 79
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

You might also like