0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views6 pages

Porpositions STAT 135

This document defines basic concepts in propositional logic, including propositions, truth tables, logical operators, and tautologies. Propositions are represented by capital letters and can be combined using logical operators like "and" and "or". Truth tables show all possible combinations of truth values for propositions connected by operators. A tautology is a statement that is always true, regardless of the truth values of its propositions. The document provides examples of representing statements as well-formed formulas and using truth tables to determine if a formula is a tautology.

Uploaded by

Zoldi3r
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views6 pages

Porpositions STAT 135

This document defines basic concepts in propositional logic, including propositions, truth tables, logical operators, and tautologies. Propositions are represented by capital letters and can be combined using logical operators like "and" and "or". Truth tables show all possible combinations of truth values for propositions connected by operators. A tautology is a statement that is always true, regardless of the truth values of its propositions. The document provides examples of representing statements as well-formed formulas and using truth tables to determine if a formula is a tautology.

Uploaded by

Zoldi3r
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Section 1.

1 Statement, Symbolic Representation, and Tautologies

Logic - Propositional Logic Proposition


Truth Table
Operators(not, ∧, ∨, implication)
Proof Technique

- Predicate Logic Predicate


Quantifier
Proof

• Def: A proposition(or statement) is a sentence that is either true or false.

e.g. Ten is less than seven.(true) YES


There are life forms on other planets in the universe.(true or false,
but we don’t need to be able to decide) YES

e.g. Pass me the butter! (A command) NO


How are you? (A question) NO

e.g. This rose is white. YES


Triangles have 4 vertices. YES
3+2=4 YES
Today is my birthday. YES

• Propositions are represented by capital letters, e.g.: A, B,…, Z.


e.g. P = work is better than vocation.

Propositional variable

• Def: The truth value of a propositional variable P is true (T) if the proposition
assigned to it is true, and false (F) otherwise.

The truth(T) or falsity(F) of a proposition is called its truth value.

1
• Logic Operators:

Name Symbol Operation


Not (unary operator) ′ (¬) e.g. P′,¬P negation

And (binary operator) ∧ e.g. P∧Q conjunction

or ∨ e.g. P∨Q disjunction

implies → e.g. P→Q implication

if and only if ↔ e.g. P↔Q equivalence


(iff)

• Truth tables show the truth value of the result after combining propositional
variable(s) with logical operator(s).

e.g. NOT AND OR


P P′ P Q P∧Q P Q P∨Q
T F T T T T T T
F T T F F T F T
F T F F T T
F F F F F F

e.g. implication P → Q is read “If P then Q”


“P implies Q”

∴P is antecedent or hypothesis
Q is consequent or conclusion.

Rule: In logic, the truth value of P→ Q is true if P is false or if Q is true.

P Q P→Q
T T T
T F F
F T T
F F T

e.g. If the rain continues, then the river will flood.

2
e.g. iff P ↔ Q ≡ (P→ Q) ∧ (Q→ P)

P Q P→Q Q→ P (P→ Q) ∧ (Q→ P)


T T T T T
T F F T F
F T T F F
F F T T T

∴only if both P and Q are T or both are F, the whole statement will be false.

Note: How many rows in a truth table with n variables? Answer: 2n

• Def:
A well-formed formula (wff) is defined as follows:
(1) All propositional variables and the constants T & F are wffs.

(2) If α and β are wffs, then α′, β′, α∧β, α∨β, α→β, α↔β are wffs.

Nothing else.

e.g. ( (P∧Q)R′ ) is not a wff.


[ ((P∧Q) ∨ (R∧S)) ∧ R′] is a wff, but is different from [(P∧Q) ∨ (R∧S) ∧ R′]

• Priority: Pr(not) > Pr(and) > Pr(or) > Pr(→) > Pr(↔)

e.g. P = Today is Monday.


Q = I’ll go to London.

(i) If today is Monday then I won’t go to London.

P → Q′

(ii) Today is Monday or I’ll go to London, but not both.

P ⊕ Q = ( P′ ∧ Q ) ∨ ( P ∧ Q′ )
= ( P ∨ Q ) ∧ ( P → Q′ )
= P′ ↔ Q

(iii) I’ll go to London and today is not Monday.

Q ∧ P′

(iv) If and only if today is not Monday then I’ll go to London.

P′ ↔ Q

3
• Translate English statements into wffs:
(1) If you go bankrupt, you either go to jail or you become a slave.

B = you go bankrupt
J = you go to jail
S = you become a slave

B → (J∨S)

(2) If you are not good kids, then I will give you hard exams.

G = you are good kids


H = I will give you hard exams

G′ → H

(3) If I miss the train today, then I can arrive only 5 minutes late, assuming that the
next train is on time.

M = I miss the train today.


A = I can arrive only 5 min. late
T = the next train is on time

(M ∧ T) → A or M → ( T → A)

Ex: P = Mathematicians are generous.


Q = Spiders hate algebra.

• Write compound propositions symbolized by:


(i) P ∨ Q′
Mathematicians are generous or Spiders don’t hate algebra
(or both).

(ii) Q ∧ P or ¬( Q ∧ P)
It’s not the case that spiders hate algebra and mathematicians are
generous.

(iii) P→Q
If mathematicians are generous then spiders hate algebra.

(iv) P′ ↔ Q′
Mathematicians are not generous if and only if spiders don’t hate
algebra.

4
• Def: A wff α, whose truth values are always true, is called a tautology.
A wff α, whose truth values are always false, is called a contradiction.
e.g.
P P′ α = P ∨ P′
T F T tautology
F T T

e.g.
P P′ α = P ∧ P′
contradiction
T F F
F T F

• Use truth table to prove that a wff is a tautology or not:

e.g. α = (P′ ∨ Q) ↔ (P → Q)

P Q P′ P′ ∨ Q P→Q P′ ∨ Q ↔ P → Q
T T F T T T
T F F F F T
F T T T T T
F F T T T T

∴α is a tautology.

5
• Some tautology equivalences:

(1) commutative properties:


A∨B⇔B∨A A∧B⇔B∧A

(2) associative properties:


(A ∨ B) ∨ C ⇔ A ∨ (B ∨ C) (A ∧ B) ∧ C ⇔ A ∧(B ∧C)

(3) distributive properties:


A ∨ (B ∧C) ⇔ (A ∨ B) ∧ (A ∨ C) A ∧ (B ∨C) ⇔ (A ∧ B) ∨ (A ∧ C)

(4) identity properties:


A∨F⇔A A∧T⇔A

(5) complement properties:


A ∨ A′ ⇔ T A ∧ A′ ⇔ F

(6) De Morgan’s Law:


(A ∨ B)′ ⇔ A′ ∧ B′ (A ∧ B)′ ⇔ A′ ∨ B′

(7) Double negative:


(A′)′ ⇔ A

(8) Rewriting implication: (A → B) ⇔ A′ ∨ B

(9) Contraposition: (A→ B) ⇔ (B′ → A′)

(10) Conditional proof: A → (B → C) ⇔ (A ∧ B) → C

You might also like