Gear Grinding Processing Developed For High-Precision Gear Manufacturing
Gear Grinding Processing Developed For High-Precision Gear Manufacturing
In recent years, many industries have been trying to introduce gear grinding machines, backed by the increasing demands for
low-noise gears in automotive transmissions and for high-precision large gears in construction machines, gearbox for wind turbine
systems, and printing machines. To address these demands, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI) has developed and added to its
product line-up two gear grinder products: the ZE series for mass production of small gears and the ZG series for medium and large
sized gears. This document describes the features of these products from the technical standpoint and explores the future prospects of
gear grinding because it is anticipated that more manufacturers will adopt this machining technique.
-5 Correction Correction
input value input value
-10 Right flank Right flank
+3 m −10 m
Fig. 2 Transition of profile angle deviation between dressing cycles Fig. 4 Example of pressure angle correction
Transition of pressure angle when 40 workpieces were ground Correction amount is entered based on result of accuracy measurement.
continuously between dressing cycles.
it allows the dressing interval to be set to as many as 40 before and after pressure angle correction, respectively. To
workpieces. This means that the cost of grinding can be develop this function, we analyzed the relative positional
reduced to as low as 12 to 13 yen per workpiece. relationship between the two spindles when correcting the
2.2 Modification of tooth profile pressure angle pressure angle.
In the ZE series, to obtain a high-accuracy tooth profile, Figure 4 shows an example of correcting the pressure
the rotary dresser is set to almost the same position as that angle by entering the required correction amounts for
of the workpiece so that the grinding wheel is dressed on both tooth flanks into the NC system. It can be seen that
the machine in the same position and posture as when a the correction results almost reflect the input values. This
workpiece is ground. Because the dresser is set and adjusted function is becoming indispensable for customers in Japan
by an operator, there is a possibility of a setting error, which where the number of experienced operators is decreasing
in turn causes a profile pressure angle deviation. Although, and in overseas manufacturing plants without experts.
on competitors’ machines, the correction of the pressure 2.3 Machining simulation technologies
angle is accomplished manually by fine-adjusting the dresser In developing the ZE series, we created a machining
position, to help inexperienced operators, we developed simulation program based on the theory of meshing between
a functionality that completes this adjustment by simply threaded grinding wheel and workpiece and the existing
entering NC data. The process of fine-adjusting the dresser simulation technologies. A simulation example is shown
position is to change the relative positional relationship in Fig. 5. The figure represents the shapes of both tooth
with the grinding wheel and this is achieved by using the flanks at three points along the face width when the leads
NC system to move each axis to correct the grinding wheel are crowned. These are biased flank shapes in which the
position with the dresser fixed. Figure 3 is a schematic tooth profile pressure angle changes in the direction of the
diagram that illustrates this function. Figures 3 (a) and 3 (b) face width. The simulated data was very close to the actual
show the relative positions of the wheel and dresser spindles machining data collected from the grinders, so we decided to
use the program to simulate various machining applications.
1. Straight 2. Crowning
Workpiece (Gear)
C
Lead
Z
Tooth profile
Workpiece specifications
25
Module 2.5
No. of teeth 74 Measuring probe X
Face width 25 mm
Pressure angle 20°
Helix angle 30° RH
( )
2.0 300 Amount
Semi-finish grinding
of radial infeed
Finish grinding 1.5 300
(Grinding conditions)
Amount No. of
of radial grinding Feedrate Dressing
infeed cycles (mm/min) Grinding pass interval
(mm) (No. of teeth)
(times)
Before bias modification After bias modification Rough 0.121 6 2 479 Conventional/ 15
grinding Climb
Simulation of profile grinding
Semi-
finish 0.06 1 2 000 Conventional 30
grinding
Finish
grinding 0.04 1 2 250 Conventional 45
Before bias
modification After bias modification Fig. 10 Automatic calculation of grinding conditions
5. Conclusion