100% found this document useful (1 vote)
231 views

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf)

This document outlines an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a Mobile Teacher/DALSC. It details their objectives, key result areas, performance indicators, and actual results over a review period. The IPCRF evaluates the employee on objectives related to advocacy/community organization, materials development, learning outcomes, and management information systems. It provides a scoring system to assess the employee's performance on each objective based on quality, efficiency and timeliness of their work.

Uploaded by

Nabz OL
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
231 views

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf)

This document outlines an Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) for a Mobile Teacher/DALSC. It details their objectives, key result areas, performance indicators, and actual results over a review period. The IPCRF evaluates the employee on objectives related to advocacy/community organization, materials development, learning outcomes, and management information systems. It provides a scoring system to assess the employee's performance on each objective based on quality, efficiency and timeliness of their work.

Uploaded by

Nabz OL
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

(Mobile Teacher/DALSC)

Name of Employee : __________________________________ Name of Rater : __________________________________


Position : __________________________________ Position : __________________________________
Review Period : __________________________________ Date of Review : __________________________________
Bureau / Center / Service / Division :______________________

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS To be filled in during evaluation


MFO KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
PER KRA Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness ACTUAL RESULTS Q E T Ave SCORE
Basic Advocacy 1. Increased public awareness 30% 5 - Attended barangay meetings and conducted ALS orientations or symposium in Q- - Attended barangay meetings and conducted ALS 5 4 4 4.3 0.43
Education Community on ALS programs and 80-100% of coverage area with complete evidences (attendance &, narrative orientations or symposium in 80-100% of coverage area with
Services Organization projects within the year to report or minutes of the session signed by the Brgy. Chairman). complete evidences (attendance &, narrative report or
& Social the 100% of the total 4 - Attended barangay meetings and conducted ALS orientations in 75-79% of minutes of the session signed by the Brgy. Chairman).
Mobilization barangays with in the coverage areas with complete evidences (attendance & narrative report or E- Attended barangay meetings and conducted ALS
district without ALS minutes of the session signed by the Brgy. Chairman). orientations in 75-79% of coverage areas with complete
Implementation. 3 - Attended barangay meetings and conducted ALS orientations or seminars in evidences (attendance & narrative report or minutes of the
65-74% of coverage areas with complete evidences (attendance &narrative report session signed by the Brgy. Chairman).
10% or minutes of the session signed by the Brgy. Chairman). Attended barangay meetings and conducted ALS orientations
2 - Attended barangay meetings and conducted ALS orientations or seminars in or symposium in 80-100% of coverage area with complete
50-64 % of coverage areas with complete evidences (attendance & narrative evidences (attendance &, narrative report or minutes of the
report or minutes of the session signed by the Brgy. Chairman). session signed by the Brgy. Chairman).
1 - Attended barangay meetings and conducted ALS orientations or seminars in T - Attended barangay meetings and conducted ALS
below 50 % of coverage area with complete evidences (attendance & narrative orientations in 75-79% of coverage areas with complete
report or minutes of the session signed by the Brgy. Chairman). evidences (attendance & narrative report or minutes of the
session signed by the Brgy. Chairman).

5 – Identified -90-95% potential learners in at least 3 or more barangays


2. Identified 75 or more 4 – Identified 70%-89% potential learners in at least 3 or more barangays
potential learners. 3 – Identified 50- 69% potential learners in at least 2 or more barangays
10% 2 - Identified 25-49% potential learners in at least 2 or more barangays
1 – Identified less than 25% potential learners at least 2 or more barangays

3. Strengthened 5-linked with 80-100% barangays & other stakeholders


partnership with 4-linked with 50-79% barangays & other stakeholders
community leaders and 3-linked with 30-49% barangays & other stakeholders
other stakeholders. 2-linked with 10-29% barangays & other stakeholders
1-linked with 0-9% barangays & other stakeholders
10%
Materials
Development 5 – Developed and adapted 20 or more instructional materials to address the
and/or learning needs of learners within the rating period by using 30 self-learning
Adaptation 1. Developed and adapted modules.
instructional materials to 4- Developed and adapted 15-19 instructional materials to address the learning
address the learning needs needs of learners within the rating period by using 30 self-learning modules.
of learners within the 3- Developed and adapted 10-14 instructional materials to address the learning
rating period by using 30 needs of learners within the rating period by using 30 self-learning modules.
self- learning modules 2- Developed and adapted 5-9 instructional materials to address the learning
10% needs of learners within the rating period by using 30 self-learning modules.
1- Developed and adapted instructional materials to address the learning needs of
learners within the rating period by using 5 & below by using self-learning
modules.

Learning 2.Determine the strengths and 5-Conducted Functional Literacy test (FLT) to 80% & above of the learners .
Outcomes for weaknesses of the learners 4- Conducted Functional Literacy test (FLT) to 60- 79- % of the learners .
ALS within the rating period by 3- Conducted Functional Literacy test (FLT) to 40-59- % of the learners .
conducting Functional Literacy 2- Conducted Functional Literacy test (FLT) to 20-39 % of the learners .
test (FLT) to at least 75 1- Conducted Functional Literacy test (FLT) to 19-0 % of the learners .
learners.
5%
5 – Assisted 75 and above learners in preparing individual learning portfolio with
3.Assisted at least 75 learners in complete contents.
the preparation of Individual 4 - Assisted 65-74 learners in preparing individual learning portfolio with complete
Learning Portfolio contents.
15% 3 - Assisted 56-64 learners in preparing individual learning portfolio with complete
contents.
2 - Assisted 47-55 learners in preparing individual learning portfolio with complete
contents.
1 - Assisted 46 & below learners in preparing individual learning portfolio with
complete contents.

Management 1.. Gathered updated & 5 – 100% updated & complete data gathered on ALS Programs and Projects
Information complete data on ALS implemented as reflected in the 4 ALS MIS forms submitted.
System Programs and Projects
implemented as reflected 4 – 90% updated & complete data gathered on ALS Programs and Projects
in the ALS MIS implemented as reflected in the 4 ALS MIS forms.
(Management Information
System) forms: 3 – 80% updated & complete data gathered on ALS Programs and Projects
a. ALS MIS 001 - Profile of implemented as reflected in the 4 ALS MIS forms.
Prospective Learners in the
Household
b. ALS MIS 002A – Learners 2 – 70% updated & complete data gathered on ALS Programs and Projects
Profile implemented as reflected in the 4 ALS MIS forms.
enrolled in ALS Programs
a. ALS MIS 002B – Learners
Profile 1 – 60% and below updated & complete data gathered on ALS Programs and
Projects implemented as reflected in the 4 ALS MIS forms.
enrolled in ALS InfEd
Programs
b. ALS MIS 003 – Community
Learning Center & Learning
Facilitators/Service Providers
Profile

10% /.z
5– submitted 90-100% ALS report on time
4– submitted 70-80% ALS report on time
2. Submitted on time 100% of 3– submitted 50-69% ALS report on time
the following ALS reports: 2– submitted 30-49% ALS report on time
a. ALS Schedule of Activities 1– submitted 0-29% ALS report on time
b. ALS Master list of
Enrolment
c. Data of Enrolment
d. ALS MIS Forms
e. ALS Monthly Reports
- ORS
- MAR
f. ALS Quarterly
Accomplishment Reports
g. ALS Annual
Accomplishment
Report
h. As Required Surveys/
Mapping:
- Literacy Mapping
- Household Survey
- Family Mapping
- Population Survey
10%
Staff 1. Attended at least 1 ALS January to 10% 5 - Attended at least 1 ALS training workshop in the national level
Development Training-Workshop in any December
for ALS level. 4 – Attended at least 1 ALS training workshop in the regional level
Teachers
5% 3 – Attended at least 1 ALS training workshop in the division level

2 - Attended at least 1 ALS training workshop in the district level

1 – No training attended.

5 – Attended at least 4 or more trainings program related to ALS with certificate of


2. Attended at least 2 trainings appearance.
program related to ALS such as, 4 - Attended at least 3 trainings program related to ALS with certificate of
but not limited to : appearance
a. DRRM 3 - Attended at least 2 trainings program related to ALS with certificate of
b. 4Ps appearance
c. GAD January to 2 - Attended at least 1 trainings program related to ALS with certificate of
d. Red Cross December appearance
e. Fire Prevention 1 – No training attended
f. Others please specify

5%

OVERALL
RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

_________________________ __________________________
(Ratee) Rater Recommending Approval Approving Authority

You might also like