0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views

Philippine Politics and Governance Debate Score Sheet

This document contains a debate score sheet for evaluating arguments on the proposition "politics is inherently dirty". It has 5 criteria for assessing the debate: organization and clarity, use of arguments, use of examples and facts, use of rebuttal, and presentation style. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest level of performance. The scores on each criterion are added up to calculate a total score out of 50.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views

Philippine Politics and Governance Debate Score Sheet

This document contains a debate score sheet for evaluating arguments on the proposition "politics is inherently dirty". It has 5 criteria for assessing the debate: organization and clarity, use of arguments, use of examples and facts, use of rebuttal, and presentation style. Each criterion is scored from 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest level of performance. The scores on each criterion are added up to calculate a total score out of 50.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Philippine Politics and Governance

Debate Score Sheet


Proposition: ”RESOLVE THAT POLITICS IS INHERENTLY DIRTY.”
Grade: 11 HUMSS Section: ________________________
Date of the Debate: ___________________
Team: ______________________________
Members:

CLASSROOM DEBATE RUBRIC

Levels of Performance
TOTAL
Criteria 1 4 7 10
1. Unclear in Clear in some Mostly clear Completely
Organization most parts parts but not and orderly in clear and
and Clarity: over all all parts orderly
viewpoints and presentation
responses are
outlined both
clearly and
orderly.
2. Use of Few or no Some relevant Many reasons Most
Arguments: relevant reasons given given: fairlyrelevant
reasons are reasons given relevant reasons
given to support given in
viewpoint. support
3. Use of Few or no Some relevant Many Most
Examples and relevant examples/facts examples/facts relevant
Facts: supporting given given: fairly supporting
examples and examples/facts relevant examples
facts are given and facts
to support given
reasons, with
references
4. Use of No effective Few effective Some effective Many
Rebuttal: counter- counter- counter- effective
arguments arguments arguments arguments counter-
made by the made made made arguments
other teams are made
responded to
and dealt with
effectively.
5. Few style Few style All style All style
Presentation features were features were features were features
Style: used; not used but they used, most were used
tone of voice, convincingly were used convincingly convincingly
use of gestures, convincingly
and level of
enthusiasm are
convincing to
audience.

TOTAL: ____________

Score = Total x 5 = ________

You might also like