College of Industrial Technology: Title Researchers
College of Industrial Technology: Title Researchers
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
TIME :
GROUP :11
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to the
Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
TIME :
GROUP :12
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name
Republic of the Philippines
EULOGIO “AMANG” RODRIGUEZ
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Nagtahan, Sampaloc, Manila
TIME :
GROUP :13
GROUP A
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Timeliness and Relevance of the study to
the Educational Goals of BSIT
2. Organizational of the study
3. Depth of Comprehensive Treatment
4. Evidence of Original Thinking
TOTAL
GROUP B
E HS VS S BS F
CRITERIA 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.50
1. Presentation
2. Mastery of the Subject Matter
3. Communication Skills
4. Attitude (Receptive of Suggestions)
TOTAL
Legend:
1.00 Excellent (E) Average: __________
1.25 Highly Satisfactory (HS)
1.50 Very Satisfactory (VS) Rating : __________
1.75 Satisfactory (S)
2.00 Barely Satisfactory (BS) Remarks: __________
2.50 Failed
Recommendations
______________________________
Signature of Panelist over Printed Name