Inter SA Compact Book
Inter SA Compact Book
Assurance
Related Services
Services
Assurance Engegements
Audit & Review of
other than audits or
Historical Financial
Review of historical
Information
Information
Audit Risk
Professional (1) Professional skepticism in simple words means having a questioning and alert mind.
Skepticism (2) Professional skepticism involves being alert to:
(a) Fraud Risk Factors (Conditions indicating possible frauds).
(b) Contradictory audit evidence.
(c) Reliability of documents.
Professional The application of relevant training, knowledge and experience in making informed
Judgement decisions about the courses of action that are appropriate in the audit.
Inherent Auditor seeks persuasive evidence rather than conclusive evidence.
Limitations of The inherent limitations of an audit arise from:
an Audit (1) The nature of financial reporting: The preparation of FS involves judgment by
management in applying the requirements of the applicable FRF.
(2) The nature of audit procedures:
(a) Management & others do not provide complete information intentionally/
unintentionally.
(b) Audit is not an official investigation.
(3) Balance between benefit and cost:
(a) User expectation that the auditor will form an opinion on the FS within a
reasonable period of time and at reasonable cost.
(b) It results into use of Test Checking.
(4) Other Matters that Affect the Limitations of an Audit
a) Fraud, particularly fraud involving senior management or collusion.
b) The occurrence of non-compliance with laws and regulations.
c) Future events or conditions that may cause an entity to cease to continue as a
going concern.
Form and The form and content of the audit engagement letter may vary for each entity.
Content of the General Form and Contents of LOE:
Engagement 1. Scope of the audit, including reference to laws, SA, Code of ethics .
Letter 2. Letter of Weakness in Internal Control.
3. Inherent limitations of an audit.
4. Management will provide Written Representations.
5. Premises or Pre-conditions for accepting an Audit.
6. The basis on which fees are computed and any billing arrangements.
7. Audit may be subjected to a Peer Review under the CA Act, 1949.
8. A request to acknowledge receipt of the engagement letter.
SA
Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements
220
The following information would assist the auditor in accepting and continuing of relationship with the client:
(i) Integrity of the KMP & TCWG;
(ii) Whether the engagement team has the necessary capabilities, including time and resources;
(iii) Whether the engagement team can comply with relevant ethical requirements; and
(iv) Significant matters that have arisen during audit engagement, and their implications for continuing the
relationship.
SA
Audit Documentation
230
Assist in Supervision,
Assist External Inspection Direction & Review
Evidence of basis
for conclusion Evidence of Audit
regarding Planning &
achievement of Performance as
overall objectives per SA & Laws
Create Accountability
Fraud Risk Events or conditions that indicate an incentive or pressure to commit fraud or provide an
Factors opportunity to commit fraud.
A) Professional Skepticism
B) Discussion Among the Engagement Team
C) Inquiry of others
Types of Laws
A B
The following are the procedures MANAGEMENT may implement to assist in the prevention and detection of
non-compliance with laws and regulations-
a) Monitoring legal requirements.
b) Instituting and operating appropriate systems of internal control.
c) Developing, publicising and following a code of conduct.
d) Monitoring compliance with the code of conduct and acting appropriately to discipline employees who
fail to comply with it.
e) Engaging legal advisors to assist in monitoring legal requirements.
f) Maintaining a register of significant laws and regulations with which the entity has to comply within its
particular industry and a record of complaints.
g) Ensuring employees are properly trained and understand the code of conduct.
Requirements
Preliminary
Involvement of
Engagement Planning Activities
Key Team Member
Activities
RAP
Control
Environment
Control
Monitoring
Activities
Internal
Control
Information Entity's
System RAP
RISKS
Presentation &
During the Year At the year end
Disclosure
1- Relate Pervasively to FS.
2- Potentially affect many
assertions
1- Occurence
3- Arise from weak control 1- Existence
Environment 1- Occurence 2- Rights &
2- Rights & Obligation
2- Completeness Obligations
3- Completeness
3- Accuracy 3- Completeness
4- Classification &
4- Cut-off 4- Valuation & understandibility
5- Classification Allocation of
Resources 5- Accuracy &
Valuation
Audit Risk is There is an inverse relationship between materiality and the degree of audit risk. The
inversely higher the materiality level, the lower the audit risk and vice versa. For example, the risk
proportional to that a particular account balance or class of transactions could be misstated by an
Materiality extremely large amount might be very low but the risk that it could be misstated by an
extremely small amount might be very high.
1
𝐴𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝑅𝑖𝑠𝑘 ∝
𝑀𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦
Factors to be 1. Item of materiality may be determined individually or in aggregate.
considered for 2. Materiality has both quantitative & qualitative dimensions.
determining 3. Even insignificant items in terms of quality may be material in special circumstances.
materiality 4. Sometimes the materiality of an item in terms of quantity is described in law itself.
For example, Schedule III requires disclosure of items of expenditures which are in
excess of 1% of the revenue from operations or ` 1,00,000, whichever is higher.
5. An item whose impact is insignificant at present, but in future it may be significant,
may be material item.
Sufficient Appropriate
SA
Audit Evidence – Specific Considerations for Selected Items
501
SA
External Confirmation
505
Term Definition
External Audit evidence obtained as a direct written response to the auditor from a third party (the
confirmation confirming party), in paper form, or by electronic or other medium.
Positive A request that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor indicating whether the
confirmation confirming party agrees or disagrees with the information in the request.
Negative A request that the confirming party respond directly to the auditor only if the confirming
confirmation party disagrees with the information provided in the request.
Process of When using external confirmation procedures, the auditor shall maintain control over
External external confirmation requests, including:
Confirmation a. Determining the information to be confirmed or requested;
b. Selecting the appropriate confirming party;
c. Designing the confirmation requests; and
d. Sending the requests to the confirming party.
SA
Initial Audit Engagements – Opening Balances
510
SA
Analytical Procedures
520
Use of AP Analytical review procedures are used for the following purposes:
(a) to assist the auditor in planning the nature, timing and extent of other audit
procedures;
(b) as substantive procedures when their use can be more effective or efficient than
tests of details in reducing detection risk for specific financial statement
assertions; and
(c) as an overall review of the financial statements in the final review stage of the
audit.
Precautions/Factors Matters relevant to the auditor’s evaluation of whether the expectation can be
to be kept in mind developed sufficiently precisely to identify a misstatement that, when aggregated
while doing AP. with other misstatements, may cause the financial statements to be materially
misstated, include:
Extent of reliance Following are relevant when determining whether data is reliable for purposes of
on AP. designing substantive analytical procedures:
1. Source of the information available. For example, information may be more
reliable when it is obtained from independent sources outside the entity;
2. Comparability of the information available. For example, broad industry data
may need to be supplemented to be comparable to that of an entity that
produces and sells specialised products;
3. Nature and relevance of the information available. For example, whether
budgets have been established as results to be expected rather than as goals to
be achieved; and
4. Controls over the preparation of the information that are designed to ensure its
completeness, accuracy and validity. For example, controls over the preparation,
review and maintenance of budgets.
Audit sampling:
1. Application of audit procedures to less than 100% of items within a population of audit relevance.
2. Such that all sampling units have a chance of selection.
3. To provide a reasonable basis on which to draw conclusions about entire population.
Sampling risk:
Risk that Auditors Conclusion based on samples may be different from the
conclusion if the entire population was subjected to same audit Procedure
Non-sampling risk:
Risk that auditor reaches an erroneous conclusion for any reason not related to sampling risk (e.g., inappropriate
audit procedures/misinterpretation of evidence/failure to recognise a misstatement/ deviation).
Statistical sampling –
An approach to sampling that has the following characteristics:
1. Random selection of the sample items; and
2. The use of probability theory to evaluate sample results, including measurement of sampling risk.
Stratification –
The process of dividing a population into sub-populations, each of which is a group of sampling units which have
similar characteristics (often monetary value).
Methods of a) Random selection: This method is applied through random number generators, for
selecting example, random number tables.
sample b) Systematic selection: In this method the number of sampling units in the population
is divided by the sample size to give a sampling interval, for example 50, and having
determined a starting point within the first 50, each 50th sampling unit thereafter is
selected. Although the starting point may be determined haphazardly, the sample is
more likely to be truly random if it is determined by use of a computerised random
number generator or random number tables.
c) Monetary Unit sampling: This method is a type of value-weighted selection in which
sample size, selection and evaluation results in a conclusion in monetary amounts.
d) Haphazard selection: In this method the auditor selects the sample without following
a structured technique. Although no structured technique is used, the auditor would
nonetheless avoid any conscious bias or predictability and thus attempt to ensure
that all items in the population have a chance of selection. Haphazard selection is not
appropriate when using statistical sampling.
Identification of (i) Inspect the underlying contracts or agreements, if any, and evaluate whether:
significant (1) The business rationale (or lack thereof) the transactions suggests that they may
related party have been entered into to engage in fraudulent financial reporting or to conceal
transaction misappropriation of assets;
outside (2) The terms of transactions are consistent with management’s explanations; &
business (3) The transactions have been appropriately accounted for and disclosed in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework; and
(ii) Obtain audit evidence that the transactions have been appropriately authorized and
approved.
.
Maintaining Auditor should remain alert when inspecting records with respect to information
Alertness for RP indicating existence of RP relationships or transactions that were not previously identified
Information or disclosed to auditor:
when reviewing a. Bank, legal and third party confirmations obtained as part of the auditor’s
records/ procedures;
documents b. Minutes of meetings of shareholders and of TCWG; and
c. Such other records or documents considers necessary by auditor in circumstances of
entity.
SA
Subsequent Events
560
Auditor’s responsibility
(1) To consider Events only if they require adjustment/ disclosure in FS.
(2) To consider Facts only if they would have impacted the AR.
Specific (1) Whether new commitments, borrowings or guarantees have been entered into.
enquiries to be (2) Whether sales or acquisitions of assets have occurred or are planned.
made from (3) Whether there have been increases in capital or issuance of debt instruments, such
Management as the new issue of shares or debentures, or an agreement to merge or liquidate has
been made or has been planned.
(4) Whether any assets have been appropriated by government or destroyed, for
example, by fire or flood.
(5) Whether there have been any developments regarding contingencies.
(6) Whether any unusual accounting adjustments have been made or are contemplated.
(7) Whether any events have occurred that are relevant to the measurement of
estimates or provisions made in the financial statements.
(8) Whether any events have occurred that are relevant to the recoverability of assets.
Facts which (1) The auditor has no obligation to perform any audit procedures regarding the financial
become known statements after the date of the auditor’s report.
to the auditor (2) However, if a fact becomes known to the auditor that, had it been known to the
after the date auditor at the date of the auditor's report, may have caused the auditor to revise the
of the Auditor’s auditor's report, the auditor shall:
Report but the (a) Discuss the matter with management.
before the date (b) Determine whether the financial statements need amendment and, if so,
the F.S are (c) Inquire how management intends to address the matter in the financial state-
issued ments.
(3) If management amends the financial statements, the auditor shall:
(a) Extend the audit procedures to the date of the new auditor's report; and
(b) Provide a new auditor's report on the amended financial statements.
(4) When law, regulation or FRF does not prohibit management from restricting the
amendment of FS to the effect of subsequent events, auditor is permitted to restrict
the audit procedures on subsequent events to that amendment. In such case, the
auditor shall:
(a) Amend the audit report to include an additional date restricted to that amend-
ment. (Dual Dating)
(b) Provide a new or amended Audit Report that includes OMP that conveys that
auditor's procedures on subsequent event are restricted solely to amendments
of financial statements.
Facts which (1) The auditor has no obligation to perform any audit procedures regarding such FS.
become known (2) However, if a fact becomes known to the auditor that, had it been known to the
to the auditor auditor at the date of the auditor's report, may have caused the auditor to amend
after the FS the auditor's report, the auditor shall:
have been (a) Discuss the matter with management.
issued (b) Determine whether the financial statements need amendment and, if so,
(c) Inquire how management intends to address the matter in the FS.
(3) If the management amends the FS, the auditor shall:
(a) Carry out the audit procedures necessary in the circumstances on the amend-
ment.
(b) Review the steps taken by management to ensure that anyone in receipt of the
previously issued financial statements together with the auditor's report
thereon is informed of the situation.
(c) Extend the audit procedures to the date of the new auditor's report; and
(d) Provide a new auditor's report on the amended financial statements.
(e) In the amended auditor's report an EMP paragraph referring to a note to the FS
that discussed the reason of amendment in FS, should be included.
SA
Going Concern (Revised)
570
Audit If events or conditions have been identified that cast significant doubt on the entity’s
Procedures ability to continue as a going concern, the auditor shall perform additional audit
When Events or procedures as follows:-
Conditions Are (a) Where management has not yet performed a GCA assessment, requesting
Identified management to make it.
(b) Evaluating management’s plans for future actions, whether the outcome of these
plans are feasible.
(c) An analysis of the cash flow forecast if prepared by management:
(i) Evaluating the reliability of the underlying data to prepare forecast; and
(ii) Determining whether there is adequate support for the assumptions.
(d) Considering whether any additional facts or information have become available since
the date on which management made its assessment.
(e) Requesting Written Representations from management regarding their plans for
future actions and the feasibility of these plans.
Basic elements (1) It is a written statement by management provided to the auditor to confirm certain
of WR matters or to support other audit evidence.
(2) It does not include financial statements or supporting books and records.
(3) The auditor shall request management to provide a written representation that it has
fulfilled its responsibility for the preparation of FS as per FRF.
(4) The written representations shall be for all FS and period(s) referred to in the
auditor’s report.
WR as Audit 1. WR are necessary audit evidence but not sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
Evidence 2. WR do not dilute auditor’s responsibility to obtain other audit evidence for matters
covered by WR.
Management’s If management does not provide one or more of the requested written representations,
refusal to give the auditor shall-
WR (i) discuss the matter with management;
(ii) re-evaluate the integrity of management and evaluate the effect that this may have
on the reliability of representations (oral or written) and audit evidence in general;
and
(iii) take appropriate actions, including determining the possible effect on the opinion in
the auditor’s report. (Disclaimer of opinion)
Additional WR
REQUIREMENTS
Nature and Examples of work of the IAF that can be used by the external auditor:
Extent of Work 1. Testing of the operating effectiveness of controls.
that can be 2. Substantive procedures involving limited judgment (Vouching).
used 3. Observations of inventory counts.
4. Testing of compliance with regulatory requirements.
Audit Procedure 1: Prior to using internal auditors to provide direct assistance for purposes of
Procedures the audit, the external auditor shall:
when using IA (a) Obtain written agreement from the entity that the internal auditors will be allowed
to follow the external auditor’s instructions, and that the entity will not intervene in
the work that internal auditor performs for the external auditor; and
(a) Obtain written agreement from the internal auditors that they will keep specific
matters confidential.
Procedure 2: The external auditor shall DIRECT, SUPERVISE and REVIEW the work
performed by internal auditors on the engagement in accordance with SA 220.
Corresponding Figures
Corresponding Figures are integral part of current period FS to be read only in relation to amounts &
disclosures relating to current period.
Auditor’s opinion on FS refers to current period only.
Prior Period FS If L&R permits reference to predecessor auditor’s report on corresponding Figs, current
Audited by audit report to include Other Matter para:
Another a. FS of prior period were audited by another auditor.
Auditor b. Type of opinion expressed by predecessor auditor (reasons for modification, if any).
c. Date of that report.