Synthesis and Characterization of A (3-N) - Labeled Cis-Syn Thymine Dimer-Containing DNA Duplex
Synthesis and Characterization of A (3-N) - Labeled Cis-Syn Thymine Dimer-Containing DNA Duplex
Cis-syn thymine dimers are the major photoproducts of DNA and are the principal cause of mutations
induced by sunlight. To better understand the nature of base pairing with cis-syn thymine dimers, we
have synthesized a decamer oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) containing a cis-syn thymine dimer labeled at
the N3 of both T’s with 15N by two efficient routes from [3-15N]-thymidine phosphoramidite. In the
postsynthetic irradiation route, an ODN containing an adjacent pair of [3-15N]-labeled T’s was irradiated
and the cis-syn dimer-containing ODN isolated by HPLC. In the mixed building block route, a mixture
of cis-syn and trans-syn dimer-containing ODNs was synthesized from a mixture of [3-15N]-labeled thymine
dimer phosphoramidites after which the cis-syn dimer-containing ODN was isolated by HPLC. The N3-
nitrogen and imino proton signals of an 15N-labeled thymine dimer-containing decamer duplex were
assigned by 2D 1H-15N heterocorrelated HSQC NMR spectroscopy, and the 15N-1H coupling constant
was found to be 1.8 Hz greater for the 5′-T than for the 3′-T. The larger coupling constant is indicative
of weaker H-bonding that is consistent with the more distorted nature of the 5′-base pair found in solution
state NMR and crystallographic structures.
* Corresponding author. Tel: (314) 935-6721. (7) Kemmink, J.; Boelens, R.; Koning, T.; van der Marel, G. A.; van
(1) Cadet, J.; Vigny, P. In Bioorganic Photochemistry; Morrison, H., Boom, J. H.; Kaptein, R. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 4645-4653.
Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1990; Vol. 1, pp 1-272. (8) Taylor, J.-S.; Garrett, D. S.; Brockie, I. R.; Svoboda, D. L.; Telser,
(2) Taylor, J.-S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 76-82. J. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 8858-8866.
(3) Begley, T. P. In ComprehensiVe Natural Products Chemistry; Poulter, (9) Kim, J.-K.; Patel, D.; Choi, B.-S. Photochem. Photobiol. 1995, 62,
C. D., Ed.; Elsevier: New York, 1999; Vol. 5, pp 371-399. 44-50.
(4) Sinha, R. P.; Hader, D. P. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2002, 1, 225- (10) McAteer, K.; Jing, J.; Kao, J.; Taylor, J. S.; Kennedy, M. A. J.
236. Mol. Biol. 1998, 282, 1013-1032.
(5) Pfeifer, G. P.; You, Y.-H.; Besaratinia, A. Mutat. Res. 2005, 571, (11) Rao, S. N.; Keepers, J. W.; Kollman, P. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984,
19-31. 12, 4789-4807.
(6) Kemmink, J.; Boelens, R.; Koning, T. M. G.; Kaptein, R.; van der (12) Raghunathan, G.; Kieber-Emmons, T.; Rein, R.; Alderfer, J. L. J.
Marel, G. A.; van Boom, J. H. Eur. J. Biochem. 1987, 162, 37-43. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1990, 7, 899-913.
SCHEME 1
structure was obtained of a cis-syn thymine dimer-containing yeast pol η would suggest that Hoogsteen base pairing is not
duplex decamer which corroborates the distorted nature of the involved,19 but this remains to be verified by other methods.
base pair with the 5′-T that was deduced from the NMR and 15N NMR has proven to be very useful for studying
(13) Miaskiewicz, K.; Miller, J.; Cooney, M.; Osman, R. J. Am. Chem. (26) Wang, C.; Gao, H.; Gaffney, B. L.; Jones, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Soc. 1996, 118, 9156-9163. 1991, 113, 5486-5488.
(14) Spector, T. I.; Cheatham, T. E., III; Kollman, P. A. J. Am. Chem. (27) Goswami, B.; Gaffney, B. L.; Jones, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
Soc. 1997, 119, 7095-7104. 115, 3832-3833.
(15) Osman, R.; Fuxreiter, M.; Luo, N. Comput. Chem. 2000, 24, 331- (28) Pervushin, K.; Ono, A.; Fernandez, C.; Szyperski, T.; Kainosho,
339. M.; Wuthrich, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 14147-14151.
(16) Danilov, V. I.; Les, A.; Alderfer, J. L. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2001, (29) De Los Santos, C. Compr. Nat. Prod. Chem. 1999, 7, 55-80.
19, 179-191. (30) Wohnert, J.; Dingley, A. J.; Stoldt, M.; Gorlach, M.; Grzesiek, S.;
(17) Park, H.; Zhang, K.; Ren, Y.; Nadji, S.; Sinha, N.; Taylor, J. S.; Brown, L. R. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 3104-3110.
Kang, C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 15965-15970. (31) Kojima, C.; Ono, A.; Kainosho, M. J. Biomol. NMR 2000, 18, 269-
(18) McCulloch, S. D.; Kokoska, R. J.; Masutani, C.; Iwai, S.; Hanaoka, 277.
F.; Kunkel, T. A. Nature 2004, 428, 97-100. (32) Liu, A.; Majumdar, A.; Hu, W.; Kettani, A.; Skripkin, E.; Patel, D.
(19) Hwang, H.; Taylor, J. S. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 4850-4860. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3206-3210.
(20) Yang, W. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 868-872. (33) Pervushin, K.; Fernandez, C.; Riek, R.; Ono, A.; Kainosho, M.;
(21) Prakash, S.; Johnson, R. E.; Prakash, L. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 2005, Wuthrich, K. J. Biomol. NMR 2000, 16, 39-46.
74, 317-353. (34) Ishikawa, R.; Kojima, C.; Ono, A.; Kainosho, M. Magn. Reson.
(22) Carty, M. P.; Glynn, M.; Maher, M.; Smith, T.; Yao, J.; Dixon, K.; Chem. 2001, 39, S159-S165.
McCann, J.; Rynn, L.; Flanagan, A. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2003, 31, 252- (35) Laxer, A.; Major, D. T.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Fischer, B. J. Org. Chem.
256. 2001, 66, 5463-5481.
(23) Kannouche, P.; Stary, A. Biochimie 2003, 85, 1123-1132. (36) Bytchenkoff, D.; Bodenhausen, G. J. Magn. Reson. 2003, 165, 1-8.
(24) Lehmann, A. R. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 873-876. (37) Leppert, J.; Urbinati, C. R.; Hafner, S.; Ohlenschlager, O.; Swanson,
(25) Ling, H.; Boudsocq, F.; Plosky, B. S.; Woodgate, R.; Yang, W. M. S.; Gorlach, M.; Ramachandran, R. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1177-
Nature 2003, 424, 1083-1087. 1183.
SCHEME 2 SCHEME 3
(38) Ariza, X.; Bou, V.; Vilarrasa, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3665-
3673.
(39) Ariza, X.; Farras, J.; Serra, C.; Vilarrasa, J. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 1547-1549.
(40) Ariza, X.; Vilarrasa, J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2827-2829.
(41) Ariza, X.; Bou, V.; Vilarrasa, J.; Tereshko, V.; Campos, J. L. Angew. FIGURE 1. HPLC analysis of the acetophenone-sensitized irradiation
Chem. 1994, 106, 2535-2537. products of d(CGAA[3-15N]T[3-15N]TAAGC). Abbreviations: c,s, cis-
(42) Gorchs, O.; Hernandez, M.; Garriga, L.; Pedroso, E.; Grandas, A.; syn photoproduct-containing ODN; SM, starting material (ODN). See
Farras, J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1827-1830. the Experimental Section for details.
SCHEME 4
containing ODN by its coelution with a sample of authentic double bond, it is likely that part of the large upfield shift of
ODN (Figure 3). the N3H of the 5′-T relative to the 3′-T is due to shielding by
NMR Spectroscopy. A complementary DNA duplex was the neighboring base pair has been previously suggested.10
prepared, and the 15N shifts were assigned by correlation with None-the-less, it appears from the increase in the 15N-1H
the imino protons which have previously been assigned by 2D coupling of the 5′-T of the dimer relative to the 3′-T that the
NOE at 5 °C in the closely related dodecamer sequence 5′-T is less H-bonded than the 3′-T and could explain in part
d(GCACGAAT[c,s]TAAG)‚d(CTTAATTCGTGC).10 In the the 1.5 kcal/mol destabilization caused by cis-syn dimer
dodecamer sequence, which shares the same d(GAAT[c,s]- formation.45 The greater selectivity in the insertion of A opposite
TAAG) core, the more upfield proton at δ 11.87 was assigned the 5′-T than the 3′-T by polymerase η19 would therefore appear
to the 5′-T whereas the more downfield proton at δ 12.93 was
assigned to the 3′-T. Figure 4 shows the HSQC spectrum
collected at 25 °C in which the more downfield proton at δ
12.72 assigned to the 3′-T correlates with the more upfield
nitrogen at δ 153.38. Likewise, the more upfield proton at δ
11.68 assigned to the more distorted 5′-T correlates with the
more downfield nitrogen at δ 155.05.
The coupling constant for the 15N-1H of the 5′-T was found
to be 89.09 Hz (Figure 5) and is 1.8 Hz greater than that of
87.27 Hz observed for the 3′-T. The larger coupling constant is
consistent with weaker H-bonding for the 5′-T than for the 3′-T
based on a recent study of the correlation between 15N-1H
coupling constants and H-bonding strength for a series of
substituted uridines in duplex DNA.44 In that study the theoreti-
cally calculated H-bonding energy was found to linearly
correlate with the 15N-1H coupling constant as well as with
the pKa and the chemical shift of the imino proton. From their
linear fit parameters an increase of 1.8 Hz in the N-H coupling
constant of the 5′-T compared to the 3′-T corresponds to a loss
of 0.39 kcal/mol in the strength of the H-bond. When using
their linear fit parameters for proton chemical shift, the decrease
of 1.06 ppm in chemical shift of the N3H of the 5′-T corresponds
to a 0.76 kcal/mol loss in H-bond strength which is about two
times larger than that calculated from the difference in the N-H
coupling constant data. Though we do not yet know how well
any of these parameters apply to thymines with a saturated 5,6 FIGURE 4. Section of the proton-coupled 15N-1H HSQC spectrum
of d(CGAA[3-15N]Td[3-15N]TAAGC)‚d(GCTTAATTCG) showing the
(44) Ishikawa, R.; Ono, A.; Kainosho, M. Nucleic Acids Res. Suppl. 2003, shift correlations and coupling constants for the N3H bonds of the
3, 57-58. thymine dimer.
CDCl3) δ 1.94 (s, 3H, C5CH3), 2.12 (s, 3H, OCOCH3), 2.14 (s,
3H, OCOCH3), 2.18 (m, 1H, H2′), 2.47 (m, 1H, H2′′), 4.24 (m,
1H, H4′). 4.37 (m, 2H, H5′ and H5′′), 5.22 (m, 1H, H3′), 6.33 (t,
J ) 7.1 Hz, 1H, H1′), 7.28 (s, 1H, ArH), 8.95 (d, J ) 90.6 Hz, 1H,
15NH); 15N NMR (90 MHz, CDCl ) δ 155.9; 13C NMR (75.4 MHz,
3
CDCl3) δ 12.0, 20.3, 20.4, 36.8, 64.1, 74.7, 82.2, 85.0, 110.8, 135.8,
150.9, 164.0, 170.4; HRMS (FAB) calcd for C14H18N15NO7 (M +
Li)+ 334.1244, found 334.1239.
[3-15N]-Thymidine (5). Ammonia (7 N) in MeOH (10 mL) was
added to a solution of [3-15N]-3′,5′-di-O-acetylthymidine (4, 985
mg, 3.01 mmol) in MeOH (10 mL) and stirred for 6 h at room
temperature. The solvent was then removed under vacuum, and
the remaining acetamide was removed by heating in a vacuum at
100 °C for 2 h to yield 5 (731 mg, 100%): 1H NMR (300 MHz,
DMSO-d6) δ 1.77 (s, 3H, C5CH3), 2.07 (m, 2H, H2′ and H2′′),
3.66 (m, 2H, H5′ and H5′′), 3.76 (s, 1H, C4′-OH), 4.23 (s, 1H,
C3′-OH), 5.03 (m, 1H, H4′), 5.24 (m, 1H, H3′), 6.16 (t, J ) 6.8
Hz, 1H, H1′), 7.70 (s, 1H, ArH), 11.29 (d, J ) 97.2 Hz, 15NH);
13C NMR (75.4 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ 12.2, 61.3, 70.4, 83.7, 87.2,
6
109.3, 136.1, 150.4, 163.6, 163.8; HRMS (FAB) calcd for
C10H14N15NO5 (M + Li)+ 250.1051, found 250.1045.
FIGURE 5. Section of the 1D 1H spectrum of d(CGAA[3-15N]Td
[3-15N]TAAGC)‚d(GCTTAATTCG) at 0.11 Hz digital resolution from [3-15N]-Dimethoxytritylthymidine (6). 4,4′-Dimethoxytrityl chlo-
which the coupling constants were determined. ride (10221 g, 3.61 mmol) was quickly added to a solution of 5
(731 mg, 3.01 mmol) in 15 mL of pyridine and the solution stirred
overnight at room temperature. The pyridine was removed under
not to be associated with H-bonding strength, but more likely vacuum to yield the crude product as a brown gum which was
due to the constrained nature of the 5′-T in the active site of redissolved in EtOAc and washed with saturated NaCl. The organic
the polymerase as previously proposed.46 A more definitive layer was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure
answer, however, will require a study of the H-bonding in a to give a brown gum which was purified by flash column
complex between pol η and a thymine dimer-containing template chromatography using 80% EtOAc in hexane to give 6 (1.183 g,
primer. 72%): 1H NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 1.47 (s, 3H, C5CH3),
2.34 (m, 2H, H2′ and H2′′), 3.38 (d, J ) 3.3 Hz, 2H, H5′ and
H5′′), 3.79 (s, 6H, ArOCH3), 4.04 (m, 1H, H4′), 4.60 (m,1H, H3′),
Conclusion
6.36 (t, J ) 7.2 Hz, 1H, H1′), 6.83-7.57 (m, 13H, ArH), 7.63 (s,
We have described the use of a [3-15N]-thymidine phos- 1H, ArH5), 9.9 (d, J ) 91.2 Hz, 1H, 15NH); 13C NMR (75.4 MHz,
phoramidite to prepare a [3-15N]-labeled cis-syn thymine dimer- acetone-d6) δ 12.1, 41.0, 55.4, 64.6, 72.3, 85.3, 87.0, 87.2, 111.0,
113.8, 127.6, 128.6, 128.8, 130.8, 136.3, 136.5, 136.6, 145.7, 151.3,
containing oligodeoxynucleotide by two routes. The presence
159.5, 159.5, 164.5, 164.7; HRMS (FAB) calcd for C31H32N15NO7
of the 15N label greatly facilitated the assignment of the 15N (M + Li)+ 552.2355, found 552.2351.
shifts and 15N-1H coupling constants of the dimer from which [3-15N]-Dimethoxytritylthymidine Phosphoramidite (7). To a
we concluded that the 5′-T is only slightly less strongly solution of 6 (550 mg, 1.01 mmol) in anhydrous CH3CN were added
H-bonded than the 3′-T. The availability of the [3-15N]-labeled 4,5-dicyanoimidazole (179 mg, 1.52 mmol) and 2-cyanoethyl
thymine dimer opens the door to study the sequence context tetraisopropylphosphorodiamidite (642 µL, 2.02 mmol) at room
dependence of base pairing of thymine dimers in DNA duplexes, temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 0.5 h and then
as well as in the active site of DNA polymerases and repair extracted with EtOAc and washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3.
enzymes by both solution and solid-state NMR. The organic layer was further washed with brine, dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated. The residue was purified by
flash column chromatography after neutralizing the silica gel with
Experimental Section Et3N using 60% EtOAc in hexane to give 7 (658 mg, 87%): 31P
[3-15N]-3′,5′-Di-O-acetylthymidine (4). Water (15 mL), CH3- (121.5 MHz, acetone-d6 referenced to trimethyl phosphate TMP)
CN (15 mL), Et3N (2.40 mL, 17.3 mmol), and a solution of 3′,5′, δ 145.78, 145.85; HRMS (FAB) calcd for C40H49N315NO8P (M +
di-O-acetyl-3-nitrothymidine in 30 mL of acetonitrile (3, 4.927 g, Li)+ 752.3405, found 752.3407.
13.26 mmol)41 were added sequentially to a tightly sealed 250-mL DMT-[3-15N]T-PO(OCH2CH2CN) [3-15N]T (8). To [3-15N]-
round-bottom flask containing 15NH4Cl (940 mg, 17.25 mmol) and labeled thymidine (5, 278 g, 1.14 mmol) and 4,5-dicyanoimidazole
KOH (85%, 1.050 g, 15.92 mmol). After being stirred vigorously (90 mg, 0.76 mmol) in 2 mL of anhydrous DMF was added
for 6 days, the solution was first saturated with NaCl and then dropwise a 2 mL solution of DMT-[3-15N]dT phosphoramidite (7,
extracted with CH2Cl2. The aqueous layer was evaporated, and the 284 mg, 0.38 mmol) in anhydrous DMF at room temperature. After
residue was triturated with CH2Cl2-MeOH (9:1). The combined 5 min, t-BuOOH (209 µL, 5-6 M solution in nonane, 1.25 mmol)
organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated. The was added. After 10 min at room temperature, the reaction mixture
resulting residue was dissolved in pyridine (30 mL), and acetic was extracted with ethyl acetate and washed with saturated NaHCO3
anhydride (50 mmol) was added. After the mixture was stirred for aqueous solution. The organic layer was further washed with brine,
3 days, 4 mL of methanol was added and the solvent evaporated. dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated. The residue was
The residue was purified by column chromatography with ethyl purified by column chromatography after neutralizing the silica gel
acetate as the eluant to give 4 (3.037 g, 70%): 1H NMR (300 MHz, with Et3N and eluted with 10% methanol in ethyl acetate to afford
the title compound (558 mg, 70%) as a yellowish solid: TLC
(methanol/ethyl acetate, 5:95) Rf 0.25; 31P (121.5 MHz, acetone-
(45) Jing, Y.; Kao, J. F.-L.; Taylor, J.-S. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26,
3845-3853. d6, referenced to TMP as an external reference) δ -4.5 and -4.7;
(46) Sun, L.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, L.; Hohler, P.; Kool, E. T.; Yuan, F.; MS (+ESI); HRMS calcd for C40H49N315NO8P (M + Na)+
Wang, Z.; Taylor, J. S. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 9431-9437. 926.2774, found 926.2783.