Abstract Group 6
Abstract Group 6
•
•
Definitions
If (1) and (2) hold, I is said to be a left ideal of R. If (1) and (3) hold, I
is said to be a right ideal of R. If all three properties are satisfied, I is
said to be an ideal (or two-sided ideal) of R, a proper ideal if I _= R, a
nontrivial ideal if I is neither R nor {0}.
•
SHARA MAE AGNES IV-BSED MATH
•
•
6.2.5 Theorem
If R is a ring with unity, and N is an ideal of R
containing a unit, then N = R.
•
6.2.6 Corollary
A field contains no proper nontrivial ideals.
•
CHRYSHELL- ANN G. ALTUBAR IV-BSED MATH
6.2.14 EXAMPLE
Z x (0) is a prime ideal of Z x Z, for if (a, b)(c,
d) ϵ Z x (0) then we must have bd = 0 in Z.
This implies that either b = 0 so (a, b) ϵ Z x
(0) or d= 0 so (c, d) ϵ Z x (0). Note that (Z x
Z) / (Z x (0) ) is isomorphic to Z, which is an
integral domain.
Alyssa G. Mijares IV-BSED MATH
6.2.15 THEOREM
Let R be a commutative ring with unity, and
let N ≠ R be an ideal in R. Then R/N is an integral
domain and only if N is a prime ideal in R.
6.2.16 Corollary
Every maximal ideal in a commutative ring R
with unity is a prime ideal.
6.2.25 THEOREM
An ideal ‹p(x)› ≠ {0} of F[x] is maximal if and
only if p(x) is irreducible over F.
5.6.7 DEF’N(IRREDUCIBLE POLYNOMIAL)
A nonconstant polynomial f(x) ϵ F(x) is irreducible
over F or is an irreducible polynomial in F(x) if f(x)
cannot be expressed as a product g(x)h(x) of two
polynomials g(x) and h(x) in F(x) both of lower
degree than the degree of F(x).
6.2.26 Example
Example 5.6.9 shows that x³+ 3x + 2 is irreducible
in [x]. Thus
[x]/ ‹ x³+ 3x + 2 › is a field. Similarly ,
theorem 5.5.11 shows that x² - 2 is irreducible in
Q [x], so Q [x]/ ‹ x² - 2 › is a
field.