Manuscript Template For IMOPH2
Manuscript Template For IMOPH2
id/#
Manuscript Format for the 5th IMOPH
International Conference : 16pt, Times New Roman bold
The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. This abstract should provide a brief
methodology and a brief summary of results. The abstract should end with a comment on the
significance of the results or a brief conclusion. Your abstract should be no more than 300
words, without reference. A list 3 – 5 keywords separated by semicolons (;), font italic,
The instructions are designed to assist you in preparing your submission for the IMOPH
Conference. Please read this text carefully. We ask authors to follow these guidelines for
giving the proceedings a consistent and high-quality appearance. In essence, you should
format your paper exactly like this document. You can identify the predefined styles on their
IMOPH prefix.
The manuscript will be almost identical to the final version that will appear in the
proceedings, except for the pagination and the insertion of running headlines.
For writing your manuscript, you can use the template as described below or copy this
template, renaming its extention to .doc or .docx, and use this copy.
In Introduction, Authors should state the objectives of the work at the end of introduction
section. Before the objective, Authors should provide an adequate background, and very short
literature survey in order to record the existing solutions/method, to show which is the best of
previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what do
you hope to achieve (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of
the paper. Give in the end of Introduction. Avoid a detailed literature survey or a summary of
the results.
Methods include the design, population, sample, data sources, techniques/instruments of data
collection and data analysis procedures. Methods should make readers be able to reproduce
the experiment. Provide sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods already
Results should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather
than providing data in great detail. Please highlight differences between your results or
findings and the previous publications by other researchers. Tables are put in results but art
Tables are sequentially numbered with the table title and number above the table. Tables
should be centered in the column OR on the page. Tables should be followed by a line space
(12pt). Elements of a table should be single-spaced, however double spacing can be used to
show groupings of data or to separate parts within the table. Table headings should be in 10pt
bold. Tables are referred in the text by the table number. eg: Table 1. Do not show vertical
line in the table. There is only horizontal line should be shown within the table.
Figures are sequentially numbered commencing at 1 with the figure title and number below
the figure as shown in Figure 1. Detailed recommendations for figures are ensure that figures
are clear and legible with typed letterings, Black & white or colored figures are allowed, and
The discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A
combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and
article. Here you get the chance to sell your data. Make the discussion corresponding to the
results, but do not reiterate the results. Often should begin with a brief summary of the main
The following components should be covered in discussion: How do your results relate to the
original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what)? Do you provide
interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your
results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any
differences?
Conclusions should answer the objectives of research. Tells how your work advances the
field from the present state of knowledge. Without clear Conclusions, reviewers and readers
will find it difficult to judge the work, and whether or not it merits publication in the journal.
Do not repeat the Abstract, or just list experimental results. Provide a clear scientific
justification for your work, and indicate possible applications and extensions. You should also
suggest future experiments and/or point out those that are underway.
Ethical clearance from ethic boards, put the number of ethic clearance
CONFLICT OF INTEREST 12PT, TIMES NEW ROMAN BOLD
Recognize those who helped in the research, especially funding supporter of your research.
Include individuals who have assisted you in your study: Advisors, Financial supporters, or
may other supporter i.e. Proofreaders, Typists, and Suppliers who may have given materials.
Books
Lawhead JB, Baker MC. Introduction to veterinary science. Clifton Park (NY): Thomson
Delmar Learning; 2005.
Edited book
Meltzer PS, Kallioniemi A, Trent JM. Chromosome alterations in human solid tumors. In:
Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, editors. The genetic basis of human cancer. New York: McGraw-
Hill; 2002. p. 93-113.
Online Article
Pullen LC. Antibiotic Resistance Continues to be a Problem in Children [Internet]. Medscape.
2017 [cited 29 December 2017]. Available from:
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/860801
NOTES :