DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT PROFILING SYSTEM IN

CAINTA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Submitted by:

Francois Gonzales

Francis Tupaz

Bilford Viola

Michelle Agarin

Czyrruz Lopez

Pedro Perez
Noah Sison

Submitted to:
Ms. Marinel Andres
 TABLE OF CONTENT

Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………………….iii

Dedication…………………………………………………………………………………......iv

Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………...v

Approval Sheet………………………………………………………………………………..vi

CHAPTER I

Background of the Study……………………………………………………………..1

Statement of the Problem…………………………...……………………………….3

Conceptual Framework….……………………….…………………………………..4

Significance of the Study…………………………...………………………………..5

Definition of terms…………………………………………………………………....6

Review of Related Literature………………………………………………………..7

CHAPTER II

Methodology………………………………………………………………………..10

Research Design…………………………………………………………………..10

Instrument and Techniques………………………………………………...…….11

Sampling Procedure/Participant…………...……………………………………..13
 Research Local……………………………………………………………………..12

Treatment of Data…………………………...……………………………………..14

CHAPTER III

Profile of the Respondents…………………………………………….…………..15

CHAPTER IV

Summary of the Study……………………………………………………………...22

Summary of the Findings…………………………………………………………..22

Conclusion………………………………………………………………….......…...23

Recommendation…………………………………………………………...………23

Bibliography………………………………………………………………………….24

Appendices…………………………………………………………………………..26

Curriculum Vitae…………………………………………………………………….27
 LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1. Profile distribution of respondents based on their age…………...………….15

TABLE 2. Profile distribution of respondents based on their gender…………………..16

TABLE 3. The evaluation of the respondents to the developed Student Profiling System

in CSHS in terms of Aesthetic GUI Appearance.………………………………………...17

TABLE 4. The evaluation of the respondents to the developed Student Profiling System

in CSHS in terms of Efficiency……………………………………………………………..18

TABLE 5. The evaluation of the respondents to the developed Student Profiling System

in CSHS in terms of Reliability..…………………………………………………………....19

TABLE 6. The evaluation of the respondents to the developed Student Profiling System

in CSHS in terms of Usefulness……………………………………………………….…..20

TABLE 7. The evaluation of the respondents to the developed Student Profiling System

in CSHS in terms of User-Friendliness…………………………………………………...21

 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The researchers would like to give thanks to the following individuals for all their

support and guidance. They have assist the researchers by giving them proper guidance

and help while doing their research paper.

Dr. Marinel G. Andres, Research advisor at Cainta Senior High School. She is the

one who gave the researcher the knowledge and better understanding of the topic, the

one who gave us effort to revise to continue and finish the research.

Mr. Bernard Bryan Ladera,Major Teacher in Information Communication and

Technology who contribute his idea for what program will be useful to the school, also by

helping us in providing what improvement should we add to make it more useful and to

make our research successful.

Mr. Dennis Arce, Mr. Roy Discutido, are the panellist who listened to the presentation

and helped the researchers. Not only that but also corrected the mistakes and provided

information on how to improve the research.

Dr. Nerissa Dalumpines, The principal at Cainta Senior High School, By giving us

the opportunity to show the School the program that was created for the research, it

helped us through for finding our respondents who participated in answering the

questionnaire.
 DEDICATION

This study would like to thanks for the support of our parents, who gave us courage

and inspiration that gave us a will to keep going, no matter what happened they

continually provided their support on us.

To all of those who helped us finishing this research our friends, teacher, mentor

and our God, who gave us strength and advice.

-Researcher’s
 ABSTRACT

Title: DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT PROFILING SYSTEM AT CAINTA SENIOR

HIGH SCHOOL

Researchers:
Gonzales, Francois
Tupaz, Francis
Viola, Bilford
Perez, Pedro
Lopez, Czyrruz
Agarin, Michelle
Sison, Noah

Adviser: MS. MARINEL G. ANDRES

School: CAINTA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Subject: INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATION AND IMMERSION
Year: 2019

The researchers developed a program that can be used as a database of all the

student of the campus that can easily give a copy to the student when needed. It would

give a lot of time then just writing their information through paper because the data will be

backup in a program in the computer/laptop.

The researchers developed the Student Profiling System so that it wouldn’t cost

much time handling on how to separate each papers through their course and how will it

manage if some of the papers was stolen, destroy or went missing because all of their

data will be transferred through the database.

 The program have an ability to add, save, delete, edit and search for the student if

needed it can easily give a printed copy of their Profile in the school so that it won’t be

hard for them. The aim of this program is to help the student and also the registrant

managing student record in the school campus.

The researchers used survey questionnaires which has close-ended questions to

gather the needed information for this study. The questionnaire is divide into three parts.

The first part is consisting of personal data of the respondent, and the second parts was

consisting of the effectiveness of the program and lastly, the last part was consisting of

the level of acceptability of the program. The researchers concluded that most of the

CSHS students are female ages 17-19 years old, and also the research concluded that

the program is useful for the CSHS students.

 APPROVAL SHEET
This thesis entitled “ THE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT PROFILING SYSTEM

IN CAINTA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ’’ prepared and submitted by the following students

of Cainta Senior High School: Francois Gonzales, Francis Tupaz, Bilford Viola, Pedro

Perez, Michelle Agarin , Czyrruz Lopez and Noah Sison in partial fulfillment of the

requirements for the course Practical Research ll has been examined and is

recommended for acceptance and approval for ORAL EXAMINITION.

MARINEL G. ANDRES ED. D

Adviser
________________________________________________________________

PANEL OF EXAMINERS

Approved by the committee in Oral Examination

Mr. BRYAN LADERA

Chairman
Mr. ROY DISCUTIDO Mr. JERICHO ARCEGA
Member Member

Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Practical
Research ll.

NERISSA R. DALUMPENES
Principal II
 Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education

Region IV-A CALABARZON

Division of Rizal

CAINTA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Cainta, Rizal

December 5, 2018

Date: ______________

The undersigned students of Cainta Senior High School are currently conducting

with their thesis entitled “The Development of Student Profiling System in Cainta Senior

High School”. In lined with this, the researchers would like to seek your permission to

allow your child to be one of the respondents in their study. Your response and identity

will be treated with utmost confidentiality.

Your positive response and cooperation will be highly appreciated and will be of

great help to their study.

Very truly yours,

Francois Gonzales

Francis Tupaz

Bilford Viola

Michelle Agarin
 Czyrruz Lopez

Pedro Perez
Noah Sison

Researchers

Noted by:

MARINEL G. ANDRES

Research Adviser
 CHAPTER I

Background of Study

Student profiling systems are used in recording a student's information. A well-built

one will reduce the load on the people that normally have to do all the work-student

information system is a good step for a school. It is useful especially when the school

retrieves the important information from the student. Through it, the school can trace what

are the standings of the students. Lack of student information system in a school can lead

to chaos and troubles, the students will be confused on what they should do and how they

will do to be able to enroll. It is extremely useful in the school in the way of making the

processes of enrolling much easy. The system design project, Student Profiling System

will provide the needed system for storing information in a faster, more convenient

through a database. This will lessen the effort of faculty staff in storing files of each student

every now and then. This will also serve as information especially for the irregular

students, freshmen, transferee, and the professor is able to get access in course, subject,

professor, and student enrollees

A Student Profiling System is a software application for education establishments

to manage student data. The aim of this project is to give the student a profiling system

for the campus. Providing flexibility to adapt to new and changing requirements.

Based on the school of St. Catherine Institute of technology is using computerized

accepting records for each student, which is used when technology is developed.

Computerized keeping records are very prompt to risk for any circumstances. Even if it is

higher development of the manual process. These days It is becoming time-consuming

in terms of recording grades and accepting new records because of the everyday
increasing population of the students, If some records are lost, they never retrieve it in

case of unexpected calamity. Accuracy and security are not been so defined.

The recognition of the student profile provides strategic information for planning

educational policies in the CSHS.

 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:

1.1 Age;

1.2 Gender;

2. Development and evaluation of Student Profiling System for the students of Cainta

Senior High School.

3. What is the evaluation of the respondents in student profiling system in terms of:

3.1 Aesthetic Graphic User Interface (GUI) appearance;

3.2 Efficiency;

3.3 Reliability;

3.4 Usefulness and

3.5 User Friendliness

 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

1.

 Development
 Related Review and evaluation
about Student  Development of
Profile (SPS) Student
 Profile of the Profiling System Development and
respondents/stud  Distribution and validated Student
ents retrieval Profiling System
 Age questions and
 Gender collecting
tabulating and
analysis of data

FEEDBACK

The researchers used the Input, Process, and Output (IPO) model to show the

conceptual framework of the study wherein the input is consisting of the following:

Literature reviews, Profile of the students, Aesthetic GUI, Efficiency, Reliability,

Usefulness, User friendliness. The output is the Developed and evaluated student

profiling system. The researchers will base the result of the study in the output.
The significance of the Study

This study would be helpful for the following group of people.

Future Researcher - The result of this study will serve as a reference and guide for the

future researchers who will do a similar study about electronic registration system.

Students- For the student to have their own printed data if needed

Teacher’s – For them to track if a student still goes to school or not

Registrar – To have a save copy of each student in the database

School Administrator - The result of this study can be used as a tool to manage the

slow process of enrollment also, to make the registrar and guidance counselor easy to

work and lessen the stress.

Definition of terms

Design – It refers to the plan and makes something for a specific use or purpose.

Development – It refers to the act or process of creating something over a period of

time.

GUI – It is defined as Graphic User Interface. Program – It refers to the plan of things

that are done in order to achieve a specific result.

Acceptability – It refers to the quality of being acceptable.

Aesthetic – It refers to the quality of graphics presented to the interface.

Efficiency –It refers in producing material without wasting time and effort.

Guidance Counselor – It refers to the person who is responsible to the registration

process.

Program- It is refer to manage a system in order to run or function.

Registration – is a method of officially would recording something.

Usefulness- It refers to the quality or fact of being useful.

User- It refers to a person who operates something, especially a computer and other

machine.
 REVIEW RELATED LITERATURE

The literature and studies cited in this area discuss the different related

concepts, ideas and development of Student profiling system.

According to Safarzade&Mansoori (2009). Student Information System literally

means the general information systems for maintaining and providing student information.

It applies to all schools, colleges, universities and other educational institutions. However,

information systems are different. Some of them are based on paper; The heavy manual

work involves managing and maintaining information such as students' personal records

of files. However, recently, most schools, even the smallest, were using computers in

some way or something else. The use of which computers differ greatly in size, from word

processing and spreadsheets to worldwide online access, complex access permissions

system and extensive functionality. According to Safarzade&Mansoori (2009) the student

record management system refers to meeting multiple subsystems based on database

databases.

the Student Profiling System (SPS) also updates the understanding of educational tactics

and school practices related to system information and to help better communicate with

through the Student Profiling System (SPS) implementation, located within the heart of

the learning mechanisms (Liao et al., 2007). It is currently changing their learnings about

Internet expansion, the control made in the past of the Philippines from various education

departments and individuals pedagogical content teachers can be greatly reduced.

Through this new informative medium, the resources of varying quality and authentic on

a range of different topics are now available to students.

 According to (Perrett, 2004). A strong implication for education is that effective

online search skills should cover more value and more important areas within the

education curriculum at all levels where SIS adaptation is the most important for the

effectiveness of academe. From the perspective of an individual student, the Student

Profiling System (SPS) features a tremendous potential for representing and manipulating

information across a range of scheduled learning paradigms and strategic studies that

are suitable for a reasonable application of different learning styles. Additionally, student

information systems provide a wider range of ways in which students can express their

knowledge, including publishing multimedia presentations around the world through the

Internet. Another one is some of the information systems required by some students

need to identify the integration of exploring how to complete comprehensive reviews of

such study studies, studying how to evaluate sources in the context of their projects, and

properly mentioned and with these resources within their theses or dissertations (Fyffe

and Walter, 2005).

According to Liao et al., (2007), A student profiling system will have a big impact to

the students, parents, and teachers because they can easily monitor the performance of

their students or children. Also, it could be the medium for connecting teachers to parents.

A ideally, educational institutions are under constant pressure to demonstrate the same

willingness and ability to incorporate the latest developments in student Profiling systems

with communication technologies supports the diversity of teaching methods. As Liao et

al., (2007) indicates that Student Profiling System (SPS) process within technological

sophistication creates an accurate partial knowledge, such as a Student Profiling System

(SPS) that can appeal to students and academic teachers. as parents. Therefore, the
belief that technology is the bulk repository of information that underpins major business

and social concerns and the communication medium through the Student Profiling

System (SPS) interacts with one another.

According to (Fyffe and Walter, 2005) The amount of material derived from

untrusted sources has caused great concern to many educators, bringing them into a

more aggregated Student Profiling System such as found and applied to the University of

the Philippines as well as those who are studying in Ateneo Integrated School facility

where Student Profiling System (SPS) processes are fully understood and realized by

the educational system of institutions. Even within academic discipline has already had a

shift in importance given the traditional forms of published knowledge, examine and

refinedthrough well-accepted but often painfully diminished processes. In this case, it was

moved toward faster electronic propagation of findings and opinions even in a more

smooth form, depending on the more individual reader's judgment than the Student

Profiling System (SPS) effective as indicated for verification and validation of student

resources.

The Student Profiling System (SPS) process is usually completed early in the role of

school students and brings together each of the features of knowledge created and value

in literacy, including education what kind of Student Profiling System (SPS) is available,

and access the order system, learning tools for information and then developing

studentinformation systems, learning some products for a better racing pattern seem like

the perfect project to focus Student Profiling System (SPS) and link it with enough

teaching on the surrounding literacy. While all students did all the database research
before, they probably did not get the search management tools available to them through

education databases, how to set up automatic searches to help streamline the research

process.

According to (Perrett, 2004) and (Belle and Boote, 2004). Thus, the Student

Profiling System (SPS) instruction within the knowledge of educational services such as

utilized with the databases used and whether or not students are familiar with software

curriculum packages (Perrett, 2004 ). It is really important for the promotion of Informative

research within the modified disciplines and the continued successful integration of the

(SIS Student Information System) applied to the Philippines setting with resources in

higher systems education that decides that some group of students can acquire and gain

effective knowledge of literacy skills through the (Student Information System) SIS

process and understanding the value of educational services made to provide the best

lessons possible (Belle and Boote, 2004).

According to (Ewald, 2006) It should be considered, it is necessary to engage with

students with academic assessments such as helping students start thinking about what

they want to learn about better research on research and know what spaces are available

to be understandable. Also, encourage the use of (Student Information System) SIS in

parallel to the active learning style that allows students to interact with their classmates

and help the instructor to facilitate an enhanced learning experience through the (Student

Information System) mode of the SIS application and finally emphasize the the value of

making student information connected to a topic teacher example focused on in-depth

educational success.
By (Martin, 1992), that different perceptions of the Information System resulted in a big

difference in the meanings of IS available. Lucas (1995) describes an information system

that helps control operations in an organization, whereas Laudon & Laudon (2002) refers

to it as a set of interconnected components that are collected (or extracted), processes,

and store, and distribute information to support the decision making, coordination, and

control of an organization. Information systems are seen as a strategic resource within

the organization, that is, they have an important impact on the major operations that

define the organizational economy.

According to Safarzade&Mansoori(2009), Student Information System literally

means the general information systems for maintaining and providing student information.

It applies to all schools, colleges, universities and other educational institutions. However,

information systems are different. Some of them are based on paper; The heavy manual

work involves managing and maintaining information such as students' personal records

of files. However, recently, most schools, even the smallest, were using computers in

some way or something else. The use of which computers differ greatly in size, from word

processing and spreadsheets to worldwide online access, complex access permissions

system and extensive functionality. According to Safarzade&Mansoori (2009) the student

record management system refers to meeting multiple subsystems based on database

databases.

According to MohdEhmer Khan and Farmeena Khan (2011) That subsystems

come from data collection, transaction processing, and validation, processing, analysis

and storing of information in databases. MIS is a system that receives data from various
units and produces information and provides managers at all levels with a relative, just-

time, accurate and consistent information for decision by MohdEhmer Khan and

Farmeena Khan (2011) (Information and Knowledge and Management.

Theoretical Perspective According to Jonelle (2002) noted that management information

system is vital in assisting executives and the general workforce in performing any tasks

related to the processing of information and Satyanaraya (2009) said that , management

information system in maintaining student records in university helps to provide accurate

and timely information necessary to facilitate the decision-making process and enable the

organizations planning, control, and operational functions to be carried out effectively.

On Kyobe, South African university (2009) explained that computerized Information

security issues (e.g. access to information, cyber-crime, privacy, and virus Attacks, and

commercial data mining) are of major concern in academia today Mylerand Broadbent

(2006). According to Wamukoya and Mutual (2005) noted that poor security.

According to Chinyemba and Ngulube (2005) find that 89% of academics

evaluated at the University of KwaZulu-Natal do not adequately protect and maintain their

electronic records. Jones and Soltren (2005) found that 58% of students evaluated are

not concerned with all the dangers of privacy in social network systems. However, little

protection of student record information is not serious because other students have

access to information about other students or colleagues without permission to be

appropriate protection for the record of the student. 2.5 Computerized Record / Data

Management for Student Retention Record.

 According to Allen (1997) found that the students surveyed were receptive towards

electronic information resources while the internet was their most used of these resources

available to them. Even Idowu (1997) found that the Nigerian university librarians have a

positive disposition towards the computerized systems. On the other hand, computerized

records management may be defined as that part of records management that deals with

records in electronic form.

According to Johnston and Bowen (2005), computerized record management

includes 'the creation, use, maintenance and disposal of electronically created records

for the purposes of providing evidence.

According to Bantin (2001), this is a particular type of information that presents

and provides evidence of business processes or individual activities (Bantin, 2001). On

the other hand according to Scottish Government of Scotland (2008) noted that

computerized Records management is the process of managing records throughout their

lives, from creating, using, maintaining and storing their ultimate and permanent care.

According to Muhenda (2000), Proper records management underpins policy

formulation, decision making, protects interests of the organization, and protects rights of

employers and students in addition to helping Institutions conduct business and deliver

services in a consistent and equitable manner.

According to Henry (1988), however, the disadvantages overweighs the

disadvantage as, for instance, the need to print the record of the student when it is in the

paper system, it slows the system, inflexible. Over the past semesters, there have been
a number of student observers who have suggested management organizations should

introduce electronic capturing, storing at academic department or recruitment

department.

The records handled by the student records management system may come in tangible

forms that will be translated to digital formats with the use of the latest technologies in the

market. According to Muhenda&Lwanga (2000) noted that Student record used for storing

large database or knowledge base. It can be used for knowing the current status of any

aspect of the business due to its online real-time processing capability (Muhenda&

Lwanga, 2000).

According to Elizabeth Parker and Christine Smith(1997), the study found (p.15)

that the greatest volume of institutional records deposited in university archives, in equal

quantities to governance records, was student records. This report thus brought into focus

the huge storage implications for all universities, including King’s College, which

traditionally has taken the paper “student record” into its archives for permanent retention

(Elizabeth Parker and Christine Smith, 1997).

According to Sauer (1993) argued that some people will see them as an expense,

others as a solution, a control mechanism, a threat to the quality of working life or even

as a technical problem in 1993.

According to this sector, the challenge begins with the institution's entry

department. Admissions departments work as delivery centers for quality inputs, which

will eventually become higher quality outputs. The department, then, must collect
significant amounts of data about the student as well as maintain the ability to effectively

study and transform the data on pertinent information. It will create new functionality for

the entry department to carry out - information technology. Information technology

currently represents a critical success factor for many organizations. Higher educational

institutions fall into this category and seek the status of first movements related to the

development and implementation of information technology throughout the academic

areas "(McClea and Yen, 2005).

 CHAPTER II

Methodology

The research utilized Qualitative and Quantitative Developmental-Descriptive

research design. Quantitative Research is an empirical investigation. That means the

research sources on verifiable observation while Qualitative Research is a scientific

method of observation to gather non-numerical data it refers to the description of things.

The researcher used Quantitative and Qualitative Developmental - Descriptive design

since the researcher described the current status of a variable or phenomenon. The

researcher does not begin with the hypothesis but typically developed one after the data

was collected. The Data collection is mostly observational in nature

ResearchDesign

The researchers used quantitative descriptive method to approach since the

present study seeks to describe the impact of management information system on

Maintenance of student records in senior high, descriptive design will be appropriate for

the study, And this will involve the examination of available documents, conducting

interviews observation Of the current system, and administering questionnaires to

different categories of the people As shown in the sample size. Examination documents

and research will be carried out for clarity and verification of facts to be collected and

information about existing systems an associated Problems venue like reference books,

journals and the internet. The design phase will be carried out as illustrated by the

diagram below.
Research Instrument

The researcher used a survey questionnaire having a close-ended question to

gather the needed information for this study. The questionnaire is divided into 2 parts, the

first part consists of the personal data of the respondent especially the age and gender.

the succeeding part seeks to know the level evaluation of the program based. The

researcher wants to know if the program was useful and user-friendly for the students

and registrar. Moreover, instrument was design to determine and evaluation of the

respondents to the Student Profiling System in four (4) aspects mentioned above. The

researchers used five-point Like scale with verbal interpretation such as 5 = Strongly

Agree, 4 = Agree, 3 = Uncertain, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly Disagree. The scales would

be presented below in chronological order.

Scale Range Interpretation

5 4.50-5.0 Strongly Agree

4 3.50-4.49 Agree

3 2.50-3.49 Uncertain

2 1.50-2.49 Disagree

1 1.00-1.49 Strongly Disagree

Sampling Procedure / Participants
The participants of this study were the ICT students of Cainta Senior High School

with a total number oh (100) as it was the minimum for descriptive studies. They were

chosen because of being the primary source of data needed for the study. The

researchers used a convenience sampling technique. The said technique is selecting a

group of individuals who are conveniently available for study

RESEARCH LOCALE

Cainta Senior High School can be found at Cainta, Rizal. It is located at A.

Bonifacio Avenue Bgry. San Roque Cainta, Rizal. The school offers two tracks and

divided into different strands. The first track is Academic Track which offers Humanities

and Social Sciences, General Academic Strands and Accountancy, Business and

Management .The second track is Technical Vocational track which offers Bread and

Pastry, Automotive, Electrical Installation and Maintenance, and Programming. The study
will be conducted in this school to ensure the availability of student to participate in this

study.

Enrollment process is a thing that needed of the students in able to study at

Cainta Senior High School. They need to comply all the requirements, and fill up the

registration form that will give by the registrar.

Data Collection Procedure

The researchers sought permission from the school administration to perform a

survey in a way of respect towards the school where the experimentation will take place.

After the permission was granted, the ICT students used the program-based

Students’ Profiling System for a free trial. Then, researchers gave questionnaires to ICT

students in Cainta Senior High School. Then, the questionnaires were retrieved from the

students. The researchers then collected the data from the answers of the respondents

based on the questionnaires and program. These data were analyzed and interpreted to

draw a conclusion and recommendation.

TREATMENT OF DATA

Statement of the problem

The profile of the respondents in terms of age and gender using frequency and

percentage to know how many students under 17-20 years old that answer the

questionnaire, so the researcher provides the frequency and percentage of the

respondents.

The effects of the develop program based on Student Profiling System for the

Student of CSHS.

The level of acceptability of the program-based on Student Profiling System in

terms of Efficiency, Reliability, Usefulness, User Friendliness using Weighted Mean since

the researchers want to know the acceptability of the program the researchers used a

weighted mean to determine the number of students who accept the program.
 CHAPTER 3

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents the data gathered from the respondents which describes the

developed and evaluated of student profiling system program. It also shows and interprets

the result of the method used in the study.

Profile of the Respondents

Age. Age refers to the extent of time associated with a particular person,
Table 1 shows the frequency distribution of respondents in terms of age.
Table 1
Profile distribution of respondents in terms of age

AGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

17-18 84 71.19%

19-20 34 28.81%

TOTAL 118 100%

Table 1 shows that the highest number of respondents are at the age of 17-18

it is the average of the most student by 71.19% percent however, the lowest is at the

age of 19-20 of students which is only 28.81% percent respondent.

 Gender. The Gender refers to the state of being male or female. Table 2

presents the age of the respondents and the corresponding frequencies and

percentages.

Table 2
Profile distribution of respondents in terms of gender

GENDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Male 53 44.92%

Female 65 55.08%

TOTAL 118 100%

Table 2 shows that there are 53 male respondents and which makes up

44.92% of the total sample. On the other hand, female has a frequency of 65 and has a

percentage of 55.08%. Therefore the female got the highest respondents in this study

than the male respondents. The respondents of this study is both male and female.
 Table 3
Evaluation of the Respondents in the developed student profiling system in terms of
GUI
AESTHETIC GUI (GRAPHIC WEIGHTED VERBAL
USER INTERFACE) MEAN INTERPRETATION

1. The icon suits the application. 4.81 Strongly Agree

2. The GUI is visually appealing. 4.48 Agree

3. Use of appropriate font style and 4.55 Strongly Agree

font color have proper contrast on
its background.

4. Background image is relevant type 4.57 Strongly Agree

of application.

5. Text is readable. 4.52 Strongly Agree

AVERAGE 4.59 Strongly Agree

Based on Table 3, the icon suits the application has a weighted mean of 4.81

interpreted as “Strongly Agree” have got the highest weighted mean. It shows that the

aesthetic GUI program icon suits well the application because the image of the icon is

related to profiles. On the other hand, the GUI is visually appealing has a weighted

mean of 4.48 interpreted as agree have got the lowest weighted mean.
 Efficiency. The ability to do something or produce something without wasting

materials, time or energy. Table 4 show the efficiency of the guidance record database

program.

Table 4
Evaluation of the Respondents in the developed student profiling system in terms of
Efficiency
WEIGHTED VERBAL
EFFICIENCY MEAN INTERPRETATION

1. The content is accurate. 4.26 Agree

2. The application is free from spelling 4.22 Agree

errors.

AVERAGE 4.24 Agree

Table 4 shows that the application is easily to expect the application what it

does has a weighted mean of 4.26 interpreted as “Agree” have got the highest weighted

mean. The application is easy to know what the application can do got the highest

weighted mean because you will just need to fill up the private information to the fill up

form. On the other hand, the content is accurate and application is free from spelling

errors has a weighted mean of 4.22 interpreted as agree have got the lowest weighted

mean.
 Reliability. It refers to the extent to which an experiment, test, or measuring

procedure yields the same result on repeated trials. Table 5 show the reliability of the

guidance record database program.

Table 5
Evaluation of the Respondents in the developed student profiling system in terms of
Reliability
WEIGHTED VERBAL
RELIABILITY MEAN INTERPRETATION

1. Enough information are provided. 4.35 Agree

2. I don’t notice any inconsistence as I 4.22 Agree

use it.

AVERAGE 4.29 Agree

Based on the Table 5, the result is accurate has weighted mean of 4.35
interpreted as “Agree” which has the highest weighted mean. The result is accurate got

the highest weighted mean because the respondents find enough details of the

application in this study. On the other hand, enough information provided has a

weighted mean of 4.22 interpreted as agree have got the lowest weighted mean.
 Usefulness. It refers to the quality of having utility and especially practical

worth or applicability. Table 6 show the usefulness of the guidance record database

program.

Table 6
Evaluation of the Respondents in the developed student profiling system in terms of
Usefulness
WEIGHTED VERBAL
USEFULNESS MEAN INTERPRETATION

1. The Student Profiling System is 4.72 Strongly Agree

useful to me.

2. The Student Profiling System was 4.33 Agree

helpful in my needs.

3. The application can be a substitute 4.30 Agree

to other related applications or
products that have similar function.

AVERAGE 4.45 Agree

Based on the Table 6, it was helpful in my needs has a weighted mean of 4.72

interpreted as “Strongly Agree” have got the highest weighted mean. The application is

helpful for the teachers to manage student’s profile in an easier way. On the other hand,

the application can be a substitute to other related applications or products that have

similar function has weighted mean of 4.30 interpreted as agree have got the lowest

weighted mean.
 User-friendliness. It refers on how easy to learn, use, understand, or deal with

user-friendly software. The Table 7 show the user-friendliness of the guidance record

database program.

Table 7
Evaluation of the Respondents in the developed student profiling system in terms of
User-friendliness
WEIGHTED VERBAL
USER-FRIENDLINESS MEAN INTERPRETATION

1. The program is easy to use. 4.49 Agree

2. The application is not confusing to 4.35 Agree

use.

3. The user interface is easy to 4.29 Agree

navigate.

AVERAGE 4.38 Agree

Based on Table 7, using it simple has a weighted mean of 4.49 interpreted as

“Agree” have got the highest weighted mean. It shows that the application is simple to

use because the appearance of the application is easy to understand, the icon, the

choice of font style and font color that suits for the application. On the other hand, the

user interface is easy to navigate has a weighted mean of 4.29 interpreted as agree

have got the lowest weighted mean.

 CHAPTER 4

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary of the findings recommendations

Summary of the study

The objective of the study is to develop and evaluate the student profiling system.

The study was conducted in Cainta Senior High School. The study uses a convenience

sampling technique in choosing the respondents of the study.

The method that was used was descriptive and with survey questionnaires as the

main data gathering instruments.

The study will help the registrant to keep and manage the profile/information of the

student by providing a program for less time consuming.

Summary of findings

Based on the data gathered, the following summary of findings is presented.

1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:

1.1 Age - Most of the respondents from age 17-18 is 71.19% and respondents in
age 19-20 is 28.81%.
1.2 Gender - Most of the respondents were has the same percentage of the male

have frequency 53 while a female has frequency 65 with a total of 118

respondents.

2. Design and develop a program-based Student Profiling System for the students of

Cainta Senior High School.

 1.3 The program has a print preview where the user can look at their own copy of

the data they provided.

1.4 The program has a secured data based.

2 What is the evaluation of the respondents in the program-based Student Profiling

System in terms of:

3.1 Aesthetic Graphic User Interface (GUI) appearance

-Based on the result, the respondents strongly agree that the developed

program will be helpful for future use.

3.2 Efficiency

- Respondents strongly agreed that the Student Profiling System was

accurate, because it’s editable and reached what the respondents expectations.

3.3 Reliability

- Respondents strongly agreed that the Student Profiling System was easy

to use and has a direction what to input in the text field

3.4 Usefulness

- Based on the questionnaire that conducted, the gathered data was

interpreted as “strongly agree” because the application can be a substitute for

other related applications or product.

 3.5 User friendliness

- Based on the questionnaire that conducted, the gathered data was

interpreted as "strongly agree”, because the application is easy to use and the user

interface is easy to navigate.

Conclusions

Based on the data gathered, the following conclusions are presented.

1. The program will be helpful to the needs of each students of Cainta Senior

High School.

2. The program will be use for backup of the students data.

3. The program will help the registrant to make the work easier and time less.

Recommendations

Based on the findings and conclusions the following recommendations are

formulated by the researchers.

1. Make the design more accurate to the form

2. Create a Button that will serve as the help button incase of the user misunderstood

the program.

3. Future improvement of the program for it to be more appealing is recommended.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Akbar Safarzadeh & Amir Reza Mansoori (2009) Retrieved from:
https://www.slideshare.net/EzhrihmCradan/chapter-2-28073663.
Liao, Y. et al. (2007). Student Information System | Interface (Computing) | Automation
retrieve from: https://www.scribd.com/document/326976193/Student-s-Profiling-System
Juhani Iivari (1991). Lucas Giovini (1981) and Tom Alter (1996) retrieved from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254579919_Student_Profiling_System_for_an
Agent-Based_Educational_System
Robert Fyfe and Scott Walter CV (2005) Student Profiling System a retrieved from:
https://prezi.com/ltcwc6ot6paa/student-profiling-system/
Bryan Perrett (2004) Student Profiling from Tutoring System Log Data retrieved from:
https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/philosophy/docs/scheines/Carlson_Genin_Rau_Scheines.
pdf
Belle and Boote (2004) Student Information System | Interface (Computing) | Automation
retrieved from:https://www.scribd.com/document/326976193/Student-s-Profiling-System
Ewald Ulrich (2006) Project Report About Student Information retrieved from: System
from:https://www.slideshare.net/rajsharma528/projectreportonstudentinformationmanag
ementsystemphpmysql
Martin Luther (1992) Student Information System | Interface (Computing) | Automation
retrieved from:https://www.scribd.com/document/326976193/Student-s-Profiling-System
Safarzade & Mansoori (2009) Student Profiling And Grading System retrieved from:
https://www.studymode.com/essays/Student-Profiling-And-Grading-System-
1347867.html
MohdEhmer Khan and Farmeena Khan (2011) Student Profiling from Tutoring System
Log
data.retrieved_from:https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/philosophy/docs/scheines/Carlson_G
enin_Rau_Scheines.pdf
Janelle Smart (2002) Student Information Systems Retrieved April 2, 2009 from:
https://www.techlearning.com/news/student-information-systems
Chinyemba and Patrick Ngulube (2005) Student Profiling System a review from
https://prezi.com/ltcwc6ot6paa/student-profiling-system/
Ronnie Allen (1997) What is a Computerize Profiling System from:
https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Computerized-Profiling-System-PKKBFJJ43RZZa
Jhonston and Bowen, C. P. (2005). Developing System of Comprehensive Student
Profiling In School retrievedfrom:https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/445/1/TL-
15-1-63.pdf
Bantin Genealogy (2001) retrieved from:https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Computerized-
Profiling-System-PKKBFJJ43RZZAz
David Muhenda (2000) Developing System of Comprehensive Student Profiling In School
https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/445/1/TL-15-1-63.pdf
Thomas J. Henry (1988) Development Student Profiling System retrieved from:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2015/652623/
David Muhenda &Charles Lwanga (2000) Student Information System for Agent –Based
Education_System_from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254579919_Student_Profiling_System_for_an
_Agent-Based_Educational_System
1.
Gustavo Sauer (1993) Project Report About Student Information System retrieved from:
https://www.slideshare.net/rajsharma528/projectreportonstudentinformationmanagemen
tsystemphpmysql
McClea and Yen (2005) The Success of Student Information Management System
retrieved from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220893982_The_Success_of_Student_Inform
ation_Management_System_The_Case_of_Higher_Education_Institution_in_Ethiopia
APPENDIX
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV – A CALABARZON
Division of Rizal
CAINTA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Cainta, Rizal

December 6, 2018

NERISSA R. DALUMPINES Ed. P

Principal II, Cainta Senior High School
Cainta, Rizal

Dear Ma’am/Sir,

Good Day!
We students of Cainta Senior High School (Computer Programming – B) are
currently working with Research entitled, “The Development of Student Profiling System
for The Students at Cainta Senior High School” in partial fulfillment of the requirements
in Inquiry Investigations and Immersion.
In line with this, we humbly request your office to allow us to conduct the study inside the
school premises and to gather the data among the students in Cainta Senior High School.
Your positive response regarding this matter will be highly appreciated.
Thank you very much.

Very truly yours,

PEDRO PEREZ _________________________________

CZYRUS LOPEZ _________________________________
FRANCOIS GONZALES _________________________________
FRANCIS TUPAZ _________________________________
BILFORD VIOLA _________________________________
NOAH SISON _________________________________
MICHELLE AGARIN _________________________________

Noted by:

MS. MARINEL G. ANDRES

Subject Teacher
 CURICULUM VITAE

Name: Francois M. Gonzales

Age: 18
Birthday: January 18, 2001
Address: 084 Madera Home,Narra st,Brgy San Roque, Cainta Rizal
Email: [email protected]
Educational Background
Elementary
Cainta Elementary School
Junior High School
Francisco P. Felix Memorial National High School
Senior High School
Cainta Senior High School
 CURICULUM VITAE

Name: Czyrruz Lopez

Age: 19
Birthday: December 18, 2000
Address: 169, Sitio Langhaya, Brgy. Delapaz
Email: [email protected]
Educational Background
Elementary
Sta Cruz Elementary School
Junior High School
Antipolo National High School
Senior High School
Antipolo Senior High School
Cainta Senior High School
 CURICULUM VITAE

Name: Bilford Viola

Age: 17
Birthday: September 24, 2001
Address: West Bank rd. Blk.9, Brgy Maybunga, Pasig City
Email: [email protected]
Educational Background
Elementary
F. Serrano Elementary School
Junior High School
Francisco P. Felix Memorial National High School
Senior High School
Cainta Senior High School
 CURICULUM VITAE

Name: Francis E. Tupaz

Age: 17
Birthday: May 23, 2001
Address: 005 Peace St, A Prime Comp, Brgy San Andress, Cainta Rizal
Email: [email protected]
Educational Background
Elementary
Cainta Elementary School
Junior High School
Francisco P. Felix Memorial National High School
Senior High School
Cainta Senior High School
 CURICULUM VITAE

Name: Pedro C. Perez

Age: 18
Birthday: May 1, 2000
Address: Blk 1 Exodus Floodway, Cainta Rizal
Email: [email protected]
Educational Background
Elementary
San Juan Elementary School
Junior High School
San Juan National High School
Senior High School
Cainta Senior High School
 CURICULUM VITAE

Name: Michelle M. Agarin

Age: 17
Birthday: December 16, 2001
Address: Saint Anthony, 14 Bayabas, Taytay Rizal
Email: [email protected]
Educational Background
Elementary
Bulan North Central School -A
Junior High School
A,G Villaroya, Technological, Foundation, Inc
Senior High School
Cainta Senior High School
 CURICULUM VITAE

Name: Noah D. Sison

Age: 17
Birthday: November 7, 2001
Address: Tower Hills Sub. Brgy Dolores, Taytay Rizal
Email: [email protected]
Educational Background
Elementary
St Cruz Elementary School
Junior High School
Sto Thomas National High School
Francisco P. Felix Memorial National High School
Senior High School
Cainta Senior High School