Symbolic interactionism is a sociological theory that emphasizes how meanings arise through interactions between people. It focuses on the micro-level interactions between individuals and how people interpret each other's actions and themselves. There are three core principles: that people act based on meanings, language allows negotiation of meaning, and thoughts are modified through interpretation. Notable theorists who contributed include George Herbert Mead, who coined the term, and Erving Goffman, who analyzed everyday social interactions and behaviors.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
190 views
Symbolic Interactionism Copies
Symbolic interactionism is a sociological theory that emphasizes how meanings arise through interactions between people. It focuses on the micro-level interactions between individuals and how people interpret each other's actions and themselves. There are three core principles: that people act based on meanings, language allows negotiation of meaning, and thoughts are modified through interpretation. Notable theorists who contributed include George Herbert Mead, who coined the term, and Erving Goffman, who analyzed everyday social interactions and behaviors.
Prepared by: interactionism 12 HUMSS – Bl. Gratia B. John Dewey – the inspiration of this theory came Irish Shayne Francisco from him which he believed that human beings Alyssa Susane Torres are best understood in a practical, interactive John Carlo Poche relation to their environment. Joshua Abaloyan C. Georg Herbert Mead- considered as the founder Florabel Agus of symbolic interactionism D. Charles Cooley – he theorized the “Looking Glass Self” argued that the way we think about Symbolic Interactionism is defined… ourselves is particularly stating that a Emphasizes that human behavior is influenced by person's self grows out of society's interpersonal definitions and meanings that are created and interactions and the perceptions of others. maintained through symbolic interaction with E. Georg Simmel – his analytical gaze to the others. sociological significance of ordinary experiences People inhabit a world that is large part socially and everyday interactions constructed. F. Erving Goffman – he used the framework of Enables the individual to develop a sense of self, “dramaturgy” he use the analogy to the theater, become socialized, participate in society, and with humans social behavior seen as more or less understand the roles and significance of other well-scripted and with the human as role taking people. actors. It is under the branch of microsociology that concerned with the social psychological THREE CORE PRINCIPLES dynamics of individuals interacting in small 1. Meaning - states that humans act toward people groups. and things based upon the meanings that they One of the major theoretical perspectives in have given to those people or things. sociology. 2. Language - gives humans a means by which to negotiate meaning through symbols. It is by ORIGIN OF SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM engaging in speech acts with others, symbolic This perspective h as a long intellectual story, interaction, that humans come to identify beginning with the German Sociologist and meaning, or naming, and develop discourse. economist, Max Weber and the American 3. Thoughts - modifies each individual’s philosopher George Med, whom emphasized the interpretation of symbols. Thought, based-on subjective meaning of human behavior, the language, is a mental conversation or dialogue overall process, and pragmatism. that requires role taking, or imagining different Although there are number of interactionists, points of view. Herbert Blumer and Georg Herbert Mead is responsible for the coining the term “symbolic FIVE CENTRAL IDEAS OF SYMBOLIC interactionism” as well as formulating the most INTERACTIONISM – By Joel M. Charon prominent version of the theory. 1. The human being must be understood as a social According to this theory, people inhabit a world person. that is in large part socially constructed. In 2. The human being must be understood as a particular, the meaning of the objects, events and thinking being. behaviors comes from the interpretation people 3. Humans define the situation they are in. give them and its interpretation from one group 4. The cause of human action is the result of what is to another. occurring in our present situation 5. Human beings as active beings in relation to their environment THE CHARACTERISTICS OF SYMBOL STREGHTS OF THE THEORY INTERACTION APPROACH – By Blumer 1. People are, above all else, symbol users. Human interaction 2. People respond to others and to other’s action Interpretation or definition rather than mere based on their definition of situation. reaction 3. People have constructed meanings and have Response based on meaning negotiated social interaction. Use of symbols 4. The social environment on which learning takes Interpretation between stimulus and response place. 5. Recognizes that perceptions of reality are THE INTERCHANGEABILITY MODEL variable and changing. 6. Uses microlevel analysis in examining issues and problems in society. 7. Give insight into small-scale human interactions . 8. Underscores the relationship between the meaning of symbols and person’s behavior. 9. Sees human as active, creative participants who construct their social world.
WEAKNESSES OF THE THEORY
1. Larger social issues imposing in society that are beyond the control of individuals. 2. Focus on small-scale, relatively trivial, aspects of It represents the relationship among subjects, social life. objects, and self-definition. 3. Over-emphasis on the “individual life” . The model suggests that, in some cases, when 4. Too much focus on individuals. someone cannot adequately integrate aspects of 5. Questions of social order and social change not other people into his or her self-definition, then adequately explained objects may be substituted, consciously or 6. How do structures affect individual perceptions, otherwise. meanings and interpretations? In other words, the respective contributions of 7. Power relationships subjects and objects to the individual's continuing 8. Symbols may be interpreted incorrectly or development may be substitutable for each other differently. at various times. 9. It can be difficult to quantify things in symbolic interactionism THE PREMISES OF SYMBOLIC 10. Overestimates the power of individuals to create INTERACTIONISM their own realities. 1. Human beings act toward things on the basis of the meanings that things have for them. 2. The meaning of the things arises out of the social interaction one has with ones fellows. 3. The meanings of the things are handled in and modified through an interpretive process used by the person in dealing with things he encounters.