DAVIT DESIGN

Approx.Weight of Blind
Thickness of Blind = 82 mm
Diameter of Blind = 1180 mm
Radius of Blind = 590 mm
Volume of Blind = 89674249 mm3
Density of Blind = 0.0078 kg/cm3
:. Weight odf Blind = 699.46 kg

Weight of davit
Length of  davit = 1200 mm
Dia of  davit = 100 mm
Material Density = 0.0078 kg/cm3
:. Weight of  davit = 73.48 kg

1.0 MOMENT AND FORCES IN DAVIT AND VESSEL

(Ref:Pressure Vessel Design Manual 3rd Edition by Dennis R. Moss Page 291~295)

1.1  Load on davit
Weight of Blind,  W L : 700 Kg = 6867 N
Weight of Davit ,  W 1 : 74.0 Kg = 725.74 N
Axial Load, P = WL + W1 = 774.0 kg = 7592.74 N

Vertical Impact Factor, Cv  : 1.5
Horizontal Impact Factor, Ch : 0.2

Vertical Force, fv = Cv x P = 11389.1157 N
Horizontal Force, fh = Ch x P = 1518.54876 N

1.2 Bending Moment in Davit , M 1
Length of Boom, L1 = 700 mm
Length of Mast, L2 = 421 mm
Length L3 = 200 mm
Length L4 = 110 mm

BENDING MOMENT IN DAVIT MAST

(Considering Type B Davit)
Moment, M1 = fvL1 + 0.5W1L1 + fhL2 = 8865700.35 Nmm

Figure 1: Davit
2.0 STRESS IN DAVIT
Davit Properties
Mast Material : 09G2S
Yield Stress, Fy = 250 N/mm2
Allowable Axial Stress, Fa = 0.6Fy = 150.0 N/mm2
Allowable Bending Stress, Fb = 0.66Fy = 165.0 N/mm2
Outside Diameter, Do = 100 mm
Outside Radius, a = 50 mm
Wall Thickness of Davit, tp = 50 mm
Inside Diameter, Di = 0 mm
Cross Sectional Area, A1 = π/4 x(Do2‐Di2) = 7854.0 mm2
Section Modulus, Z1 = (π/32Do)x (Do4‐Di4) = 98174.8 mm3
Moment Inertia, I = π/64 x(Do4‐Di4) = 4908738.5 mm4
Radius of Gyration, r = Sqrt(I/A1) = 25.0 mm
Radius of Davit R = 300.0

Axial Stress at Mast, fa = P/A = 1.45 N/mm2

Bending Stress at Mast  M1, fb1= M1/Z1 = 90.3 N/mm2

Bending Moment ,M2 = M 1 ( L2  R ) = 2548099.1 Nmm
L2
M2D  2 
Bending Stress at M2 fb2   61.9 N/mm2
I  3K 3  
(Curved Davit)
where, α = tpR / a2 6.00
where, β = 6 / (5+6α²) 0.03
where, K = 1 ‐ (9 / (10+12α ²) 0.98

Ratio  (Greater of fb1 & fb2), fb 90.31 N/mm2

Combined Stress, fa/Fa + fb/Fb  ≤ 1
Calculate Combined Stress = 0.557

Since Calculate Combined Stress  < 1 , Stress on David mast  is Satisfactory

FINDING EQUIVALENT RADIAL LOAD, Fre
Radial force at Guide and Support Fr= M1/L3 44329 N
Fr is max when davit rotation f is at 0°

Cir.moment at guide and support, Mf = Fr * L4 4876135 Nmm

Mφ is max when davit rotation φ is at 90◦

Longitudinal moment at guide, Mx=P*L4 835202 Nmm

Equivalent Unit load, w = (Fr*Cosφ / B) + (6*Fr*L4*Sinφ / B² )  Nmm
Equivalent Radial Load, Fre = w*B/2 N
where  B is width of support plate  200 mm

φ (°) w (N/mm) Fre (N)

min 0 221.64 22164.25
max 90 555.57 55557.00
3.0 WELDED DESIGN JOINT
(Ref:Pressure Vessel Handbook 12th Edition by Eugene F. Megyesy Page 459)
 Davit Arm Bracket

Vertical Shear, V = 6867 N
Bending Moment, M = lV = 0 Nmm

Horizontal Weld Length,b = 200 mm
Vertical Weld Length,d = 20 mm
Length of Weld, Aw = 440 mm
Fillet Weld Used = 10 mm

Section Modulus (Bending Moment),Sw : bd +(d2 /3)
= 4133.3 mm2

Allowable load on weld,f = 9600 psi

= 66.19 N/mm2

Vertical Shear Forces,Ws =V/Aw = 15.61 N/mm

Bending Forces, Wb = M/Sw = 0.00 N/mm

Resultant Force, W =(Wb2 + Ws2)1/2 = 15.61 N/mm

Fillet Weld Leg Size,w =W/f = 0.24 mm

Since Calc. weld size > Weld used = Satisfactory

 EVALUATING STIFFENER BUKLING 
EULERS METHOD, FIXED AT BOTH END

        a Top Support Plate

L
Z
Y

b
X Bottom Support Plate

L = 180 mm
Le = 90 mm (Le = L x 0.5 for Fixed support @ both end)
No of Stiffiner = 2
2
E = 199948 N/mm
Material = SA 516 Gr 60
Vertical Loads (P) = 11390 N 11.39 KN
a = 10 mm
b = 125 mm

Iy = 1/12 x a x b3
4
= 1627604 mm

3
Ix = 1/12 x b x a
4
= 10417 mm

2
Pcritical yz = PI  x E x Iy
Lc2
= 396534 KN

Pcritical xz = PI2 x E x Ix
Lc2
= 2538 KN

Load provided to = P / 2 (Total 2 Stiffiners)

Stiffiner = 5.695 KN

Pcritical xz  > Load provided to stiffner
Hence provided Stiffiner is Safe from Compression Load
Graphical Results

3d

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
Graphical Results

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
Graphical Results

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)

3d(Small) 3d
Graphical Results

3d(Deformed)

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
Graphical Results

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)
Graphical Results

3d(Small) 3d
3d(Deformed)

3d(Small) 3d
Graphical Results

3d(Deformed)

3d(Small) 3d

3d(Small) 3d
Graphical Results

3d(Small) 3d

3d(Small) 3d
Finite Element Results

Tabular Results
Results were generated with the finite element program FE/Pipe®. Stress results are post-processed in accordance with the rules specified in ASME Section III and
ASME Section VIII, Division 2.

Analysis Time Stamp: Wed Sep 11 06:20:49 2019.

 Model Notes
 Load Case Report
 Solution Data
 ASME Code Stress Output Plots
 Stress Results - Notes
 ASME Overstressed Areas
 Highest Primary Stress Ratios
 Highest Secondary Stress Ratios
 Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios
 Graphical Results

Model Notes
Model Notes

Input Echo:

Model Type : Cylindrical Shell

Parent Geometry
Parent Outside Diam. : 989.000 mm.
Thickness : 14.000 mm.

Parent Properties:
Cold Allowable : 117.9 MPa
Hot Allowable : 117.9 MPa
Material DB # 1007501.
Ultimate Tensile (Amb) : 413.7 MPa
Yield Strength (Amb) : 220.6 MPa
Yield Strength (Hot) : 220.6 MPa
Elastic Modulus (Amb) : 203409.0 MPa
Poissons Ratio : 0.300
Expansion Coefficient : 0.1162E-04 mm./mm./deg.
Weight Density : 0.0000E+00 N /cu.mm.(NOT USED)

Structural Attachment Type : U-Section

Side Plate Thickness : 16.000 mm.

Side Plate Height : 180.000 mm.
Bottom Plate Thickness : 20.000 mm.
Bottom Plate Width : 200.000 mm.
Length : 313.000 mm.
Nozzle Tilt Angle : 0.000 deg.
Distance from Top : 0.000 mm.
Distance from Bottom : 0.000 mm.

Nozzle Properties
Cold Allowable : 117.9 MPa
Hot Allowable : 117.9 MPa
Material DB # 1007501.
Ultimate Tensile (Amb) : 413.7 MPa
Yield Strength (Amb) : 220.6 MPa
Yield Strength (Hot) : 220.6 MPa
Elastic Modulus (Amb) : 203409.0 MPa
Poissons Ratio : 0.300
Expansion Coefficient : 0.1162E-04 mm./mm./deg.
Weight Density : 0.0000E+00 N /cu.mm. (NOT USED)

Design Operating Cycles : 7000.

Ambient Temperature (Deg.) : 21.10

Uniform thermal expansion produces no stress in this geometry.

Any thermal loads will come through operating forces and
Finite Element Results

moments applied through the nozzle.

Nozzle Inside Temperature : 30.00 deg.

Nozzle Outside Temperature : 30.00 deg.
Vessel Inside Temperature : 30.00 deg.
Vessel Outside Temperature : 30.00 deg.

Pressure : 0.000 MPa

User Defined Load Input Echo:

Loads are given at the End of Nozzle
Loads are defined in Global Coordinates

Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)

Load Case FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPER: 0.0 44329.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 835.2

FEA Model Loads:

These are the actual loads applied to the FEA model.
These are the User Defined Loads translated to the
end of the nozzle and reported in global coordinates.

Forces( N ) Moments (N-m)

Load Case FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPER: 0.0 44329.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 835.2

The "top" or "positive" end of this model is "free" in

the axial and translational directions.

Stresses ARE nodally AVERAGED.

No weld dimensions have been given for the nozzle

connection to the shell. This will produce conservative
results for external loads and may tend to produce more
realistic inside surface pressure stresses.

The cylinder length or nozzle/branch location was adjusted

so that a better mesh could be generated at each end of the
cylinder. The nozzle is now located 941.75 mm.
down the length of the cylinder and the total cylinder length
is 1883.51 mm.

Vessel Centerline Vector : 0.000 1.000 0.000

Nozzle Orientation Vector : 1.000 0.000 0.000

Table of Contents

Load Case Report

FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 6:20am SEP 11,2019

Load Case Report $X

Inner and outer element temperatures are the same

throughout the model. No thermal ratcheting
calculations will be performed.

THE 3 LOAD CASES ANALYZED ARE:

1 SUSTAINED (Wgt)

Sustained case run to satisfy local primary

membrane and bending stress limits.

/-------- Loads in Case 1

Loads due to Weight

2 OPERATING
Finite Element Results

Case run to compute the operating stresses used in

secondary, peak and range calculations as needed.

/-------- Loads in Case 2

Loads from (Operating)

3 RANGE (Fatigue Calc Performed)

Case run to get the RANGE of stresses.

as described in NB-3222.2, 5.5.3.2, 5.5.5.2 or 5.5.6.1.

/-------- Combinations in Range Case 3

Plus Stress Results from CASE 2
Minus Stress Results from CASE 1

Table of Contents

Solution Data
FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 6:20am SEP 11,2019

Solution Data

Maximum Solution Row Size = 1452

Number of Nodes = 2835
Number of Elements = 952
Number of Solution Cases = 2

Summation of Loads per Case

Case # FX FY FZ

1 0. 0. 0.
2 0. 44329. 0.

Table of Contents

ASME Code Stress Output Plots

FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 6:20am SEP 11,2019

ASME Code Stress Output Plots $X

1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1

2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 1

3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1

4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1

5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 1

6) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Inside) Case 2

7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2

8) Membrane < User (OPE,Membrane) Case 2

9) Bending < User (OPE,Bending) Case 2

10) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (OPE,S1+S2+S3) Case 2

11) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Inside) Case 3

Finite Element Results

12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 3

13) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Inside) Case 3

14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 3

Table of Contents

Stress Results - Notes

FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 6:20am SEP 11,2019

Stress Results - Notes

- Results in this analysis were generated using the finite

element solution method.

- Using 2013-2015 ASME Section VIII Division 2

- Use Polished Bar fatigue curve.

- Ratio between Operating and Design Pressure = 1.000000

Assume pressure increases all other stresses.

- Assume free end displacements of attached pipe

(e.g. thermal loads) are secondary within the limits
of nozzle reinforcement.

- Use Equivalent Stress (Von Mises).

- Include S1+S2+S3 evaluation for operating stress.

Include S1+S2+S3 evaluation in primary case evaluation.
Assume bending stress not local primary for S1+S2+S3.

- Use local tensor values for averaged and not

averaged stresses.

Table of Contents

ASME Overstressed Areas

FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 6:20am SEP 11,2019

ASME Overstressed Areas $X

*** NO OVERSTRESSED NODES IN THIS MODEL ***

Table of Contents

Highest Primary Stress Ratios

FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 6:20am SEP 11,2019

Highest Primary Stress Ratios $X

Shell SCR at Plate # 1

Finite Element Results

Pl SPL Primary Membrane Load Case 1

0 221 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1

0%

Qb SPS Primary Bending Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1

0%

S1+S2+S3 4S Part 5 (5.3.2) Load Case 1

0 472 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 1

0%

Circ Plate SCR for Plate # 1

Pl SPL Primary Membrane Load Case 1

0 221 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1

0%

Qb SPS Primary Bending Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1

0%

S1+S2+S3 4S Part 5 (5.3.2) Load Case 1

0 472 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 1

0%

Long Plate SCR for Plate # 1

Pl SPL Primary Membrane Load Case 1

0 221 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1

0%

Qb SPS Primary Bending Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 1

0%
Finite Element Results

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1

0%

S1+S2+S3 4S Part 5 (5.3.2) Load Case 1

0 472 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 1

0%

Shell in Plate # 1 Vicinity

Pl SPL Primary Membrane Load Case 1

0 221 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1

0%

Qb SPS Primary Bending Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1

0%

S1+S2+S3 4S Part 5 (5.3.2) Load Case 1

0 472 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 1

0%

Circ Plate for Plate # 1

Pl SPL Primary Membrane Load Case 1

0 221 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1

0%

Qb SPS Primary Bending Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1

0%

S1+S2+S3 4S Part 5 (5.3.2) Load Case 1

Finite Element Results

0 472 Plot Reference:

MPa MPa 5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 1

0%

Long Plate for Plate # 1

Pl SPL Primary Membrane Load Case 1

0 221 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 1) Pl < SPL (SUS,Membrane) Case 1

0%

Qb SPS Primary Bending Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 2) Qb < SPS (SUS,Bending) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Inner) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 3) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Inside) Case 1

0%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 1

0 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 4) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (SUS,Outside) Case 1

0%

S1+S2+S3 4S Part 5 (5.3.2) Load Case 1

0 472 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 5) S1+S2+S3 < 4S (SUS,S1+S2+S3) Case 1

0%

Table of Contents

Highest Secondary Stress Ratios

FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 6:20am SEP 11,2019

Highest Secondary Stress Ratios $X

Shell SCR at Plate # 1

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 2

237 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2

53%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 3

237 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 3

53%

Circ Plate SCR for Plate # 1

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 2

48 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2

10%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 3

48 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 3
Finite Element Results

10%

Long Plate SCR for Plate # 1

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 2

126 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2

28%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 3

126 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 3

28%

Shell in Plate # 1 Vicinity

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 2

271 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2

61%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 3

271 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 3

61%

Circ Plate for Plate # 1

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 2

30 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2

6%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 3

30 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 3

6%

Long Plate for Plate # 1

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 2

54 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 7) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (OPE,Outside) Case 2

12%

Pl+Pb+Q SPS Primary+Secondary (Outer) Load Case 3

54 441 Plot Reference:
MPa MPa 12) Pl+Pb+Q < SPS (EXP,Outside) Case 3

12%

Table of Contents

Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios

FE/Pipe Version 10.0 Jobname: NOZZLE $P
Released Nov 2017 6:20am SEP 11,2019

Highest Fatigue Stress Ratios $X

Shell SCR at Plate # 1

Finite Element Results

Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Outer) Load Case 3

160 0.152 Life Stress Concentration Factor = 1.350
MPa 0.551 Stress Strain Concentration Factor = 1.000
Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 46,151.
Allowable "B31" Fatigue Stress Allowable = 294.8
289.9 Markl Fatigue Stress Allowable = 287.5
MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 366,270.
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 85,088.
55% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 118,134.
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 52,114.
Membrane-to-Bending Ratio = 0.417
Bending-to-PL+PB+Q Ratio = 0.706
Plot Reference:
14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 3

Circ Plate SCR for Plate # 1

Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Outer) Load Case 3

33 0.000 Life Stress Concentration Factor = 1.350
MPa 0.112 Stress Strain Concentration Factor = 1.000
Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 1.0000E11
Allowable "B31" Fatigue Stress Allowable = 294.8
289.9 Markl Fatigue Stress Allowable = 287.5
MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 39,152,084.
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 9,095,375.
11% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 12,627,797.
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 6,142,301.
Membrane-to-Bending Ratio = 0.547
Bending-to-PL+PB+Q Ratio = 0.646
Plot Reference:
14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 3

Long Plate SCR for Plate # 1

Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Outer) Load Case 3

85 0.008 Life Stress Concentration Factor = 1.350
MPa 0.294 Stress Strain Concentration Factor = 1.000
Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 924,832.
Allowable "B31" Fatigue Stress Allowable = 294.8
289.9 Markl Fatigue Stress Allowable = 287.5
MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 2,032,320.
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 472,126.
29% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 655,488.
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 342,064.
Membrane-to-Bending Ratio = 16.384
Bending-to-PL+PB+Q Ratio = 0.058
Plot Reference:
14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 3

Shell in Plate # 1 Vicinity

Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Outer) Load Case 3

135 0.070 Life Stress Concentration Factor = 1.000
MPa 0.467 Stress Strain Concentration Factor = 1.000
Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 100,021.
Allowable "B31" Fatigue Stress Allowable = 294.8
289.9 Markl Fatigue Stress Allowable = 287.5
MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 237,985.
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 55,286.
46% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 76,758.
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 34,844.
Membrane-to-Bending Ratio = 0.412
Bending-to-PL+PB+Q Ratio = 0.708
Plot Reference:
14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 3

Circ Plate for Plate # 1

Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Outer) Load Case 3

15 0.000 Life Stress Concentration Factor = 1.000
MPa 0.052 Stress Strain Concentration Factor = 1.000
Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 1.0000E11
Allowable "B31" Fatigue Stress Allowable = 294.8
289.9 Markl Fatigue Stress Allowable = 287.5
Finite Element Results

MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 1.7100E8

WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 39,725,216.
5% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 55,153,464.
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 48,867,768.
Membrane-to-Bending Ratio = 0.620
Bending-to-PL+PB+Q Ratio = 0.617
Plot Reference:
14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 3

Long Plate for Plate # 1

Pl+Pb+Q+F Damage Ratio Primary+Secondary+Peak (Outer) Load Case 3

27 0.000 Life Stress Concentration Factor = 1.000
MPa 0.093 Stress Strain Concentration Factor = 1.000
Cycles Allowed for this Stress = 1.0000E11
Allowable "B31" Fatigue Stress Allowable = 294.8
289.9 Markl Fatigue Stress Allowable = 287.5
MPa WRC 474 Mean Cycles to Failure = 28,955,760.
WRC 474 99% Probability Cycles = 6,726,680.
9% WRC 474 95% Probability Cycles = 9,339,148.
BS5500 Allowed Cycles(Curve F) = 4,387,118.
Membrane-to-Bending Ratio = 32.827
Bending-to-PL+PB+Q Ratio = 0.030
Plot Reference:
14) Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa (EXP,Outside) Case 3

Table of Contents