ASSESSMENT PIPELINE SETTLEMENT GAS PIPE

PLTU TAMBAK LOROK BLOCK 3

Doc. No. : XXXXXXXXXXXXX

PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS Rev. No. : A
Page No. : 1 of 5

PROJECT : ASSESSMENT PIPELINE SETTLEMENT GAS PIPE PLTU

TAMBAK LOROK BLOCK 3

CONTRACTOR : -

LOCATION : SEMARANG – CENTRAL JAVA

SUBCONTRACTOR : PT REKAYASA ENGINEERING

A 03-Jul-19 Issued for Review FTR AMR FA

PREPAREED CHECKED APPROVED
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION
BY BY BY
 ASSESSMENT PIPELINE SETTLEMENT GAS PIPE
PLTU TAMBAK LOROK BLOCK 3

Doc. No. : XXXXXXXXX

PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS Rev. No. : A
Page No. : of 54

REVISION HISTORICAL SHEET

Rev. No 1 Date Description

A 03-Jul-19 Issued for Review
 ASSESSMENT PIPELINE SETTLEMENT GAS PIPE
PLTU TAMBAK LOROK BLOCK 3

Doc. No. : XXXXXXXXX

PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS Rev. No. : A
Page No. : of 54

TABLE OF CONTENT

SECTION PAGE

I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4
II. PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................... 4
III. SCOPE OF WORK .......................................................................................................... 4
IV. EXECUTION PLAN ......................................................................................................... 4
A. Base Item ............................................................................................................. 4
B. Optional Item ........................................................................................................ 5
V. SCHEDULE CONTRACT…………………………………………………………………….... 5
 ASSESSMENT PIPELINE SETTLEMENT GAS PIPE
PLTU TAMBAK LOROK BLOCK 3

Doc. No. : XXXXXXXXX

PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS Rev. No. : A
Page No. : of 54

1. INTRODUCTION
In order to increase production capacity PT. Indonesia Power as one of the biggest company which engaged to power
generator field is developing new plant Block 3. During construction activity one of the gas pipeline which they owned
get impacted and they have to reduce the production. Therefore further analysis/investigation to impacted pipeline will
be required before running production in normal condition.

2. SCOPE OF WORK

 Pipeline Engineering
 Civil Engineering

3. PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS

3.1 Purpose
The purpose of Pipe stress analysis is to ensure that the pipeline remain in safe condition related to impact of construction
activity. Sensitivity analysis also will performed related to actual condition after impacted and the result will be compared
to design condition.

3.2 References
This calculation has been performed based on all data and requirements on referred documents as listed below:
3.2.1 Code and Standard
ASME B31.8 Gas transmission and Distribution System
API Spec. 5L Specification for Line Pipe
3.2.2 Projects Documents
IPSMG-PL-DWG-001 Keyplan Pipeline Route
IPSMG-PL-DWG-002-1~4 Alignment Sheet 16” Pipeline from PT. PDG to PLTU 3
3.3 Scope
The main concern of the pipeline stress analysis is above ground section which impacted from construction activity. The
other part of the pipeline which modelled it’s just for reference only beside to get condition analysis as real as posible.
3.4 Design Data
3.4.1 Process Design Data
Design data for this calculation is listed below.
Table. 3.1. Process Data
PRESS. TEMP. PRESS. TEMP. PRESS. FLUID.
NO LINE NO.
DES. DES. OPE. OPE. HYD. DENSITY
(psi) 0F (psi) 0F (psi) Kg/m3

1 - 500 150 400 85 750 20

 ASSESSMENT PIPELINE SETTLEMENT GAS PIPE
PLTU TAMBAK LOROK BLOCK 3

Doc. No. : XXXXXXXXX

PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS Rev. No. : A
Page No. : of 54

3.4.2 Pipe Properties

Pipe properties for this calculation is listed below.
Table. 3.2. Line Pipe Mechanical Data
Size Corrosion Flange
NO Pipe Material SMYS Wall Thickness
(NPS) Allowance Rating
(inch) (psi) mm inch mm
1 API 5L X52 16 52000 11.125 0.438 1.6 300

3.4.3 Design Parameter

Design basis for base temperature and seismic condition in the analysis are as follows:
 Base/Installation/Ambient temperature : 85 0F
 Seismic condition : 0.3

3.5 METHODOLOGY
3.5.1 Software
Flexibility of piping system is analyzed by comprehensive method using computer software of Caesar II version 5.3. SI
Units to be used for analysis and documentation. Piping system coordinate in the analysis is as follows:
X : South
Y : Elevation
Z : West

3.5.2 Friction Effects

Friction effects shall be included in the thermal expansion and contraction analysis for all sizes lines and all sizes lines
connected to strain and load sensitive equipment.
Friction force shall be calculated based on the properties of the sliding surface and contact material. Table below shown
static friction coefficients shall be used.
Table. 3.3. Line Pipe Mechanical Data

Contact Surface Friction Coefficient

Steel to steel 0.30

Steel to teflon 0.10
Steel to concrete 0.40
Teflon to teflon 0.05
 ASSESSMENT PIPELINE SETTLEMENT GAS PIPE
PLTU TAMBAK LOROK BLOCK 3

Doc. No. : XXXXXXXXX

PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS Rev. No. : A
Page No. : of 54

3.5.3 Load Case Scenario

Load case combination used in the analysis is as follows:
Table. 3.4. Load Case Combination

Load Case Combination Definition

CASE 1 (HYD) WW+HP Hydrostatic test load

CASE 2 (OPE) W+T1+P1 Operating Load (Operating Temperature)

CASE 3 (OPE) W+T2+P2 Operating Load (Design Temperature)

CASE 4 (SUS) W+P1 Sustain Load (Operating Condition)

CASE 5 (SUS) W+P2 Sustain Load (Design Condition)

CASE 6 (OCC) W+P1+T1+U1 Design Load + Seismic (+X Direction)

CASE 7 (OCC) W+P1+T1+U3 Design Load + Seismic (+Z Direction)

CASE 8 (EXP) L8=L2-L4 Expansional Load (Operating Temperature)

CASE 9 (EXP) L9=L3-L5 Expansional Load (Design Temperature)

CASE 10 (EXP) L10=L2-L3 Expansion Load (Design-Operating)

Abbreviation :

HYD : Hydrotest Condition HP : Hydrotest Pressure

OPE : Operating Condition P1 : Design Pressure

SUS : Sustain Condition T1 : Design Temperature

OCC : Occasional Condition T2 : Operating Temperature

EXP : Thermal Expansion Condition U1 : Seismic in X direction

WW : Water Filled Weight U3 : Seismic in Z direction

W : Piping Weight including Component

3.5.4 Analysis Method

Design consideration in the pipe stress analysis and load from piping system acting on load sensitive equipment vessels
comprises:
 Thermal expansion (expansion stress)
 Dead weight, pressure (sustained stress)

3.5.5 Design Criteria

The calculated code stress shall be acceptable based on ASME B31.8 for all load cases.
 ASSESSMENT PIPELINE SETTLEMENT GAS PIPE
PLTU TAMBAK LOROK BLOCK 3

Doc. No. : XXXXXXXXX

PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS Rev. No. : A
Page No. : of 54

3.6 ANALYSIS RESULT

3.6.1 Stress Summary

The calculated stresses in hydrotest, sustain, occasional, and thermal expansion cases are acceptable based on ASME
B31.8 as shown in table below.
Table. 3.5. Stress Summary
CALCULATED
ALLOWABLE STRESS RATIO
NODE LOAD CASE STRESS REMARK
(KG./SQ.CM) (%)
(KG./SQ.CM)

35 CASE 1 (HYD) WW+HP 915 3658.4 25.0 PASSED

175 CASE 2 (OPE) W+T1+P1 1399 3292.5 42.5 PASSED

35 CASE 4 (SUS) W+P1 479.8 3292.5 14.6 PASSED

35 CASE 5 (SUS) W+P2 569.7 3658.4 17.3 PASSED

35 CASE 6 (OCC) W+P1+U1 480.2 3658.4 13.1 PASSED

35 CASE 7 (OCC) W+P1+U3 480.5 3658.4 9.8 PASSED

3.6.2 Support Load, Type, and Location

Maximum restraint load in this calculation are provided in the Table below:
Table. 6.2. Maximum Restrain

MAXIMUM LOAD
NO TYPE SUPPORT NODE
FX FY FZ

1 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 190 157 -1144 170

2 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 200 298 -2009 297

3 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 210 418 -2296 340

4 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 220 356 -2228 337

5 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 230 389 -2246 332

 ASSESSMENT PIPELINE SETTLEMENT GAS PIPE
PLTU TAMBAK LOROK BLOCK 3

Doc. No. : XXXXXXXXX

PIPELINE STRESS ANALYSIS Rev. No. : A
Page No. : of 54

MAXIMUM LOAD
NO TYPE SUPPORT NODE
FX FY FZ

6 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 240 332 -2241 332

7 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 250 336 -2242 332

8 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 260 332 -2242 332

9 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 270 333 -2242 332

10 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 280 333 -2242 332

11 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 290 334 -2244 332

12 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 300 338 -2236 331

13 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 310 0 -2267 339

14 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 320 371 -2450 318

15 RIGID +Y; RIGID GUIDE W/GAP 330 -716 -2589 389

16 RIGID +Y 420 291 -2761 435

3.7 CONCLUSION

The following conclusions have be en made from the result of the analysis:
1. The maximum stresses is under the allowable criteria due to sustained case.