Quantitative Methods
Quantitative Methods
Course prescription
Creating value through effective and efficient operating and information system in both
product and service-based firms. Emphasises process inter-relationships and
infrastructural requirement.
Course advice
Prerequisite: BUSADMIN 763
Content outline
Week / Relevant learning Assessment
Topic
Module resources/activities due this period
It is essential to have read and reflected on the prescribed material before each session
to ensure class discussion is well informed and productive.
Student feedback will be sought throughout the course – informally, via evaluation and
student representatives.
I will endeavour to respond to emails from students within 24 hours and to provide
feedback on submissions or tests with one week. I will be available at my office during
published office hours and by appointment.
Teaching staff
Subh Ganguly
Office: 260-354
Learning resources
The following text is optional:
Cachon, G., & Terwiesch, C. (2019). Matching supply with demand: An introduction to
operations management. (4th Edition) New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
[Note: In case the 4th edition is not widely available by the time class begins, the 3rd
edition (2013) can be used.]
Digital as well as printed copies of the 3rd edition are available for purchase or rent at
amazon.com. There are also copies in the General and Engineering Libraries as well as a
short loan (3 day) copy. It will be helpful to get you “up to speed” before the classes,
and to provide greater detail to improve understanding.
Cases, articles, and chapters listed in the Detailed Course Schedule provide
fundamentals, applications, illustrations, and extensions. The case study questions (that
will be posted CANVAS) should be contemplated before the appropriate class. I
recommend that, for each chapter and journal article, you record (e.g., on a single sheet
of paper) the key issues, features (positive and negative), and perhaps a question you
would like answered in class.
As a reference source you may like to refer to the APICS Operations Management Body
of Knowledge (free download at www.apics.org/ombok) or the glossary at
All other course readings are available via Reading Lists under each module on the
Canvas page or in the Reading List module on Canvas.
Readings
KAVTHANKAR, A. 2017. Zara: Future Ready?, IBS Center for Management Research.
FERRER, G. & WHYBARK, D.C. 2000. From Garbage to Goods: Successful
Remanufacturing Systems and Skills, Business Horizons
FISHER, M.L. 1997. What is the right supply chain for your products?, Harvard Business
Review
INKPEN, A., TAN, C., DEGROOT, V., EDENS, W., MASHRU, J., PATIL, S. & WAGNER, A.
2013. Southwest Airlines. Thunderbird School of Global Management.
JACOBS, F. R. & CHASE, R. B. 2013. Operations and Supply Management: The Core,
New York, McGraw-Hill.
KOPCZAK, L.R. & LEE, H. 2004. Hewlett Packard Co.: DeskJet Printer Supply Chain (A),
Stanford Graduate School of Business.
KUMAR, S. & WOOD, S. 2009. Managing a Short Product Life Cycle at Littlefield Labs.
Stanford: Stanford Graduate School of Business.
LASETER, T. M. 2009. An Essential Step for Corporate Strategy. strategy+business, 57.
LEENDERS, M.R. and WALSH, J. 1998. Noram Foods, London, Ontario, Canada, Ivey
Business Publishing.
MAISTER, D.H. 1984. Psychology of Waiting Lines, Harvard Business School.
SPEAR S.J. & BOWEN H.K. 1999. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System,
Harvard Business Review.
WHEELWRIGHT, S.C. 1997. Manzana Insurance: Fruitvale Branch (Abridged), Harvard
Business School.
Assessment information
Group and/or
Assessment task Weight % Submission
individual
Hand-written hard copy
Midterm Test 20 Individual
(Week 5)
Hand-written hard-copy
Final Test 40 Individual
(administered in Week 11)
Pass requirements
To pass the course, an overall passing mark is required on the aggregate of all of the
assessments. Students are expected to prepare before coming to class, attend all
classes, participate in class discussion and submit all assignments on time.
Students who cannot sit a test: If a student misses a test or their performance
and/or their preparation is impaired during the test due to a medical condition or other
unforeseen circumstances outside of their control, then they can apply online for an
aegrotat or compassionate consideration. These forms need to be filled out and
submitted to the Health and Counselling service within one week of the assessment date.
Support staff can provide the links.
If work commitments prevent the student from sitting a test (they must provide
evidence), the lecturer should be informed in advance and alternative arrangements can
be made (e.g. sitting an out of time test).
Late Assignments: Case write-ups are due before they are scheduled to be discussed
in class; late case write-ups will not be accepted. For other assignments, a penalty of
10% will be levied for each day of delay.
Individual Assignment
Original report on a topic to be shared in class by Week 2.
LO5
Students are expected to reference several sources beyond
textbooks.
Academic integrity
The University of Auckland will not tolerate cheating, or assisting others to cheat, and
views cheating in coursework as a serious academic offence. The work that a student
submits for grading must be the student’s own work, reflecting his or her learning.
Where work from other sources is used, it must be properly acknowledged and
referenced. This requirement also applies to sources on the worldwide web. A student’s
assessed work may be reviewed against electronic source material using computerised
detection to provide an electronic version of their work for computerised review.
Student feedback
The University of Auckland evaluates the quality of teaching and of courses by using the
Summative Evaluation Tool, or SET. Summative evaluation is formal, summative
evaluation of teaching undertaken according to University policy and is conducted at the
end of a semester/quarter through the use of the formal University SET instruments.
Summative evaluation is used by teachers to reflect on their teaching practice, and is
also used by the University for quality assurance of teaching and courses.
Graduate Profile
2. Critical thinking
Graduates will be able to effectively evaluate and synthesise evidence from
multiple sources to develop coherent and evidence-based arguments.
3. Solution seeking
Graduates will be able to frame and analyse complex problems, develop practical
solutions, and understand the impact and implications of planned implementation.