Matrix of Violations Committed by Both Comelec and Smartmatic
The document summarizes violations committed by both COMELEC and Smartmatic in Philippine elections from 2010 to 2016 in the areas of security, accuracy, auditability, and integrity/transparency provisions required by law and contractual agreements. Some of the key violations included failure to conduct proper source code review, lack of digital signatures, inaccurate recording and reading of votes beyond the legal limit, premature disclosure of randomly selected precincts for manual audits, and failure of Smartmatic to demonstrate the required system capabilities and obtain necessary certifications within mandated timeframes.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
190 views
Matrix of Violations Committed by Both Comelec and Smartmatic
The document summarizes violations committed by both COMELEC and Smartmatic in Philippine elections from 2010 to 2016 in the areas of security, accuracy, auditability, and integrity/transparency provisions required by law and contractual agreements. Some of the key violations included failure to conduct proper source code review, lack of digital signatures, inaccurate recording and reading of votes beyond the legal limit, premature disclosure of randomly selected precincts for manual audits, and failure of Smartmatic to demonstrate the required system capabilities and obtain necessary certifications within mandated timeframes.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9
MATRIX OF VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY BOTH COMELEC AND SMARTMATIC (2010-2016)
2010 2013 2016
LEGAL/CONTRACTUAL PROVISIONS VIOLATED N/L Elections N/L Elections N/L Elections I. SECURITY PROVISIONS 1. Source Code Review Violated Violated Violated A. Required in Sec 14 RA 9369 No review at all per Incomplete and Incomplete but line by (Examination and Testing of AES/ admission of then selective review line review covering Opening of Source Code for Review) Chairman Brillantes at covering only the PCOS, only the VCM, CCS and B. Required in Sec 11 (3) and (5) RA 9369 JCOC-AES hearing. CCS and EMS which was EMS but not the (Technical Evaluation Committee made only after the Transparency Server, Certification) elections in June 2013. Queue Server, SFTP Server and transmission infrastructure which all form part of the AES technology used. 2. Digital Signature Violated Violated Violated A. Required in Sec 22 RA 9369 Alleged machine Alleged machine Electronic token was (Election Returns) signature was used but signature was used but used but the ICTO of B. Required in Sec 25 RA 9369 contradicted by SLI contradicted by SLI DICT has no file on (Certificates of Canvass) report (no trace of report (no trace of record of the issuance C. Required in Sec 30 RA 9369 in relation encryption using Secure encryption using Secure of such certificates. to RA 7166 and RA 8792 (Authentication Socket Layer) and the Socket Layer) and the Comelec also admitted of Electronically Transmitted Election Joint Forensic Team (no Joint Forensic Team (no at the JCOC-AES hearing Returns) evidence found to prove evidence found to prove being unable to secure D. Required in Request for Proposal for existence of digital existence of digital digital signatures with Automated Election System certificates). Moreover, certificates). Moreover, the appropriate digital (Digital Signatures) Comelec Resolution Comelec Resolution certificates. E. Rule 6 A.M. No. 01-7-01-SC 8786 in Sec 40 (f) and 9640 in Sec 51 (f) and (Rules of Electronic Evidence) (g) specifically (g) specifically instructed the BEIs not instructed the BEIs not to digitally sign the to digitally sign the transmission files with transmission files with the BEI signature key. the BEI signature key. 3. UV Detector for Ballot Security Violated A. Required in Sec 15 RA 9369 Not implemented (Official Ballot) ostensibly because the B. Required in Request for Proposal for wrong UV ink was Automated Election System supplied making the (Rejection of Fake Ballots) PCOS unable to detect the mark. II. ACCURACY PROVISIONS 1. Accuracy in Recording and Reading of Votes Violated Violated Violated A. Required in Sec 6 (b) RA 9369 Accuracy rate of the Accuracy rate of the Accuracy rate of the (Minimum System Capabilities) PCOS per RMA is a PCOS per RMA is only VCM per RMA is only B. Required in Request for Proposal for dismal 99.6% or 80 99.9747% or 5 errors 99.884% or 23.2 errors Automated Election System (Accuracy errors per 20,000 vote per 20,000 vote marks per 20,000 vote marks Rate of 99.995% or 1 Error per 20,000 marks which means up which means up to which means up to Vote Marks) to 4.578 million vote 284,000 vote marks 1.565 million vote marks marks were erroneously were erroneously read were erroneously read read and/or counted. and/or counted. and/or counted. III. AUDITABILITY PROVISIONS 1. Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail Violated Violated Violated A. Required in Sec 6 (e) and (n) RA 9369 PCOS merely showed PCOS merely showed VCM printed voter (Minimum System Capabilities) congratulatory message congratulatory message receipt without security on screen. on screen. and evidentiary features impeding any post- election audit. 2. Random Manual Audit Violated Violated Violated A. Required in Sec 29 RA 9369 Sec 7 (a) of Comelec Sec 4 (a), (a.1) and (a.2) Sec 5 (a) of Comelec (Random Manual Audit) Resolution 8837 states of Comelec Resolution Resolution 10078 states that random selection 9595 states that random that random selection of precincts subject to selection of precincts of precincts subject to RMA shall be done at subject to RMA shall be RMA shall be made not the PICC at 12n on made not later than 4 later than 4 days before election day, however, days before election day election day thus the PES of Biliran was and shall be disclosed 2 prematurely identifying already aware of subject days prior to election them and defeating any precincts at least 4 days day thus prematurely means to randomly before election day. identifying them and detect fraud. defeating any means to randomly detect fraud. IV. INTEGRITY/TRANSPARENCY PROVISIONS 1. TEC Certification Requirement Violated A. Required in Sec 11 RA 9369 Required certification (Technical Evaluation Committee stating categorically that Certification) the AES and all its components are operating properly, securely and accurately based on 6 documented results was submitted only on 30 Apr 2016, a full month after the start of OAV and well beyond the 3-month deadline set by law. 2. Demonstrated Capability Requirement Violated A. Required in Sec 12 RA 9369 Smartmatic submitted a (Procurement of Equipment) certification from Bulgaria’s election authority as proof that the VCM (SAES1800plus) was successfully used in a prior electoral exercise but the voting machines used in Bulgaria were DRE while the VCMs in the Philippines were OMR, two entirely different election technologies such that the VCM could not be proven as complaint under the law. 3. Rules and Regulations Violated Violated Violated A. Required in Sec 37 RA 9369 No rules and regulations No rules and regulations No rules and regulations (Implementing Rules and Regulations) were promulgated by were promulgated by were promulgated by Comelec. Comelec. Comelec. 4. Testing of Equipment and Storage Devices Violated A. Required in Request for Proposal for Alleged configuration Automated Election System errors in the CF cards caused the PCOS to misread the votes resulting in tabulation errors 3 days before election day causing the recall and re- configuration of 76,347 CF cards across the country which were never subjected to the required testing after reconfiguration and prior to redeployment due to lack of time. 5. Queue Server/Man in the Middle Violated Violated Violated A. Sec 35 (b) RA 9369 Transmission from the Transmission from the Transmission from the (Prohibited Acts and Penalties) PCOS to the MBOC/CCS, PCOS to the MBOC/CCS, VCM to the MBOC/CCS, Comelec Central Server Comelec Central Server Comelec Central Server and Transparency and Transparency and Transparency Server should be direct Server should be direct Server should be direct and unimpeded but the and unimpeded but the and unimpeded but the presence of the un- presence of the un- presence of the un- disclosed/secret Queue disclosed/secret Queue disclosed/secret Queue Server which served as Server which served as Server which served as checkpoint that checkpoint that checkpoint that captured all transmitted captured all transmitted captured all transmitted results prior to being results prior to being results prior to being reported in the final reported in the final reported in the final destination servers destination servers destination servers constitute interfering constitute interfering constitute interfering with and/or impeding with and/or impeding with and/or impeding the processing and the processing and the processing and transmission of election transmission of election transmission of election results. results. results. V. PROHIBITED ACTS/ELECTION OFFENSES Violated Violated 1. Sec 35 (a), (b) and (c) RA 9369 Key Smartmatic officials Key Smartmatic officials (Prohibited Acts and Penalties) inexplicably changed in connivance with 2. Sec 27 (b) (3) RA 9369 the script of the Comelec ITD personnel (Election Offenses/Electoral Sabotage) Transparency Server introduced alleged purportedly to adjust “cosmetic change” in the 12 million votes it the script of the already received and Transparency Server at reported but which the height of the clearly exceeded the transmission and number of voters in the canvassing of votes. precincts involved. (Querubin, et. al. v Rico, et. al.; DOJ; pending; complaint based mainly on the Post-Election Report of the 2013 NLE by CAC submitted to JCOC-AES) 3. Sec 4 (a) (1), (3) and (4) RA 10175 The DOJ found probable (Cybercrime Offenses) cause to indict key Smartmatic officials and Comelec ITD personnel for illegal access and intentional or reckless alteration or interference of data and system arising from the “cosmetic change” made in the script of the Transparency Server at the height of the transmission and canvassing of votes. (Dela Cruz v Garcia, et. al.; NPS Docket No. XV- 07-INV-16E-02592; DOJ; pending) VI. PROCUREMENT PROCESS 1. ISO 9001 Certification Violated A. Required in Request for Proposal for Smartmatic submitted Automated Election System the ISO certification of Jarltech passing it off as its subsidiary when in fact it is never owned by, or a part of, Smartmatic or the joint venture it established with TIM. A certification of extension of credit line by Jarltech to Smartmatic issued on 20 Aug 2013 to the Electoral Supreme Court of the Republic of El Salvador stated that Smartmatic was its client since 2003, not its owner. 2. Single Largest Completed Contract Violated A. Required in Sec 23.4.1.3 IRR RA 9184 Smartmatic submitted a (Technical Documents/SLCC) document in compliance with the SLCC requirement but the names of the parties and amount involved were redacted such that the BAC could not have properly evaluated it for compliance. 3. Disclosure of Arrangement with Violated Violated Subcontractors A. Required in Request for Proposal for The software that runs The violation was Automated Election System and the PCOS was actually disclosed when Government Procurement Policy Board owned by Dominion Smartmatic could not Rules Voting Systems (DVS) produce the source and Smartmatic was code for review in time simply a reseller which for the elections did not disclose this because DVS withheld it arrangement with a from Smartmatic after subcontractor involving both were entangled in important parts of the a legal dispute in the US. system. 4. Other Bid Qualification Requirements Violated Violated A. Required in Request for Proposal for On demonstration, the Smartmatic was initially Automated Election System and PCOS shutdown after post disqualified by the Government Procurement Policy Board emitting smoke due to BAC for failing in the Rules faulty wiring and failed technical demonstration i. Technical Demonstration to work again thus and for its deficient AOI ii. Articles of Incorporation failing in the technical only to be reversed by iii. Board Resolution requirement. Comelec en banc. It iv. Tax Clearance Certificate also failed to submit the required board resolutions and tax clearance certificates. VII. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS Violated 1. Item 18 Part V Request for Proposal for Comelec’s direct Automated Election System (Warranty on admission in Pabillo, et. Availability of Parts, Labor, Technical al. v Comelec that its ITD Support and Maintenance) personnel are incapable of performing the required repair and refurbishment of the PCOS clearly proves that Smartmatic reneged on its obligation to provide extensive training and education program on repair, troubleshooting, tuning up, and maintenance of the PCOS.