Scribd
Upload
128 views

Rubrics - Individual Reflection

This rubric evaluates individual project reflections on a scale of 1 to 4 in 5 criteria: description, depth of reflection, required components, evidence and practice/photos, and structure. Excellent responses are thorough, well-supported, and address all reflection components. Good responses generally meet reflection requirements with minor flaws. Average responses incompletely address some criteria. Responses that need improvement lack reflection, support, or required components. Timely submission is also evaluated.

Uploaded by

Rizqin Sktp
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
128 views

Rubrics - Individual Reflection

This rubric evaluates individual project reflections on a scale of 1 to 4 in 5 criteria: description, depth of reflection, required components, evidence and practice/photos, and structure. Excellent responses are thorough, well-supported, and address all reflection components. Good responses generally meet reflection requirements with minor flaws. Average responses incompletely address some criteria. Responses that need improvement lack reflection, support, or required components. Timely submission is also evaluated.

Uploaded by

Rizqin Sktp
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SCHOOL OF EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCES

PEC100 THINKING SKILLS


INDIVIDUAL PROJECT REFLECTION- RUBRIC

Criteria EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT Score %


(4) (3) (2) (1)
Description Provides a detailed Provides an acceptable
Provides a cursory Provides a poor
description of the description of the
(25%) description of the description of the ____ /4 x 25
activities, activities,
activities, experience, and activities, experience, and
experience, and experience, and
observation. Most observation. Some
observation. All observation. All
information given are information given are
information given are information given are
accurate and valid. No accurate and valid. No
accurate and valid with accurate and valid with
learning outcome. learning outcome.
learning outcome. learning outcome.
Depth of Response in all entries Response in all entries Response in all entries Response in all entries
Reflection demonstrates an in- demonstrates a general demonstrates a minimal demonstrates a lack of
depth reflection on, and reflection on, and reflection on, and reflection on, or
(25%) personalization of, personalization of, personalization of, personalization of,
thinking skills. thinking skills. Viewpoints thinking skills. Viewpoints thinking skills. Viewpoints ____ / 4 x25
Viewpoints and and interpretations are and interpretations are and interpretations are
interpretations are supported. Appropriate unsupported or supported missing, inappropriate,
insightful and well examples are provided, as with flawed arguments. and/or unsupported.
supported. Clear, applicable. Examples, when Examples, when
detailed examples are applicable, are not applicable, are not
provided, as applicable. provided or are irrelevant provided.
to the question.

Required Response includes all Response includes all Response is missing some Response excludes
Components components and meets components and meets components and/or does essential components
or exceeds all all requirements not fully meet the and/or does not address ____ / 4 x25
(20%) requirements indicated indicated in the requirements indicated in the requirements
in the instructions. Each instructions. Each the instructions. Some indicated in the
question or part of the question or part of the questions or parts of the instructions. Many parts
reflection is addressed reflection is addressed. reflection are not of the reflection are
thoroughly. addressed. addressed minimally,
inadequately, and/or not
at all.
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
PEC100 THINKING SKILLS
INDIVIDUAL PROJECT REFLECTION- RUBRIC

Evidence and Response shows strong Response shows evidence Response shows little Response shows no
Practice /Photos evidence of synthesis of of synthesis of ideas evidence of synthesis of evidence of synthesis of
ideas presented and presented and insights ideas presented and ideas presented and ____ / 4 /25
(20%) insights gained gained throughout the insights gained throughout insights gained
throughout the entire entire course. The the entire course. Few throughout the entire
course. The implications implications of these implications of these course. No implications
of these insights on insights on thinking skills insights on thinking skills on thinking skills for the
thinking skills for the for the respondent's for the respondent's respondent's overall
respondent's overall overall learning are overall learning are learning are presented, as
learning are thoroughly presented, as applicable. presented, as applicable. applicable.
detailed, as applicable.
Structure Writing is clear, concise, Writing is mostly clear, Writing is clear with thesis Writing is unclear and
(5%) and well organized with concise, and well sentence and 1 supporting disorganized. Thoughts
excellent organized with good sentence. Thoughts are ramble and make little
sentence/paragraph sentence/paragraph not expressed in a logical sense. There are
construction of thesis construction with thesis manner. There are more numerous spelling,
sentence and a minimum sentence and 2 than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors
of 3 supporting supporting sentences. grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response.
sentences for each thesis Thoughts are expressed per page of writing.
sentence. Thoughts are in a coherent and logical
expressed in a coherent manner. There are no
and logical manner. more than five spelling,
There are no more than grammar, or syntax errors
three spelling, grammar, per page of writing.
or syntax errors per page
of writing.
SUBMISSION Submitted on the Submitted on the Submission after 3 days Submission after the
(5%) deadline with no deadline with 1 and 2 deadline (up to 5 days)
mistakes and 100% mistakes and/ or few
followed instruction instructions were not
followed

TOTAL /100

You might also like