Design of Timber Structures
Design of Timber Structures
PD 6693-1:2012
PUBLISHED DOCUMENT
UK Non-Contradictory
Complementary Information
to Eurocode 5: Design of
timber structures
Part 1: General – Common rules and
rules for buildings
Publication history
First published October 2012
Contents
0 Introduction 1
1 Scope 1
2 Normative references 1
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviations 1
4 Design responsibilities 2
5 Effective anchorages of timber floors to walls for buildings of
Consequence Class 2a 2
6 Assignment of timbers to BS EN 338 strength classes
[BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 3.2] 3
7 Horizontally glued laminated hardwood members
[BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 3.3] 3
8 Factor, kc,90, for compression perpendicular to grain
[BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 6.1.5] 4
9 Effective lengths of compression members [BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008,
6.3.2] 5
10 Limits on notches and circular holes in joists and studs for which no
calculations are required 6
11 Design of beams with circular holes 6
12 Characteristic properties of fasteners 7
13 Yield moment of annular ring-shanked nails
[BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 8.3.1.1(4)] 7
14 Diameters for evaluating lateral load-carrying capacities of screws
[BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 8.7.1] 8
15 Axially loaded screws [BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 8.7.2] 8
16 Connections made with punched metal plate fasteners
[BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 8.8.1] 9
17 Misalignment tolerances in punched metal plate fastener joints
[BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 8.8.5.1] 9
18 Contact pressure between timber members in punched metal plate
fastener joints under compression [BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008,
8.8.5.1(3)] 9
19 Trusses with punched metal plate fasteners [BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008,
9.2.2] 10
20 Masonry shielding to wall diaphragms 11
21 Simplified analysis of wall diaphragms [BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008,
9.2.4.3] 11
22 Contribution of plasterboard to racking resistance 22
23 Evaluation of design racking resistance of plasterboard-clad timber frame
walls 23
24 Bracing to trussed rafter roofs [BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 9.2.5.3] 23
25 Lateral load-carrying capacity of glued lap joints
[BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 10.3] 23
Annexes
Annex A (normative) Exchange of information between building designer and
component designer(s) 25
Annex B (informative) Effective anchorage of floors to timber frame wall
buildings of Consequence Class 2a 26
Annex C (informative) Actions and combinations of actions that may be
considered in the design of trussed rafters 28
Annex D (informative) Masonry shielding to timber frame wall diaphragms 31
Annex E (normative) Bracing of trussed rafter roofs 32
Annex F (informative) Optional recommendations for the support of water tanks
in trussed rafter roofs 57
Bibliography 59
List of figures
Figure 1 – Division of racking wall into wall diaphragms 13
Figure 2 – Forces transmitted into underlying construction by bottom rail of wall
diaphragm 16
Figure 3 – Calculation of design stabilizing and destabilizing moments 18
Figure 4 – Division of wall diaphragms into wall panels 21
Figure B.1 – Details of effective anchorage of floors to timber frame walls in
buildings of Consequence Class 2a 27
Figure D.1 – Area of brickwork providing wind shield to timber frame
structure 32
Figure E.1 – Procedure for the design of roof bracing at rafter level 34
Figure E.2 – Procedure for the design of roof bracing at ceiling level 35
Figure E.3 – Standard bracing for rafter and web members of duopitch trussed
rafters 36
Figure E.4 – Standard bracing for rafter and web members of mono-pitch
trussed rafters 39
Figure E.5 – Limiting spans for standard bracing of trussed rafter roofs 42
Figure E.6 – Basic wind zones for buildings at site altitudes ≤150 m 45
Figure E.7 – Basic wind zones for buildings at site altitudes between 150 m and
300 m 46
Figure E.8 – Wall plate splice joint 49
Figure E.9 – Standard bracing for rafter members: detail C1 and D1 50
Figure E.10 – Standard bracing for rafter members: detail C2 and D2 51
Figure E.11 – Standard bracing for rafter members: detail C3 53
Figure E.12 – Standard bracing for rafter members: detail D3 splice connection
and D4 crossing connection 55
Figure F.1 – Supports for water tanks 57
List of tables
Table 1 – Assignment of temperate hardwoods to BS EN 338 strength classes 3
Table 2 – Modification factors klam for characteristic strengths, stiffnesses and
densities of hardwood glued laminated timber applicable for service classes 1
and 2 4
Table 3 – Examples of hardwoods suitable for glue laminating 4
Table 4 – Effective lengths of compression members 5
Table 5 – Effective lengths of compression members in trussed rafters 5
Table 6 – Maximum lengths of chord and internal members 10
Table 7 – Modification factor, Ke, to account for loading eccentricities in girder
trusses 11
Table 8 – Values of sheathing combination factor, Kcomb 17
Table 9 – Total design shear capacities per unit length of the perimeter fasteners
for various specifications of plasterboard 23
Table C.1 – Summary of actions for duo-pitch and mono-pitch trussed rafters 28
Table C.2 – Summary of action combinations for duo-pitch and mono-pitch
trussed rafters 29
Table E.1 – Thickness and fixing of sarking materials 33
Table E.2 – Maximum truss spans for Figure E.5 43
Table E.3 – Maximum design cumulative surface wind pressures (kN/m2) on
windward and leeward gable walls for roofs constructed using the details of
Figure E.10 47
Table E.4 – Maximum design cumulative surface wind pressures (kN/m2) on
windward and leeward gable walls for roofs constructed using the details of
Figure E.11 and E.12 47
Table E.5 – Maximum design horizontal wind force (kN/m) at bottom chord level
on 12.5 mm thick plasterboard ceiling diaphragms 48
Table E.6 – Maximum design horizontal wind force (kN/m) at bottom chord level
on 15 mm thick plasterboard ceiling diaphragms 48
Table F.1 – Sizes for support members for water tanks 58
Summary of pages
This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover, pages i to iv,
pages 1 to 60, an inside back cover and a back cover.
Foreword
This Published Document is published by BSI Standards Limited, under licence
from The British Standards Institution and came into effect on 31 October 2012.
It was prepared by Subcommittee B/525/5, Structural use of timber, under the
authority of Technical Committee B/525, Building and civil engineering structure.
A list of organizations represented on this committee can be obtained on
request to its secretary.
Presentational conventions
The guidance in this standard is presented in roman (i.e. upright) type. Any
recommendations are expressed in sentences in which the principal auxiliary
verb is “should”.
Commentary, explanation and general informative material is presented in
smaller italic type, and does not constitute a normative element.
0 Introduction
When there is a need for guidance on a subject that is not covered by the
Eurocode, a country can choose to publish documents that contain
non-contradictory complementary information that supports the Eurocode. This
Published Document, which has been prepared by BSI Subcommittee B/525/5,
Structural use of timber, provides just such information and has been cited as a
reference in the UK National Annex to BS EN 1995-1-1.
1 Scope
This Published Document gives non-contradictory complementary information
for use with BS EN 1995-1-1 and NA to BS EN 1995-1-1.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of
this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any
amendments) applies.
BS 8103-1, Structural design of low-rise buildings – Part 1: Code of practice for
stability, site investigation, foundations, precast concrete floors and ground floor
slabs for housing
BS 8212, Code of practice for dry lining and partitioning using gypsum
plasterboard
BS EN 301, Adhesives, phenolic and aminoplastic, for loading bearing timber
structures – Classification and performance requirements
BS EN 338:2009, Structural timber – Strength classes
BS EN 520, Gypsum plasterboards – Definitions, requirements and test methods
BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures –
Part 1-1: General – Common rules and rules for buildings
BS EN 13986, Wood-based panels for use in construction – Characteristics,
evaluation of conformity and marking
BS EN 14592, Timber structures – Dowel-type fasteners – Requirements
BS EN 15425, Adhesives – One component polyurethane for load bearing timber
structures – Classification and performance requirements
3.2 Abbreviations
For the purposes of this Published Document, the following abbreviations apply.
4 Design responsibilities
On every project it is essential that one person assumes overall responsibility as
building designer and is clearly defined as such. The building designer should be
responsible for ensuring the integration of the design of the various building
components including the detailing of suitable connections between the
building components and their support structure. The building designer should
be responsible for ensuring adequate provision is made for the stability of the
building as a whole, as distinct from, and in addition to, the stability of
individual components, including the detailing of all elements of bracing
required in the building. The building designer should ensure that necessary
information, including the information listed, for example, in Annex A is
provided to all parties involved in the design of the building.
Table 2 Modification factors klam for characteristic strengths, stiffnesses and densities of
hardwood glued laminated timber applicable for service classes 1 and 2
In bays:
min { bay le
ength
distance between adjacent points of contraflexure
9.4 The effective length of storey height wall studs sheathed on one or both
sides should be taken as 0,85 times the length of the stud when considering
buckling out of the plane of the wall. Timber wall studs sheathed on one or
both sides may be assumed to be fully laterally restrained in the plane of the
wall.
10.2 For simply supported joists of solid timber, glued laminated timber or LVL
of depth, h, less than 250 mm and at centres not exceeding 610 mm with a hole
of diameter, dhole, the effect of holes need not be calculated where all of the
following apply:
a) dhole ≤ 0.25h
b) the hole centre is equidistant from the top and bottom edges of the joist;
c) the hole is located within 0,25 and 0,4 of the span from the nearest joist
support;
d) centres of adjacent holes are at least 3dhole apart. Where adjacent holes are
not of the same diameter, the maximum diameter should be used for dhole.
10.3 The distance between the edge of a notch conforming to 10.1 and the
edge of the nearest hole, conforming to 10.2 should be at least 200 mm.
10.4 For studs of solid timber, glued laminated timber or LVL of depth, h, less
than 250 mm and at centres not exceeding 610 mm, having a hole diameter,
dhole, the effect of holes need not be calculated where all of the following
apply:
a) dhole ≤ 0.25h;
b) the hole is central in the depth of the member;
c) the distance between the end of the member and the closest hole is not less
than the maximum of 150 mm and 0.05 times the length of the member
between supports;
d) the spacing between the holes is not less than 3dhole.
(If the hole centre is not equidistant from the top and bottom edges of the
beam, then the calculation should be based on a larger hole whose centre is
equidistant from the top and bottom edges of the beam and within which
the actual hole is entirely contained.)
e) The distance from the hole centre to the nearest end of the beam is a
minimum of 4dhole or h.
f) The distance from the hole centre to an adjacent hole centre is a minimum
of 4dhole or h.
11.3 The design tensile stress perpendicular to the grain at the hole location,
σt,90,d should be calculated as:
1,8Vhole,ddhole + 0,07Mhole,d
σt,90,d=
bh2 (1)
where:
Vhole,d is the design shear force acting on the beam at the hole
centre, in N;
Mhole,d is the design moment acting on the beam at the hole
centre, in N·mm;
b, h, and dhole are taken in mm.
11.4 The verification of the bending strength of a beam which contains a hole
should be based on the properties of the residual cross-section at the hole
position.
14.3 Where the smooth shank extends 4def either side of the shear plane, def
should be taken as the smooth shank diameter.
14.4 Where the threaded length extends 4def either side of the shear plane, def
should be taken as 1,1 times the thread root diameter.
14.5 In all other cases, def should be taken as the lower of the smooth shank
diameter or 1,1 times the thread root diameter.
14.6 The embedment strength fh,k and the yield moment My,k should be
calculated using def.
14.7 For screws with an effective diameter def >6 mm, the rules in
BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 8.5.1, should be applied except for spacing and
edge distances, see 14.9.
14.8 For screws with an effective diameter def ≤6 mm, the rules in
BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, 8.3.1, should be applied.
14.9 For screws of all diameters, the spacing, edge and end distances should be
calculated using d and BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, Table 8.2.
16.2 Where ksys is used for the member design of a truss made with punched
metal plate fasteners, ksys may also be used for the anchorage design, but not
for the steel plate design of the punched metal plate fastener connections.
19.2 To take account of practical factors such as handling, the size of members
and span should be restricted in accordance with the following limits.
a) Spans of trussed rafters manufactured in timber of target thickness between
35 mm and 47 mm should conform to the following:
Span ≤ t × 345
where:
t is the target thickness of timber.
NOTE 1 The use of mechanical handling equipment is particularly important
for trussed rafters of more than 47 mm in thickness during their manufacture,
loading, offloading and erection in order to prevent damage.
NOTE 2 Where a 2-ply truss is fixed together in the factory and mechanical
handling equipment is utilized the member thickness t can be taken as two
times the individual ply thickness.
b) The maximum bay length of any top chord or bottom chord member, when
measured on plan on the lower-edge position, should not exceed the
appropriate value given in Table 6. These limits may be increased by 50%
when applied to top chord extensions such as overhangs or hip rafters.
c) The overall length of any internal member should not exceed the
appropriate value given in Table 6. The overall length is the actual cut
length as measured on the centre-line of the member.
19.3 To account for loading eccentricities in girder trusses, the design shear force
Fv,Ed perpendicular to grain at a joint should be multiplied by the modification
factor, Ke, given in Table 7. Additionally, any joint in a girder truss which is
subject to a tension force perpendicular to grain should have a minimum
fastener bite in any chord member not less than 0,5 times the member depth.
Table 7 Modification factor, Ke, to account for loading eccentricities in girder trusses
19.4 For trusses made with punched metal plate fasteners and supporting a floor
imposed load ≥ 1,5 kN/m2, all joints, except chord splices, should be designed
using axial forces 50% greater than the axial forces utilized for the member
design. Additionally, the minimum fastener bite on to chord members should be
0,5 times the member depth.
19.5 In splice joints the minimum length of the connector plate should be
0,8h + 80 where h is the depth of the timber member, in mm.
21.1.1.2 The connection between horizontal rails and studs should comprise a
minimum of two ring-shanked nails of diameter ≥3,1 mm and having a
penetration into the stud ≥45 mm, or equivalent.
21.1.3.2 The fasteners fixing the sheathing to the framing should be equally
spaced around the perimeter of each sheathing sheet at a maximum distance of
150 mm. Fasteners fixing the sheathing to the framing within the perimeter of a
sheathing sheet should be equally spaced at a distance not more than twice the
perimeter fastener spacing.
NOTE For further details on the construction of timber frame wall diaphragms refer
to the TRADA publication, Timber frame construction [2].
13
PD 6693-1:2012 PUBLISHED DOCUMENT
Licensed copy: Leeds Metropolitan University User, Leeds Metropolitan University, Version correct as of 09/01/2013 02:23, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012
21.2.3 A wall diaphragm may contain framed openings of dimensions within the
limits given in 21.2.2a) and 21.2.2b), provided that their effects on racking
strength and stiffness are taken into account (see 21.5.2.8).
21.2.4 Small openings within a length of wall diaphragm comprising only full
height sheathing sheets may be allowed without reducing racking resistance if
all of the following conditions are met.
a) The opening does not exceed 300 mm in both length and height where the
opening is framed.
b) The opening does not exceed 150 mm in both length and height or 200 mm
in diameter where the opening is unframed.
c) The edge distance from the opening to any edge of a sheathing sheet is at
least the maximum dimension of the opening.
d) Only one such opening is allowed in a sheathing sheet and the spacing
between such openings is at least 1 200 mm.
21.2.5 No more than two sheathing sheets of a length less than 600 mm should
be used consecutively along the length of wall diaphragm.
21.2.6 A wall diaphragm with a framed opening of dimensions within the limits
given in 21.2.2a) and 21.2.2b) may be designed to resist racking (see 21.5.2)
provided that the following conditions are met.
a) Each full height sheathing sheet either side of the opening should have a
minimum length of 0,25 times the width of the opening or one-eighth of
the wall height, whichever is the larger. Alternatively, there should be a full
width sheathing sheet (nominally 1 200 mm) within a distance of one-eighth
of the wall height from the vertical edge of the opening.
b) The connection between the edge stud of the panel below the opening and
the cripple stud immediately adjacent to the opening should have a design
shear capacity per unit length of no less than fp,d,t (see 21.5.2.2).
aggregated wall racking resistance, the forces resulting from the torsional
moment on the floor diaphragm should be applied to orthogonal racking
walls.
21.4.3 At each floor level, the overturning resistance of each wall diaphragm
should be provided by ensuring that the design withdrawal capacity of its
bottom rail-to-floor connection, fw,d, see 20.5.2.5, can be mobilized by the
underlying construction (including at foundation level).
NOTE Calculation of design racking strength in accordance with 21.5 ensures the
overturning stability of the wall diaphragm (including taking into account the effects
of design permanent load).
21.4.4 For both overturning and racking calculations, additional permanent load
may be utilized from the following sources.
a) Return walls, provided that the connection between the return wall and the
wall diaphragm is designed to transfer the additional permanent load
mobilized.
b) The weight of the underlying construction, mobilized via holding-down
straps or tension fixings from the bottom rail of the wall diaphragm.
Figure 2 Forces transmitted into underlying construction by bottom rail of wall diaphragm
Key
1 Design horizontal wind load
2 Sheathing-bottom rail fasteners providing uplift resistance per unit length of µfp,d,t (=fw,d)
3 Sheathing-bottom rail fasteners providing horizontal shear resistance per unit length, fp,d,t
4 Uplift resistance required from underlying construction (including at foundation level) of
(1 - Ki,w)fw,dL
5 Racking resistance transmitted to underlying construction of Ki,wfp,d,tL
21.5.2.2 The total design shear capacity per unit length of perimeter sheathing
fasteners should be calculated as follows:
fp,dt, 5 fp,d1, + kcombfp,d2, (6)
with:
fp,d,2 ≤ fp,d,1
where:
21.5.2.4 The design shear capacity per unit length of the perimeter fasteners to
a sheathing sheet, fp,d, should be calculated from:
df1,15+sg / s
fp,d 5 Ff,R(7)
where:
21.5.2.5 The modification factor Ki,w should be calculated from equation (9).
Where equation (9) gives a value of Ki,w > 1, Ki,w should be taken as 1,0. Where
equation (9) gives a value of Ki,w < 0, Ki,w should be taken as 0.
Ki,w 5 minf1 + (H ⁄ µL兲2 + (2Md,stb,n ⁄ µfp,d,tL2)]0.5 − (H ⁄ µL兲 (8)
where:
Md,stb,n 5 Md,stb 2 Md,dst,top (9)
1,0
hfw, d
µ 5 min
fp,dt, (10)
and where:
Key
1 Design point load, V1 H1 Height of wall
diaphragm 1
2 Design UDL, w1 H2 Height of wall
diaphragm 2
3 Wall diaphragm 1 H3 Height of wall
diaphragm 3
where:
Md,stb 5 0.5w1L2+0.5w2L2+0.5w3L2+V3L (12)
(13)
M d,dst,top 5 R1sH1 1 H f 1 H2 1 H f d 1 R2sH2 1 H f d
B)
Leeward compression calculations (see 21.5.2.10) for wall diaphragm 3:
(14)
Wv,td, 5 w1L 1 V1 1 w2L 1 V2 1 w3L 1 V3
(15)
M d,stb 5 0.5w1L2 1 V1L 1 0.5w2L2 1 V2L0.5w3L2 1 V3L
(16)
M d,dst,base 5 R1sH1 1 H f 1 H2 1 H f 1 H3d 1 R2sH2 1 H f 1 H3d 1 R3H3
21.5.2.6 A check should be made that fw,d does not exceed the permanent load
per unit length of the underlying construction. In particular, if the permanent
load of the underlying wall storeys is being mobilized, it should be checked that
the withdrawal capacity, fw,d, can be achieved across all the horizontal interfaces
present in the floor constructions.
21.5.2.7 For a wall diaphragm comprising only of full height sheathing sheets
(see also 21.2.5), or containing only small openings in accordance with 21.2.4,
Kopening should be taken as 1,0.
21.5.2.9 Where the wall diaphragm is made up of more than one wall panel (see
Figure 4), the design shear capacity per unit length of the wall panel-to-wall
panel connection should be greater than or equal to fp,d,t.
Key
1 Wall diaphragm 4 Wall panel-to-wall panel connection having design shear capacity ≥fp,d,t
2 Wall panel 5 Sheathing sheet
•
PD 6693-1:2012
21
PD 6693-1:2012 PUBLISHED DOCUMENT
Licensed copy: Leeds Metropolitan University User, Leeds Metropolitan University, Version correct as of 09/01/2013 02:23, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012
21.5.2.10 Unless a special analysis is made to check that the compressive force at
the leeward end of a wall diaphragm, Fc,d,leewd, does not cause either buckling of
the wall studs or excessive bearing stresses on the horizontal framing members,
the following condition should be observed:
Fc,dl,eewd≤FcR,d
where:
Fc,dl,eewd 5 0,8Wv,td, f(Md,dst,base ⁄ Md,stb兲 1 共0,6 ⁄ L兲g (19)
and:
22.2 In the case of separating walls comprising two or more built-up layers of
plasterboard having a minimum thickness of 30 mm, plasterboard alone may be
used to provide the racking resistance of a building.
Table 9 Total design shear capacities per unit length of the perimeter fasteners for various
specifications of plasterboard
25.5 For connected softwood members, the design planar (rolling) shear
strength for the glueline should be calculated as follows:
fr,d 5 fv,d共1 − 0,67sinα兲 (20)
where:
25.6 When metal fasteners are present in the glued joint, they should not be
considered as contributing to the strength of the joint.
NOTE It is advisable to consider the possibility of differential movements, distortion
and stress concentrations at glued joints.
d) For ceilings supported via resilient bars, blockings (of depth > 0.75 joist
depth) are required between joists at a maximum of 2 000 mm centres.
Blockings to be fixed at each end by a minimum of 2 no. 75 mm long
x 3.1 mm diameter nails.
Figure B.1 Details of effective anchorage of floors to timber frame walls in buildings of Consequence
Class 2a
a) Floor joists perpendicular to timber frame wall b) Floor joists parallel to timber frame wall
Key
1 Wall panel 5 Rim beam
2 Bottom rail 6 Head binder
3 Sole plate 7 Floor joists
4 Structural deck 8 Top rail
9 Blocking in end bay when ceiling supported via resilient
bars
Table C.1 Summary of actions for duo-pitch and mono-pitch trussed rafters
Table C.1 Summary of actions for duo-pitch and mono-pitch trussed rafters
Man load on Qk,6 0,9 kN, only Centre and each Short term ψ 0,6 = 1,0
top chord applicable for roof end of any top
pitches ≤ 30° chord bay and
300 mm from end
of unsupported
overhangs
> 600 mm
Top chord Qk,7 Pitch < 30°, Full length of top Short term ψ 0,7 = 0,7
imposed load 0,6 kN/m2 chord
in accordance 30°≤Pitch<60°,
with Table
NA.7 of UK NA 0,6[(60-Pitch)/30]
to kN/m2
BS EN 1991-1-1:2002 Pitch > 60°,
0 kN/m2
Man load, Qk,8 0,9 kN Centre and each Short term ψ 0,8 = 1,0
bottom chord end of any bottom
chord bay where
clearance
>1,2 m
Wind Qk,9 As appropriate Full length of Instantaneous ψ 0,9 = 0,5
chord including
end vertical
members which
are exposed to
wind
Table C.2 Summary of action combinations for duo-pitch and mono-pitch trussed rafters
Table C.2 Summary of action combinations for duo-pitch and mono-pitch trussed rafters
Figure D.1 Area of brickwork providing wind shield to timber frame structure
Key
1 Shaded area may be assumed to be fully shielded from wind load in
direction shown
2 Direction of applied wind load (±)
Figure E.1 Procedure for the design of roof bracing at rafter level
A)
For monopitch roofs, use a span which is twice the actual span, Ls.
B)
The wallplate anchorage detail should be designed to transfer the forces stated for the rafter diagonal braces
in Figure E.9, Figure E.10 and Figure E.11 into the supporting structure.
Figure E.2 Procedure for the design of roof bracing at ceiling level
A)
For monopitch roofs, use a span which is twice the actual span, Ls.
B)
The diaphragm span and depth should be defined from any unbroken area of plasterboard bounded on each
edge by timber wallplates, head plates or trusses which can be deemed to act as flanges to the diaphragm.
C)
The wallplate anchorage detail should be designed to transfer the forces stated for the rafter diagonal braces
given in Figure E.9 and Figure E.10.
Figure E.3 Standard bracing for rafter and web members of duopitch trussed rafters
Figure E.3 Standard bracing for rafter and web members of duopitch trussed rafters
c) Section A–A using WW truss (upper figure) and d) Plan of rafter diagonal bracing layout for
using fan truss (lower figure) wider-fronted detached roofs (rafter braces
do not need to cross)
Key to Figure E.3
1 Rafter diagonal bracing nailed to wall plate 9 Ridge
2 Roof pitch, α 10 Frontage, F
3 Chevron bracing to webs 11 Alternative direction of chevron brace
4 Span of trussed rafter, Ls 12 Longitudinal brace
5 Gable end 13 Maximum of two trusses between chevron
braces
6 Alternative direction of rafter diagonal 14 For spans in excess of 11 m, additional
bracing chevron bracing is required
7 Party wall C) For details on view C [see Figure E.3a)], see
Figure E.9, Figure E.10, Figure E.11 and Figure
E.12
8 Chevron brace to be at approximately 45° D) For details on view D [see Figure E.3b)], and
and nailed to at least 3 trusses refer to Figure E.9, detail D1 and Figure E.12,
detail D4
Figure E.3 Standard bracing for rafter and web members of duopitch trussed rafters
NOTE 2 denotes longitudinal bracing not required when the criteria described in specification
note g)2) are met.
NOTE 3 For the purposes of Annex E, a building may be defined as narrow fronted when the frontage is: F ⬍
/
1+(Ls 1.4cosα)
Figure E.4 Standard bracing for rafter and web members of mono-pitch trussed rafters
Figure E.4 Standard bracing for rafter and web members of mono-pitch trussed rafters
c) Section on roof (using alternative mono trusses) g) Plan of rafter diagonal bracing layout
for wider fronted detached roofs (rafter
braces do not need to cross)
Key to Figure E.4
1 Rafter diagonal bracing nailed to wall 9 Alternative direction of chevron bracing
2 Roof pitch, α 10 Longitudinal bracing
3 Chevron bracing to webs 11 Web diagonal bracing
4 Span of trussed rafter, Ls 12 For spans in excess of 8,0 m, additional
5 Gable end bracing is required
6 Alternative direction of rafter diagonal 13 Frontage F
7 Maximum of two trusses between chevron C) For details on view C [see Figure E.4.a),
braces section A–A)] see Figure E.9, Figure E.10,
Figure E.11 and Figure E.12
8 Chevron brace to be approximately 45° and D) For details on view D [see Figure E.4.f)], see
nailed to at least three trusses Figure E.9, detail D1 and Figure E.12,
detail 4
Figure E.4 Standard bracing for rafter and web members of mono-pitch trussed rafters
NOTE 2 denotes longitudinal bracing not required when the criteria described in specification
note g)2) are met.
NOTE 3 For the purposes of this annex, a building may be defined as narrow fronted when the frontage is:
F ⬍ 1+(Ls 1.4 cos α) .
/
A)
Figure E.5 Limiting spans for standard bracing of trussed rafter roofs
Key
1 Underside of ceiling tie
2 Ground level
3 Truss span Ls
A)
For maximum truss spans, see Table E.2.
° m m m m
° m m m m
Three-storey duo-pitch
22,5 12,0 12,0 10,7 9,3
25,0 12,0 11,4 9,3 8,1
27,5 11,6 10,2 8,9 7,7
30,0 10,5 9,1 7,8 6,7
32,5 9,3 8,0 6,8 6,3
35,0 8,9 7,6 6,4 5,4
37,5 7,9 6,7 5,5 5,2
40,0 6,9 6,3 5,2 4,3
42,5 6,6 5,4 4,4 4,1
45,0 5,6 5,2 4,2 3,9
Three-storey mono-pitch
22,5 7,6 6,4 5,6 4,6
25,0 6,6 5,7 5,0 4,0
27,5 5,9 5,1 4,5 3,8
30,0 5,3 4,5 3,9 3,3
32,5 5,0 4,0 3,4 3,1
35,0 4,5 3,8 3,2 2,7
37,5 3,9 3,3 2,8 2,7
40,0 3,7 3,2 2,7 2,7
42,5 3,3 2,7 2,7 2,7
45,0 3,1 2,7 2,7 2,7
A)
Wind zones are shown in Figure E.6 and Figure E.7.
Figure E.6 Basic wind zones for buildings at site altitudes ≤150 m
NOTE 1 This map is intended for sites in the United Kingdom, Isle of Man and Channel Islands only.
NOTE 2 The isopleths in the Irish Republic are shown for purposes of interpolation only.
Figure E.7 Basic wind zones for buildings at site altitudes between 150 m and 300 m
NOTE 1 This map is intended for sites in the United Kingdom, Isle of Man and Channel Islands only.
NOTE 2 The isopleths in the Irish Republic are shown for purposes of interpolation only.
Table E.3 Maximum design cumulative surface wind pressures (kN/m2) on windward and leeward
gable walls for roofs constructed using the details of Figure E.10
Roof Maximum design cumulative surface wind pressure (kN/m2)on windward and leeward gable
pitch (°) walls for roof of span (m)
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Table E.4 Maximum design cumulative surface wind pressures (kN/m2) on windward and leeward
gable walls for roofs constructed using the details of Figure E.11 and E.12
Roof Maximum design cumulative surface wind pressure (kN/m2)on windward and leeward gable
pitch (°) walls for roof of span (m)
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Table E.5 Maximum design horizontal wind force (kN/m) at bottom chord level on 12.5 mm thick
plasterboard ceiling diaphragms
Diaphragm span A) B)
m
Diaphragm 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
depth
m
6 2,12 1,91 1,73 1,58 1,47 1,37 1,26 1,19 1,11
7 2,46 2,22 2,01 1,85 1,70 1,59 1,49 1,38 1,31
8 2,82 2,54 2,30 2,12 1,95 1,80 1,68 1,58 1,50
9 3,17 2,85 2,60 2,37 2,16 2,04 1,91 1,77 1,67
10 3,51 3,17 2,88 2,64 2,43 2,25 2,12 1,98 1,86
11 3,87 3,48 3,17 2,90 2,69 2,49 2,31 2,18 2,06
12 4,22 3,80 3,45 3,17 2,91 2,72 2,54 2,37 2,22
13 4,58 4,11 3,74 3,42 3,17 2,94 2,75 2,57 2,42
14 4,94 4,43 4,04 3,69 3,41 3,17 2,96 2,76 2,58
15 5,28 4,76 4,32 3,96 3,65 3,39 3,17 2,96 2,81
16 5,63 5,07 4,61 4,22 3,90 3,62 3,38 3,17 2,97
17 6,14 5,39 4,91 4,49 4,13 3,84 3,68 3,36 3,17
A)
Intermediate values may be obtained by linear interpolation.
B)
For plasterboard ceiling diaphragms, wallplates should be spliced in accordance with Figure E.8 or using an
alternative splice detail capable of resisting a design instantaneous axial action of 4,9 kN.
Table E.6 Maximum design horizontal wind force (kN/m) at bottom chord level on 15 mm thick
plasterboard ceiling diaphragms
A) B)
Diaphragm Diaphragm span
depth
m
m 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Key
1 Wall plate
2 Steel strap fixed using 6 no. 3,75 mm × 30 mm square twist nails into each member
3 100 mm long half lap joint with no. 2 nail fixings
a) Detail C1: Eaves and lap connection – view on b) Detail D1: Crossing connection for narrow
slope on topside of rafters (see arrow C section fronted buildings (see arrow D on plan view of
A-A on Figure E.3 or Figure E.4) narrow fronted roof rafter diagonal bracing in
Figure E.3 or E.4)
Key
1 Ideally 45° but not less than 35° or greater
than 55°
2 Nail to wall plate
3 Rafter diagonal brace lap jointed, where
required
4 Wall plate
5 600 mm long timber splice plate the same size as bracing timbers
Timber splice plate should be fixed using minimum of 4 no. 3,35 diameter galvanized nails each side ×
minimum nail length equal to bracing thickness + 32 mm. Protruding nails should be clenched over as
required.
a) All bracing members are of minimum width 89 mm and minimum depth 22 mm and free from
major strength reducing defects. Additionally the cross-sectional area should not be less than
2 134 mm2. Provided these conditions are met, no further strength grading is necessary for
bracing members.
b) All bracing members are nailed to every trussed rafter they cross with two 3,35 mm diameter
wire nails with a minimum length equal to the bracing thickness plus 32 mm.
c) In all details 3,1 mm × 90 mm long mechanically driven gun nails may be substituted for 3,35
mm × 65 mm long wire nails.
d) Where bracing members are provided in two pieces, they are lap jointed over at least two trussed
rafters and are nailed as described in b) or c).
e) Where nails exceed the thickness of bracing members they should either be clenched, or a
packing piece added behind the joint.
f) For the purpose of designing a suitable wallplate anchorage detail a design instantaneous axial
action of 4,9 kN should be assumed to exist in the rafter diagonal braces.
a) All bracing members are nailed to every trussed rafter they cross with two 3,35 mm diameter
wire nails with a minimum length equal to the bracing thickness plus 32 mm.
b) In all details 3,1 mm × 90 mm long mechanically driven gun nails may be substituted for 3,35
mm × 65 mm long wire nails.
c) Where nails exceed the thickness of bracing members, they should either be clenched or a
packing piece added behind the joint.
d) Other connection details may be used as alternative to those shown provided they are designed
to provide equivalent stiffness and can resist a design instantaneous axial action in the rafter
brace of 8.3 kN in the case of details shown in Figure E.10.
b) Detail C3: Eaves connection: view on slope on topside of rafters [see C, Figure E.3c) or Figure E.4a)]
Key
1 Trussed rafters at ≤ 600 mm centres
2 Wall plate
3 47 mm × 100 mm × 250 mm long timber blocks to be fixed hard against each side of
truss and nailed to wallplate using 4 no. 4 mm diameter × 90 mm long nails
4 1 mm thick steel bracket fixed to both rafter and timber shelf using minimum of 10 no.
3,75 mm diameter × 30 mm long square twist nails
5 35 mm × 120 mm diagonal rafter brace (minimum grade C16) fixed to 47 mm × 220 mm
timber shelf (minimum grade C16) using 15 no. 3,35 mm diameter × 75 mm long nails
6 Ideally 45° but not less than 35° or greater than 55°
a) All bracing members are nailed to every trussed rafter they cross with two 3,35 mm diameter
wire nails with a minimum length equal to the bracing thickness plus 32 mm.
b) In all details 3,1 mm × 90 mm long mechanically driven gun nails may be substituted for 3,35 mm
× 75 mm long wire nails.
c) Where nails exceed the thickness of bracing members, they should either be clenched or a
packing piece added behind the joint.
d) Other connection details may be used as alternative to those shown provided they are designed
to provide equivalent stiffness and can resist a design instantaneous axial action in the rafter
brace of 14,5 kN in the case of details shown in Figure E.11.
Figure E.12 Standard bracing for rafter members: detail D3 splice connection and D4 crossing connection
PUBLISHED DOCUMENT
a) Detail D3: Splice connection: view on slope on underside of rafters d) Detail D4: Crossing connection for narrow fronted buildings [see
D, Figure E.3b) or Figure E.4f)]
Key
55
Licensed copy: Leeds Metropolitan University User, Leeds Metropolitan University, Version correct as of 09/01/2013 02:23, (c) The British Standards Institution 2012
56
Figure E.12 Standard bracing for rafter members: detail D3 splice connection and D4 crossing connection
•
2 Timber splice plate (35 mm × 120 mm) fixed to each diagonal 4 Rafter braces butt-jointed over a truss
rafter brace using 15 no 3,35 mm diameter × 75 mm long nails
a) All bracing members are nailed to every trussed rafter they cross with two 3,35 mm diameter wire nails with a minimum length equal to the
bracing thickness plus 32 mm.
PD 6693-1:2012
b) In all details 3,1 mm × 90 mm long mechanically driven gun nails may be substituted for 3,35 mm × 75 mm long wire nails.
c) Where nails exceed the thickness of bracing members they should either be clenched or a packing piece added behind the joint.
d) Other connection details may be used as alternatives to those shown provided they are designed to provide equivalent stiffness and can resist
a design instantaneous axial action in the rafter brace of 14,5 kN in the case of details shown in Figure E.12.
Key
1 Node point A Bay size
2 Tank placed centrally B Trussed rafter span, Ls
3 Offset bracing to clear tank bearers S Trussed rafter spacing
4 Bearer “A” placed as close to the node
point as possible
5 Tank
NOTE See Table F.1 for minimum sizes and strength class for support members.
A)
Table F.1 Sizes for support members for water tanks
Bibliography
Standards publications
For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the
latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
BS 4978, Visual strength grading of softwood – Specification
BS 5756, Visual strength grading of hardwood – Specification
BS 6446, Specification for manufacture of glued structural components of timber
and wood based panels
BS EN 386, Glued laminated timber – Performance requirements and minimum
production requirements
BS EN 622-2, Fibreboards – Specifications – Part 2: Requirements for hardboards
BS EN 771-1:2011, Specification for masonry units – Part 1: Clay masonry units
BS EN 772-7:1998, Methods of test for masonry units – Part 7: Determination of
water absorption of clay masonry damp proof course units by boiling in water
BS EN 998-2:2010, Specification for mortar for masonry – Part 2: Masonry mortar
BS EN 1075, Timber structures – Test methods – Joints made with punched metal
plate fasteners
BS EN 1991-1-1:2002, Eurocode 1 – Actions on structures – Part 1-1: General
actions – Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings
BS EN 1991-1-4, Eurocode 1 – Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General actions –
Wind actions
BS EN 1991-1-7:2006, Eurocode 1 – Actions on structures – Part 1-7: General
actions – Accidental actions
BS EN 1996-1-1, Eurocode 6 – Design of masonry structures – Part 1-1: General
rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures
BS EN 14250:2010, Timber structures – Product requirements for prefabricated
structural members assembled with punched metal plate fasteners
NA to BS EN 1990:2002+A1:2005, UK National Annex for Eurocode – Basis of
structural design
NA to BS EN 1991-1-7:2006, UK National Annex to Eurocode 1: Actions on
structures – Part 1-7: Accidental actions
NA to BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008, UK National Annex to Eurocode 5: Design
of timber structures – Part 1-1: General – Common rules and rules for buildings
PD 6697:2010, Recommendations for the design of masonry structures to
BS EN 1996-1-1 and BS EN 1996-2
Other publications
[1] TIMBER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION. Wood information
sheet WIS 1-17. High Wycombe: TRADA Technology Ltd., December 2010.
[2] Lancashire, R., Taylor, L. Timber frame construction. 5th edition. High
Wycombe: TRADA Technology Ltd., October 2011.
60
•
PD 6693-1:2012
BSI
389 Chiswick High Road London W4 4AL UK
Tel +44 (0)20 8996 9001
Fax +44 (0)20 8996 7001
www.bsigroup.com/standards