Communalism Concept of Communalism: Communalism Is An Ideology Which States That Society Is
Communalism Concept of Communalism: Communalism Is An Ideology Which States That Society Is
It is widely realized that communalism in India was born, nurtured and promoted by the
British imperialism as a deliberate design to sow dissensions. It served the purpose of the
colonial administration to divide and rule. Thus, the prevailing religious differences were
first used to project the social and cultural variations and then to promote political
divisions by treating Indians not as Indians but as members of different religious
communities.
Jawaharlal Nehru once described communalism as the Indian version of fascism. He said,
while all communalism is bad, we must remember that minority communalism is born
out of fear, while majority communalism takes the form of political reaction to assert
dominance. But he added: ‘there could be no compromise on the issue of communalism,
Hindu communalism or Muslim communalism, as it is a challenge to Indian nationhood
and Indian nationalism.’
The main forces, which have encouraged the growth of communalism in contemporary
India, are:
ii) Besides political interests, economic interests also play a vital role in fermenting
communal clashes.
iii) The probability of recurrence of communal riots in a town where communal riots
have already taken place once or twice is stronger than in a town when such riots have
never occurred.
iv) Most communal riots take place on the occasion of religious festivals.
Measures to meet the challengeof communalism and communal violence can be of two
types: long-term and short-term.
1) In initiating the process of de-communalising the people at all levels, say, by bringing
home to them that communal assumptions are false, by explaining to them the socio-
economic and political roots of communalism.
2) Communalisation of the state and of the political elite has to be checked because it
leads to inaction against communal violence and covert or overt political and ideological
support to communalism by the state apparatus.
3) The communalisation of civil society also needs to be checked because it leads to riots
that are more communal. People with communal ideas and ideologies pressurize the
government to act in a manner, which is always against the principles of secularism.
2) The state has to plan and use new strategies in dealing with communal violence.
Whenever strong and secular administrators have used or threatened the use of strong
steps, riots either did not occur or were of short duration.
3) The role of media is immensely highlighted during the course of communal violence.
The fear and hatred can be checked if the press, radio and TV report the events in a way
conducive to soothing the frayed nerves of people instead of inflaming the temper further.
4) Lastly, the government in power has to treat the extremist communal outfits as its
immediate targets and cripple their capacity to disrupt law and order. The secessionists in
Kashmir, the militants in Punjab, the ISS now banned in Kerala and other extremist
organisations of Hindu, Muslim and Sikh communalism have to be dealt with by the state
through its law and order machinery.
The small insecure communities always look to government or move towards communal
parties for protection. The Pundits in Kashmir, the innocent victims of communal riots in
Mumbai, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat and other states, and the sufferers of violence of
extremists in Bihar, Assam, look towards the secular state of India for the security of life
and property.