ENG01P001S02U00
ENG01P001S02U00
Structure
The Faerie Queene is both a canonical poem and a classic work. It is enormously long: longer
than Jerusalemme Liberata and Paradise Lost put together. It is difficult to conceive of any part
of Elizabethan culture and literature to which it is not relevant. Yet it is timeless in that it
addresses the most fundamental and enduring questions that continue to haunt people today,
namely, what are the moral foundations of a society, what do individuals contribute towards
social reconstruction, how do the genders and classes interact in society, what is the meaning and
function of suffering in the human condition, what are the objectives of human existence, and
where do the individual‘s spiritual quest and a nation‘s self-construction intersect.
2. Objectives of the Unit:
The following suggested module for reading The Faerie Queene, Book I, encourages and aids
thorough critical reading of the text from a sound and authoritative edition. It does not propose to
substitute the text itself and to that end only provides material such as will help the reader
unfamiliar with Spenserian language, place the text in its socio-political and historical
framework and relate it to the author‘s course of personal, professional and ideological
development.
3. Introduction:
3.1 Sir Edmund Spenser’s Life and Times
4. Summary:
The Faerie Queene is a poem of romantic and chivalrous adventures but it also has deeper
religious meaning which is embedded in the allegorical mode. The allegorical nature of the poem
is complex because it also contains political and historical allegory. Gloriana clearly represents
Queen Elizabeth I who was popularly called so. The political and historical allegory is not so
significant in Book I. The poem sets itself the dual task of guiding Spenser‘s post-Reformation
compatriot believer back into faith and promoting the English nation-state as the rising leader of
a pan-European Protestantism. Spenser draws upon the well-known Horatian prescription in Ars
poetica of combining profit with pleasure, which is the universal motto of imaginative writers in
Renaissance England who are otherwise unsure about the value and status of literature
independent of a didactic purpose.
Proem is a prologue to the whole of The Faerie Queene and not to Book I alone. Indeed, Book I
may be read as a proem to The Faerie Queene in its entirety. Books I, II and III were published
together in 1590, and Books IV, V and VI published together in 1596. Spenser changed the
earlier rounded off ending of Book III in 1596 in order to ensure a continuity from Book III to
Book IV. There are the mysterious fragments known as the Mutability Cantos, published
posthumously in 1609. The letter to Sir Walter Raleigh is prefixed to the first fragment
comprising the first three books of the long poem.
5. Issues:
The idea of the twelve cardinal virtues derived from Aristotle, was to be distributed among the
twelve books of The Faerie Queene and each would be represented by a knight. Prince Arthur
recurs in every book along with the hero-knight of that book. He represents the super-virtue of
greatness and magnanimity of the soul. It is due to this that the knight in each book is in trouble
and is saved by Arthur. Human virtue could hold till a certain point and then fails, according to
the Calvinists. They held that the Grace of God was supreme. Spenser takes Prince Arthur as the
representative of this aspect of Divine Grace. The personification has a literal existence. At one
level it is operating on literal terms. At another it is operating on allegorical terms.
The Red Cross Knight represents the fundamental virtue of Holiness. In the very first stanza, the
Red Cross Knight is referred to as ―The Patron of true Holiness.‖ Repeated emphasis on the
Knight‘s unflinching devotion to Christ is meant to indicate the fact that the mission to reunite
Una with her parents is ultimately a task undertaken for the sake of Christ and true religion.
Thus, the Knight represents the human soul and its strife with all adversities before it achieves
the goal which the Knight represents—holiness in Book I.
Una, meaning ‗one‘, represents the Ultimate Truth, that is, the central focus of Godhead. Thus,
the Red Cross Knight‘s chivalric exploits for Una and his final reconciliation with her, besides
being in the tradition of chivalric romance, also subscribes to the tradition of religious allegory
where Holiness and Truth are finally united.
Duessa as the Whore of Babylon was taken by Protestant commentators on Revelation to be a
prophecy of the corrupt state of the Catholic Church in the last six days of the world. Duessa‘s
father is the Pope. Alternatively, Duessa the false enchantress is Mary, Queen of Scots, and the
false message she sends the Redcross Knight to try to stop Una‘s marriage stands for Mary‘s
false claim to the English throne. Book I is an apocalyptic re-reading, modelled on the Protestant
historiographers of church history in which the Redcross Knight is faced with a choice between
the innocent Una, representing the Invisible Church, and the seductive Duessa, representing the
corrupt Visible Church. Duessa, on the other hand, plays the beautiful but distressed woman best
fashioned to appeal to the knight‘s righteous chivalric ardour. Duessa is ‗double‘, implying
deceit. She is the exact opposite of Una. She appears to be beautiful but is exposed as ugly in the
end. At a literal level she deceives the knights and other men by her beauty, serving a figure of
lust. At another, deeper level, she stands for deceit in the general sense, appearing to be holy and
virtuous, but trapping knights. Both Duessa and Archimago are associated with the same
category of evil from Spenser‘s point of view.
Archimago is presented as a beadsman—a holy man who offers prayers for others as their
deputy. To the Protestant Spenser, Archimago is associated with Catholicism. He uses disguises
that are most likely to dupe Una, i.e. either as the Redcross Knight himself or as a hermit or as a
frail old man. He is a figure who works evil, is associated with evil but is not an allegorical
representation of evil. He is playing a part in a design of good and evil in interplay. He serves a
In his prefactory letter to Sir Walter Raleigh, Spenser said that Faerie Queene contains an
allegory or ―dark conceit.‖ In the Middle Ages, Christian authors developed their own
mythology with a series of allegorical figures who are sometimes raised to the status of Gods.
The purely abstract are converted into the real. The forces which guided the life of the Middle
Ages were personified in the allegories.
For a spiritual allegory, The Faerie Queene offers remarkably subtle psychological exploration
and exposition. One is left with the impression that Spenser is no less interested in the workings
of the human mind than in the dissection of faith and man‘s relationship with religion.
The Redcrosse Knight‘s enemy, indeed, and Man‘s, enemy, is, Spenser implies, himself. And the
battle with one‘s self is eternal. Given the centrality of the mirror motif, it is necessary to add
that The Faerie Queene is not merely Elizabeth‘s mirror. It is every Christian believer‘s mirror: a
mirror that never lies and never flatters. It is likely that Spenser is trying to warn Elizabeth
against the dangers of narcissism by showing her, as he persistently does in The Faerie Queene,
a refracted image of the Queen in a plausible avatar.
The three Pagan brothers allegorically indicate the degeneration of human institutions
progressively brought on by spiritual blindness. The Fradubio episode offers the deluded
Redcrosse Knight a mirror in which to view his own errors, for Fradubio‘s inability to tell his
true love Fraelissa from the false sorceress Duessa was his doom. Spenser‘s Redcrosse Knight
meets Fradubio after being gulled by Duessa. This change is supposed to alert the reader to the
trial of Redcrosse‘s ability to read the signs of his own unfolding journey in the allegorical
figures that he encounters.
Una‘s lion represents the force of nature‘s law, supporting neglected or despised truth.‖ The
Lion‘s forcible entry into Abessa and Corceca‘s house and subsequent destruction of Kirkrapine
could be an allegory of King Henry VIII‘s dissolution of monasteries between 1536 and 1541 as
part of the English Reformation which he initiated through his Act of Supremacy in 1534.
Significantly, Una‘s stay at this inappropriate resting place will be extremely short-lived,
indicating that the mere dissolution of monasteries or foundation of an English Church did not
suffice. The new church will have to find and secure Truth. The Lion‘s defeat in the hands of
Sansloy signifies natural law‘s understandable incapacity to stem lawlessness in human society.
Pride in the Renaissance, is what prompts people continually to reach out for more than they
deserve. Lucifera is a usurper and will soon be revealed to be a tyrant as well. In conventional
Renaissance English political philosophy, where the law of primogeniture still applied, usurpers
were discredited as tyrants and vice versa.
10
6. Glossary:
Adamant a mythical substance proverbial for its hardness
Aeolus god of the winds
Alcides Hercules by another name
11
12
8. Bibliography:
Anderson, Judith. Spenser’s Narrative Figuration of Women in ‘The Faerie Queene’. Michigan:
Medieval Institute Publications, 2018.
Borris, Kenneth. Allegory and Epic in English Renaissance Literature: Heroic Form in Sidney,
Spenser and Milton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Bowra, C.M. From Virgil to Milton. London: Macmillan, 1963.
Burlinson, Christopher. Allegory, Space and the Material World in the Writings of Edmund
Spenser. Suffolk: D.S. Brewer, 2006.
Burrow, Colin. Epic Romance: Homer to Milton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
Chaudhuri, Sukanta, Infirm Glory. Shakespeare and the Renaissance Image of Man. Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1981.
- - -. A Companion to Pastoral Poetry of the English Renaissance. Manchester: Manchester
University Press, 2018.
- - -. Renaissance Pastoral and Its English Developments. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
Eggert, Katherine. Showing Like a Queen: Female Authority and Literary Experiment in
Spenser, Shakespeare, and Milton. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.
Evans, Maurice, Spenser’s Anatomy of Heroism: A Commentary on ‘The Faerie Queene’.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Goth, Maik. ‗Monsters and the Poetic Imagination in the Faerie Queene: ‗Most Ugly Shapes, and
Horrible Aspects.‘ (The Manchester Spenser). Manchester: Manchester University Press,
2015.
Greene, Thomas, ‗Norms of Epic‘, Comparative Literature, Vol.13, No.3 (Summer, 1961),
pp.193-207, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1768997. Accessed: 30.12.2018.
Greenblatt, Stephen, Renaissance Self-Fashioning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
Hadfield, Andrew, (ed.) Edmund Spenser. Longman Critical Readers. London & New York:
1996.
Hamilton, A.C. ed. The Spenser Encyclopaedia. London: Routledge, 1990.
Hankins, John Erskine. Source and Meaning in Spenser’s Allegory. Oxford: Clarendon Press,
1971.
Heale, Elizabeth. The Faerie Queene: A Reader’s Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1999.
Jameson, Frederic, ‗Magical Narrative: Romance as Genre‘, New Literary History, Vol.7, No.1,
Critical Challenges: The Bellagio Symposium (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, Autumn,
1975), pp.135-163, http://www.jstor.org/stable/468283. Accessed: 30.12.2018.
King, Andrew. The Faerie Queene and Middle English Romance: The Matter of Just Memory.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.
13
14